how unstable are you?

Message

padoor · Post by **padoor** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 1:59 pm

padoor conf.d # TOTAL=$(eix --compact -I | grep -c -i "^\[I\]"); UNSTABLE=$(eix --compact --installed-testing | grep -c -i "^\[I\]"); PERC=$(echo "($UNSTABLE/$TOTAL)*100" | bc -l);  echo "Percentage unstable: $PERC"
Percentage unstable: 55.26315789473684210500
padoor conf.d # Unknown option --installed-testing

it looks almost every one get same 50 - 60% result

the unknown option ?? i have only used ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~86".
no extra test packages.

it behaves stable enough. no crashes noticed for 2 yrs.

wjb · Post by **wjb** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 3:08 pm

I got 0 as well because of the undefined option

Using equery rather than eix, it looks like this:

Code: Select all

# TOTAL=$(equery -N -C list | wc -l);UNSTABLE=$(equery -N -C list | grep -c "~]");PC=$(echo $UNSTABLE*100/$TOTAL | bc -l);echo Total=$TOTAL Unstable=$UNSTABLE %=$PC

Which gets me a slightly more credible result:
Total=1280 Unstable=36 %=2.81250000000000000000

kernelOfTruth · Post by **kernelOfTruth** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 4:16 pm

wjb wrote:I got 0 as well because of the undefined option

Using equery rather than eix, it looks like this:
Code: Select all
# TOTAL=$(equery -N -C list | wc -l);UNSTABLE=$(equery -N -C list | grep -c "~]");PC=$(echo $UNSTABLE*100/$TOTAL | bc -l);echo Total=$TOTAL Unstable=$UNSTABLE %=$PC
Which gets me a slightly more credible result:
Total=1280 Unstable=36 %=2.81250000000000000000

yeah, that's definitely more accurate ! Thanks

Total=2343 Unstable=1278 %=54.54545454545454545454

how's the weather in Scotland ?

warrens · Post by **warrens** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 5:05 pm

With eix I got, as posted yesterday:

Code: Select all

Percentage unstable: 62.97918948521358159900

With equery I got:

Code: Select all

Total=1165 Unstable=805 %=69.09871244635193133047"

This system is completely stable, despite haveing 805 unstable packages installed.

RageOfOrder · Post by **RageOfOrder** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 5:21 pm

Equery says

Total=2221 Unstable=1393 %=62.71949572264745610085

eix says

Percentage unstable: 22.64367816091954022900

Post by **asturm** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 5:40 pm

No eix installed.

Code: Select all

Total=955 Unstable=343 %=35.91623036649214659685

megaflow · Post by **megaflow** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 6:50 pm

equery:

Code: Select all

Total=978 Unstable=537 %=54.90797546012269938650

eix:

Code: Select all

Percentage unstable: 54.55497382198952879500

rndusr · Post by **rndusr** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 7:42 pm

According to equery:

Code: Select all

Total=736 Unstable=249 %=33.83152173913043478260

My unstable packages are KDE 3.5.10 and Firefox 3, and their required dependencies.

M · Post by M » Tue Dec 16, 2008 7:59 pm

Code: Select all

Total=677 Unstable=445 %=65.73116691285081240768

That is ~amd64 with rox desktop and mygnome set. I am a little curious what DE's people with more than 2000 packages are using, or if only one what are those other packages.

rndusr · Post by **rndusr** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:14 pm

M wrote:
Code: Select all
Total=677 Unstable=445 %=65.73116691285081240768
That is ~amd64 with rox desktop and mygnome set. I am a little curious what DE's people with more than 2000 packages are using, or if only one what are those other packages.

I totally agree. I mean, I have not an excessively trimmed system (by laziness I use a lot of meta packages), but still I'm only at 736 packages.

arnvidr · Post by **arnvidr** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:37 pm

Code: Select all

Total=1034 Unstable=624 %=60.34816247582205029013

Using e16, so not sure why I have so many packages. Running ~amd64.

Post by **NeddySeagoon** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:42 pm

I'm all ~x86 except where ~SPARC works better.

HMC · Post by **HMC** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:44 pm

Trying to keep ~x86 off this computer. Hard when there are many packages that do not have a stable version.

Total=769 Unstable=38 %=4.9

purak · Post by **purak** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:50 pm

On ~x86 system
Equery:

Code: Select all

Total=730 Unstable=456 %=62.46575342465753424657

Eix:

Code: Select all

Percentage unstable: 53.56622998544395924300

wjb · Post by **wjb** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 9:43 pm

kernelOfTruth wrote: how's the weather in Scotland ?

dreech

jonnevers · Post by **jonnevers** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 9:47 pm

Code: Select all

Percentage unstable: 60.28

just did an ~amd64 -e @world @system yesterday

poly_poly-man · Post by **poly_poly-man** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 10:01 pm

NeddySeagoon wrote:I'm all ~x86 except where ~SPARC works better.

ouch... is it bad that I laughed at that?

ndse2112 · Post by **ndse2112** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 10:06 pm

equery:

Code: Select all

Total=609 Unstable=2 %=.32840722495894909688

jstead1 · Post by **jstead1** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 11:32 pm

With equery:
Total=872 Unstable=8 %=.91743119266055045871

872 packages, I'll have to look and see if I need all those.

I like lean, I like stable. That's just me.

poly_poly-man · Post by **poly_poly-man** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 11:42 pm

Total=1796 Unstable=1256 %=69.93318485523385300668

Post by **asturm** » Wed Dec 17, 2008 1:25 am

PanzerKanzler wrote:
M wrote:
Code: Select all
Total=677 Unstable=445 %=65.73116691285081240768
That is ~amd64 with rox desktop and mygnome set. I am a little curious what DE's people with more than 2000 packages are using, or if only one what are those other packages.
I totally agree. I mean, I have not an excessively trimmed system (by laziness I use a lot of meta packages), but still I'm only at 736 packages.

Perhaps multiple DEs? But it's not only DEs adding up to packages...

RedSquirrel · Post by **RedSquirrel** » Wed Dec 17, 2008 1:40 am

equery:

Total=444 Unstable=66 %=14.9

Most of that is xorg-x11 and a few window managers.

platojones · Post by **platojones** » Wed Dec 17, 2008 1:51 am

Well, using the equery method, I'm more unstable than the eix method:

Code: Select all

Total=1619 Unstable=649 %=40.08647313156269302038

Wow, some people here have very loaded machines...which is good, IMO!

padoor · Post by **padoor** » Wed Dec 17, 2008 2:00 am

Code: Select all

padoor ~ # TOTAL=$(eix --compact -I | grep -c -i "^\[I\]"); UNSTABLE=$(eix --compact --installed-testing | grep -c -i "^\[I\]"); PERC=$(echo "($UNSTABLE/$TOTAL)*100" | bc -l);  echo "Percentage unstable: $PERC"
Percentage unstable: 62.95045045045045045000
padoor ~ #

this is my p4 845 mother board desktop

why i am not getting total number of packages? use update-eix?? no it shows portage contents number of packages.

eix --installed
**--***---**
Found 918 matches.
padoor distfiles #

this is 8% more unstable than my laptop.
profile 2008.0/desktop

Code: Select all

tux1 ~ # TOTAL=$(eix --compact -I | grep -c -i "^\[I\]"); UNSTABLE=$(eix --compact --installed-testing | grep -c -i "^\[I\]"); PERC=$(echo "($UNSTABLE/$TOTAL)*100" | bc -l);  echo "Percentage unstable: $PERC"
Percentage unstable: 58.00807537012113055100
tux1 ~ #

the result above is for the second install in desktop with profile 2008.0
eix --installed
Found 818 matches.

bbgermany · Post by **bbgermany** » Wed Dec 17, 2008 12:05 pm

platojones wrote:Well, using the equery method, I'm more unstable than the eix method:
Code: Select all
Total=1619 Unstable=649 %=40.08647313156269302038
Wow, some people here have very loaded machines...which is good, IMO!

Same here:

Code: Select all

zeus ~ # TOTAL=$(equery -N -C list | wc -l);UNSTABLE=$(equery -N -C list | grep -c "~]");PC=$(echo $UNSTABLE*100/$TOTAL | bc -l);echo Total=$TOTAL Unstable=$UNSTABLE %=$PC
Total=903 Unstable=98 %=10.85271317829457364341
zeus ~ # TOTAL=$(eix --compact -I | grep -c -i "^\[I\]"); UNSTABLE=$(eix --compact --installed-testing | grep -c -i "^\[I\]"); PERC=$(echo "($UNSTABLE/$TOTAL)*100" | bc -l);  echo "Percentage unstable: $PERC"
Percentage unstable: 8.44079718640093786600
zeus ~ #

bb