http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gento ... 11728.htmlGentoo-Dev Mailing List wrote: I've cleaned up the XFS patch and upgraded it to XFS 1.1. Feel free to test
it, but keep in mind it is just as experimental as the previous one.
Changes:
XFS 1.1 (in stead of an old CVS snapshot)
Quota works
General cleanup
I would really appreciate if you could test the general stability of it, and
especially if you use highmem support.
The URLs:
http://www.SuxOS.org/~styx/gentoo/linux ... .patch.bz2
http://www.SuxOS.org/~styx/gentoo/linux ... .patch.bz2
Notes:
* The difference between the two patches is that the one at the top is and
incremental patch that you should apply to a clean gentoo-sources-2.4.19-r1
tree, while the latter one should be applied to a clean 2.4.18 tree.
* The old patches have been moved to www.SuxOS.org/~styx/gentoo/old-patches
(note that the URLs are the same as in the announcement of the old patches).
I'd like to thank Rigo Ketelings for helping me test the old patch, and giving
me lots of feedback.
Best Regards,
--
Joachim Blaabjerg
styx@SuxOS.org
www.SuxOS.org
It might happen, but at this point in time the gentoo+xfs kernel source is untested and is still experimental.snoop wrote:Hello,
wouldn't it be possible to create an ebuild for this so
one can just "emerge sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-xfs"
or something similar?
cu
Torsten

Code: Select all
rc[13] exited with preempt_count 9
mount[18] exited with preempt_count 4
rc[17] exited with preempt_count 7
cat[19] exited with preempt_count 3
mount[24] exited with preempt_count 1
devfsd[26] exited with preempt_count 481
mount[31] exited with preempt_count 2
ls[56] exited with preempt_count 13
depscan.sh[55] exited with preempt_count 3
ls[278] exited with preempt_count 1