Spanik wrote:Never tought about it, selected the first profile with KDE and no systemd. How stable is 5? Problem with kde is that each time they release a major number you're in for a complete rebuild.
It's pretty good now in my opinion. I find it to be stable for me and cna now have it running for weeks without a crash (nvidia binary + systemd + sddm + plasma 5 on ~amd64). There are some missing things like the ratings are a bit messed up in Dolphin and the restoration of some applications from a session or activity is not always happening but other than that I'm not having problems. The thing about kde4 is that development has mostly stopped and all the individual applications have either switched or are in the process of switching over. So as time goes on it is just going to rust more. Most major Linux distros have switched over to Plasma 5 from kde4.
Also see this thread:
viewtopic-t-1040846.html
but keep in mind that a lot of people just hate change too.
Also upgrades are a little different now. It's not like kde4 where everything was often upgraded at once. Now it is split into three main categories:
Frameworks - the base functionality needed by Plasma and other apps.
Plasma - Pretty much the part you think of when you think of a DE (the operating environment)
Applications - the individual applications bundled with KDE normally such as Dolphin. These rely on the two above.
These all tend to update at different times so the upgrade pain is less at any given time though it is more frequent. Of course with Gentoo you can mask stuff if you aren't ready to upgrade.
Only you can decide what is best for you but if you are the type who absolutely hates any change at all and would be upset if even the smallest feature was gone then you are probably better on kde4 still. For everyone else Plasma 5 is probably the better option unless you know for a fact there is a problem with your hardware or some missing feature you need.