i doubt it keeps many away. They are too much fixed in their girly macbook world, or in their windows world. Secureboot, a lack of knowledge does the rest to stick to their everyday macbook / windows world.
I think only a small user base uses kde or gnome. And it was long time obvious that kde and gnome will be rubbish. Many users went for the smaller less bloated desctops, or use some self made glued together desctop environments. Is it just coincidence that both kde and gnome uses SYSTEMD and went downhill that fast recently? (Sarcasm)
We are in 2017, this can not happend, in no way...
I only want k3b. The ebuilds are rubbish for many many years. too many packages are pulled in which are not really needed for example. Burn errors becasue of converting data to some other data which is than burnt. kde3 was much better regarding k3b. kde4 made things worse. and these 9999 ebuilds for kde are the worst. When the developers have used a proper design flows, I would not have made roosters with wrong coded steams in the first place. They did not even test their own software, or read hte docs about the small tools they use to create those WORM. A poor coding style reflects such behaviour of the software.
IT does happens, and it happens regularly.
gnome 2 => gnome 3 switch ...
kde 3 => kde 4 switch
stable => SYSTEMD
I need relyable software with a small memory footprint.
Note this is my personal opinion.
How an issue like this, is a minor problem...?
I did take my time to report bugs.
Invalid, unconfirmed, report upstream => use a dice, choose one of those 3 or more. basically not even worth reporting bugs these days. And when you go one level above to kde, its the same stuff.
Only thing i do these days, fix it myself. Or hardmask packages which do not build. Over the years you will learn which packages are important, which packages can be skipped, or replaced with some other verions or packages.