Forums

Skip to content

Advanced search
  • Quick links
    • Unanswered topics
    • Active topics
    • Search
  • FAQ
  • Login
  • Register
  • Board index International Gentoo Users Polskie forum (Polish) Polish OTW
  • Search

GLX Gears - contest

Rozmowy nie związane ściśle z Gentoo

Moderator: SlashBeast

Post Reply
  • Print view
Advanced search
241 posts
  • Page 7 of 10
    • Jump to page:
  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • Next
Author
Message
flakusiek
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper
User avatar
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 11:49 am
Location: Gdansk[PL]
Contact:
Contact flakusiek
Website

  • Quote

Post by flakusiek » Fri Mar 25, 2005 10:03 pm

Code: Select all

11619 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2323.800 FPS
11630 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2326.000 FPS
11629 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2325.800 FPS
11640 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2328.000 FPS
11625 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2325.000 FPS
11629 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2325.800 FPS
11629 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2325.800 FPS
11643 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2328.600 FPS
11631 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2326.200 FPS
11629 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2325.800 FPS

Xorg.conf

Code: Select all

# === ATI device section ===

Section "Device"
    Identifier                          "ATI Graphics Adapter"
    Driver                              "fglrx"
# ### generic DRI settings ###
# === disable PnP Monitor  ===
    #Option                              "NoDDC"
# === disable/enable XAA/DRI ===
    Option "no_accel"                   "no"
    Option "no_dri"                     "no"
# === misc DRI settings ===
    Option "mtrr"                       "on" # disable DRI mtrr mapper, driver has its own code for mtrr
# ### FireGL DDX driver module specific settings ###
# === Screen Management ===
    Option "DesktopSetup"               "0x00000000" 
    Option "MonitorLayout"              "AUTO, AUTO"
    Option "IgnoreEDID"                 "off"
    Option "HSync2"                     "unspecified" 
    Option "VRefresh2"                  "unspecified" 
    Option "ScreenOverlap"              "0" 
# === TV-out Management ===
    Option "NoTV"                       "yes"     
    Option "TVStandard"                 "NTSC-M"     
    Option "TVHSizeAdj"                 "0"     
    Option "TVVSizeAdj"                 "0"     
    Option "TVHPosAdj"                  "0"     
    Option "TVVPosAdj"                  "0"     
    Option "TVHStartAdj"                "0"     
    Option "TVColorAdj"                 "0"     
    Option "GammaCorrectionI"           "0x06419064"
    Option "GammaCorrectionII"          "0x00000000"
# === OpenGL specific profiles/settings ===
    Option "Capabilities"               "0x00000000"
# === Video Overlay for the Xv extension ===
    Option "VideoOverlay"               "on"
# === OpenGL Overlay ===
# Note: When OpenGL Overlay is enabled, Video Overlay
#       will be disabled automatically
    Option "OpenGLOverlay"              "off"
# === Center Mode (Laptops only) ===
    Option "CenterMode"                 "off"
# === Pseudo Color Visuals (8-bit visuals) ===
    Option "PseudoColorVisuals"         "off"
# === QBS Management ===
    Option "Stereo"                     "off"
    Option "StereoSyncEnable"           "1"
# === FSAA Management ===
    Option "FSAAEnable"                 "no"
    Option "FSAAScale"                  "1"
    Option "FSAADisableGamma"           "no"
    Option "FSAACustomizeMSPos"         "no"
    Option "FSAAMSPosX0"                "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosY0"                "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosX1"                "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosY1"                "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosX2"                "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosY2"                "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosX3"                "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosY3"                "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosX4"                "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosY4"                "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosX5"                "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosY5"                "0.000000"
# === Misc Options ===
    Option "UseFastTLS"                 "2"
    Option "BlockSignalsOnLock"         "on"
    Option "UseInternalAGPGART"         "no"
    Option "ForceGenericCPU"            "no"
    BusID "PCI:1:0:0"    # vendor=1002, device=514d
    Screen 0
EndSection
Nie wiem czemu tak słabo :/ ... ludzie wykręcają więcej na gf5200 :/
Coś byście poprawili ??[/quote]
HP Compaq nc6000
Linux Registered User : #385414
Top
Raku
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva
User avatar
Posts: 2374
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 12:02 am
Location: Poland

  • Quote

Post by Raku » Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:19 pm

doklejam moje wyniki:

Code: Select all

raku@demon ~ $ glxgears
8128 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1625.600 FPS
8979 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1795.800 FPS
8895 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1779.000 FPS
8990 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1798.000 FPS
8857 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1771.400 FPS
8987 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1797.400 FPS

raku@demon ~ $ fgl_glxgears
1574 frames in 5.0 seconds = 314.800 FPS
1585 frames in 5.0 seconds = 317.000 FPS
1643 frames in 5.0 seconds = 328.600 FPS
1606 frames in 5.0 seconds = 321.200 FPS
1644 frames in 5.0 seconds = 328.800 FPS
radeon 9550, ati-drivers 8.12.10, Athlon XP 1600+

EDIT:

Code: Select all

raku@demon ~ $ glxgears
7556 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1511.200 FPS
9081 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1816.200 FPS
9076 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1815.200 FPS
9098 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1819.600 FPS
9028 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1805.600 FPS
9095 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1819.000 FPS
9108 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1821.600 FPS
9107 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1821.400 FPS
9046 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1809.200 FPS
9094 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1818.800 FPS
Przerwany potok
raku@demon ~ $ fgl_glxgears
1371 frames in 5.0 seconds = 274.200 FPS
1619 frames in 5.0 seconds = 323.800 FPS
1607 frames in 5.0 seconds = 321.400 FPS
1612 frames in 5.0 seconds = 322.400 FPS
1602 frames in 5.0 seconds = 320.400 FPS
1617 frames in 5.0 seconds = 323.400 FPS
więcej już chyba nie wycisnę :-/

to zaledwie 200 więcej niz mój stary GF2 Ti
raku

Powered by Archlinux ;-)
Top
rebus
n00b
n00b
User avatar
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 8:12 am

  • Quote

Post by rebus » Fri Apr 29, 2005 6:04 am

11472 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2294.400 FPS
11356 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2271.200 FPS
11283 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2256.600 FPS
11227 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2245.400 FPS
11253 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2250.600 FPS
11239 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2247.800 FPS
11282 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2256.400 FPS
11239 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2247.800 FPS
11217 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2243.400 FPS
11235 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2247.000 FPS
11305 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2261.000 FPS
11278 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2255.600 FPS
11242 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2248.400 FPS

--------------
athlon 9,5x166=1577MHz na Abicie NF7 pamięś hyper karta 5200FX Gentoo 2005.0 KDE
ustwienia systemu podstawowe bez optymalizacji - wyniki uważam dobre z uwagi na
ustawienia biosu - myślę że jak będzie czas to podkręce w systemie ale na FXe więcej niż 3000nie wyciągne
zawsze były zbliżone na innych sysach
jestem ciekaw czy na Gnome Ice lub innym wyniki inne
Top
joker
l33t
l33t
User avatar
Posts: 681
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 8:20 pm
Location: www
Contact:
Contact joker
Website

  • Quote

Post by joker » Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:54 am

nie ma co porownywac wynikiw miedzy nvidia a ati pod linux'em, takze nie przejmujcie sie ze macie gorsze wyniki na ati niz na nvidi mimo ze karta jest lepsza. chill out :wink:
http://amarok.org.pl | http://koffice.org.pl | http://kde.org.pl
Top
Raku
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva
User avatar
Posts: 2374
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 12:02 am
Location: Poland

  • Quote

Post by Raku » Fri Apr 29, 2005 11:27 am

odświeżyłem ten wątek nie po to, aby porównywać ati z nvidią (choć niemile się zaskoczyłem), ale aby sprawdzić, czy mój r9550 nie odstaje przypadkiem od innych.
raku

Powered by Archlinux ;-)
Top
wojtek
n00b
n00b
User avatar
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:03 pm
Location: Krakow/Pszczyna, Poland

  • Quote

Post by wojtek » Fri Apr 29, 2005 7:03 pm

Code: Select all

37241 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7448.200 FPS
47394 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9478.800 FPS
47246 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9449.200 FPS
47502 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9500.400 FPS
47418 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9483.600 FPS
47511 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9502.200 FPS
47479 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9495.800 FPS
47512 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9502.400 FPS
47499 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9499.800 FPS
47364 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9472.800 FPS
Athlon 3000+ (10,5*200Mhz), 512MB RAM DualDDR GeIL @ 400MHz, GeForce 6800 (Gigabyte), Abit NF7-S 2.0
i moje prywatne zdanie: glxgears to żaden benchmark...
Last edited by wojtek on Fri Apr 29, 2005 8:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
pwe
Guru
Guru
User avatar
Posts: 445
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 11:00 am
Location: Polska aka Poland

  • Quote

Post by pwe » Fri Apr 29, 2005 7:27 pm

wojtek wrote: Athlon 3000+ (11*200Mhz), 512MB RAM DualDDR GeIL @ 400MHz, GeForce 6800 (Gigabyte), Abit NF7-S 2.0
i moje prywatne zdanie: glxgears to żaden benchmark...
11x200Mhz -> to Athlon 3200+ ;) czyli Barton 2200Mhz
Top
cichy
Apprentice
Apprentice
User avatar
Posts: 217
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 6:50 am
Location: Jasionówka/podlaskie/Poland

  • Quote

Post by cichy » Fri Apr 29, 2005 7:35 pm

wojtek wrote: i moje prywatne zdanie: glxgears to żaden benchmark...
Zgadzam sie z tym. Na linuksie nie ma benchmarka 3d jako takiego. Od biedy mozna podciagnac pod ten termin niektore gry...
Zadaniem glxgears jest pokazanie tylko ze akceleracja 3d dziala

Pozdrawiam
Last edited by cichy on Fri Apr 29, 2005 8:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
::Gentoo::Linux::(athlon-xp // amd64 // pentium-m // nocona)::ID:387704::
Top
wojtek
n00b
n00b
User avatar
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 7:03 pm
Location: Krakow/Pszczyna, Poland

  • Quote

Post by wojtek » Fri Apr 29, 2005 8:30 pm

pwe wrote:11x200Mhz -> to Athlon 3200+ ;) czyli Barton 2200Mhz
Racja, pisalem z pamięci i jeszcze raz zajrzałem do BIOSu, oczywiście miałem na myśli mnożnik 10,5 czyli 2100MHz - już poprawiłem. Swoją drogą miałem duży dylemat czy standardowe 11,5 * 166Mhz nie byłoby szybsze (bo to o 66MHz więcej), ale jak zrobiłem kilka testowych kompilacji to okazało się, że jednak przepustowość pamięci wzięła górę. Nie należę do bloody oveclockers ale, małe usprawnienia jak najbardziej... ;).
cichy wrote:Zgadzam sie z tym. Na linuksie nie benchmarka 3d jako takiego. Od biedy mozna podciagnac pod ten termin niektore gry...
Zadaniem glxgears jest pokazanie tylko ze akceleracja 3d dziala
Myślę, że Unreal Tornament 2003/2004 (i jego darmowa wersja w postaci America's Army, albo wersji demo), Doom3, czy nawet ostatecznie Enemy Territory to całkiem bogaty zestaw oprogramowania testowego. Mam mieszane uczucia co do windowsowych 3DMarków, ponieważ są pisane specjalnie do testów, i niekoniecznie odzwierciedlają potrzeby konkretnych silników 3D - a w końcu to one są tym produktem, dla których kupujemy karty 3D. Jeśli się popatrzy na testy na różnych stronach to to co wynika z 3DMarka często się nie pokrywa z tym co osiągają konkretne tytuły gier. Bodajże XBit Labs (ale nie jestem pewien czy dobrze pamiętam) jest generalnie anty 3DMarkowy i można się spotkać z opiniami, że ten benchmark bywa wykorzystywany bardziej jako propaganda (specjalne optymalizacje w driverach dla niego) niż rzeczywiste źródło obiektywnej informacji.
Tym którzy są zainteresowani ciekawym narzędziem dla Linuksa do testowania wydajności swoich kart polecam AnandTech-owego FrameGettera.
Top
Mihashi
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper
User avatar
Posts: 98
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:27 am
Location: Wroclaw, Poland

  • Quote

Post by Mihashi » Sun Dec 11, 2005 9:25 pm

Code: Select all

michal@argos ~ $ glxgears
17982 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3596.400 FPS
18574 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3714.800 FPS
18566 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3713.200 FPS
18575 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3715.000 FPS
18582 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3716.400 FPS
18575 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3715.000 FPS
18564 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3712.800 FPS
18549 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3709.800 FPS
18574 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3714.800 FPS
18571 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3714.200 FPS
Konfig:
  • cpu: Athlon XP 2000@2800 (FSB333), 40C - AIUHB :-)
  • grafa: GeForce4 4200 (niekręcona, niemodowana)
  • ram: Kingston 512M (FSB333, 2.5 LC)
  • mobo: Asus A7V8X deluxe
  • hdd: WDC WD800LB
  • psu: Codegen 300X :-(
Mihashi
Top
13Homer
Guru
Guru
User avatar
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 1:07 pm

  • Quote

Post by 13Homer » Mon Dec 12, 2005 7:28 am

Pięć pierwszych jest z fokusem na oknie z trybami:

18891 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3778.200 FPS
19579 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3915.800 FPS
19580 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3916.000 FPS
19580 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3916.000 FPS
19579 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3915.800 FPS

drugie pięć z fokusem w innym oknie (xtermie):

51820 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10364.000 FPS
58710 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11742.000 FPS
58842 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11768.400 FPS
58821 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11764.200 FPS
58833 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11766.600 FPS
Lenovo ThinkPad R61 / C2D@2.6.24 / nVidia Quatro NVS 140M / 2 GB RAM
Top
Klekot
Apprentice
Apprentice
User avatar
Posts: 152
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:09 pm
Location: Poznań

  • Quote

Post by Klekot » Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:41 am

Code: Select all

[klekot@hawudepe ~] fgl_glxgears 
Using GLX_SGIX_pbuffer
3279 frames in 5.0 seconds = 655.800 FPS
5157 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1031.400 FPS
5173 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1034.600 FPS
5159 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1031.800 FPS
5173 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1034.600 FPS
5150 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1030.000 FPS

[klekot@hawudepe ~] glxgears 
28439 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5687.800 FPS
29995 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5999.000 FPS
30089 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6017.800 FPS
20982 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6019.400 FPS
25568 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5998.600 FPS
30062 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6012.400 FPS

[klekot@hawudepe ~]
radeon 9700p. 512ddr. p4 1.6ghz
Ragga, ragga, ragga y0!
with a510 (;
Top
BeteNoire
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1827
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 11:59 pm

  • Quote

Post by BeteNoire » Mon Dec 12, 2005 12:51 pm

Hm... czy u mnie coś jest nie tak?
1280x1024@75Hz:

Code: Select all

4585 frames in 5.0 seconds = 917.000 FPS
4593 frames in 5.0 seconds = 918.600 FPS
4607 frames in 5.0 seconds = 921.400 FPS
1024x768@85Hz:

Code: Select all

4963 frames in 5.0 seconds = 992.600 FPS
4994 frames in 5.0 seconds = 998.800 FPS
4994 frames in 5.0 seconds = 998.800 FPS
GF FX 5200, AthlonXP 2400...

A może przyznajcie się, że okienko glxgears zmniejszacie maksymalnie, bo tak to ja mam osiągi:

Code: Select all

48678 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9735.600 FPS
51668 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10333.600 FPS
54638 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10927.600 FPS
:lol:
Top
rasheed
Guru
Guru
User avatar
Posts: 466
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:59 pm
Location: Ostrów Wielkopolski
Contact:
Contact rasheed
Website

  • Quote

Post by rasheed » Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:10 pm

BeteNoire wrote:Hm... czy u mnie coś jest nie tak?
Nie wydaje mi się. GF FX 5200 to po prostu gówno a nie karta graficzna (przepraszam za wyrażenie).

Pozdrawiam.
rasheed - #gentoo.pl@IRCnet team | www.mklimek.org - BLOG - Linux, Opera, Open Source | JID / Mail: rasheed@gentoo.pl

APEL!
Top
rybirek
n00b
n00b
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 10:39 am
Location: Warszawa

  • Quote

Post by rybirek » Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:39 pm

Code: Select all

glxgears
6259 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1251.800 FPS
6259 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1251.800 FPS
6260 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1252.000 FPS
6261 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1252.200 FPS

Code: Select all

fgl_glxgears
Using GLX_SGIX_pbuffer
1244 frames in 5.0 seconds = 248.800 FPS
1255 frames in 5.0 seconds = 251.000 FPS
1240 frames in 5.0 seconds = 248.000 FPS
1241 frames in 5.0 seconds = 248.200 FPS

ATI Technologies Inc M22 [Radeon Mobility M300]
Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.86GHz
Rozdzielczość 1400x1050
Top
adam1957
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper
User avatar
Posts: 121
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:55 am
Contact:
Contact adam1957
Website

  • Quote

Post by adam1957 » Tue Dec 13, 2005 10:35 pm

Cześć !!

Code: Select all

1419 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2283.800 FPS
13386 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2677.200 FPS
13963 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2792.600 FPS
13962 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2792.400 FPS
13973 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2794.600 FPS
13951 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2790.200 FPS
13968 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2793.600 FPS
13967 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2793.400 FPS
13982 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2796.400 FPS
13987 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2797.400 FPS
13951 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2790.200 FPS
Sempron 2500 GFX5200
Linux Registered User #376200
Gentoo2007.0
Mowa jest srebrem, a milczenie złotem
Top
brodi
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper
User avatar
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: EU, Poland, Lodz

  • Quote

Post by brodi » Wed Dec 14, 2005 9:20 pm

Moje 0,03PLN: :wink:

Code: Select all

lucas@skynet ~ $ glxgears
5306 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1061.200 FPS
6620 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1324.000 FPS
6604 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1320.800 FPS
6395 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1279.000 FPS
6527 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1305.400 FPS
6620 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1324.000 FPS
GeForce 2MX 400 32RAM
Łukasz

"Linux - because it works!"
Top
Klekot
Apprentice
Apprentice
User avatar
Posts: 152
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:09 pm
Location: Poznań

  • Quote

Post by Klekot » Wed Dec 14, 2005 10:40 pm

jak sobie zmniejszam okienko od glxgear to z 6000 podskakuje mi na 14000 ;]
Ragga, ragga, ragga y0!
with a510 (;
Top
Gabrys
Veteran
Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 1096
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 10:21 pm
Location: Toruń [PL]
Contact:
Contact Gabrys
Website

  • Quote

Post by Gabrys » Thu Dec 15, 2005 7:56 pm

Jeśli konkurs na najgorszy wynik jest cały czas aktualny:

Code: Select all

47 frames in 5.0 seconds =  9.334 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds =  9.922 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds =  9.934 FPS
50 frames in 5.1 seconds =  9.901 FPS
50 frames in 5.1 seconds =  9.840 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds =  9.978 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds =  9.930 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds =  9.934 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds =  9.972 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds =  9.932 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds =  9.922 FPS
50 frames in 5.1 seconds =  9.840 FPS
50 frames in 5.1 seconds =  9.869 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds =  9.982 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds =  9.936 FPS
50 frames in 5.0 seconds =  9.926 FPS
na sprzęcie, który zaraz sobie wrzucę do podpisu.


EDIT: (bo widzę, że nie działa)
Linux 2.6.13-gentoo-r5, X.org 6.9.0 RC2 (nvidia 1.0.8174), Qt 3.3.4, KDE 3.4.3, Kadu 0.4.3
MSI KT4AV, AMD Sempron 2800+, GeForce4 MX440 (128bit) 64MB, 512MB DDRAM 333MHz
Top
Woocash
Guru
Guru
User avatar
Posts: 525
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 6:49 pm
Location: Poland, Praszka

  • Quote

Post by Woocash » Fri Dec 16, 2005 7:35 am

Code: Select all

66409 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13281.800 FPS
66403 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13280.600 FPS
66412 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13282.400 FPS
66438 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13287.600 FPS
65851 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13170.200 FPS
Gf6800GT
AMD64 3000+
"When a man lies he murders some part of the world
These are pale deaths which men miscall their lives
All this I cannot bear to witness any longer
Cannot the kingdom of salvation take me home..."
Cliff Burton
Top
Raku
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva
User avatar
Posts: 2374
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 12:02 am
Location: Poland

  • Quote

Post by Raku » Sat Dec 17, 2005 12:09 pm

Przełom w sterach ATI????

Code: Select all

11225 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2245.000 FPS
13619 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2723.800 FPS
13489 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2697.800 FPS
13612 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2722.400 FPS
13537 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2707.400 FPS
13552 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2710.400 FPS
13497 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2699.400 FPS
Radeon 9550, ati-drivers 8.20.8, Athlon XP 1600+. Porównajcie z moim poprzednim wynikiem podanym kilka postów wyżej !!!!
Na 8.19.10 miałem coś koło 2000
raku

Powered by Archlinux ;-)
Top
tswiercz
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper
Posts: 106
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 4:19 pm

  • Quote

Post by tswiercz » Sat Dec 17, 2005 6:24 pm

Ja na mym radku 9550@325/450 albo jakoś tak mam: ( 8.20.8 )

Code: Select all

tswiercz@localhost$ tswiercz$ glxgears
14582 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2916.400 FPS
16239 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3247.800 FPS
16253 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3250.600 FPS
16256 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3251.200 FPS
16251 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3250.200 FPS
16257 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3251.400 FPS
i chyba UT2004 też lepiej działa.
Top
nigdydosc
n00b
n00b
User avatar
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 7:56 pm
Location: Jaroslaw, Poland
Contact:
Contact nigdydosc
Website

  • Quote

Post by nigdydosc » Sun Dec 18, 2005 1:20 am

Code: Select all

glxgears 
24851 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4970.200 FPS
35998 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7199.600 FPS
36278 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7255.600 FPS
36965 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7393.000 FPS
36524 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7304.800 FPS
36898 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7379.600 FPS
Athlon XP 1.7, 1GB Ram'u Sparkle GF 6600 GT 128 MB
Miejsce na Twoją reklamę.
Top
KonMan
n00b
n00b
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 11:12 pm
Contact:
Contact KonMan
Website

  • Quote

Post by KonMan » Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:49 pm

Code: Select all

22090 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4418.000 FPS
24033 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4806.600 FPS
22867 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4573.400 FPS
34018 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6803.600 FPS
34425 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6885.000 FPS
34899 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6979.800 FPS
32495 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6499.000 FPS
37611 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7522.200 FPS
35102 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7020.400 FPS
37411 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7482.200 FPS
@ Athlon 64 3200+, 1GB Geil 400 Mhz, GeForce 6600

Aktualizacja, po zemergowaniu modularnego Xorg 7:

Code: Select all

38333 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7666.577 FPS
39275 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7837.796 FPS
39392 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7878.223 FPS
39405 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7880.820 FPS
38949 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7789.764 FPS
39408 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7881.423 FPS
39375 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7874.869 FPS
39265 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7852.808 FPS
39139 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7827.663 FPS
39243 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7848.566 FPS
39373 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7874.588 FPS
39415 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7882.974 FPS
:))
Last edited by KonMan on Tue Feb 14, 2006 12:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
sebad
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper
User avatar
Posts: 130
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 11:33 pm
Location: Poland

  • Quote

Post by sebad » Mon Jan 02, 2006 10:53 pm

Code: Select all

gentos sebad # glxgears
12997 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2599.400 FPS
15641 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3128.200 FPS
15654 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3130.800 FPS
15656 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3131.200 FPS
15652 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3130.400 FPS
15656 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3131.200 FPS
15602 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3120.400 FPS
Radeon 9550XT ,Sempron(Barton)3000+ ,1024Ram 400Mhz(Kingston)
Przełom w sterach ATI????
Cos w tym jest raku. Tez mam stery 8.20.8 ,a na starych mialem cos ok 500fps mniej.
Serwis komputerowy - Warszawa
Top
Post Reply
  • Print view

241 posts
  • Page 7 of 10
    • Jump to page:
  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • Next

Return to “Polish OTW”

Jump to
  • Assistance
  • ↳   News & Announcements
  • ↳   Frequently Asked Questions
  • ↳   Installing Gentoo
  • ↳   Multimedia
  • ↳   Desktop Environments
  • ↳   Networking & Security
  • ↳   Kernel & Hardware
  • ↳   Portage & Programming
  • ↳   Gamers & Players
  • ↳   Other Things Gentoo
  • ↳   Unsupported Software
  • Discussion & Documentation
  • ↳   Documentation, Tips & Tricks
  • ↳   Gentoo Chat
  • ↳   Gentoo Forums Feedback
  • ↳   Duplicate Threads
  • International Gentoo Users
  • ↳   中文 (Chinese)
  • ↳   Dutch
  • ↳   Finnish
  • ↳   French
  • ↳   Deutsches Forum (German)
  • ↳   Diskussionsforum
  • ↳   Deutsche Dokumentation
  • ↳   Greek
  • ↳   Forum italiano (Italian)
  • ↳   Forum di discussione italiano
  • ↳   Risorse italiane (documentazione e tools)
  • ↳   Polskie forum (Polish)
  • ↳   Instalacja i sprzęt
  • ↳   Polish OTW
  • ↳   Portuguese
  • ↳   Documentação, Ferramentas e Dicas
  • ↳   Russian
  • ↳   Scandinavian
  • ↳   Spanish
  • ↳   Other Languages
  • Architectures & Platforms
  • ↳   Gentoo on ARM
  • ↳   Gentoo on PPC
  • ↳   Gentoo on Sparc
  • ↳   Gentoo on Alternative Architectures
  • ↳   Gentoo on AMD64
  • ↳   Gentoo for Mac OS X (Portage for Mac OS X)
  • Board index
  • All times are UTC
  • Delete cookies

© 2001–2026 Gentoo Foundation, Inc.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited

Privacy Policy

 

 

magic