currently I'm trying a heavy-patched 2.6.37 with SLUB and it seems to work fine - I need to try it out against SLAB (as a reference)rx3 wrote:And yet...kernelOfTruth wrote:
it's my own day-to-day experience and reading the comments & reports from the devs and users on lkml
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=36019
http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=913888
+1 for SLQB, if only someone ported the patch to 2.6.37...
but it seems to have improved nicely since the last time I tested it
yeah, SLQB really was a kind of light-weight juggernaut - working perfectly under heavy load and improving responsiveness
hopefully Nick will find some time to update it - in the meantime he has come up with lots of amazing improvements:
*) Quick merge window note..
*) [patch 0/8] Inode data integrity patchesLinus Torvalds wrote:some of the performance numbers are pretty stunning. For example, a
hot-cache "find . -size" on my home directory (which basically just
does name lookups to get the stat information for every file
recursively) became 35% faster. And that's the _unthreaded_ case. Not
some odd high-end scalability thing, and not some recompiled binary
taking advantage of new facilities. Pathname lookup is just simply
faster.
only to name some ...







