|~| CONRAD |~| Stage 1 on 72 "Eins/Uno/One"

Message

baigsabeeh · Post by **baigsabeeh** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:33 pm

For some reason, Conrad does not play well with Flash 9 Beta. It has locked up everytime I tried to watch Judas Priest's Painkiller video on Gootube. Since, it's also running in the background for Yahoo Launch, it also locked up when I watched Judas Priest's Living After Midnight video.

For some reason, it has also, locked up once during compilations. I don't know why. My system is overclocked, but it has been running at that overclock, since I bought my X2 3800+. I don't know why it would start conking out now.

Has anyone experienced the above issues? Could any of this be related to Reiser4? I assume not though and Reiser4 is fast. I can even feel it!

r00t440 · Post by **r00t440** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:07 am

For AMD64 users, the following cflag(s) may break a few packages:

Code: Select all

CFLAGS="-Os -march=${YOURARCH} -frename-registers -fweb -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -funit-at-a-time -freorder-blocks -fno-ident -freorder-blocks-and-partition -fgcse-sm -fgcse-las -fgcse-after-reload -fmerge-all-constants -combine"
CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -fvisibility-inlines-hidden"

Change it to:

Code: Select all

CFLAGS="-Os -march=${YOURARCH} -frename-registers -fweb -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -funit-at-a-time -freorder-blocks -fno-ident -fgcse-sm -fgcse-las -fgcse-after-reload -fmerge-all-constants -combine"
CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"

The problematic flags:

Code: Select all

CFLAGS="-freorder-blocks-and-partition"
CXXFLAGS="-fvisibility-inlines-hidden"

Post a reply if this helped you...

vipernicus · Post by **vipernicus** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:00 am

r00t440 wrote:For AMD64 users, the following cflag(s) may break a few packages:

Code: Select all

CFLAGS="-Os -march=${YOURARCH} -frename-registers -fweb -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -funit-at-a-time -freorder-blocks -fno-ident -freorder-blocks-and-partition -fgcse-sm -fgcse-las -fgcse-after-reload -fmerge-all-constants -combine"
CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -fvisibility-inlines-hidden"

Change it to:

Code: Select all

CFLAGS="-Os -march=${YOURARCH} -frename-registers -fweb -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -funit-at-a-time -freorder-blocks -fno-ident -fgcse-sm -fgcse-las -fgcse-after-reload -fmerge-all-constants -combine"
CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"

The problematic flags:

Code: Select all

CFLAGS="-freorder-blocks-and-partition"
CXXFLAGS="-fvisibility-inlines-hidden"

Post a reply if this helped you...

What broke with "-freorder-blocks-and-partition"?

RaZoR1394 · Post by **RaZoR1394** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:00 pm

r00t440 wrote:For AMD64 users, the following cflag(s) may break a few packages:

Code: Select all

CFLAGS="-Os -march=${YOURARCH} -frename-registers -fweb -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -funit-at-a-time -freorder-blocks -fno-ident -freorder-blocks-and-partition -fgcse-sm -fgcse-las -fgcse-after-reload -fmerge-all-constants -combine"
CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -fvisibility-inlines-hidden"

Change it to:

Code: Select all

CFLAGS="-Os -march=${YOURARCH} -frename-registers -fweb -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -funit-at-a-time -freorder-blocks -fno-ident -fgcse-sm -fgcse-las -fgcse-after-reload -fmerge-all-constants -combine"
CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"

The problematic flags:

Code: Select all

CFLAGS="-freorder-blocks-and-partition"
CXXFLAGS="-fvisibility-inlines-hidden"

Post a reply if this helped you...

The only breakages I have gotten are related to -fPIC (...recompile with -fPIC...). Are you referring to those?

RaZoR1394 · Post by **RaZoR1394** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:15 pm

Seems it works. Thanks.

r00t440 · Post by **r00t440** » Wed Jan 10, 2007 12:36 pm

RaZoR1394 wrote:The only breakages I have gotten are related to -fPIC (...recompile with -fPIC...). Are you referring to those?

Yup, i've experienced breakages with -fPIC stuff, removing the flags i posted above fixed it.

vipernicus wrote:What broke with "-freorder-blocks-and-partition"?

As far as I can remember, I think it was dev-libs/gmp that fails with the above cflag.

eug2k · Post by **eug2k** » Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:17 am

I just wanted to say I got an error emerging glibc that it couldn't download glibc-2.5-patches-1.0.tar.bz2 so I just did this

Code: Select all

cd /usr/portage/distfiles
wget http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/dist/glibc-2.5-patches-1.0.tar.bz2

I don't know if this is the same problem _BLooDy_ was having earlier because his link doesn't work anymore. Seems like it was something more complicated. In any case if somebody runs into this thats how you can fix it. Also I'm posting this to see if this is okay to do, because it started to compile so I think its fine?

MrVahn · Post by **MrVahn** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 3:14 am

This may seem stupid but here goes..

I booted using my Conrad CD. It had detected everything, especially internet. But the internet connection does not stay for long. After a minute it will disappear. All I can do is open up a page with links, after which I cannot do anymore. I reboot and pinged google. Success. Then I ran links but to no avail. It seems like a one time internet access

I reboot again, went out to drink some water, and when I came back, internet is not working. I concluded that there is a timeout with the connection. I checked resolv.conf and it looks fine. I pinged the other pc on my home network and it worked. I ran net-setup eth0 n times but nothing seems to happen. I thinks this has something to do with dns. I'll try to ping a site using its IP and see if it works. For the meantime, can you suggest possible solutions for my problem? I can't go on the installation without the net.

BTW I am a DSL user, dhcp enabled router/modem.

whitesouls · Post by **whitesouls** » Mon Feb 19, 2007 4:16 am

is there any updates on Conrad?

zxy · Post by **zxy** » Mon Feb 19, 2007 9:30 pm

AFAIK no.

no-sources stopped when conrad stopped maintaining them (there were some info others wil contiune but i didn't see no new versions).

I guess the conrad install guide goes the similar way.

cheater1034 · Post by **cheater1034** » Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:57 am

zxy wrote:AFAIK no.

no-sources stopped when conrad stopped maintaining them (there were some info others wil contiune but i didn't see no new versions).

I guess the conrad install guide goes the similar way.

I had some family matters to take care of, that's why I havent been in the running recently for awhile.

Everything is ok now, and I have assembled a parade of patches into my next -no tree (.20-no1)

zxy · Post by **zxy** » Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:09 am

cheater1034 wrote:
zxy wrote:AFAIK no.

no-sources stopped when conrad stopped maintaining them (there were some info others wil contiune but i didn't see no new versions).

I guess the conrad install guide goes the similar way.
I had some family matters to take care of, that's why I havent been in the running recently for awhile.

Everything is ok now, and I have assembled a parade of patches into my next -no tree (.20-no1)

cheater1034 , it's very nice to hear that everything is ok now.

/me is happy to see you back...

nbvcxz · Post by **nbvcxz** » Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:38 pm

it's nice to hear that everything is ok now; a lot of people are waiting for next no-sources

sirdilznik · Post by **sirdilznik** » Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:50 pm

Hearing that another no-sources is coming is great news! However I'm far happier to hear that you got your personal issues resolved.

RaZoR1394 · Post by **RaZoR1394** » Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:10 pm

Nice to hear that you are back Cheater

. I hope your family is ok. Family troubles suck :/.

Atlas95 · Post by **Atlas95** » Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:01 pm

When is the next version on this beautifull doc??

Thanks cheater and cie

Non_E · Post by **Non_E** » Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:53 pm

Glad too hear everything is fine now. FYI I am still using 2.6.18-no2

It is rock solid.

codereverser · Post by **codereverser** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:21 am

wow . nice to see you back. hope everything worked out well in family.

me too still stuck with Conrad 3.1.0 and 2.6.18-no2 since you left

whitesouls · Post by **whitesouls** » Thu Feb 22, 2007 3:24 am

codereverser wrote:wow . nice to see you back. hope everything worked out well in family.

me too still stuck with Conrad 3.1.0 and 2.6.18-no2 since you left

Same over here..Waitting for the next Conrad to be released..

EndrjuX · Post by **EndrjuX** » Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:30 am

Hi!

Can I get somehow "package.mask" file from previous version of Conrad Guide?
I want to mask whole Xorg 7.1 (like in that file...)

_BLooDy_ · Post by **_BLooDy_** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 8:03 pm

Non_E wrote:Glad too hear everything is fine now. FYI I am still using 2.6.18-no2 It is rock solid.

exactly the same here

vipernicus · Post by **vipernicus** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 8:45 pm

EndrjuX wrote:Hi!

Can I get somehow "package.mask" file from previous version of Conrad Guide?
I want to mask whole Xorg 7.1 (like in that file...)

what's wrong with 7.1?

EndrjuX · Post by **EndrjuX** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 8:56 pm

I wrote something about two hundreds posts

about my problems with crashing ogl and crashing nvidia... service checked my hardware and they said "it's all ok" so I want to downgrade xorg to 7.0 and check if it helps

Elv13 · Post by **Elv13** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:11 pm

I understand now why reiser4 is not in kernel... The filesystem broke after 3 week!!!
When i boot i see an error like libuuid.so is too short.

When i try to mount reiser4 in a live-cd (linspire (live-cd with reiser4 are rare)

Code: Select all

linspirelive:~# mount /dev/hda4 /mnt/hda4 -t reiser4
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda4,
       missing codepage, or too many mounted file systems

when i try to use fsck

Code: Select all

linspirelive:~# fsck /dev/hda4  --build-fs
fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004)
*******************************************************************
This is an EXPERIMENTAL version of fsck.reiser4. Read README first.
*******************************************************************

Fscking the /dev/hda4 block device.
Will check the consistency of the Reiser4 SuperBlock.
Will check the consistency of the Reiser4 FileSystem.
Continue?
(Yes/No): yes
***** fsck.reiser4 started at Wed Feb 28 17:02:35 2007
Reiser4 fs was detected on /dev/hda4.
Master super block (16):
magic:          ReIsEr4
blksize:        4096
format:         0x0 (format40)
uuid:           43991f80-73d7-4832-9bc7-762a8fa7bb31
label:          <none>

Format super block (17):
plugin:         format40
description:    Disk-format for reiser4.
magic:          ReIsEr40FoRmAt
flushes:        0
mkfs id:        0x586f2e27
blocks:         8389946
free blocks:    2666843
root block:     3666008
tail policy:    0x2 (smart)
next oid:       0x4d9c27
file count:     688792
tree height:    5
key policy:     LARGE


CHECKING STORAGE TREE
FSCK: Node (3666005), item (0), [29:1(SD):0:2a:0]: does not look like a valid SD
plugin set extention: wrong pset member count detected (12).
FSCK: Node (3666005), item (0), [29:1(SD):0:2a:0]: does not look like a valid
stat data.
FSCK: Node (3666005), item (0), [29:1(SD):0:2a:0]: broken item found.
FSCK: Node (3666005): the node is broken. Pointed from the node (3666004), item
(0), unit (0). The whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Level (1) of the node (776841) doesn't match the expected one (2). The
whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Node (697182): The last key [173c27:4(FB):16b636865636b72:4ba377:fbd] in
the node is greater then the right delimiting key
[116cb:4(FB):16c696275756964:2bd43a:fbe].
FSCK: Node (455873), item (67), unit (0): Points to the node [697182] with wrong
delimiting keys. The whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Node (862192): The last key [f147c:4(FB):7374706f4d7832:f16d9:24af] in the
node is greater then the right delimiting key
[1171e:4(FB):6174615f69642e:3a4da3:1259].
FSCK: Node (478820), item (1), unit (0): Points to the node [862192] with wrong
delimiting keys. The whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Node (862193): failed to open the node pointed by the node (478820), item
(2), unit (0) on the level (2). The whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Node (862194): failed to open the node pointed by the node (478820), item
(3), unit (0) on the level (2). The whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Node (499970), items (0) and (1): Wrong order of keys.
FSCK: Node (499970): the node is broken. Pointed from the node (478820), item
(21), unit (0). The whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Node (874661): The last key [1181a:1(SD):178736c7470726f:43f187:0] in the
node is greater then the right delimiting key
[1171e:4(FB):1756465765f7275:3a4dad:1556].
FSCK: Node (478820), item (26), unit (0): Points to the node [874661] with wrong
delimiting keys. The whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Level (3) of the node (1148812) doesn't match the expected one (1). The
whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Node (1148814): The last key [1181a:4(FB):173616e64626f78:155b11:2f39] in
the node is greater then the right delimiting key [1171f:0(NAME):0:0:0].
FSCK: Node (478820), item (28), unit (0): Points to the node [1148814] with
wrong delimiting keys. The whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Node (3639044), item (28), unit (0): Points to the block (477943) which is
in the tree already. The whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Node (3639044), item (29), unit (0): Points to the block (477970) which is
in the tree already. The whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Node (3639044), item (30), unit (0): Points to the block (478469) which is
in the tree already. The whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Node (3639044), item (31), unit (0): Points to the block (478470) which is
in the tree already. The whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Node (478933): failed to open the node pointed by the node (3639044), item
(32), unit (0) on the level (2). The whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Node (850418): failed to open the node pointed by the node (1742457), item
(29), unit (0) on the level (2). The whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Node (854782): failed to open the node pointed by the node (1742457), item
(30), unit (0) on the level (2). The whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Node (854823): failed to open the node pointed by the node (1742457), item
(31), unit (0) on the level (2). The whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Node (1212104), items (40) and (41): Wrong order of keys.
FSCK: Node (1212104): the node is broken. Pointed from the node (386439), item (25), unit (0). The
whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Node (2438745): The first key [1009e:1(SD):316a7968626d70:394f32:0] is not equal to the left
delimiting key [11fe36:4(FB):64657074726565:1202ad:2f3a].
FSCK: Node (803704), item (39), unit (0): Points to the node [2438745] with wrong delimiting keys.
The whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Node (854824): The last key [184650:0(NAME):6b6d61696c2e61:6e74697669727573:7263000000000000]
in the node is greater then the right delimiting key [173c27:4(FB):16c6e7573657274:4ba3ea:1f7c].
FSCK: Node (2432797), item (9), unit (0): Points to the node [854824] with wrong delimiting keys.
The whole subtree is skipped.
FSCK: Level (3) of the node (3651602) doesn't match the expected one (1). The whole subtree is
skipped.
        Read nodes 412612
        Nodes left in the tree 412600
                Leaves of them 405245, Twigs of them 7229
        Broken of them 3
                Leaves of them 2, Twigs of them 1
        Nodes with wrong delimiting keys 6
                Leaves of them 6, Twigs of them 0
        Invalid node pointers 13
        Time interval: Wed Feb 28 17:02:37 2007 - Wed Feb 28 17:07:47 2007
CHECKING EXTENT REGIONS.
FSCK: Node (414183), item (7), unit (1), [f147c:4(FB):73747178665243:f16db:0]: points to the
already used blocks,  region [1148815..1148815].
FSCK: Node (477509), item (4), unit (0), [f147c:4(FB):73747938795163:f16d8:0]: points to the
already used blocks,  region [1150348..1150348].
FSCK: Node (477509), item (4), unit (1), [f147c:4(FB):73747938795163:f16d8:0]: points to the
already used blocks,  region [1151324..1151324].
FSCK: Node (803704), item (35), unit (7), [11fe36:4(FB):64657063616368:1202ac:0]: points to the
already used blocks,  region [1607900..1607900].
FSCK: Node (2485717), item (36), unit (3), [12140:4(FB):16c69625872616e:234044:0]: points to the
already used blocks,  region [776800..776800].
FSCK: Node (3666114), item (4), unit (2), [10004:4(FB):646d6573670000:1201ea:0]: points to the
already used blocks,  region [854123..854123].
        Read twigs 7229
        Invaid extent pointers 6
        Time interval: Wed Feb 28 17:07:47 2007 - Wed Feb 28 17:08:01 2007
Warn : Fatal corruptions were found. Semantic pass is skipped.
***** fsck.reiser4 finished at Wed Feb 28 17:08:01 2007
Closing fs...done

22 fatal corruptions were detected in FileSystem. Run with --build-fs option to fix them.

Any chance to repair the FS in this condition?

RobertDavid · Post by **RobertDavid** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:27 pm

How much is your partition filled?? Because Reiser4 problem while beeing filled to 100% then corruptions like that occures. Or this is only when I had error with reiser4, so you had to do something realy wrong to your system to get this.. did you tryed to mount that after building-fs? just to backup and reformat??

Second: keep backup while reiser4ing, my crasshed are realy rare but not impossible, and dont use reiser4 for all stuff like documents etc (also reiser4 isnt suitable for big file partitions like video, music, etc) So I use reiser4 on /var /usr/src / and ext3 on /usr/lib and data-documents partitions

On the other side, reiser4 is pretty stable, but sometimes as a little child that needs more care and caution than other filesystems.

|~| CONRAD |~| Stage 1 on 72 "Eins/Uno/One"

Cheater1034

Re: Cheater1034