Forums

Skip to content

Advanced search
  • Quick links
    • Unanswered topics
    • Active topics
    • Search
  • FAQ
  • Login
  • Register
  • Board index Assistance Unsupported Software
  • Search

2.6.13.2-nitro1 "Down with latency!'

This forum covers all Gentoo-related software not officially supported by Gentoo. Ebuilds/software posted here might harm the health and stability of your system(s), and are not supported by Gentoo developers. Bugs/errors caused by ebuilds from overlays.gentoo.org are covered by this forum, too.
Post Reply
Advanced search
179 posts
  • Page 5 of 8
    • Jump to page:
  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • Next
Author
Message
1U
Guru
Guru
User avatar
Posts: 319
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 8:56 pm

  • Quote

Post by 1U » Mon Sep 26, 2005 8:30 am

You have a good point about installing a new kernel, but it's really not that hard. I think if enough fixes and updates were made to this one it would justify a new realease. After all, 13 had nitro1-5 so just a second version couldn't hurt.

Also, the 2.6.13.2 thing is a bit redundant. It's almost like how some developers have "program 5.1.6.19.823.62 build 1592496010234234". You and tiger should agree on a standard for naming the releases, I think kernel.version-nitroX is good enough, no need for extra -rcx or .x and etc.
Obstacles do not exist to be surrendered to, but only to be broken.
Top
Zyne
Guru
Guru
Posts: 334
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 12:16 pm

Re: sata and smart

  • Quote

Post by Zyne » Mon Sep 26, 2005 8:43 am

tagwar wrote:just installed on my home machine, which has two sata discs. Now I want to do SMART-readings of my discs from time to time to ensure that everything is OK.
I applied that patch, but it doesn't seem to work for me...

Code: Select all

# hddtemp /dev/sd?
/dev/sda: ATA Maxtor 6Y120M0:  known drive, but it doesn't have a temperature sensor.
/dev/sdb: ATA Maxtor 6Y160M0:  known drive, but it doesn't have a temperature sensor.
/dev/sdc: ATA WDC WD740GD-00FL:  known drive, but it doesn't have a temperature sensor.
Could it be that I missed something in the kernel config? I just applied the patch, did a make clean, and recompiled the kernel... I assumed that was enough... :)


as for the logo problem, that one is fixed perfectly by manually editing the files mentioned in a previous thread!

EDIT: should be solved now... apparently the file I downloaded was 0 bytes, so the patch really didn't do anything at all...
more info here: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-31 ... ature.html

EDIT2: :p

Code: Select all

# hddtemp /dev/sd?
/dev/sda: Maxtor 6Y120M0: 37°C
/dev/sdb: Maxtor 6Y160M0: 39°C
/dev/sdc: WDC WD740GD-00FLA2:  36°C
Top
miedo95
n00b
n00b
User avatar
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:18 am
Location: Mexicali, Mexico

Re: Problem resolved!!!

  • Quote

Post by miedo95 » Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:37 pm

|cub| wrote:
miedo95 wrote:...
i was following instrucions and get

Code: Select all

  CC      drivers/video/logo/logo.o
  LOGO  drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_mono.c
  CC      drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_mono.o
  LOGO  drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_vga16.c
  CC      drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_vga16.o
  LOGO  drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_clut224.c
  CC      drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_clut224.o
  LOGO  drivers/video/logo/logo_nitro_clut224.c
drivers/video/logo/logo_nitro_clut224.ppm: Binary PNM is not supported
Use pnmnoraw(1) to convert it to ASCII PNM
make[3]: *** [drivers/video/logo/logo_nitro_clut224.c] Error 1
make[2]: *** [drivers/video/logo] Error 2
make[1]: *** [drivers/video] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
can't jump this step


backup
mv logo_nitro_clut224.ppm logo_nitro_clut224.ppm_old

write
pnmnoraw logo_nitro_clut224.ppm_old > logo_nitro_clut224.ppm


La informacion es poder!!!
Top
a13x
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 215
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 12:01 am

  • Quote

Post by a13x » Mon Sep 26, 2005 3:21 pm

The logo is broken in this release. Just disable it and it will work. Or ... wait for the next relase.
Top
Anthaus
n00b
n00b
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 4:12 pm
Location: Arlington, VA

  • Quote

Post by Anthaus » Mon Sep 26, 2005 3:37 pm

1U wrote:Also, the 2.6.13.2 thing is a bit redundant. It's almost like how some developers have "program 5.1.6.19.823.62 build 1592496010234234". You and tiger should agree on a standard for naming the releases, I think kernel.version-nitroX is good enough, no need for extra -rcx or .x and etc.
Glad to hear I'm NOT the only one who thinks this way. :twisted:
Fedora Core 4
2.6.15-wintermute1 "Something Called Armitage"
Top
satanskin
Guru
Guru
Posts: 353
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 1:37 am

  • Quote

Post by satanskin » Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:27 pm

Wow. I've noticed this release is a bit sluggish. Especially when switching between open windows. I don't know if this is the problem with the swapping you are talking about, but it is rather annoying. I still have half a gig of ram free and a 64-bit processor so it shouldn't be hardware limitations.
Top
Robin79
l33t
l33t
User avatar
Posts: 632
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2003 11:42 am
Location: /home/valdemarsvik

  • Quote

Post by Robin79 » Mon Sep 26, 2005 5:33 pm

hmm i tried to compile and gets this anyone?

Code: Select all

CC      init/main.o
init/main.c: I funktion `setup_per_cpu_areas':
init/main.c:329: error: `__per_cpu_end' undeclared (first use in this function)
init/main.c:329: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
init/main.c:329: error: for each function it appears in.)
init/main.c:329: error: `__per_cpu_start' undeclared (first use in this function)
make[1]: *** [init/main.o] Fel 1
make: *** [init] Fel 2
Gentoo 2005.0
ASUS P5AD2 Deluxe MB
Intel P4 3.2GHz
PCI-E Nvidia Geforce PCX 5750
--------------------

Registered Linux User Nr # 319050 http://counter.li.org
Top
jurrie
Apprentice
Apprentice
User avatar
Posts: 177
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Netherlands
Contact:
Contact jurrie
Website

  • Quote

Post by jurrie » Mon Sep 26, 2005 6:00 pm

1U wrote:Also, the 2.6.13.2 thing is a bit redundant. It's almost like how some developers have "program 5.1.6.19.823.62 build 1592496010234234". You and tiger should agree on a standard for naming the releases, I think kernel.version-nitroX is good enough, no need for extra -rcx or .x and etc.
well, since this nitro release is the first one based on kernel 2.6.13.2, it's kind of obvious it is named 2.6.13.2-nitro1, no?
Top
Robin79
l33t
l33t
User avatar
Posts: 632
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2003 11:42 am
Location: /home/valdemarsvik

  • Quote

Post by Robin79 » Mon Sep 26, 2005 6:20 pm

dam Juyrrie :) i tought you had a answer to my problem so i fast looked back to this thread ;;)
Gentoo 2005.0
ASUS P5AD2 Deluxe MB
Intel P4 3.2GHz
PCI-E Nvidia Geforce PCX 5750
--------------------

Registered Linux User Nr # 319050 http://counter.li.org
Top
tagwar
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper
User avatar
Posts: 147
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 3:20 pm
Location: Karlsruhe

daaaamnn... this is soooo cool..

  • Quote

Post by tagwar » Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:48 pm

sorry, if you're already running this kernel, you probably already noticed, so this is for all those who're wondering if it is worth the trouble to install this wonderful thing...

I just got back to my laptop (1.3ghz pentium m), started up firefox, checked my mail, all the "normal" stuff one does... then I did a "ps ax" cause I wondered about the pid of a process I just started... well, what I saw realy interesting... emerge was running and compiling the new firefox... I mean... normaly my system got quite a bit unresponsible when doing big compiles.. now I didn't even notice... :-) funny... and yes, I'm absolutely sure that it is still the same laptop... :-)
Top
Legoguy
Apprentice
Apprentice
User avatar
Posts: 166
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 3:35 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Contact:
Contact Legoguy
Website

  • Quote

Post by Legoguy » Mon Sep 26, 2005 10:57 pm

satanskin wrote:Wow. I've noticed this release is a bit sluggish. Especially when switching between open windows. I don't know if this is the problem with the swapping you are talking about, but it is rather annoying. I still have half a gig of ram free and a 64-bit processor so it shouldn't be hardware limitations.
I've noticed this too, 3.2GHz P4 (Prescott), NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 128mb, 1gb mem -- it wasn't like this on 2.6.13.1-nitro1 :-/
Top
Hauser
l33t
l33t
User avatar
Posts: 650
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 9:19 pm
Location: 4-dimensional hyperplane

  • Quote

Post by Hauser » Tue Sep 27, 2005 12:27 am

iphitus wrote:
Fleta wrote:
iphitus wrote:
Fleta wrote:ipw2200 failed to compile:... :(
I released patches to fix this on the archck webpage as the same problem occurs on archck. The patches apply to the module not the kernel.

http://iphitus.loudas.com/archck.php
How do I apply the patch? :oops:
I have no idea how to do it the gentoo way, but if you wish to do it manually...

download the driver's source (http://unc.dl.sourceforge.net/sourcefor ... -1.0.6.tgz)
extract it. cd into the driver's source directory,
patch -p1 < path/to/patch/ipw2200-fix.diff
then 'make', and as root, 'make install'

will patch and install the driver.

Code: Select all

# ebuild /usr/portage/net-wireless/ipw2200/ipw2200-1.0.6.ebuild unpack
# cd /var/portage/ipw2200-1.0.6/work/ipw2200-1.0.6
# patch -p1 < /path/to/ipw2200-fix.diff
# ebuild /usr/portage/net-wireless/ipw2200/ipw2200-1.0.6.ebuild merge
AMD Athlon XP 2600+; 512M RAM;
nVidia FX5700LE; Hitachi 120Gb
2.6.9-nitro4, reiser4, linux26-headers+nptl

Do I like to compile everything?
Positive definite!
Top
bbkr
n00b
n00b
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:48 pm

  • Quote

Post by bbkr » Tue Sep 27, 2005 1:31 am

works fine.

Code: Select all

localhost ~ # uname -a
Linux localhost 2.6.13.2-nitro1 #2 Mon Sep 26 23:40:20 CEST 2005 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
localhost ~ # gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (Gentoo Hardened 3.4.4-r1, ssp-3.4.4-1.0, pie-8.7.8)
thanks for great job!!
Top
alinv
Guru
Guru
User avatar
Posts: 395
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 3:17 pm
Location: Bucharest

  • Quote

Post by alinv » Tue Sep 27, 2005 6:35 am

satanskin wrote:Wow. I've noticed this release is a bit sluggish. Especially when switching between open windows. I don't know if this is the problem with the swapping you are talking about, but it is rather annoying. I still have half a gig of ram free and a 64-bit processor so it shouldn't be hardware limitations.
Same here :(
I also noticed that my free memory doesn't go below 300Mb, while I have ~1Gb in swap. I never had more than 2-300Mb in swap (for 1Gb of RAM).
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better.
S.B.
Top
massimo
Veteran
Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 1226
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 5:56 pm

  • Quote

Post by massimo » Tue Sep 27, 2005 6:43 am

I upgraded my kernel on my home desktop pc (Athlon XP 3200, 1GB, GF6600) from 2.6.12-nitro5 to this one as well as at my office's desktop (Dell Optiplex GX-280 - P4 3GHz ht and smp enabled, 512MB, intel onboardgfx). At home I've one GB of RAM and at my office "only" 512 MB of RAM, which since I've upgraded to this kernel was leading to out of memory errors at the desktop pc at my office -> applications are killed automatically (randomly?) too free up some mem. I'm running a few memory intensive Java applications, so the 512MB RAM are used up very fast. There are just a few architectural and network .config differences, so I really didn't try to change any settings there. This happens although there is enough swapable memory (total ~ 800MB). So at my office I'm back on 2.6.12-nitro5. I'm just curious if anybody else did experience something like that. If anybody knows what to do to resolve this issue with 2.6.13.2-nitro1 I'd appreciate your suggestions.
Hello 911? How are you?
Top
bollucks
l33t
l33t
Posts: 606
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 11:49 pm

  • Quote

Post by bollucks » Tue Sep 27, 2005 7:07 am

Disable swap prefetch. It was clearly marked as experimental and was under heavy development. The version in this nitro kernel is known broken.
Top
massimo
Veteran
Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 1226
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 5:56 pm

  • Quote

Post by massimo » Tue Sep 27, 2005 7:14 am

bollucks wrote:Disable swap prefetch. It was clearly marked as experimental and was under heavy development. The version in this nitro kernel is known broken.
Thank you, I didn't know that.
Hello 911? How are you?
Top
alinv
Guru
Guru
User avatar
Posts: 395
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 3:17 pm
Location: Bucharest

  • Quote

Post by alinv » Tue Sep 27, 2005 7:37 am

bollucks wrote:Disable swap prefetch. It was clearly marked as experimental and was under heavy development. The version in this nitro kernel is known broken.
I did that when I switched from 2.6.13.1 to 2.6.13.2, but I didn't update my grub.conf. Stupid me :oops:

Thanks!
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better.
S.B.
Top
XioXouS
n00b
n00b
User avatar
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 7:14 pm

  • Quote

Post by XioXouS » Tue Sep 27, 2005 7:52 am

well i was gonna wait for nitro2, but i had so homework to put off, so seemed like the perfect time to upgrade kernels

aside from one issue, looking good so far

i applied the logo fix and libata patch mentioned earlier, the ck5 patch to see if there was a difference at all with swap prefetching - think i'm gonna turn it back off completely though, just doesn't seem to be much need, and i also got l7-filters working (2.0.0_beta)

vmware, fglrx, emu10k1 (external alsa), all work normally so far, although fglrx seemed a little slow just in comparison to previous glxgear runs, but the important stuff like ut run fine

alright problem is this, I try to put my laptop to sleep, which has worked great for over a year now, but still one of the first things I check with a new kernel, and I get this nasty message. It's got LVM2 with several Reiser4 partitions, one of which seem to be the failure(s). Can anyone enlighten me at all about these messages? Thanks.

Code: Select all

...
ACPI: PCI interrupt for device 0000:00:1f.5 disabled
ACPI: PCI interrupt for device 0000:02:08.0 disabled
Stopping tasks failed.
Tasks that refused to be refrigerated and haven't since exited:
 - ktxnmgrd:hda3:w (#758) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ent:hda3. (#759) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ktxnmgrd:dm-0:t (#1602) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ent:dm-0. (#1603) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ktxnmgrd:dm-1:w (#1617) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ent:dm-1. (#1618) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ktxnmgrd:dm-2:w (#1619) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ent:dm-2. (#1620) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ktxnmgrd:dm-3:w (#1621) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ent:dm-3. (#1622) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ktxnmgrd:dm-4:w (#1623) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ent:dm-4. (#1624) signalled and todo list empty.
agpgart: Found an AGP 2.0 compliant device at 0000:00:00.0.
...
Top
aenertia
n00b
n00b
User avatar
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 10:05 am
Location: New Zealand(Aotearoa)
Contact:
Contact aenertia
Website

PCMCIA-CS Fixed in this version?

  • Quote

Post by aenertia » Tue Sep 27, 2005 10:10 am

Hi there I have been using .12-nitro5 in both my Opteron Server/Workstation and in A machine upstairs which is p4 based. I have never been able to emerge pcmcia-cs (the cardmgr tools) with nitro5.

I am just about to image the p4 machine to send to my partner who has a p4 laptop. And I need to get those pesky pcmcia-cs tools workin with nitro-5. Can someone let me know if this new e-build works. And anyone who has been using the cardbus succesfully with nitro5.

Kind regards


Joel W (Ænertia)
IM is Good.
Top
aenertia
n00b
n00b
User avatar
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 10:05 am
Location: New Zealand(Aotearoa)
Contact:
Contact aenertia
Website

  • Quote

Post by aenertia » Tue Sep 27, 2005 10:14 am

I also noticed that my free memory doesn't go below 300Mb, while I have ~1Gb in swap. I never had more than 2-300Mb in swap (for 1Gb of RAM).[/quote]

You should never have more than 5% of memory free if the kernel is doing a good job. Basically all good kernels will ramp up to 100% useage after a while, then drop down to around 97%. The key is looking at how much of that 97% is cached... it should be around 30% odd. This is good.

More free mem != a good thing, and is a sign that somthing is not working right.
IM is Good.
Top
XioXouS
n00b
n00b
User avatar
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 7:14 pm

  • Quote

Post by XioXouS » Tue Sep 27, 2005 7:36 pm

XioXouS wrote:alright problem is this, I try to put my laptop to sleep, which has worked great for over a year now, but still one of the first things I check with a new kernel, and I get this nasty message. It's got LVM2 with several Reiser4 partitions, one of which seem to be the failure(s). Can anyone enlighten me at all about these messages? Thanks.

Code: Select all

...
ACPI: PCI interrupt for device 0000:00:1f.5 disabled
ACPI: PCI interrupt for device 0000:02:08.0 disabled
Stopping tasks failed.
Tasks that refused to be refrigerated and haven't since exited:
 - ktxnmgrd:hda3:w (#758) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ent:hda3. (#759) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ktxnmgrd:dm-0:t (#1602) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ent:dm-0. (#1603) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ktxnmgrd:dm-1:w (#1617) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ent:dm-1. (#1618) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ktxnmgrd:dm-2:w (#1619) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ent:dm-2. (#1620) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ktxnmgrd:dm-3:w (#1621) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ent:dm-3. (#1622) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ktxnmgrd:dm-4:w (#1623) signalled and todo list empty.
 - ent:dm-4. (#1624) signalled and todo list empty.
agpgart: Found an AGP 2.0 compliant device at 0000:00:00.0.
...
I've since confirmed this on three machines (some without lvm), with various simplified kernel configs for both mm-sources (just for reiser4) and nitro-sources - both were the 2.6.13 variant. If the machine is put to sleep via

Code: Select all

echo mem > /sys/power/state
those reiser4 parts running (ktxnmgrd*, ent*) get angry, display the above messages, and then return to the system hogging all the CPU resources aka 100% utilization.
Help? Should I be submiting this to someone else as a bug? Thanks.
Top
Fleta
n00b
n00b
User avatar
Posts: 68
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:55 pm

  • Quote

Post by Fleta » Wed Sep 28, 2005 12:23 am

Hauser wrote:
iphitus wrote:
Fleta wrote:
iphitus wrote:
Fleta wrote:ipw2200 failed to compile:... :(
I released patches to fix this on the archck webpage as the same problem occurs on archck. The patches apply to the module not the kernel.

http://iphitus.loudas.com/archck.php
How do I apply the patch? :oops:
I have no idea how to do it the gentoo way, but if you wish to do it manually...

download the driver's source (http://unc.dl.sourceforge.net/sourcefor ... -1.0.6.tgz)
extract it. cd into the driver's source directory,
patch -p1 < path/to/patch/ipw2200-fix.diff
then 'make', and as root, 'make install'

will patch and install the driver.

Code: Select all

# ebuild /usr/portage/net-wireless/ipw2200/ipw2200-1.0.6.ebuild unpack
# cd /var/portage/ipw2200-1.0.6/work/ipw2200-1.0.6
# patch -p1 < /path/to/ipw2200-fix.diff
# ebuild /usr/portage/net-wireless/ipw2200/ipw2200-1.0.6.ebuild merge
Thanks a lot, now it works! :)
Top
Cinder6
l33t
l33t
User avatar
Posts: 767
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 4:33 am
Location: California
Contact:
Contact Cinder6
Website

  • Quote

Post by Cinder6 » Wed Sep 28, 2005 1:21 am

alinv wrote:
bollucks wrote:Disable swap prefetch. It was clearly marked as experimental and was under heavy development. The version in this nitro kernel is known broken.
I did that when I switched from 2.6.13.1 to 2.6.13.2, but I didn't update my grub.conf. Stupid me :oops:

Thanks!
Wait...you have to enable swap prefetching via GRUB?
Knowledge is power.
Power corrupts.
Study hard.
Be evil.

Ugly Overload
Top
Gnufsh
Guru
Guru
User avatar
Posts: 400
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2002 5:40 pm
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:
Contact Gnufsh
Website

  • Quote

Post by Gnufsh » Wed Sep 28, 2005 3:37 am

Cinder6 wrote:
alinv wrote:
bollucks wrote:Disable swap prefetch. It was clearly marked as experimental and was under heavy development. The version in this nitro kernel is known broken.
I did that when I switched from 2.6.13.1 to 2.6.13.2, but I didn't update my grub.conf. Stupid me :oops:

Thanks!
Wait...you have to enable swap prefetching via GRUB?
I think he means he didn't update it to point to the new kernel.
Top
Post Reply

179 posts
  • Page 5 of 8
    • Jump to page:
  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • Next

Return to “Unsupported Software”

Jump to
  • Assistance
  • ↳   News & Announcements
  • ↳   Frequently Asked Questions
  • ↳   Installing Gentoo
  • ↳   Multimedia
  • ↳   Desktop Environments
  • ↳   Networking & Security
  • ↳   Kernel & Hardware
  • ↳   Portage & Programming
  • ↳   Gamers & Players
  • ↳   Other Things Gentoo
  • ↳   Unsupported Software
  • Discussion & Documentation
  • ↳   Documentation, Tips & Tricks
  • ↳   Gentoo Chat
  • ↳   Gentoo Forums Feedback
  • ↳   Duplicate Threads
  • International Gentoo Users
  • ↳   中文 (Chinese)
  • ↳   Dutch
  • ↳   Finnish
  • ↳   French
  • ↳   Deutsches Forum (German)
  • ↳   Diskussionsforum
  • ↳   Deutsche Dokumentation
  • ↳   Greek
  • ↳   Forum italiano (Italian)
  • ↳   Forum di discussione italiano
  • ↳   Risorse italiane (documentazione e tools)
  • ↳   Polskie forum (Polish)
  • ↳   Instalacja i sprzęt
  • ↳   Polish OTW
  • ↳   Portuguese
  • ↳   Documentação, Ferramentas e Dicas
  • ↳   Russian
  • ↳   Scandinavian
  • ↳   Spanish
  • ↳   Other Languages
  • Architectures & Platforms
  • ↳   Gentoo on ARM
  • ↳   Gentoo on PPC
  • ↳   Gentoo on Sparc
  • ↳   Gentoo on Alternative Architectures
  • ↳   Gentoo on AMD64
  • ↳   Gentoo for Mac OS X (Portage for Mac OS X)
  • Board index
  • All times are UTC
  • Delete cookies

© 2001–2026 Gentoo Foundation, Inc.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited

Privacy Policy

 

 

magic