Evolution Mission Install Guide 4.0

Message

bigbob73 · Post by **bigbob73** » Sat Nov 18, 2006 1:35 pm

vipernicus wrote:
EAD wrote:When will you update this guide? beside is GCC 4.2 is good now?
and what about a new emission kernel ??
He just updated it Oct 22, and I released a kernel on Oct 05. How often do you expect new releases of everything? Want some methadone?

Hell, this is November now! what is this, debian?

vipernicus · Post by **vipernicus** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 9:28 am

bigbob73 wrote:
vipernicus wrote:
EAD wrote:When will you update this guide? beside is GCC 4.2 is good now?
and what about a new emission kernel ??
He just updated it Oct 22, and I released a kernel on Oct 05. How often do you expect new releases of everything? Want some methadone?
Hell, this is November now! what is this, debian?

Shhh, Nesl hasn't even gotten apt into his overlay yet.

johnnyboyro · Post by **johnnyboyro** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 10:15 am

vipernicus wrote:
marco007 wrote:Step 7.4
and error
standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:52: Error: unknown relocation (243)
{standard input}:101: Error: unknown relocation (243)
{standard input}:125: Error: unknown relocation (243)
{standard input}:134: Error: unknown relocation (243)
{standard input}:216: Error: unknown relocation (243)
make[4]: *** [dis-buf.lo] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.17.50.0.6/work/build/opcodes'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.17.50.0.6/work/build/opcodes'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.17.50.0.6/work/build/opcodes'
make[1]: *** [all-opcodes] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.17.50.0.6/work/build'
make: *** [all] Error 2

!!! ERROR: sys-devel/binutils-2.17.50.0.6 failed.
Call stack:
ebuild.sh, line 1568: Called dyn_compile
ebuild.sh, line 937: Called src_compile
ebuild.sh, line 1261: Called toolchain-binutils_src_compile
toolchain-binutils.eclass, line 197: Called die

!!! emake failed
Heh, oddly enough, I'm getting this same exact error... Maybe it was the upgrade to gcc-4.1.1-r2? I thought it was just me, because I was using gcc-4.1.1-hardened...

Jupiter1TX, you see that I'm not the only one having this problem ... By the way: I was not changing the C[XX]FLAGS, LDFLAGS, etc; however, I did not take that "Skip to step. 7.x" as mandatory.
I have an AMD64, and I'm using the athlon-xp profile (32 bit) and I hit this even before recompiling the new gcc (only glibc and portage went rebuild before this), but I don't really remember what is the version installed in the stage3 (emission one) now ...
[edit]Same on a laptop using the pentium-m stage3.[/edit]

n0rbi666 · Post by **n0rbi666** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:24 pm

vipernicus wrote:
marco007 wrote:Step 7.4
and error
standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:52: Error: unknown relocation (243)
{standard input}:101: Error: unknown relocation (243)
{standard input}:125: Error: unknown relocation (243)
{standard input}:134: Error: unknown relocation (243)
{standard input}:216: Error: unknown relocation (243)
make[4]: *** [dis-buf.lo] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.17.50.0.6/work/build/opcodes'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.17.50.0.6/work/build/opcodes'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.17.50.0.6/work/build/opcodes'
make[1]: *** [all-opcodes] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.17.50.0.6/work/build'
make: *** [all] Error 2

!!! ERROR: sys-devel/binutils-2.17.50.0.6 failed.
Call stack:
ebuild.sh, line 1568: Called dyn_compile
ebuild.sh, line 937: Called src_compile
ebuild.sh, line 1261: Called toolchain-binutils_src_compile
toolchain-binutils.eclass, line 197: Called die

!!! emake failed
Heh, oddly enough, I'm getting this same exact error... Maybe it was the upgrade to gcc-4.1.1-r2? I thought it was just me, because I was using gcc-4.1.1-hardened...

Hum, getting same error here, when doing emerge -e system ... I've changed CFLAGS to -O2 -march -pip -fomit-frame-pointer, and nothing more ... strange, did someone solved it ?

vipernicus · Post by **vipernicus** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:27 pm

n0rbi666 wrote:
vipernicus wrote:
marco007 wrote:Step 7.4
and error
standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:52: Error: unknown relocation (243)
{standard input}:101: Error: unknown relocation (243)
{standard input}:125: Error: unknown relocation (243)
{standard input}:134: Error: unknown relocation (243)
{standard input}:216: Error: unknown relocation (243)
make[4]: *** [dis-buf.lo] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.17.50.0.6/work/build/opcodes'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.17.50.0.6/work/build/opcodes'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.17.50.0.6/work/build/opcodes'
make[1]: *** [all-opcodes] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.17.50.0.6/work/build'
make: *** [all] Error 2

!!! ERROR: sys-devel/binutils-2.17.50.0.6 failed.
Call stack:
ebuild.sh, line 1568: Called dyn_compile
ebuild.sh, line 937: Called src_compile
ebuild.sh, line 1261: Called toolchain-binutils_src_compile
toolchain-binutils.eclass, line 197: Called die

!!! emake failed
Heh, oddly enough, I'm getting this same exact error... Maybe it was the upgrade to gcc-4.1.1-r2? I thought it was just me, because I was using gcc-4.1.1-hardened...
Hum, getting same error here, when doing emerge -e system ... I've changed CFLAGS to -O2 -march -pip -fomit-frame-pointer, and nothing more ... strange, did someone solved it ?

What -march? So far two of us are 'athlon-xp'. Being that I'm not on the troubled machine, would someone want to try something?

Code: Select all

# nano -w /usr/portage/sys-devel/binutils/binutils-2.17.50.0.6.ebuild 
PATCHVER="1.1" to PATCHVER="1.0" (Only difference is Cell support was added, but it affects the same area as the build error)
# ebuild /usr/portage/sys-devel/binutils/binutils-2.17.50.0.6.ebuild digest
# emerge -1 binutils

n0rbi666 · Post by **n0rbi666** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 5:00 pm

What -march?

athlon-xp

I'm trying downgrading patchver, as you suggested

--add--
Works !

vipernicus · Post by **vipernicus** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:54 pm

n0rbi666 wrote:
What -march?
athlon-xp I'm trying downgrading patchver, as you suggested
--add--
Works !

Could I have your emerge --info to file the bug report, or would you like to?

Bug report is here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155881

n0rbi666 · Post by **n0rbi666** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:07 pm

Code: Select all

Portage 2.1.2_rc2-r1 (default-linux/x86/2006.1, gcc-4.1.1, glibc-2.5-r3, 2.6.18-no2 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.18-no2 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP
Gentoo Base System version 1.12.6
Last Sync: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:00:01 +0000
dev-java/java-config: 1.3.7, 2.0.30
dev-lang/python:     2.4.4
dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r5
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.18.1
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.61
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2, 1.10
sys-devel/binutils:  2.17.50.0.6
sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.3.14
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.22
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.17-r1
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/3.5/env /usr/kde/3.5/share/config /usr/kde/3.5/shutdown /usr/share/X11/xkb /usr/share/config"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/env.d /etc/env.d/java/ /etc/gconf /etc/java-config/vms/ /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/splash /etc/terminfo"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -fvisibility-inlines-hidden"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoconfig distlocks metadata-transfer parallel-fetch sandbox sfperms strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://distfiles.gentoo.org http://gentoo.zie.pg.gda.pl http://mirror.gentoo.no ftp://ftp.wh2.tu-dresden.de/pub/mirrors/gentoo"
LANG="pl_PL"
LC_ALL="pl_PL.UTF-8"
LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=both"
LINGUAS="pl"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --delete-after --stats --timeout=180 --exclude=/distfiles --exclude=/local --exclude=/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage /usr/local/overlays/conrad"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 3dnow 3dnowext X aac aiglx alsa audiofile berkdb bitmap-fonts bzip2 cairo cli cracklib crypt dbus dlloader dri dvd dvdr dvdread elibc_glibc encode ffmpeg flac fortran gdbm gif gpm hal iconv imlib input_devices_evdev input_devices_keyboard input_devices_mouse ipv6 isdnlog java jpeg jpeg2k kde kdeenablefinal kdehiddenvisibility kdexdeltas kernel_linux lame libg++ linguas_pl lirc lirc_devices_devinput mad mmx mmxext motif moznopango mp3 mpeg musepack ncurses nls nptl nptlonly ogg openal opengl pam pcre perl pic png ppds pppd python qt3 qt4 quicktime readline reflection sdl session slang spell spl sse ssl tcpd threads tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev unicode userland_GNU userlocales v4l v4l2 video_cards_ati video_cards_radeon vorbis xcomposite xine xinerama xml xorg xv zlib"
Unset:  CTARGET, EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, INSTALL_MASK, PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS

johnnyboyro · Post by **johnnyboyro** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 3:10 pm

-Wl,--as-needed in LDFLAGS breaks imlib

nesl247 · Post by **nesl247** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 4:12 pm

johnnyboyro wrote:-Wl,--as-needed in LDFLAGS breaks imlib

You are using the ebuild in the overlay correct? When emerging, does it say patching with an as-needed patch?

johnnyboyro · Post by **johnnyboyro** » Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:21 am

nesl247 wrote:
johnnyboyro wrote:-Wl,--as-needed in LDFLAGS breaks imlib
You are using the ebuild in the overlay correct? When emerging, does it say patching with an as-needed patch?

Yes, I am using the correct ebuild from the overlay.
The problem is at configure, when testing to see if it can build a gmodularized imlib. This test fails with some unresolved symbold from /usr/lib/gmodule.so which is part of glib-1.2.10-r5.
Because of this, the gdk_imlib does not link against glib stuff (gdk/gtk for example) + all those imlib_gif, imlib_jpeg, etc.
Then, when compiling ./utils, it fails at some point because it needs for linking a gdk_imlib that have symbols from imlib_gif, tiff, jpeg, etc ...
Now, why it fails that test?... I do not know yet

... Maybe because the gmodule.so does not explicitelly use some symbols from gdk/gtk, thus not having a explicit dependency to those libs ...
Or maybe from other reasons ... I don't really have more time to look forward on this problem, not at this moment at least

, so ... I just disabled that flag from LDFLAGS and I'm happy for the moment.
And yes, it is applying correctly the as-needed patch ...

johnnyboyro · Post by **johnnyboyro** » Sun Dec 03, 2006 12:15 pm

"risky" use flag for qt-3.3.6 breaks compilation of kde-base/kompare.
It seems that, using -fvisibility-hidden stuff leads to QSplitter & friends not being exported from libqt ...

zxy · Post by **zxy** » Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:24 pm

Hi,

With which version of glibc are the stage3 files compiled?

Jesterhead · Post by **Jesterhead** » Tue Jan 16, 2007 5:15 pm