GIMP Alternative, Qt Based?
GIMP Alternative, Qt Based?
Is there a program siliar to the gimp that's qt based?
- brazzmonkey
- Guru

- Posts: 372
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 1:54 pm
- Location: between keyboard and chair
- brazzmonkey
- Guru

- Posts: 372
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 1:54 pm
- Location: between keyboard and chair
Krita officially beat GIMP in terms of features, version 1.5 has recently implemented many features that have been on GIMP's TODO list since the beginning (for example, full CMYK support; not yet in the GIMP, but now in Krita!)
Only downside that I feel of Krita is that the UI copies Photoshop, yuck
Only downside that I feel of Krita is that the UI copies Photoshop, yuck
No more than GIMP does, but then again, Photoshop doesn't use QT or GTK.Only downside that I feel of Krita is that the UI copies Photoshop, yuck
Krita is a nice program, but it's not really intended to be a replacement for GIMP. There is alot of functionality overlap, but GIMP is intended to be a photoeditor while Krita is intended to be more of a digital paint program. http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=06/01/10/1627212
"...as we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours, and this we should do freely and generously." -Benjamin Franklin
-
CptnObvious999
- Apprentice

- Posts: 292
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 11:55 pm
Karbon14 is basically Krita except with vectors instead of bitmaps.sonicbhoc wrote:Karbon14
Anyways I agree Krita rules. (at least version 1.5). The UI is much better than GIMP in my opinion, actually I like it a little more than Photoshops but it isn't as powerful yet. (there is only one additional Krita script right now http://www.kde-files.org/?xcontentmode=616) I like how the middle mouse will zoom instead of scroll and how everything is docked on the sides instead of having a couple of windows (GIMP) or a couple of windows inside a window (Photoshop). Krita has become my new favorite editor.
Krita is better than Gimp is some respects already ...
Krita handles HDR (high dynamic range) and CMYK. Gimp is still stuck in 8 bit land, and that's quite limiting for anything photo related those days.
Krita also supports the use of ICC profiles so that you can implement color managed work flows. The GIMP folks are still working on this and there are some vestages of it in the current GIMP developement branch but it is still not functional.
In addition to HDR Krita supports 16bit/channel images. It will be a while before GIMP supports these images. My guess - at least a year perhaps more.
In addition to HDR Krita supports 16bit/channel images. It will be a while before GIMP supports these images. My guess - at least a year perhaps more.
try cinepaint for more color-depth - a movie industry branch of the gimp.
http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=cinepaint
cheers
http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=cinepaint
cheers
lo-jay
The mechanic "One of 'em Dodge Chargers - let him go by."
The driver "Not today!"
taken from "Two Lane Blacktop"
The mechanic "One of 'em Dodge Chargers - let him go by."
The driver "Not today!"
taken from "Two Lane Blacktop"
In some ways cinepaint is more mature than Krita. For example it's ICC profile (color management) support is a little better. It also has support for some file formats that Krita (and GIMP) do not support and like Krita has high bit depth and HDR support. In terms of overall feature sets I would rate Krita vs. cinepaint to be a toss up. With each having a few features that the other lacks. I do however think that the UI for Krita is a little better. Also cinepaint is in the middle of a major rewrite and I suspect when the new version (called Glasgow) is released that it will be worth having a good look at it.



