nighty wrote:if youve got the time to mess with E youll notice a few basic shortcomings. it has relatively poor configuration and documention. and its not as easilly extensive as other wms out there. E17 had no documention what so ever and it has binary config files which make no sense to me at least. but hey its still in alpha.
It´s propably not even alpha yet (why should there be documentation at all at this stage?), although it is fairly usable already. I´ve been using e17 only for weeks already.
About your documentation concerns:
That´s why me, gimpel and some others from #edocumentation decided to help :) I see you haven´t read the entire thread so you missed this:
http://lude.net/edocs/
And this is about the binary config files question:
http://lude.net/edocs/eet_edb.htm
(no, I don´t really claim to understand why they chose binary config files of course, but I´m sure raster & co know what they´re doing)
E17 has a nice module architecture, so it can be as minimal or as bloated as you want it to be.