Official thread: "zenmm-sources" - Latest: 2.6.27-rc1-zenmm0

Message

rmh3093 · Post by **rmh3093** » Thu Jul 03, 2008 4:48 pm

Starting a new thread so cheater don't get pissy

... so besides tuxonice, what else ar people missing from -zenmm?

gimpel · Post by **gimpel** » Thu Jul 03, 2008 6:06 pm

rc8-mm1 base!

kernelOfTruth · Post by **kernelOfTruth** » Thu Jul 03, 2008 6:41 pm

gimpel wrote:rc8-mm1 base!

++

thanks, btw for zen-mm

mbar · Post by **mbar** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:37 am

I'm missing an ebuild

rmh3093 · Post by **rmh3093** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 12:46 pm

just so you know there is a modified version of eselect in the zen-overlay which supports kernel symlinks for zen-sources and zenmm-sources (for you git users)

gimpel · Post by **gimpel** » Fri Jul 04, 2008 4:55 pm

Code: Select all

┌--tom@sirius---[Fr Jul 04 18:53:46]---[~]
└» uname -a
Linux sirius 2.6.26-rc8-zenmm1 #5 SMP PREEMPT Fri Jul 4 17:16:51 CEST 2008 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5600+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux

yumm!

nvidia needed some

Code: Select all

sed -i -e 's:return kill_proc:return kill_pid:g' usr/src/nv/os-interface.c

It did compile and does work so far.. but might blast your graphics, whatever...

eDiT:

Code: Select all

00:46:14 up  6:48,  2 users,  load average: 0.52, 0.44, 0.37

...and doing just fine!

I really like (zen)mm these days!

netguy · Post by **netguy** » Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:37 am

thanks gimpel.it's worked.

rmh3093 · Post by **rmh3093** » Sat Jul 05, 2008 1:44 pm

-zenmm / lockless has been fixed in latest zenmm, it works with xorg 1.5 now

kernelOfTruth · Post by **kernelOfTruth** » Sat Jul 05, 2008 3:07 pm

It did compile and does work so far.. but might blast your graphics, whatever...

are you serious

?

I'd like to try zen-mm out but can't afford to blow up my laptop

thanks

gimpel · Post by **gimpel** » Sat Jul 05, 2008 3:40 pm

kernelOfTruth wrote:are you serious ?

I'd like to try zen-mm out but can't afford to blow up my laptop

thanks

LOL. Well meanwhile it's

Code: Select all

# uptime
 17:36:39 up 23:38,  2 users,  load average: 0.14, 0.04, 0.01

.. and no problems with nvidia.

What was that with xorg 1.5 and hardlocks? Haven't encountered any so far *fingers crossed*

rmh3093 · Post by **rmh3093** » Sat Jul 05, 2008 4:05 pm

gimpel wrote:
kernelOfTruth wrote:are you serious ?

I'd like to try zen-mm out but can't afford to blow up my laptop

thanks
LOL. Well meanwhile it's
Code: Select all
# uptime
 17:36:39 up 23:38,  2 users,  load average: 0.14, 0.04, 0.01
.. and no problems with nvidia.

What was that with xorg 1.5 and hardlocks? Haven't encountered any so far *fingers crossed*

lockless patches caused an issue with xorg 1.4.99.*, but i discussed the issue and LKML and found the bug, that is now fixed, so use xorg 1.5 all you want

kernelOfTruth · Post by **kernelOfTruth** » Sat Jul 05, 2008 4:23 pm

gimpel wrote:
kernelOfTruth wrote:are you serious ?

I'd like to try zen-mm out but can't afford to blow up my laptop

thanks
LOL. Well meanwhile it's
Code: Select all
# uptime
 17:36:39 up 23:38,  2 users,  load average: 0.14, 0.04, 0.01
.. and no problems with nvidia.

What was that with xorg 1.5 and hardlocks? Haven't encountered any so far *fingers crossed*

is virtualbox-modules working too ? (will try that out later)

thanks

rmh3093 · Post by **rmh3093** » Sat Jul 05, 2008 4:28 pm

kernelOfTruth wrote:
gimpel wrote:
kernelOfTruth wrote:are you serious ?

I'd like to try zen-mm out but can't afford to blow up my laptop

thanks
LOL. Well meanwhile it's
Code: Select all
# uptime
 17:36:39 up 23:38,  2 users,  load average: 0.14, 0.04, 0.01
.. and no problems with nvidia.

What was that with xorg 1.5 and hardlocks? Haven't encountered any so far *fingers crossed*
is virtualbox-modules working too ? (will try that out later)

thanks

idk, didnt test, virtualbox modules usually work on new kernels, its vmware that has issues keeping up to date

gimpel · Post by **gimpel** » Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:33 pm

VirtualBox module plays fine here.

kernelOfTruth · Post by **kernelOfTruth** » Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:35 pm

gimpel wrote:VirtualBox module plays fine here.

thanks

now if I only would succeed to compile that beast:

CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
CHK include/linux/compile.h
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `include/config/builtin/firmware/dir.h', needed by `firmware/n.gen.S'. Stop.
make: *** [firmware] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

help - please ?

Code: Select all

find . | grep n.gen.
./arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon_generic.h
./arch/powerpc/boot/dtc-src/version_gen.h
./firmware/n.gen.S

edit:

make[1]: *** No rule to make target `include/config/builtin/firmware/dir.h', needed by `firmware/n.gen.S'. Stop.
make: *** [firmware] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

find . | grep firmware/dir.h
./include/config/extra/firmware/dir.h

edit2:

1) well, somehow a "n" must have gotten into Device Drivers -> Generic Driver Options -> () External firmware blobs to build into the kernel binary
and it wouldn't work; so the default entered 'n' (by make) doesn't work
clearing the field "fixed" it

2) besides that include/config/extra/firmware* should link to include/config/builtin/firmware* (I made symbolic links to make it work), another
approach surely would also work ...

rmh3093 · Post by **rmh3093** » Sat Jul 05, 2008 6:24 pm

kernelOfTruth wrote:1) well, somehow a "n" must have gotten into Device Drivers -> Generic Driver Options -> () External firmware blobs to build into the kernel binary
and it wouldn't work; so the default entered 'n' (by make) doesn't work
clearing the field "fixed" it

sounds like you did make oldconfig and pressed n for a string option when you should have pressed return

kernelOfTruth · Post by **kernelOfTruth** » Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:20 pm

rmh3093 wrote:
kernelOfTruth wrote:1) well, somehow a "n" must have gotten into Device Drivers -> Generic Driver Options -> () External firmware blobs to build into the kernel binary
and it wouldn't work; so the default entered 'n' (by make) doesn't work
clearing the field "fixed" it
sounds like you did make oldconfig and pressed n for a string option when you should have pressed return

seemingly - yes

afaik it said "N"/"Y" so I pushed n and thought it would be fine but it wasn't - the main point is that it works now

rmh3093 · Post by **rmh3093** » Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:31 pm

kernelOfTruth wrote:
rmh3093 wrote:
kernelOfTruth wrote:1) well, somehow a "n" must have gotten into Device Drivers -> Generic Driver Options -> () External firmware blobs to build into the kernel binary
and it wouldn't work; so the default entered 'n' (by make) doesn't work
clearing the field "fixed" it
sounds like you did make oldconfig and pressed n for a string option when you should have pressed return
seemingly - yes

afaik it said "N"/"Y" so I pushed n and thought it would be fine but it wasn't - the main point is that it works now

i've done that too, so you are not alone

tranquilcool · Post by **tranquilcool** » Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:19 pm

2.6.26-rc8-zenmm1 hardlocks here (twice in 2hrs)

xorg-server is 1.4.2

rmh3093 · Post by **rmh3093** » Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:37 pm

tranquilcool wrote:2.6.26-rc8-zenmm1 hardlocks here (twice in 2hrs)

xorg-server is 1.4.2

more info please.... what were you doing when it happened, what filesystems were involved, when did you pull last? i applied two patches from lkml that were supposed to be bug fixes but they could have broken something

I have been using rc8-mm1 for days now with xorg 1.4.99.905 w/ compiz with out issues, although i dont use ricer4

tranquilcool · Post by **tranquilcool** » Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:42 pm

rmh3093 wrote:
tranquilcool wrote:2.6.26-rc8-zenmm1 hardlocks here (twice in 2hrs)

xorg-server is 1.4.2
more info please.... what were you doing when it happened, what filesystems were involved, when did you pull last? i applied two patches from lkml that were supposed to be bug fixes but they could have broken something

pulled around 6hrs ago. first hardlock was with paludis and second was with firefox, ktorrent and paludis. fs is reiserfs.

rmh3093 · Post by **rmh3093** » Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:45 pm

tranquilcool wrote:
rmh3093 wrote:
tranquilcool wrote:2.6.26-rc8-zenmm1 hardlocks here (twice in 2hrs)

xorg-server is 1.4.2
more info please.... what were you doing when it happened, what filesystems were involved, when did you pull last? i applied two patches from lkml that were supposed to be bug fixes but they could have broken something
pulled around 6hrs ago. first hardlock was with paludis and second was with firefox, ktorrent and paludis. fs is reiserfs.

type 'git reset --hard 94ac2a5fd1479c3a6376f823c347ebabbb6aeab7; git checkout -f' then rebuild your kernel and see if the hardlocks go away

tranquilcool · Post by **tranquilcool** » Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:50 pm

rmh3093 wrote:
tranquilcool wrote:
rmh3093 wrote:
tranquilcool wrote:2.6.26-rc8-zenmm1 hardlocks here (twice in 2hrs)

xorg-server is 1.4.2
more info please.... what were you doing when it happened, what filesystems were involved, when did you pull last? i applied two patches from lkml that were supposed to be bug fixes but they could have broken something
pulled around 6hrs ago. first hardlock was with paludis and second was with firefox, ktorrent and paludis. fs is reiserfs.
type 'git reset --hard 94ac2a5fd1479c3a6376f823c347ebabbb6aeab7; git checkout -f' then rebuild your kernel and see if the hardlocks go away

with git checkout -f i have the following;

Your branch is behind the tracked remote branch 'origin/master' by 7 commits,
and can be fast-forwarded

now i'll build and report back.
thanks meanwhile for your quick answer.

rmh3093 · Post by **rmh3093** » Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:54 pm

tranquilcool wrote:
rmh3093 wrote:
tranquilcool wrote:
rmh3093 wrote:
tranquilcool wrote:2.6.26-rc8-zenmm1 hardlocks here (twice in 2hrs)

xorg-server is 1.4.2
more info please.... what were you doing when it happened, what filesystems were involved, when did you pull last? i applied two patches from lkml that were supposed to be bug fixes but they could have broken something
pulled around 6hrs ago. first hardlock was with paludis and second was with firefox, ktorrent and paludis. fs is reiserfs.
type 'git reset --hard 94ac2a5fd1479c3a6376f823c347ebabbb6aeab7; git checkout -f' then rebuild your kernel and see if the hardlocks go away
with git checkout -f i have the following;

Your branch is behind the tracked remote branch 'origin/master' by 7 commits,
and can be fast-forwarded

now i'll build and report back.
thanks meanwhile for your quick answer.

that just means your kernel is out of date (not running the latest commit)

tranquilcool · Post by **tranquilcool** » Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:56 pm

rmh3093 wrote:
tranquilcool wrote:
rmh3093 wrote:
tranquilcool wrote:
rmh3093 wrote:
tranquilcool wrote:2.6.26-rc8-zenmm1 hardlocks here (twice in 2hrs)

xorg-server is 1.4.2
more info please.... what were you doing when it happened, what filesystems were involved, when did you pull last? i applied two patches from lkml that were supposed to be bug fixes but they could have broken something
pulled around 6hrs ago. first hardlock was with paludis and second was with firefox, ktorrent and paludis. fs is reiserfs.
type 'git reset --hard 94ac2a5fd1479c3a6376f823c347ebabbb6aeab7; git checkout -f' then rebuild your kernel and see if the hardlocks go away
with git checkout -f i have the following;

Your branch is behind the tracked remote branch 'origin/master' by 7 commits,
and can be fast-forwarded

now i'll build and report back.
thanks meanwhile for your quick answer.
that just means your kernel is out of date (not running the latest commit)

then is it ok if i go on and compile or should i bring it to latest commit?