GCC-4.0 (part 3)

Message

nxsty · Post by **nxsty** » Thu Sep 29, 2005 9:22 am

SteveYin wrote:gcc mail list says gcc 4.0.2 will be released today or tommorow..

And now it's out!

chtephan: Does your hardened gcc set -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 by default in the spec-file? Otherwise that migh be a good idea.

chtephan · Post by **chtephan** » Thu Sep 29, 2005 9:41 am

Yes, I just compiled it on all machines.

No, it doesn't add that in the specs file itself. Spec file hackery... ugh. Do you think it should be added to all hardened specs? (like the linker stuff?)

Xake · Post by **Xake** » Thu Sep 29, 2005 10:58 am

So it compiles on your machines?

I just get this error:

Code: Select all

test -z "/usr/lib" || mkdir -p -- "/var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/image//usr/lib"
 /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=install /bin/install -c  'libstdc++.la' '/var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/image//usr/lib/libstdc++.la'
/bin/install -c .libs/libstdc++.so.6.0.6 /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/image//usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.6
(cd /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/image//usr/lib && rm -f libstdc++.so.6 && ln -s libstdc++.so.6.0.6 libstdc++.so.6)
(cd /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/image//usr/lib && rm -f libstdc++.so && ln -s libstdc++.so.6.0.6 libstdc++.so)
/bin/install -c .libs/libstdc++.lai /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/image//usr/lib/libstdc++.la
libtool: install: warning: remember to run `libtool --finish /usr/lib'
i686-pc-linux-gnu-ar cru libstdc++_pic.a *.o ../libsupc++/*.o
i686-pc-linux-gnu-ar: *.o: Filen eller katalogen finns inte
make[3]: *** [install-exec-local] Fel 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/work/build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src'
make[2]: *** [install-am] Fel 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/work/build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src'
make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Fel 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/work/build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3'
make: *** [install-target-libstdc++-v3] Fel 2

!!! ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-4.0.2 failed.
!!! Function gcc-compiler_src_install, Line 1478, Exitcode 2
!!! (no error message)
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.

nxsty · Post by **nxsty** » Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:38 am

chtephan wrote:No, it doesn't add that in the specs file itself. Spec file hackery... ugh. Do you think it should be added to all hardened specs? (like the linker stuff?)

Since -fstack-protector is on by default on hardened why not also D_FORTIFY_SOURCE? Just adding it to the CFLAGS is easier but then it just gets striped by a lot of packages.

Exner · Post by **Exner** » Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:39 pm

Anyone have a list of bugs fixed from 4.0.2_pre20050917 to 4.0.2 ?

fredor · Post by **fredor** » Thu Sep 29, 2005 1:33 pm

Compiling gcc-4.0.2 failed applying patch ' 07_all_gcc4-pr21254.patch!'

>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking gcc-4.0.2.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/work
>>> Unpacking gcc-4.0.2-patches-1.0.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/work
>>> Unpacking gcc-4.0.0-uclibc-patches-1.0.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/work
>>> Unpacking gcc-4.0.0-piepatches-v8.7.8.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/work
* Applying Gentoo patches ...
* 01_all_gcc4-ice-hack.patch ... [ ok ]
* 02_all_gcc4-ppc64-m32-m64-multilib-only.patch ... [ ok ]
* 03_all_gcc4-ia64-libunwind.patch ... [ ok ]
* 04_all_gcc4-java-nomulti.patch ... [ ok ]
* 05_all_gcc4-pr17965.patch ... [ ok ]
* 06_all_gcc4-pr22052.patch ... [ ok ]
* 07_all_gcc4-pr21254.patch ...

* Failed Patch: 07_all_gcc4-pr21254.patch !
* ( /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/work/patch/07_all_gcc4-pr21254.patch )
*
* Include in your bugreport the contents of:
*
* /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/temp/07_all_gcc4-pr21254.patch-14529.out

!!! ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-4.0.2 failed.
!!! Function epatch, Line 361, Exitcode 0
!!! Failed Patch: 07_all_gcc4-pr21254.patch!
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.

Failed as follows

***** 07_all_gcc4-pr21254.patch *****

=====================================

PATCH COMMAND: patch -p0 -g0 --no-backup-if-mismatch < /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/work/patch/07_all_gcc4-pr21254.patch

=====================================
patching file gcc/loop-iv.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 2166.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 2176.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 2203.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 2214.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 2326.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 2470.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 2538.
Hunk #8 FAILED at 2636.
8 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gcc/loop-iv.c.rej
patching file gcc/loop-unroll.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 442 with fuzz 2 (offset 70 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 512.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gcc/loop-unroll.c.rej
=====================================
<4-pr21254.patch-14529.out" [converted] 127L, 4980C 1,1

System is amd64 using '2005.1/no-muultilib' profile.

rmh3093 · Post by **rmh3093** » Thu Sep 29, 2005 2:00 pm

i just got gcc-4.0.2 to compile with USE="gcj" but has anyone gotten this to compile with USE="gtk" also?

wuno · Post by **wuno** » Thu Sep 29, 2005 3:33 pm

rmh3093 wrote:i just got gcc-4.0.2 to compile with USE="gcj" but has anyone gotten this to compile with USE="gtk" also?

Here successfully compiled with USE="fortran gtk nls" -02 on a pentium4 IBM T30

Post by **Halcy0n** » Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:53 pm

fredor wrote:Compiling gcc-4.0.2 failed applying patch ' 07_all_gcc4-pr21254.patch!'
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking gcc-4.0.2.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/work
>>> Unpacking gcc-4.0.2-patches-1.0.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/work
>>> Unpacking gcc-4.0.0-uclibc-patches-1.0.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/work
>>> Unpacking gcc-4.0.0-piepatches-v8.7.8.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/work
* Applying Gentoo patches ...
* 01_all_gcc4-ice-hack.patch ... [ ok ]
* 02_all_gcc4-ppc64-m32-m64-multilib-only.patch ... [ ok ]
* 03_all_gcc4-ia64-libunwind.patch ... [ ok ]
* 04_all_gcc4-java-nomulti.patch ... [ ok ]
* 05_all_gcc4-pr17965.patch ... [ ok ]
* 06_all_gcc4-pr22052.patch ... [ ok ]
* 07_all_gcc4-pr21254.patch ...

* Failed Patch: 07_all_gcc4-pr21254.patch !
* ( /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/work/patch/07_all_gcc4-pr21254.patch )
*
* Include in your bugreport the contents of:
*
* /var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2/temp/07_all_gcc4-pr21254.patch-14529.out

!!! ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-4.0.2 failed.
!!! Function epatch, Line 361, Exitcode 0
!!! Failed Patch: 07_all_gcc4-pr21254.patch!
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.

Failed as follows

I can never tell anymore in this thread. Is this with the package in the tree?

Edit: because you are using the wrong patchset if so.

fredor · Post by **fredor** » Thu Sep 29, 2005 5:13 pm

It is complied from portage with package.keyword set to '-*'
Which patchset should I be using?

fredor · Post by **fredor** » Thu Sep 29, 2005 5:27 pm

I deleted the gcc-4.0.2 patch files. Did emerge --sync and it seems to be compiling OK now.

Post by **Halcy0n** » Thu Sep 29, 2005 5:33 pm

fredor wrote:It is complied from portage with package.keyword set to '-*'
Which patchset should I be using?

The patchset on the mirrors does not have that patch in it. Never has

gpierce · Post by **gpierce** » Thu Sep 29, 2005 5:58 pm

Hello everyone! I see a number of comments here stating that people have successfully compiled gcc-4.0.2. Are people building their own ebuilds or downloading someone else's? Also, are people using gcc-3.4.4 to compile gcc-4.0.2 and then compiling gcc-4.0.2 again with the gcc-4.0.2 binary that was built by compiling with gcc-3.4.4? Hope that's not too confusing

fredor · Post by **fredor** » Thu Sep 29, 2005 6:06 pm

Halcyon

The patchset on the mirrors does not have that patch in it. Never has

With the freshly downloaded patch file and emerge --sync, gcc-4.0.2 compiled fine so the mirrors must have been updated.

xordan · Post by **xordan** » Thu Sep 29, 2005 10:55 pm

4.0.2 compiles fine for me. Looking good.

What's the roadmap now for the 4.0.x branch? Will there be a 4.0.3 or will all resources go towards 4.1 now?

Xake · Post by **Xake** » Fri Sep 30, 2005 9:06 am

Could someone plase point me in the right direction to make gcc4 merge (look above for errormessage)?

Here it just errors out during install at the same place every time.

fredor · Post by **fredor** » Fri Sep 30, 2005 10:39 am

Xake:-
I compile without 'maketest. and everything works OK now. Using 'maketest' some programs fail which otherwise seem to work perfectly well.

Rafal_Glazar · Post by **Rafal_Glazar** » Fri Sep 30, 2005 1:57 pm

Successful compile of gcc 4.0.2 with USE="fortran gtk nls" using portage ebuild. Just complited emerge -e system. I've had only one problem. I couldn't compile it with gcc 3.4.4 and had to use gcc 3.3.5 which still is on my system.
This is what i did:

Code: Select all

emerge gcc
switch to gcc 4.0.2
emerge gcc
emerge linux-headers glibc binutils-config binutils gcc-config gcc
emerge glibc binutils gcc
emerge -e system

Why i did this? Well, all is said in first line of my signature.

gpierce · Post by **gpierce** » Fri Sep 30, 2005 2:26 pm

I also couldn't compile gcc-4.0.2 with gcc-3.4.4. I keep getting "internal errors" messages when I try. Some have claimed that it is a result of a defective/failing/overheated CPU, but I am not so sure as I everything else (even OO) compiles just fine. So, I think I will try to install gcc-3.3.5 and try with that instead.

fredor · Post by **fredor** » Fri Sep 30, 2005 5:31 pm

In a KDE-3.5-beta system, I have run 'emerge -e world' with only 2 failures:-
alsa-tools
hpijs
Everything else compiled with gcc-4.0.2

Post by **Halcy0n** » Fri Sep 30, 2005 5:55 pm

gpierce wrote:I also couldn't compile gcc-4.0.2 with gcc-3.4.4. I keep getting "internal errors" messages when I try. Some have claimed that it is a result of a defective/failing/overheated CPU, but I am not so sure as I everything else (even OO) compiles just fine. So, I think I will try to install gcc-3.3.5 and try with that instead.

The makefile for gcc-4.0.2 is somewhat screwed up. It shouldn't be calling the current system compiler at that point. There is a bug open about this on our bugzilla, and GCC's.

luca82 · Post by **luca82** » Fri Sep 30, 2005 6:50 pm

I have compiled gcc-4.0.2 successfull with 4.0.2_pre. But after this I got some error about the profile. I solved with a manual gcc-config [n] with the [n]=right profile. Maybe I'm wrong but it seems like an ebuild problem...

UncleOwen · Post by **UncleOwen** » Fri Sep 30, 2005 8:03 pm

luca82 wrote:I have compiled gcc-4.0.2 successfull with 4.0.2_pre. But after this I got some error about the profile. I solved with a manual gcc-config [n] with the [n]=right profile. Maybe I'm wrong but it seems like an ebuild problem...

Exactly the same thing here.

ts · Post by ts » Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:35 am

help !

After emerge glibc-2.3.5.20050722 using gcc-4.0.2, I can't emerge any package any more.

Code: Select all

creating cache ./config.cache
checking host system type... x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
checking build system type... x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
checking for a BSD compatible install... /bin/install -c
checking whether ln works... yes
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc -march=k8 -O2 -pipe -Wl,-O1) works... no
configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables.

!!! ERROR: sys-devel/binutils-2.16.1 failed.
!!! Function toolchain-binutils_src_compile, Line 124, Exitcode 1
!!! configure failed

I googled the problem, and tried different ways. However, all failed. Any gurus can help me?

j-m · Post by **j-m** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 8:01 am

luca82 wrote:I have compiled gcc-4.0.2 successfull with 4.0.2_pre. But after this I got some error about the profile. I solved with a manual gcc-config [n] with the [n]=right profile. Maybe I'm wrong but it seems like an ebuild problem...

Yeah, I can confirm this...

GCC-4.0 (part 3)

ebuild for gcc-4.0.2

Compiling 4.0.2 with 3.4.4

Re: Compiling 4.0.2 with 3.4.4