I would love to see media-plugins/xmms-finespectrum ported to audacious. Homepage: http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/finespectrum/nenolod wrote:Additionally, if you want a general/vis/output/effect plugin ported, please say so. We may be able to do it.
- nenolod
(BTW: I had some more questions regarding audacious in the other post).I like xmms-finespectrum very much. URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/finespectrum/
It seems unmaintained, but it works nice even under Gentoo Hardened, there is an ebuild in Gentoo Portage (stable before masking due to the masking of xmms) and it is GPL'ed. Almost all other visualisation plugins are not suitable for a hardened desktop setup (e.g. needing an executable stack, etc.) or are consuming too many ressources (or are boring me over the time).
I'm not a coder and I know nothing about the differences between the plugin interfaces of audacious and xmms, but I think this nice little plugin is easy to port for an experienced programmer. What can I say more to advertise the porting of Fine Spectrum Analyzer Plugin? Pleeeeeease...
Is it possible to split the plugins to different ebuilds (as with media-plugins/xmms-*) so that everyone could install *only* the plugins he/she likes to have installed?[..] and included the next release of audacious-plugins (1.2.3).
audacious-plugins uses USE flags to select which plugins to install.kadeux wrote:I would love to see media-plugins/xmms-finespectrum ported to audacious. Homepage: http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/finespectrum/nenolod wrote:Additionally, if you want a general/vis/output/effect plugin ported, please say so. We may be able to do it.
- nenolod
I've mentioned it already in another thread here before I see this topic.(BTW: I had some more questions regarding audacious in the other post).I like xmms-finespectrum very much. URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/finespectrum/
It seems unmaintained, but it works nice even under Gentoo Hardened, there is an ebuild in Gentoo Portage (stable before masking due to the masking of xmms) and it is GPL'ed. Almost all other visualisation plugins are not suitable for a hardened desktop setup (e.g. needing an executable stack, etc.) or are consuming too many ressources (or are boring me over the time).
I'm not a coder and I know nothing about the differences between the plugin interfaces of audacious and xmms, but I think this nice little plugin is easy to port for an experienced programmer. What can I say more to advertise the porting of Fine Spectrum Analyzer Plugin? Pleeeeeease...
Is it possible to split the plugins to different ebuilds (as with media-plugins/xmms-*) so that everyone could install *only* the plugins he/she likes to have installed?[..] and included the next release of audacious-plugins (1.2.3).
emerge audacious-itouchwizard69 wrote:I would be interested in seeing an itouch plugin for the volume control and next track there seems to be one here
http://nedudu.hu/static.php?page=audacious
but i can't get it to compile otherwise i really enjoy using audacious the sound quality seems to be better than XMMS.
emerge audacious-itouch
- nenolod
Code: Select all
simon@gentoo ~/Desktop $ emerge audacious-itouch -av
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "audacious-itouch".

There is a version of audacious-mplayer on the audacious boards -bob1977 wrote:Hi all,
xmms has 2 mplayer input plugins that I really need to switch to audacious. There was a first port of one of them (audacious-mplayer) but it doesn't work anymore probably due to a change in API and the site where I got it isn't accessible anymore. It would be great if you could adapt it or make another as you want.
If you don't have this plugin, I can upload it with the ebuild too.
Thanks in advance

The alarm plugin can be obtained here -nukem996 wrote:My biggest issue with it right now is the lack of the alarm plugin and that after I select a song from the open dialog it does not play automatically. This happens even when no song is being played. Its really starting to bug me :\

Please what are doing that rest of us dont to get that plugin to play internet streamsnenolod wrote:Included by default.Morpheouss wrote:what about aac support?
The AAC plugin will never support streams.ryszardzonk wrote:Please what are doing that rest of us dont to get that plugin to play internet streamsnenolod wrote:Included by default.Morpheouss wrote:what about aac support?
That's odd. I would suggest nuking your audacious configuration, as it shouldn't be doing that.nukem996 wrote:My biggest issue with it right now is the lack of the alarm plugin and that after I select a song from the open dialog it does not play automatically. This happens even when no song is being played. Its really starting to bug me :\

Sorry to hear this. Isn't it possible to steal some code from VLC and include it in Audacious? I am saying it as a user not a programmer, but it seems to me that if it is possible to write the code capable of stealing elections using Diebold voting machines that noone would notice http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEzY2tnwExs (just to prove my point) than it is even more possible to port opensource program capabilities to onother program. I kindly ask for reconsidering writitng it and I am sure others would welcome it as well.nenolod wrote:The AAC plugin will never support streams.ryszardzonk wrote:Please what are doing that rest of us dont to get that plugin to play internet streamsnenolod wrote:Included by default.Morpheouss wrote:what about aac support?
There's many reasons for this, the main one being that Shoutcast has a tendency to lie and say the stream is MP3 when it isn't. Audacious 1.x's design doesn't handle that well.
- nenolod
