Help with creation, editing, or playback of sounds, images, or video. Amarok, audacious, mplayer, grip, cdparanoia and anything else that makes a sound or plays a video.
i'm not too much into graphics stuff but i thought krita is not as powerful as the gimp. krita seems ok for basic image manipulation. this is more than enough for me anyhow.
you may want to give it a shot and make your own opinion
Krita officially beat GIMP in terms of features, version 1.5 has recently implemented many features that have been on GIMP's TODO list since the beginning (for example, full CMYK support; not yet in the GIMP, but now in Krita!)
Only downside that I feel of Krita is that the UI copies Photoshop, yuck
Only downside that I feel of Krita is that the UI copies Photoshop, yuck
No more than GIMP does, but then again, Photoshop doesn't use QT or GTK.
Krita is a nice program, but it's not really intended to be a replacement for GIMP. There is alot of functionality overlap, but GIMP is intended to be a photoeditor while Krita is intended to be more of a digital paint program. http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=06/01/10/1627212
"...as we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours, and this we should do freely and generously." -Benjamin Franklin
Karbon14 is basically Krita except with vectors instead of bitmaps.
Anyways I agree Krita rules. (at least version 1.5). The UI is much better than GIMP in my opinion, actually I like it a little more than Photoshops but it isn't as powerful yet. (there is only one additional Krita script right now http://www.kde-files.org/?xcontentmode=616) I like how the middle mouse will zoom instead of scroll and how everything is docked on the sides instead of having a couple of windows (GIMP) or a couple of windows inside a window (Photoshop). Krita has become my new favorite editor.
Krita also supports the use of ICC profiles so that you can implement color managed work flows. The GIMP folks are still working on this and there are some vestages of it in the current GIMP developement branch but it is still not functional.
In addition to HDR Krita supports 16bit/channel images. It will be a while before GIMP supports these images. My guess - at least a year perhaps more.
In some ways cinepaint is more mature than Krita. For example it's ICC profile (color management) support is a little better. It also has support for some file formats that Krita (and GIMP) do not support and like Krita has high bit depth and HDR support. In terms of overall feature sets I would rate Krita vs. cinepaint to be a toss up. With each having a few features that the other lacks. I do however think that the UI for Krita is a little better. Also cinepaint is in the middle of a major rewrite and I suspect when the new version (called Glasgow) is released that it will be worth having a good look at it.