Some of previous morph-sources were based on -ac indeed. I chose to switch to -as because -ac didn't have any feature urgently demanded by the community, and -as seemed a safer choice since it is bugfix-only. However I can switch back to -ac if there is enough interest in it, I trust Alan Cox toopilx wrote:I wonder why is it this way... I've been struggling with morph/ac/as to isolate it82xx from ac and I concluded it would be better to include to whole -ac patch because of the many nice fixes/improvements it contains that do not appear on -as, really.predatorfreak wrote:morph-sources includes as, which is similer to ac, but doesn't have the drivers your looking for
Besides, I'm very much confident on the work of Alan so I trust the -ac patchset will not yield dangerous unstabilities.
So... is it possible/reasonable to morph-sources include ac instead of as? Or both?
What do you people think?
Let me know what you folks think.
Oh, BTW, an unstable morph based on 2.6.11-rc4 will be out tomorrow. I managed to mantain all the features of morph-sources 2.6.10, and I'm getting ready to switch to 2.6.11. But the 2.6.10 tree will live on and will be acitvely worked on at least until 2.6.11 final is out. Cheers!
EDIT: typos.




