Typo in default fstab

Message

boomslang · Post by **boomslang** » Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:43 am

Would it be worth anyone's while to fix the "audo" typo in the default fstab present in the amd64 stage3? I know it doesn't /really/ matter because everyone changes it anyway, but it wouldn't hurt to have it say "auto" instead of "audo."

This is the line:

Code: Select all

/dev/cdrom              /mnt/cdrom      audo            noauto,ro       0 0

Sorry if this is a poor thread...

didymos · Post by **didymos** » Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:05 am

Probably would be worth the time. I'm actually surprised I haven't seen a post about some drive not working with the poster trying to use that in the fstab file.

boomslang · Post by **boomslang** » Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:35 am

A tribute to the intelligence of the human race, I'm sure!

GivePeaceAChance · Post by **GivePeaceAChance** » Tue Aug 07, 2007 2:43 am

That's the same with the x86 architecture fstab. Noticed it, wondered what "audo" did, and changed it to auto.

desultory · Post by **desultory** » Tue Aug 07, 2007 2:58 am

[post=4060452]This[/post] [post=4101192]has[/post] [post=4101257]appeared[/post] [post=4156746]before[/post] on the forums, but apparently not as a problem someone was trying to rectify. It has been [bug=177990]reported[/bug] in the Gentoo Bugzilla and has been fixed in sys-apps/baselayout-1.12.10-r4.

didymos · Post by **didymos** » Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:39 am

desultory wrote:[post=4060452]This[/post] [post=4101192]has[/post] [post=4101257]appeared[/post] [post=4156746]before[/post] on the forums, but apparently not as a problem someone was trying to rectify. It has been [bug=177990]reported[/bug] in the Gentoo Bugzilla and has been fixed in sys-apps/baselayout-1.12.10-r4.

Well, sure, if you're actually going to do research about it....

boomslang · Post by **boomslang** » Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:45 am

desultory wrote:[post=4060452]This[/post] [post=4101192]has[/post] [post=4101257]appeared[/post] [post=4156746]before[/post] on the forums, but apparently not as a problem someone was trying to rectify. It has been [bug=177990]reported[/bug] in the Gentoo Bugzilla and has been fixed in sys-apps/baselayout-1.12.10-r4.

That's good. I assume it would be too much of an ordeal to push an update out to all the stage mirrors for one measly typo.

To · Post by To » Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:41 am

boomslang wrote: That's good. I assume it would be too much of an ordeal to push an update out to all the stage mirrors for one measly typo.

Specialy like this one.. That breaks everything up;)

Tó

desultory · Post by **desultory** » Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:02 pm

boomslang wrote:That's good. I assume it would be too much of an ordeal to push an update out to all the stage mirrors for one measly typo.

I have contacted Release Engineering and received verification that as this is a fairly trivial issue, there does not seem to be cause to release a new set of stages before 2007.1. Presently, 2007.1 is planned to be to released in November.