Whatever processor you choose is a personal decision. The processor choice will affect the overall price of a completed system. If you decide to use a high end processor you need a high end board. So you can see how the price is affected by your choice.ibrown39 wrote:So I’ll preface this with I know I’ve asked pretty much the same before, however this was more theoretical and the medium/use case weren’t clear. This time I really want plan on building a desktop centered around fantastic emerge, compile, and build times. I won’t be gaming on this so no need for a monster GPU.
Before most suggested a 3rd gen thread ripper but now some others have suggested some multi core Intels (i9). I see myself using this for kernel development, OS DEV work, and possibly as a distcc node. But also just to have fun.
For gaming and graphic intensive work I have an i9 + 3090, so I would think/prefer to save the majority of the budget or this build for CPU and ram. From what I understand, there are greatly diminishing returns for each significant jump in cores and memory (16cores -> 24c -> … 64c + 64gb -> 120gb+ ram) and that a 3rd gen threadripper would more than enough. Honestly a case + cpu (+ thermal handling) + ram + psu (probs hunt around for an NVME) would all Id need for it. I have a r/buildapc thread going under the same user name so feel free to pop there too if you prefer.
I’m mostly asking given the difference in suggestions. Ideally the whole build would be <$3500, better if under $3000. I’m in CO, USA and have access to microcenter. Thanks and I’ll try to respond as soon as I can. I’m open to used prebuilt workstations to building it. DMs open.
Dude I get it that don’t like how I phrased the question but this a bit unnecessary.steve_v wrote:IMO this question could easily be rephrased as "how long is a piece of string".
Well I’m not 100% sure what I’ll be doing with this all the time, just that it won’t be graphic intensive computations and/or not gaming. Aside from that I’m looking for an overall build that would provide a good amount of raw power for the price point. Some have suggested just going with AMD for driver support and avoiding their TR given bad thermals, overkill for my uses, and greatly diminishing returns on emerge times as the cores+memory go up. As for single vs multi threaded performance not sure. I can see myself utilizing several simultaneous VMs for various uses, but then again I could see single thread performance mattering for other tasks.“steve_v” wrote: You want hardware recommendations for running Gentoo, but only you can find a suitable balance between price, performance, and patience.
Thank you! This is more what I’m looking for narrowing things down. I appreciate it.steve_v wrote: If you want to compile chromium and co, you'll want plenty of RAM. Other than that, compile time is just a matter of raw general-purpose compute power and how much noise, heat and power consumption you're willing to put up with.
Personally, I like Intel CPUs with the best single-thread performance I can get, because I do stuff other than compiling or rendering on this box. TBH the last AMD CPU I bought was a K6-3, and they totally lost me with the bulldozer fiasco.
Lolsteve_v wrote:Last time I went with an overclocked 10900KF on air for my desktop, because there's something strangely satisfying about a machine that sounds like a tornado under load... Tastes will vary. It's pretty quick, and it cost a fair bit less than the figures you're throwing around.
I was considering a Xeon, but until now you’re the only to mention it. I’ll look more but is it because of the single core performance isn’t great or something like mobo compatibility not being ideal for desktops?steve_v wrote:There's a 233MHz Pentium MMX on my desk right now as well, and it's fine too. Patience is a virtue, and I needed something to stick a Voodoo in.
Home server? That's a dual (sandybridge) xeon. It gets along pretty well, and it was dirt cheap. Just sits in the corner and does its thing.
Well I would say I asked a specific one before, but figured people were going to gripe. I’ve asked you some additional questions in my response. Aside from some of the snarky remarks I appreciate your input.steve_v wrote:Did you have a specific question, or are we just rambling now?


Xeons bring very little over desktop-class parts, besides support for MP and ECC, and often more PCIE lanes. They're also multiplier-locked and tend to use slightly different sockets and/or HSF mounting for intentional incompatibility with common desktop parts.ibrown39 wrote:I was considering a Xeon, but until now you’re the only to mention it. I’ll look more but is it because of the single core performance isn’t great or something like mobo compatibility not being ideal for desktops?
Like Neddy, I too squint a bit at putting such fancy CPU and memory on a relatively cheap B series motherboard, and in such a small case. I also don't like MSI, but that's a matter of taste.ibrown39 wrote:What do you guys think of this list?
Trend? What do you call a trend? Smaller and quieter has been a thing since prior to my registration date. I'd much prefer silent and unobtrusive. Although I've never seen that in DIY components. Then again, I also keep an eye out for some sort of networking device between worthless consumer software and unobtanium enterprise price. Haven't found it yet. I've partly avoid upgrading from my AMD Phenom because I don't want to deal with the ridiculous coolers that are required for modern CPUs. I mean seriously, that stuff looks like it belongs in a Christopher Guest film (perhaps A Mightier Wind).steve_v wrote:To be fair though, I know next-to-nothing about this newfangled pc-shrinking trend. It might be fine. I'm in the full size conventional airflow ATX tower camp and always have been. ;)
Micro ATX and ITX have become far more popular over the last few years, even in enthusiast and gaming circles. 10 years ago anything smaller than mid-ATX for a DIY machine was pretty uncommon.pjp wrote:What do you call a trend?
Sure. You can have cool and quiet, or you can have enthusiast performance. Unless we're talking really exotic cooling solutions, everything ends up as hot air eventually.pjp wrote:I've partly avoid upgrading from my AMD Phenom because I don't want to deal with the ridiculous coolers that are required for modern CPUs.
I guess I've been paying attention to the segment for a very long time. Admittedly the ITX stuff wasn't easy to find. I mainly avoided it for want of replacement parts availability, particularly the PSUs. Considering that it is a niche segment of a niche market, I wonder what the sales numbers have been. Obviously there had to be enough interest 15+ years ago or it wouldn't have existed, so growth isn't at all surprising. People aren't still seeking brick mobile phones or the ones needing carry bag.steve_v wrote:Micro ATX and ITX have become far more popular over the last few years, even in enthusiast and gaming circles. 10 years ago anything smaller than mid-ATX for a DIY machine was pretty uncommon.
My recollection is that those interested were after desktop and gaming usage, so it seems to be natural growth, and consequently maybe better availability.steve_v wrote:But I think it's safe to assume that low power consumption SFF desktops are not what we're talking about here, given the mention of "[DIY] enthusiast build" and "fantastic compile times".
For compiling, anything new would have to do better. I can make do with the Phenom for a while, but investing the money to replace that performance wouldn't like make much sense. Unless I could get it something small and quiet :). As I mentioned, that was only one reason to avoid upgrading. Cost, time (figuring out what to buy), no longer interested in the DIY aspect. Mass market alternatives seem to have either proprietary designs and / or an absurd price premium for comparable or lesser quality components.steve_v wrote:I expect you'd actually get away with a smaller cooler than you have on the phenom if you upgraded to something with similar performance, but in a more recent process. I mean, I don't like getting rid of perfectly good equipment either, but if cool and efficient is what you're after, holding on to old CPUs isn't the way to go about it.
I never quite figured out their product line, and nothing really seemed suitable for a switch. Cost may have been a factor too, I don't recall (I've looked at a bunch of similar offerings, so can't recall which issues were associated with which products).steve_v wrote:Speaking of network gear, my home router/firewall is a fanless design built around a PCEngines SBC. It's actually quite nice, but again the only reason it's fanless is because it doesn't have or need a lot of computing horsepower.

Speak for yourself, I'd gladly trade the wafer-thin and needlessly fragile toys that pass as phones these days for some good old (removable) battery capacity, storage expansion options, and an analogue audio jack.pjp wrote:People aren't still seeking brick mobile phones
You almost certainly can... But I hear you on the time and effort deciding (and even keeping up with the options) on what to buy.pjp wrote:investing the money to replace that performance wouldn't like make much sense. Unless I could get it something small and quiet.
Yeah, they're ideal for a router or a mini-server, but I wouldn't build a switch around one. You really want specialised hardware for that, and such doesn't seem to be available to the general public.pjp wrote:I never quite figured out their product line, and nothing really seemed suitable for a switch.

YES YOU CAN!NeddySeagoon wrote:ibrown39,
Can you really get 4 DIMMs on a Micro ATX motherboard?
All that heat in such a small space too.



My phone has both, though I don't use the audio jack (ironically, I partially purchased it because I thought I was going to use it for music... never happened). And A year plus ago I put in a new battery. In 2015/16, it was one of the few options that still had external storage (under the cover) and a replaceable battery.steve_v wrote:Speak for yourself, I'd gladly trade the wafer-thin and needlessly fragile toys that pass as phones these days for some good old (removable) battery capacity, storage expansion options, and an analogue audio jack. :Ppjp wrote:People aren't still seeking brick mobile phones
Sure, but I've never seen a comparson old CPU performance to comparable new CPU performance, so the research would likely be even more painful.steve_v wrote:You almost certainly can... But I hear you on the time and effort deciding (and even keeping up with the options) on what to buy.
Unfortunately. I'm surprised there isn't a middle-ground option.pjp wrote:Yeah, they're ideal for a router or a mini-server, but I wouldn't build a switch around one. You really want specialised hardware for that, and such doesn't seem to be available to the general public.
I haven't looked hard, but nowhere I've looked has anything. I did look at a 4 port NIC for the hell of it... yeah, no. $400+ (can't recall if that was an SFP model). A "RaspberryPi" for each networking and storage doesn't seem _that_ much of an ask.pjp wrote:I mean you could cobble something together with a bunch of PCIE NICs, assuming you can find a board with enough slots, but it seems like a bit of a waste to me. Better a custom board and some FPGAs... If there was such a thing to be found.
I'll admit I haven't looked very hard though, it's not something I have a burning need for.
Yikes. Am I that out of touch with pricing, or is there something that board offers to warrant that price?sitquietly wrote:* Then I'd choose an LGA1200 board with great i/o support. Looks like this would do.