Forums

Skip to content

Advanced search
  • Quick links
    • Unanswered topics
    • Active topics
    • Search
  • FAQ
  • Login
  • Register
  • Board index Assistance Unsupported Software
  • Search

2.6.14-rc3-nitro1 "Braineating Monsterpenguin"

This forum covers all Gentoo-related software not officially supported by Gentoo. Ebuilds/software posted here might harm the health and stability of your system(s), and are not supported by Gentoo developers. Bugs/errors caused by ebuilds from overlays.gentoo.org are covered by this forum, too.
Post Reply
Advanced search
162 posts
  • Page 5 of 7
    • Jump to page:
  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • Next
Author
Message
ahorn
Guru
Guru
User avatar
Posts: 366
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 7:31 pm
Location: Ol' europe

  • Quote

Post by ahorn » Sun Oct 16, 2005 6:44 am

got many unresolved symbols with fglrx (6.18.6). the ati-drivers v6.16.14-r5 are working, but since my card is supported first at 6.16.20 (these doesn't work with this patchset, too) i'm a little bit lost. so a patch or a hint or whatever to my unresolved symbols problem would be nice, tiger. or maybe, i use the wrong xorg-version/use-flags (+dlloader,+opengl,xorg-x11-6.8.2-r6)...

i tried this, it helped for loading the fglrx module (the verify_area thing) but the unresolved symbols are still there.

Code: Select all

--- firegl_public.c.orig        2005-08-16 20:13:33.000000000 +0400
+++ firegl_public.c     2005-09-23 17:25:49.000000000 +0400
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
 #endif
 
 #ifdef __x86_64__
-#include "asm/ioctl32.h"
+#include "linux/ioctl32.h"
 #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,2)
 #include "linux/syscalls.h"
 #endif
@@ -1425,7 +1425,7 @@
 
 int ATI_API_CALL __ke_verify_area(int type, const void * addr, unsigned long size)
 {
-    return verify_area(type, addr, size);
+    return access_ok(type, addr, size);
 }
 
 int ATI_API_CALL __ke_get_pci_device_info(__ke_pci_dev_t* dev, __ke_pci_device_info_t *pinfo)
i'm wondering why this patch works for x86. with that patch, there's no verify_area msg in dmesg. and this verify_area is the reason why the fglrx can't be insert. so i'm one step forward.

greetings, ahorn.
Too many connections. Please try again later.
Top
oFooBaro
n00b
n00b
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 7:25 am
Location: Berlin, Germany

  • Quote

Post by oFooBaro » Sun Oct 16, 2005 1:41 pm

ndiswrapper compile fails :cry:

Code: Select all

make -C //usr/src/linux M=/var/tmp/portage/ndiswrapper-1.2/work/ndiswrapper-1.2/driver \
	NDISWRAPPER_VERSION=1.2 \
	EXTRA_VERSION= modules
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.14-rc3-nitro1'
  CC [M]  /var/tmp/portage/ndiswrapper-1.2/work/ndiswrapper-1.2/driver/hal.o
  CC [M]  /var/tmp/portage/ndiswrapper-1.2/work/ndiswrapper-1.2/driver/iw_ndis.o
  CC [M]  /var/tmp/portage/ndiswrapper-1.2/work/ndiswrapper-1.2/driver/loader.o
/var/tmp/portage/ndiswrapper-1.2/work/ndiswrapper-1.2/driver/loader.c: In function `register_devices':
/var/tmp/portage/ndiswrapper-1.2/work/ndiswrapper-1.2/driver/loader.c:963: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type
  CC [M]  /var/tmp/portage/ndiswrapper-1.2/work/ndiswrapper-1.2/driver/misc_funcs.o
  CC [M]  /var/tmp/portage/ndiswrapper-1.2/work/ndiswrapper-1.2/driver/ndis.o
/var/tmp/portage/ndiswrapper-1.2/work/ndiswrapper-1.2/driver/ndis.c:1721:5: warning: "LINUX_KERNEL_VERSION" is not defined
  CC [M]  /var/tmp/portage/ndiswrapper-1.2/work/ndiswrapper-1.2/driver/ntoskernel.o
  CC [M]  /var/tmp/portage/ndiswrapper-1.2/work/ndiswrapper-1.2/driver/pe_linker.o
  CC [M]  /var/tmp/portage/ndiswrapper-1.2/work/ndiswrapper-1.2/driver/proc.o
  CC [M]  /var/tmp/portage/ndiswrapper-1.2/work/ndiswrapper-1.2/driver/wrapper.o
/var/tmp/portage/ndiswrapper-1.2/work/ndiswrapper-1.2/driver/wrapper.c:287:54: macro "halt" passed 1 arguments, but takes just 0
/var/tmp/portage/ndiswrapper-1.2/work/ndiswrapper-1.2/driver/wrapper.c: In function `miniport_halt':
/var/tmp/portage/ndiswrapper-1.2/work/ndiswrapper-1.2/driver/wrapper.c:287: warning: statement with no effect
make[2]: *** [/var/tmp/portage/ndiswrapper-1.2/work/ndiswrapper-1.2/driver/wrapper.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [_module_/var/tmp/portage/ndiswrapper-1.2/work/ndiswrapper-1.2/driver] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.14-rc3-nitro1'
make: *** [default] Error 2
Top
Grubshka
n00b
n00b
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:30 am
Location: Toulouse - France
Contact:
Contact Grubshka
Website

  • Quote

Post by Grubshka » Sun Oct 16, 2005 1:47 pm

oFooBaro wrote:ndiswrapper compile fails :cry:
You will need ndiswrapper 1.4, see here to make an ebuild for it.
Top
m0p
Apprentice
Apprentice
User avatar
Posts: 205
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: en_GB

  • Quote

Post by m0p » Sun Oct 16, 2005 5:02 pm

Well, I'm still on 2.6.12-nitro5, and I want to know, is it really worth upgrading yet? Is 2.6.14 a huge improvement?
Top
oFooBaro
n00b
n00b
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 7:25 am
Location: Berlin, Germany

  • Quote

Post by oFooBaro » Sun Oct 16, 2005 5:07 pm

Grubshka wrote:
oFooBaro wrote:ndiswrapper compile fails :cry:
You will need ndiswrapper 1.4, see here to make an ebuild for it.
Thanks for your advice.
Top
thubble
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri May 16, 2003 9:08 pm
Location: Winnipeg, Canada

  • Quote

Post by thubble » Sun Oct 16, 2005 7:03 pm

Whenever I leave the machine for a while (i.e. overnight) and come back to it, I get a weird problem where apps (specifically X apps, and the X server) will lock up for a few seconds. It happens specifically when I'm starting to use an app that hasn't been used for a while, or when switching between windows. There will be about 2 second delay where the whole system locks up, no mouse, keyboard LEDs are stuck, etc. Then everything goes back to normal. I thought it was the swap prefetch patch so I disabled that, same thing.

I'm using the nvidia driver and latest modular xorg-server. I've reversed the patch that was causing problems with nvidia, and there are no relevant lines in dmesg. Pentium 4 with hyperthreading enabled.
Top
Karl-Franz
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper
User avatar
Posts: 121
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:16 pm
Location: /se/lund

  • Quote

Post by Karl-Franz » Sun Oct 16, 2005 7:17 pm

Ok, the old ati-drivers (8.14.13-r5) would not work with this kernel, with the new ones (8.18.whatever) my dualscreen doesn't work.
I suppose following patch would solve it.

Code: Select all

--- firegl_public.c.orig        2005-08-16 20:13:33.000000000 +0400
+++ firegl_public.c     2005-09-23 17:25:49.000000000 +0400
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
 #endif
 
 #ifdef __x86_64__
-#include "asm/ioctl32.h"
+#include "linux/ioctl32.h"
 #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,2)
 #include "linux/syscalls.h"
 #endif
@@ -1425,7 +1425,7 @@
 
 int ATI_API_CALL __ke_verify_area(int type, const void * addr, unsigned long size)
 {
-    return verify_area(type, addr, size);
+    return access_ok(type, addr, size);
 }
 
 int ATI_API_CALL __ke_get_pci_device_info(__ke_pci_dev_t* dev, __ke_pci_device_info_t *pinfo)
My problem is I don't know how to apply it. I touch a file, enter the text and run try to patch it

Code: Select all

localhost linux # patch -p1 < ../patches/firegl
missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- firegl_public.c.orig   2005-08-16 20:13:33.000000000 +0400
|+++ firegl_public.c   2005-09-23 17:25:49.000000000 +0400
--------------------------
File to patch:
I do not know enough of this to figure out how to do it properly and I'd sure be thankfull if someone would care to explain it to me.

Thanks, KF.
Top
ahorn
Guru
Guru
User avatar
Posts: 366
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 7:31 pm
Location: Ol' europe

  • Quote

Post by ahorn » Sun Oct 16, 2005 7:40 pm

you have to patch the ati-drivers, not the kernel. look into the portage directory, theres a similar patch which you can modify (ioctl32.patch), add to the ebuild the following: epatch ${FILESDIR}/ioctl32.patch
and then emerge --digest ati-drivers.
BUT why are the 8.14.13-r5 not working at your system. this is the only driver which works here.

anyway, you should read the posts above before you post...
Too many connections. Please try again later.
Top
Karl-Franz
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper
User avatar
Posts: 121
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:16 pm
Location: /se/lund

  • Quote

Post by Karl-Franz » Sun Oct 16, 2005 9:04 pm

Thanks alot. It was bitching about the first part so I removed it and now it works like a charm.

Its funny cause the 8.18.6 didn't work with the 2.6.13-r4 kernel (got a res of 1024x768 and only one screen working). And with the 2.6.14-rc4-nitro1 - 8.14.13-r5 combo, startx freezes and I have to reset my computer the windows way.

I don't know what kind of info you like, but I'd sure like to help so if it's anything you need, just walk me through it.

According to the xorg log:

Code: Select all

II) fglrx(0): Kernel Module Version Information:
(II) fglrx(0):     Name: fglrx
(II) fglrx(0):     Version: 8.14.13
(II) fglrx(0):     Date: Jun  8 2005
(II) fglrx(0):     Desc: ATI FireGL DRM kernel module
(WW) fglrx(0): Kernel Module version does *not* match driver.
(EE) fglrx(0): incompatible kernel module detected - HW accelerated OpenGL will not work
(II) fglrx(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel
(II) fglrx(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA 0xf9c34000 at 0xb7c0f000
(WW) fglrx(0): ***********************************************
(WW) fglrx(0): * DRI initialization failed!                  *
(WW) fglrx(0): * (maybe driver kernel module missing or bad) *
(WW) fglrx(0): * 2D acceleraton available (MMIO)             *
(WW) fglrx(0): * no 3D acceleration available                *
(WW) fglrx(0): ********************************************* *
And it finally breaks down since it's unable to query this kernel module.

/KF
Top
HecHacker1
Apprentice
Apprentice
User avatar
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 5:39 am
Location: UCSD
Contact:
Contact HecHacker1
Website

  • Quote

Post by HecHacker1 » Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:52 am

m0p wrote:Well, I'm still on 2.6.12-nitro5, and I want to know, is it really worth upgrading yet? Is 2.6.14 a huge improvement?
Me too. I want to upgrade. but ipw2200 doesn't work with anything except the 2.6.12-nitro5 or the genkernel/vanilla kernel. If you enable ipw2200 in this latest nitro for some reason it can't load the firmware.. module or built in. And because this kernel includes 802.11 support built in, you have to use it because the 802.11 package in portage won't compile because of all the 802.11 stuff already in the kernel.

Has anybody got a working ipw2200 with the newest nitro? Or even -mm in general.
Top
Tiger683
Veteran
Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 1347
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 8:34 pm
Location: Heffner's House

  • Quote

Post by Tiger683 » Mon Oct 17, 2005 3:01 am

Karl-Franz wrote:

Code: Select all

(WW) fglrx(0): Kernel Module version does *not* match driver.
(EE) fglrx(0): incompatible kernel module detected - HW accelerated OpenGL will not work
Try doing an opengl-update ati, your kernel module version doesnt match the Xorg opengl driver, thus
no HW acceleration... ;)

I would discourage switching from a stable nitro release to this one (ie. from 2,6,12-nitro5 or 2.6.13-nitro1)

This is a very testing-like release, as many of you have noticed.
until the stable 2.6.14 kernel appears. only the people who want and CAN debug some
problems in it should also use it. Cause: i do not have the hardware to test all the failing drivers on...
Lets hope we will get through this painlessly...

rgds.

T
Retired gentoo user
Top
HecHacker1
Apprentice
Apprentice
User avatar
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 5:39 am
Location: UCSD
Contact:
Contact HecHacker1
Website

  • Quote

Post by HecHacker1 » Mon Oct 17, 2005 3:46 am

i found the solution to the problem.. for some reason the ipw2200 drivers in the 2.6.14 release use the 2.2 version of the firmware... Which is two versions old, and one version older than the one in portage.

I enabled the 80211 stack in the kernel (built in) and made the ipw2200 driver as a module. Then you have to manually download the ipw2200-firmware 2.2 and extract it to /lib/firmware

:D
Top
blk_jack
Apprentice
Apprentice
User avatar
Posts: 298
Joined: Fri May 10, 2002 3:22 pm
Location: Toronto

  • Quote

Post by blk_jack » Mon Oct 17, 2005 5:09 pm

thubble wrote:Whenever I leave the machine for a while (i.e. overnight) and come back to it, I get a weird problem where apps (specifically X apps, and the X server) will lock up for a few seconds. It happens specifically when I'm starting to use an app that hasn't been used for a while, or when switching between windows. There will be about 2 second delay where the whole system locks up, no mouse, keyboard LEDs are stuck, etc. Then everything goes back to normal. I thought it was the swap prefetch patch so I disabled that, same thing.

I'm using the nvidia driver and latest modular xorg-server. I've reversed the patch that was causing problems with nvidia, and there are no relevant lines in dmesg. Pentium 4 with hyperthreading enabled.
I get the same thing. Memory usage seems fairly high for this release too, a lot higher than older versions of Nitro.
Top
SchAmane
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper
User avatar
Posts: 107
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 2:07 pm
Contact:
Contact SchAmane
Website

  • Quote

Post by SchAmane » Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:21 pm

thubble wrote:I get a weird problem where apps will lock up for a few seconds. It happens specifically when I'm starting to use an app that hasn't been used for a while, or when switching between windows. There will be about 2 second delay where the whole system locks up, no mouse, keyboard LEDs are stuck, etc. Then everything goes back to normal. I thought it was the swap prefetch patch so I disabled that, same thing.
I can agree with that. Enother issue i have with this and 2.6.13.2-nitro1 kernel is slower IO. Mostly on my HDD, but generaly on CD-WRITER and second DVDROM. System mostly hold if i am copying or writing something. Mouse is vely sloooow ;)
One, until i played openttd, whole system get lockup, so i haved to reset my PC.
This kernel is not claimed as stable, so i have no bad hopes about stability, but i would like to know if somebody has IO speed decrase on all >2.6.13 kernels with VIA Chipset like me ?
Top
HecHacker1
Apprentice
Apprentice
User avatar
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 5:39 am
Location: UCSD
Contact:
Contact HecHacker1
Website

  • Quote

Post by HecHacker1 » Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:55 pm

compared to nitro 2.6.12 rc5 this new version is actually using much LESS memory for me.. However, it just seems that the caching is not being used properly. So yes, less memory usage, but I have to frequently access the hard drive which causes stalls (reiser4, just upgrade to 1.0.5).

I need to take a look at the swap settings cause since I'm running a notebook using the harddrive is not a good thing (and I have a 1GB stick coming soon as an upgrade)
Top
unz
l33t
l33t
User avatar
Posts: 819
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2004 12:19 am
Location: Roma, Italia

  • Quote

Post by unz » Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:58 pm

i got problems with via kt880, ide0/ide1 resets and dma is disabled ... but seem only warnings, transfers net->hd hd->dvd work at full speed ...
Ma che c'hai là? Sulla spalla!!!! http://lascimmia.it/
Top
mbar
Advocate
Advocate
User avatar
Posts: 2000
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 9:45 am
Location: Poland

  • Quote

Post by mbar » Tue Oct 18, 2005 5:58 pm

Tiger683 wrote: that's it :)
works here, inserts fine :))))
also works with -acid1 :)
Top
SchAmane
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper
User avatar
Posts: 107
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 2:07 pm
Contact:
Contact SchAmane
Website

  • Quote

Post by SchAmane » Tue Oct 18, 2005 11:07 pm

Yep, thay defenetively have changed something with IO (chipsets support) in last 2 kernels, anybody know ?
DMA option is set for all my CR/DVD Drives but thay feels like thay dont use DMA.
Haved anohter system lock today. After updating world and leaving PC for some hours allone. And it was little bit strange ;) I can still use gnome-terminal (type something), but no new commands, and all other applications seems to no response. I wait few seconds and reset system.

Tiger, are there any other plans to release new 2.6.13.x nitros ? It would be nice "stable nitro" tree :lol:
Top
playfool
l33t
l33t
User avatar
Posts: 688
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 12:49 am
Location: Århus, Denmark

  • Quote

Post by playfool » Wed Oct 19, 2005 12:42 am

Would you consider adding the adaptive readahead patch which was recently posted on lkml (and covered in this weeks LWN as well btw.) ?

*edit*

Never mind, Andrew Morton included this in the lastest -mm kernel, it will trickle down to vanilla soon enough.
Last edited by playfool on Fri Oct 21, 2005 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My blog

Proud supporter of The EFF, The FSF and The Triad of Reason.
Top
metalifloyd
n00b
n00b
User avatar
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 2:48 am
Location: Atlanta, GA
Contact:
Contact metalifloyd
Website

  • Quote

Post by metalifloyd » Fri Oct 21, 2005 5:06 am

Does this version of Nitro have the staircase scheduler? Unless I'm blind I can't seem to find it.

Also, I tried it out and everything seems to work fine but responsiveness in X is very slow compared to previous Nitro patchsets. That is why I am wondering which CPU scheduler is in use.
Top
seppe
Guru
Guru
User avatar
Posts: 431
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 1:13 pm
Location: Hove, Antwerp, Belgium
Contact:
Contact seppe
Website

  • Quote

Post by seppe » Fri Oct 21, 2005 9:26 am

metalifloyd wrote:Does this version of Nitro have the staircase scheduler? Unless I'm blind I can't seem to find it.

Also, I tried it out and everything seems to work fine but responsiveness in X is very slow compared to previous Nitro patchsets. That is why I am wondering which CPU scheduler is in use.
Yes, the staircase scheduler is in the ck patch. More info at http://kernel.kolivas.org
nitro-sources, because between stable and experimental there exists only speed

Latest release I made: 2.6.13.2-nitro1
Top
metalifloyd
n00b
n00b
User avatar
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 2:48 am
Location: Atlanta, GA
Contact:
Contact metalifloyd
Website

  • Quote

Post by metalifloyd » Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:53 pm

I always thought Nitro was based on ck.

Hmm, For some reason this nitro is significantly slower than the current ck sources (2.6.13-ck8). Well at least it feels slower. My .config's are pretty similar.
Top
chichibabin
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:11 am

  • Quote

Post by chichibabin » Sat Oct 22, 2005 4:17 pm

Hi,
Compiling ipw2100 and IEEE80211 as modules floods dmesg with the following error:

Code: Select all

eth2 (WE) : Driver using old /proc/net/wireless support, please fix driver !
eth2 (WE) : Driver using old /proc/net/wireless support, please fix driver !
eth2 (WE) : Driver using old /proc/net/wireless support, please fix driver !
eth2 (WE) : Driver using old /proc/net/wireless support, please fix driver !
eth2 (WE) : Driver using old /proc/net/wireless support, please fix driver !
eth2 (WE) : Driver using old /proc/net/wireless support, please fix driver !
eth2 (WE) : Driver using old /proc/net/wireless support, please fix driver !
eth2 (WE) : Driver using old /proc/net/wireless support, please fix driver !
eth2 (WE) : Driver using old /proc/net/wireless support, please fix driver !
My kernel config settings for these 2 modules are as follows:

Code: Select all

# CONFIG_BT_HCIVHCI is not set
CONFIG_IEEE80211=m
# CONFIG_IEEE80211_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_IEEE80211_CRYPT_WEP=m
CONFIG_IEEE80211_CRYPT_CCMP=m
CONFIG_IEEE80211_CRYPT_TKIP=m

CONFIG_IPW2100=m
# CONFIG_IPW2100_MONITOR is not set
# CONFIG_IPW_DEBUG is not set
# CONFIG_IPW2200 is not set
# CONFIG_AIRO is not set
# CONFIG_HERMES is not set
# CONFIG_ATMEL is not set
Help much appreciated.
Cheers,
Sat
Top
mbar
Advocate
Advocate
User avatar
Posts: 2000
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 9:45 am
Location: Poland

  • Quote

Post by mbar » Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:55 pm

This is connected to recent update of wireless-tools, I've got the same messages but with rt2500.
Top
sirdilznik
l33t
l33t
User avatar
Posts: 731
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:13 am

  • Quote

Post by sirdilznik » Sun Oct 23, 2005 3:19 am

So far so good AND it seems to use less memory than my previous kernel (2.6.13-rc3-mm1). Great work!
Top
Post Reply

162 posts
  • Page 5 of 7
    • Jump to page:
  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • Next

Return to “Unsupported Software”

Jump to
  • Assistance
  • ↳   News & Announcements
  • ↳   Frequently Asked Questions
  • ↳   Installing Gentoo
  • ↳   Multimedia
  • ↳   Desktop Environments
  • ↳   Networking & Security
  • ↳   Kernel & Hardware
  • ↳   Portage & Programming
  • ↳   Gamers & Players
  • ↳   Other Things Gentoo
  • ↳   Unsupported Software
  • Discussion & Documentation
  • ↳   Documentation, Tips & Tricks
  • ↳   Gentoo Chat
  • ↳   Gentoo Forums Feedback
  • ↳   Duplicate Threads
  • International Gentoo Users
  • ↳   中文 (Chinese)
  • ↳   Dutch
  • ↳   Finnish
  • ↳   French
  • ↳   Deutsches Forum (German)
  • ↳   Diskussionsforum
  • ↳   Deutsche Dokumentation
  • ↳   Greek
  • ↳   Forum italiano (Italian)
  • ↳   Forum di discussione italiano
  • ↳   Risorse italiane (documentazione e tools)
  • ↳   Polskie forum (Polish)
  • ↳   Instalacja i sprzęt
  • ↳   Polish OTW
  • ↳   Portuguese
  • ↳   Documentação, Ferramentas e Dicas
  • ↳   Russian
  • ↳   Scandinavian
  • ↳   Spanish
  • ↳   Other Languages
  • Architectures & Platforms
  • ↳   Gentoo on ARM
  • ↳   Gentoo on PPC
  • ↳   Gentoo on Sparc
  • ↳   Gentoo on Alternative Architectures
  • ↳   Gentoo on AMD64
  • ↳   Gentoo for Mac OS X (Portage for Mac OS X)
  • Board index
  • All times are UTC
  • Delete cookies

© 2001–2026 Gentoo Foundation, Inc.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited

Privacy Policy

 

 

magic