
Code: Select all
6.1 Greg Kroah-Hartman & Sasha Levin 2022-12-11 Dec, 2026
5.15 Greg Kroah-Hartman & Sasha Levin 2021-10-31 Oct, 2026
5.10 Greg Kroah-Hartman & Sasha Levin 2020-12-13 Dec, 2026
5.4 Greg Kroah-Hartman & Sasha Levin 2019-11-24 Dec, 2025
4.19 Greg Kroah-Hartman & Sasha Levin 2018-10-22 Dec, 2024
4.14 Greg Kroah-Hartman & Sasha Levin 2017-11-12 Jan, 2024
You mean a 4.x.y kernel?pjp wrote: I'm using 4 in part because 5 and 6 both seemed to introduce more problems that garnered attention than I previously perceived. I haven't decided if I'll bother with 5, but I'm leaning toward one of its longterm versions.
I commend 5.10 series to you. I had been running 4.9 series for several years, keeping up-to-date within the series as upstream and gentoo-sources released up-to-date versions. Maybe a year ago, over a period of less than a week, I stepped through 4.14, 4.19, 5.4, finally landing on 5.10, currently at 5.10.191. The stepwise upgrade was relatively painless.pjp wrote:Yes.
Code: Select all
>=sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-5.11
Code: Select all
Keywords for sys-kernel/gentoo-kernel:
| | u |
| a a r | n |
| m r i | e u s | r
| d m s | a s l | e
| 6 6 c | p e o | p
| 4 4 v | i d t | o
----------+-------+--------------+-------
5.4.254 | + + o | 8 o 5.4.254 | gentoo
----------+-------+--------------+-------
5.4.255 | ~ ~ o | 8 o 5.4.255 | gentoo
----------+-------+--------------+-------
5.10.191 | + + o | 8 o 5.10.191 | gentoo
----------+-------+--------------+-------
5.10.193 | ~ ~ o | 8 o 5.10.193 | gentoo
----------+-------+--------------+-------
5.15.127 | + + o | 8 o 5.15.127 | gentoo
----------+-------+--------------+-------
5.15.128 | ~ ~ o | 8 o 5.15.128 | gentoo
----------+-------+--------------+-------
5.15.129 | ~ ~ o | 8 o 5.15.129 | gentoo
----------+-------+--------------+-------
[I]6.1.46 | + + ~ | 8 o 6.1.46 | gentoo
----------+-------+--------------+-------
6.1.47 | ~ ~ ~ | 8 o 6.1.47 | gentoo
----------+-------+--------------+-------
6.1.48 | ~ ~ ~ | 8 o 6.1.48 | gentoo
----------+-------+--------------+-------
6.1.49 | ~ ~ ~ | 8 o 6.1.49 | gentoo
----------+-------+--------------+-------
6.1.50 | ~ ~ ~ | 8 o 6.1.50 | gentoo
----------+-------+--------------+-------
6.4.11 | ~ ~ ~ | 8 o 6.4.11 | gentoo
----------+-------+--------------+-------
6.4.12 | ~ ~ ~ | 8 o 6.4.12 | gentoo
----------+-------+--------------+-------
6.4.13 | ~ ~ ~ | 8 o 6.4.13 | gentooCode: Select all
0100100100100000011000010110110100100000
0100111001100001010011100010000100100000
0100100100100000011000010110110100100000
0110000100100000011011010110000101101110
00100001Thanks. I've generally found the same to be true. I "tried" to get a 5.0 config done sometime in 2019, but there were too many new things, not enough time, and not enough interest or justification. I'm leaning toward 5.4 as the first stop in 5-land. That stay only lasts until the end of 2025, and 5.10 only through 2026. I may prep a 6.1 since it too only lasts through 2026, that might make it easier for the next 6LTS, whatever that is.figueroa wrote:over a period of less than a week, I stepped through 4.14, 4.19, 5.4, finally landing on 5.10, currently at 5.10.191. The stepwise upgrade was relatively painless.
That is the time consuming part :)figueroa wrote:I run "make oldconfig" and carefully pay attention to any changes that I'm prompted about, doing internet searches and referring to the forums here when I wasn't sure what to do.
It is somewhat necessary until I give up and merge /usr and/or abandon lvm.figueroa wrote:I do everything manually and also do not use an initrd. All of my Gentoo systems are relatively old (or ancient) and stable.
stefan11111 wrote:Is there something in the 6.x.y or 5.x.y kernels that you don't like?
That's it. I don't remember specifics, only that they were "user-affecting" enough to get some attention. On top of other reasons I mentioned above, it was easy to wait until 6. "And there was more drama," to abuse a quote. Neither 5's nor 6's problems were probably that big of a deal, but they were enough to make me not feel the urgency of upgrading. Given 4's EOL at the end of 2024 (if not sooner based on this announcement), it needs to be more of a priority.pjp wrote:5 and 6 both seemed to introduce more problems that garnered attention than I previously perceived.
That's disturbing, given the lack of clarity on what's going away. As of today, 4 is still in gentoo-sources.Zucca wrote:Meanwhile gentoo-kernel doesn't have any 4.x releases