Tweaked glibc 2.4 + 2.5 + snapshot ebuilds

Message

nxsty · Post by **nxsty** » Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:21 am

The gcc ebuild is broken.

Don´t use it. I added some visibility fixes from the HEAD branch (4.2) but they actually made things worse. In the firefox case the configure script detect that #pragma visibility works, when it actually don´t, and try to compile with it instead of falling back to using -fvisibility=.

immudium · Post by **immudium** » Fri Jul 28, 2006 4:00 pm

nxsty wrote:The gcc ebuild is broken. Don´t use it. I added some visibility fixes from the HEAD branch (4.2) but they actually made things worse. In the firefox case the configure script detect that #pragma visibility works, when it actually don´t, and try to compile with it instead of falling back to using -fvisibility=.

Ah, ok, thanks for the heads up. I'll revert to gentoo's gcc ebuild for now.

SteveYin · Post by **SteveYin** » Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:45 am

sorry to mention, I can not download from http://snigel.no-ip.com, so, I can not download glibc-2.4-extra_patches-2.7.tar.bz2

enderandrew · Post by **enderandrew** » Tue Aug 01, 2006 1:01 pm

I have a mirror for his files, but it looks like he hasn't updated there. I think I may have the file in my distfiles directory, and if so, I will upload it within the hour.

SteveYin · Post by **SteveYin** » Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:32 pm

so, nxsty, why don't you put these extra patches in overlay, I also checked some previous version like 2.5/2.6, the extra-patches are only 5-7K, I hope you can put these patches in overlay, becase I know there are some people can not connect to http://snigel.no-ip.com

nxsty · Post by **nxsty** » Sat Aug 05, 2006 12:30 pm

I added a new CVS snapshot (a lot of bugfixes since last one).

I have considered moving the patches to the overlay. But it's much easier to have a patch tarball rather than many separate epatch lines in the different ebuilds. There are 5 patches atm.

SteveYin · Post by **SteveYin** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 1:40 am

But the problem is some ppl can not connect to http://snigel.no-ip.com, so, they I can not using this greate patch. it's a big pitty!!

Xake · Post by **Xake** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 8:40 am

nxsty wrote:I added a new CVS snapshot (a lot of bugfixes since last one).

Faulty digest/manifest here for the svn....

nxsty · Post by **nxsty** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 8:53 am

SteveYin wrote:But the problem is some ppl can not connect to http://snigel.no-ip.com, so, they I can not using this greate patch. it's a big pitty!!

I´ve synced the mirrors now. You can get the files from:

http://www.kriga.net/dl/glibc/
http://www.enderandrew.com/nxsty/

nxsty · Post by **nxsty** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 8:54 am

Xake wrote:
nxsty wrote:I added a new CVS snapshot (a lot of bugfixes since last one).
Faulty digest/manifest here for the svn....

I´ll look into that!

SteveYin · Post by **SteveYin** » Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:37 pm

Thanks for the mirror update

abhay · Post by **abhay** » Thu Aug 10, 2006 12:46 pm

I have upgraded linux-headers today and tried to recompile glibc-2.4-r3 with the latest ebuild but it fails

Here is the output

Code: Select all

i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc enbl-secure.c -c -std=gnu99 -DNDEBUG=1 -O2 -Wall -Winline -Wwrite-strings -fmerge-all-constants -fno-ident -march=prescott -mtune=prescott -pipe -Wstrict-prototypes -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2     -I../include -I/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.4-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/elf -I/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.4-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl -I../sysdeps/i386/elf -I../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/i686 -I../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386 -I../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I../nptl/sysdeps/pthread -I../sysdeps/pthread -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux -I../sysdeps/gnu -I../sysdeps/unix/common -I../sysdeps/unix/mman -I../sysdeps/unix/inet -I../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/i386 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/i386 -I../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../sysdeps/unix/i386 -I../ports/sysdeps/unix -I../nptl/sysdeps/unix -I../sysdeps/unix -I../sysdeps/posix -I../sysdeps/i386/i686/fpu -I../nptl/sysdeps/i386/i686 -I../sysdeps/i386/i686 -I../sysdeps/i386/i486 -I../nptl/sysdeps/i386/i486 -I../sysdeps/i386/fpu -I../nptl/sysdeps/i386 -I../sysdeps/i386 -I../sysdeps/wordsize-32 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-96 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32 -I../sysdeps/ieee754 -I../sysdeps/generic/elf -I../sysdeps/generic -I../ports -I../nptl  -I.. -I../libio -I. -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/include -isystem /usr/include -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -include ../include/libc-symbols.h       -o /var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.4-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/elf/enbl-secure.o -MD -MP -MF /var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.4-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/elf/enbl-secure.o.dt -MT /var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.4-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/elf/enbl-secure.o
dl-addr.c: In function '_dl_addr':
dl-addr.c:78: error: 'DT_GNU_HASH' undeclared (first use in this function)
dl-addr.c:78: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
dl-addr.c:78: error: for each function it appears in.)
dl-addr.c:85: error: 'struct link_map' has no member named 'l_gnu_buckets'
dl-addr.c:88: error: 'struct link_map' has no member named 'l_gnu_chain_zero'
make[2]: *** [/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.4-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/elf/dl-addr.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.4-r3/work/glibc-2.4/elf'
make[1]: *** [elf/subdir_lib] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.4-r3/work/glibc-2.4'
make: *** [all] Error 2

!!! ERROR: sys-libs/glibc-2.4-r3 failed.
Call stack:
  ebuild.sh, line 1543:   Called dyn_compile
  ebuild.sh, line 938:   Called src_compile
  glibc-2.4-r3.ebuild, line 1217:   Called toolchain-glibc_src_compile
  glibc-2.4-r3.ebuild, line 277:   Called die

!!! make for default failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant.

!!! This ebuild is from an overlay: '/usr/local/portage'

emerge --info

Code: Select all

# emerge --info
Portage 2.1.1_pre4-r3 (default-linux/x86/2006.0, gcc-4.1.1/vanilla, glibc-2.4-r3, 2.6.17-beyond3 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.17-beyond3 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.66GHz
Gentoo Base System version 1.12.4
ccache version 2.4 [enabled]
app-admin/eselect-compiler: 2.0.0_rc2-r1
dev-lang/python:     2.4.3-r1
dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r5
dev-util/ccache:     2.4-r2
dev-util/confcache:  [Not Present]
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.18.1
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.60
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.93
sys-devel/gcc-config: 2.0.0_rc1
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.22
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.17
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-O3 -mtune=prescott -march=prescott -fforce-addr -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -fomit-frame-pointer -ftracer -pipe -fno-ident"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/3.5/env /usr/kde/3.5/share/config /usr/kde/3.5/shutdown /usr/share/X11/xkb /usr/share/config"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/env.d /etc/env.d/java/ /etc/eselect/compiler /etc/gconf /etc/java-config/vms/ /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/splash /etc/terminfo"
CXXFLAGS="-O3 -mtune=prescott -march=prescott -fforce-addr -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -fomit-frame-pointer -ftracer -pipe -fno-ident -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fno-enforce-eh-specs"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoconfig ccache distlocks metadata-transfer parallel-fetch sandbox sfperms strict userpriv usersandbox"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://ftp.heanet.ie/mirrors/gentoo.org/ http://gentoo.osuosl.org/ http://distfiles.gentoo.org http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo"
LC_ALL="en_US.utf8"
LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -Wl,-Bdirect -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-hashvals -Wl,-zdynsort"
LINGUAS="en"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --delete-after --stats --timeout=3600 --exclude='/distfiles' --exclude='/local' --exclude='/packages'"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 X a52 aac acpi alsa apm arts artswrappersuid avi berkdb bitmap-fonts branding bzip2 cddb cdr cli crypt cups curl dbus dga dlloader dri dts dvd elibc_glibc emboss encode ffmpeg flac foomaticdb fortran gdbm gif glitz gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 hal i8x0 imlib input_devices_evdev input_devices_keyboard input_devices_mouse isdnlog jpeg jpeg2k kde kdeenablefinal kdehiddenvisibility kdenewldflags kernel_linux lcms libcaca libg++ libwww linguas_en logrotate lzo mad mikmod mmx mmx2 mmxext motif mp3 mpeg ncurses nls nojoystick nptl nptlonly ogg opengl oss pam pcre pdf pdflib perl pic png ppds pppd python qt qt3 quicktime readline real reflection sdl session smime sndfile spell spl sse sse2 sse3 ssl svg svga tcl tcpd theora tiff tk truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev usb userland_GNU vcd video_cards_i810 video_cards_vesa vidix vorbis win32codecs xcomposite xine xml xorg xv xvid xvmc zlib"
Unset:  CTARGET, EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, INSTALL_MASK, LANG, PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS

Since the headers are 2.6.17, do I need to compile 2.4-r4 instead of 2.4-r3 or is something else broken? Do I need to upgrade to binutils-2.17 (I am currently running 2.16.93) before I upgrade glibc?

Gergan Penkov · Post by **Gergan Penkov** » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:31 pm

'DT_GNU_HASH' undeclared (first use in this function)

You are installing glibc with the hash-style patches, before this you will need binutils, which support this, if you are sure you want this read the wiki, on how to make the transition.

abhay · Post by **abhay** » Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:39 pm

Gergan Penkov wrote:
'DT_GNU_HASH' undeclared (first use in this function)
You are installing glibc with the hash-style patches, before this you will need binutils, which support this, if you are sure you want this read the wiki, on how to make the transition.

...but I didn't set the use flag

Code: Select all

emerge -pv glibc

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild     U ] sys-libs/glibc-2.4-r4 [2.4-r3] USE="nls nomalloccheck nptl nptlonly -build -debug -glibc-omitfp -hardened -hashstyle -profile" 0 kB [1]

Total size of downloads: 0 kB
Portage overlays:
 [1] /usr/local/portage

P.S. Upgrading binutils and trying to install glibc-2.4-r4 doesn't help. It also fails at DT_GNU_HASH

Gergan Penkov · Post by **Gergan Penkov** » Thu Aug 10, 2006 2:01 pm

nxsty said in the hashstyle-thread that he has updated the hashstyle patches for the 2.4* builds to the ones in the snapshots, so this could be some sort of regression of this, as it tries to build the loader with the hashstyle patches and does not find the definitions.

abhay · Post by **abhay** » Thu Aug 10, 2006 2:43 pm

Ok..well then waiting for nxsty to do something about it

mbar · Post by **mbar** » Thu Aug 10, 2006 4:02 pm

Yeah, same here, I tried clean install today and it failed DT_GNU_HASH undeclared. It's a regression all right.

lnxz · Post by **lnxz** » Thu Aug 10, 2006 4:05 pm

Works for me.

abhay · Post by **abhay** » Thu Aug 10, 2006 4:20 pm

Can we have your emerge info?

immudium · Post by **immudium** » Thu Aug 10, 2006 5:05 pm

I'm a little confused on where to get the updated ebuilds from. Are they available in the toolchain overlay on the first page or only from the mirrors from a couple of posts back for now? Is there a possiblity of getting nxsty's changelog added as part of that overlay, if that's the "official" place to get it from so that it's more apparent what version we're pulling in from there?

lnxz · Post by **lnxz** » Thu Aug 10, 2006 5:09 pm

abhay wrote:Can we have your emerge info?

Sure.

Code: Select all

Portage 2.1.1_pre4-r4 (default-linux/x86/2006.0, gcc-4.1.1/vanilla, glibc-2.4-r4
, 2.6.17-ck1-r2 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.17-ck1-r2 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+
Gentoo Base System version 1.12.4
ccache version 2.4 [enabled]
app-admin/eselect-compiler: 2.0.0_rc2-r1
dev-lang/python:     2.4.3-r1
dev-python/pycrypto: 2.0.1-r5
dev-util/ccache:     2.4-r2
dev-util/confcache:  [Not Present]
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.18.1
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.60
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r2
sys-devel/binutils:  2.17.50.0.3
sys-devel/gcc-config: 2.0.0_rc1
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.22
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.17
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86"
CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-Wall -march=athlon-xp -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-ident -pipe"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CXXFLAGS="-Wall -march=athlon-xp -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-ident -pipe"
LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--hash-style=both"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"

Gergan Penkov · Post by **Gergan Penkov** » Thu Aug 10, 2006 5:51 pm

Well you are already using +hashstyle and they are trying to build -hashstyle, that's where their problem comes from.

mbar · Post by **mbar** » Fri Aug 11, 2006 7:34 am

I presume the ebuilds for glibc aren't fixed yet?

nxsty · Post by **nxsty** » Fri Aug 11, 2006 8:35 am

It should work now. It wasn't excluding a patch it should.

abhay · Post by **abhay** » Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:14 am

nxsty wrote:It should work now. It wasn't excluding a patch it should.

Yes, worked now