



Doesn't really matter. I've seen two during the last two days and a German 3rd Reich flag is pretty easy to recognise.frostschutz wrote:Symbols, where?
I know what the swastika once was. It was so immensely abused, though, that its other meanings have basically disappeared from common knowledge.frostschutz wrote:Most symbols used by the Nazi were not invented by them; you'll find swastika and stuff in temples all over the world, it had a very positive meaning before the Nazi decided to abuse it and turn it into something evil. So not all Nazi symbols you are seeing might not actually be Nazi symbols.
I totally agree. But uncritically using Nazi symbols is not the best idea either. We can't make neo-Nazis change their mind here but we could at least stop them from spreading their poison here.frostschutz wrote:My personal opinion on the matter is that you can't make people change their mind by silently shutting them out.

Amne, the quotation above is from a former judge of the US-American Supreme Court. :-)amne wrote:General policies about that are hard to achieve as there are multiple cultures and philosophies clashing at the forums, which makes it virtually impossible to figure out a solution. Censorship and not having freedom of speech (as defined in the US-American principle) may be as outragous for an American as a Swastika to a German.
The user that originally used the avatar has already removed it. The one that caused the other thread I linked to above still has it.amne wrote:We try to solve those problems as good as possible, so if you could provide us with information which avatar makes you feel uncomfortable we will try our best to help.

Please, let's stay on topic. This about Nazi stuff.6thpink wrote:1. There are people that have a similar concept of G. W. Bush and the USA, should we, to be fair for everyone, forbide to use anything USA related as an avatar?
Well, a black swastika in a white circle on a red background is pretty clearly a Nazi symbol, wouldn't you agree? A swastika alone would still annoy me but I wouldn't complain. A SS officer with full insignia is pretty clearly Nazi stuff, too.6thpink wrote:2. As someone suggested, svastica and most of the stuff, is not inherently nazi related stuff. Just symbols, that a mad man abused.
Basically, I agree. Read my original posting: If someone used something like that in an unambigous context to remind people of the horrors of that time, I'd applaud him. If it's just an avatar I wouldn't because that might simply show his/her sympathy for the Nazis. That's the difference, IMHO.6thpink wrote:3. The ones that likes to hide and forget the past, are advocated to repeat it. So, let the info be available, let the symbols remain, and let the names of Hitler, Gadaffi, Mussolini and Franco be shown. So, all the people can know about them, and the history will not -hopefully, be repeated.

Code: Select all
Show avatars in threads: Yes * NoBones McCracker wrote:On the other hand, regex is popular with the ladies.


Bones McCracker wrote:On the other hand, regex is popular with the ladies.


I've read it and disagree, I'm sorry.amne wrote:Philantrop, please re-read and understand what i wrote in my earlier post.
First of all, what I suggest is not censorship. Secondly, there's a major difference between allowing symbols of an organisation that murdered 30 to 35 million people and something simply offensive.amne wrote:As said, your concept of censorship is as offensive to some people as Nazi related avatars may be to you.
Why not simply outlaw the use of Nazi symbols and be done with it? Is the "friction" caused by such kind of symbols worth your and your fellow moderators'/admins' time?amne wrote:Part of living in a global society is to accept different points of view and philosophies, and as also said, we do our best to minimize friction that is likely to occur.
What exactly is the difference, it's pixels, the fact that their configuration doesn't please you can't be up to the rest of us to take care of.Philantrop wrote: First of all, what I suggest is not censorship. Secondly, there's a major difference between allowing symbols of an organisation that murdered 30 to 35 million people and something simply offensive.

I'm quite certain some Americans will strongly disagree about it. So what is it then?Philantrop wrote: First of all, what I suggest is not censorship.
If we outlaw them, we should as well outlaw lots of other symbols, Neddy already mentioned a few before. Basically everything is offensive to someone in some culture. So we either need to outlaw everything or nothing.Philantrop wrote:Secondly, there's a major difference between allowing symbols of an organisation that murdered 30 to 35 million people and something simply offensive.
[..]
Why not simply outlaw the use of Nazi symbols and be done with it?
If we outlawed them by the forum rules, we would be spending our time explaining to Americans why we don't allow freedom of speech. If we don't we spend our time explaing to you why we don't. So it's a lose/lose scenario anyway.Philantrop wrote:Is the "friction" caused by such kind of symbols worth your and your fellow moderators'/admins' time?
If you want my personal opinion: No i do not want it to be spread here. I don't want to have intolerant and ignorant points of view spread in these forums as well - this happens in quite some threads in OTW. However simply applying censorship is not what the Gentoo forums consider the solution to this problem.Philantrop wrote:I cannot believe either of us wants the stuff to be spread here.
We'd also need to make a rule not to use everything else that offends someone else. In the long run we'd be ending turning off avatars anyway.Philantrop wrote:So why is it so difficult to just make it a rule not to use it?
Maybe you should invest your time to convince German politicians that their laws concerning the internet are seriously flawed then.Philantrop wrote:Please re-read my non-ethical arguments as well: As it is I couldn't even safely put a link to these forums on my own site.
Not only are you brushing over the pagan roots of the symbol, you are effectively willing to do the same kind of historical revisioning that holocaust deniers want.Philantrop wrote:Playfool, I've answered the "remember it" argument in http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-34 ... ml#3450521 already. Please re-read that.


Censorship is information control by a government. As we're both from German-speaking countries I'll post a link to the German Wikipedia:amne wrote:I'm quite certain some Americans will strongly disagree about it. So what is it then?Philantrop wrote: First of all, what I suggest is not censorship.
That's why I referred to one subject only that is universally recognised as being one of the worst ever. We're simply not discussing anything else here but the Nationalsocialsm and its symbols. Therefor, it's not a matter of outlawing everything but just one topic.amne wrote:If we outlaw them, we should as well outlaw lots of other symbols, Neddy already mentioned a few before. Basically everything is offensive to someone in some culture. So we either need to outlaw everything or nothing.Philantrop wrote:Secondly, there's a major difference between allowing symbols of an organisation that murdered 30 to 35 million people and something simply offensive.
[..]
Why not simply outlaw the use of Nazi symbols and be done with it?
Ok, so choose the moral/ethical way out: Lose with grace and outlaw Nazi stuff. My personal experience with Americans (and basically any other people) is that they will understand eventually. I've run a large-scale phpBB forum (about 1000 users concurrently online during peak hours) in the past which was most frequently used by Americans. None of them had any problem with leaving Nazi stuff outside.amne wrote:If we outlawed them by the forum rules, we would be spending our time explaining to Americans why we don't allow freedom of speech. If we don't we spend our time explaing to you why we don't. So it's a lose/lose scenario anyway.Philantrop wrote:Is the "friction" caused by such kind of symbols worth your and your fellow moderators'/admins' time?
I'd love to educate those people with Nazi avatars/signatures/whatever instead of making them remove it, too. But this is not the place to do it.amne wrote:If you want my personal opinion: No i do not want it to be spread here. I don't want to have intolerant and ignorant points of view spread in these forums as well - this happens in quite some threads in OTW. However simply applying censorship is not what the Gentoo forums consider the solution to this problem.
No, just outlaw what's already outlawed anyway in some of the European countries.amne wrote:We'd also need to make a rule not to use everything else that offends someone else. In the long run we'd be ending turning off avatars anyway.Philantrop wrote:So why is it so difficult to just make it a rule not to use it?
It's not a flawed Internet law but a series of court rulings which is way worse because a law can be changed but rulings need to be overruled and that'll take lots and lots of money.amne wrote:Maybe you should invest your time to convince German politicians that their laws concerning the internet are seriously flawed then.Philantrop wrote:Please re-read my non-ethical arguments as well: As it is I couldn't even safely put a link to these forums on my own site.
Quoted for truthcurtis119 wrote: If we were to start banning symbols I would INSIST that all religious iconography of any sort to be banned as well. Since religions are also responsible for millions of deaths around the world. FAR FAR FAR FAR more deaths than the nazis could have ever dreamed about. And the worst part is that Religions are STILL killing people in the name $DIETY to this very day. Hitler died 50+ years ago.....
