miroR wrote:I read what khayyam, krinn and Ant P. wrote.
miro ... you read, perhaps, but didn't understand.
miroR wrote:Pls., Moderators and higher, if you decide, I can, just as I said in the post itself, try and remove it as soon as I manage to post it elsewhere.
This sounds as though the forums operate as your personal blog.
miroR wrote:I don't feel that I need to do it, before, as I wrote in that post: senior members decide. Senior members being at least one Moderator or higher than Moderator rank member, at least one pro or con, if I understand correctly (if I don't, do tell me).
That's not how it works, both users and moderators work to posting guidelines. This isn't the place for you to have a monologue with your ISP. It has nothing to do with gentoo, censorship, or any of the babble provided by you in that post. Get a blog and you can post nonsense like the reported thread all day long, just stop using gentoo forums as a platform for your lack of understanding.
miroR wrote:Pls. do notice that I am censored, and without a reason.
No, you are *not* censored, you just don't understand what is going on. Its you who are without reason, because for you not understanding is an opening for you to claim you understand ("censorship", etc). If you spent half the time and energy on trying to understand the problem rather than claiming you do, and writing nonsense on the forum, you might gain more sympathy, and someone might explain it to you. As it stands you just tax peoples patience, because you either don't listen, or bog down any discussion with trivia, speculation, and verbiage.
miroR wrote:I kindly ask senior members, to leave my post, as it is also about Gentoo and the methods that people are pretty interested in, and which I have learned here on Gentoo Forums, as shown by the visits to: Air-Gapped Gentoo Install, Tentative
Here's a perfect example, you think that "visits" equate to "interest", you do realise that the site is crawled by robots, and that if you put that link in every post you make (as you do) then you increase hits? This is exactly what spammers do, that's how they increase their page rank on search engines ... the more links the more hits. The fact that you seem to think that people are interested in your muddled, overstated, long winded, and often incorrect, posts suggests you don't understand how "views" work. They do not attest to the content at all, in fact, anyone could raise the number of "views" on any post on the forum simply by linking to it from other posts. That's your trick, though your unaware that your doing it, I seriously doubt that anyone pays any attention to your posts at all ... having taken the time to try and correct your misconceptions, and failed, I simply don't bother reading ... unless in the case above where it was obvious within a few paragraphs you were using the forum as your own personal blog.
miroR wrote:I really don't think the explanation of that real censorship case, should detract from the Forums in any way.
Yeah, "real censorship", your sure of that right? I mean blog away, just do it somewhere else because it *does* distract from the forum, that's why we have "posting guidelines".
miroR wrote:Pls., if you do decide that I need to remove the post, allow a number of hours for me to comply (as I wish to post a link to that text after I, as I said, hopefully manage to post it elsewhere). I'm not very versed in all things web and internet, so I will need time.
Again, suggesting the forum is your personal blog ... if you need to have somewhere on the internet to "link to" then get a blog.
miroR wrote:Also due to pranks thrown at me, by my pretty hostile regime, due to which I have to perform network packet capturing and analysis of those (and the analysis still takes me a multiple, even a few dozen and more multiple amout of time than the time I am online), I really can not do anything within a short notice. (And also the reactions have come up a few hours ago, if I get the time difference right btwn Gentoo U.S.A [EST or other] time and the time here in Europe;
Halarious ... honestly, gentoo forums is hosting this nonsense while you find somewhere else for it ... at "short notice"?
miroR wrote:The post that has been reported is important to me... I'll check back before going to sleep tonight, if Senior Gentoo Members have decided pro or con.
Again suggesting you are using gentoo forums as your personal blog, being "important to you" doesn't qualify it being relevant to the forums ... which it isn't.
I personally object to the fact that you use "gentoo" in your "letter" and so create the impression that this validates your understanding of the "problem", it doesn't have anything to do with us ... its entirely your own problem (ie, lack of understanding of your "censorship case").
best ... khay