e17 does work on gentoo!! yayyyyyyyyyy!

[rambo No. 5]

Dammit!

Code: Select all

Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 3) media-libs/etox-0.0.2.20040327 to /
>>> md5 src_uri ;-) etox-0.0.2.20040327.tar.bz2
 * Please do not contact the E team about bugs in Gentoo.
 * Only contact vapier@gentoo.org via e-mail or bugzilla.
 * Remember, this stuff is CVS only code so dont cry when
 * I break you :).
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking etox-0.0.2.20040327.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/etox-0.0.2.20040327/work
nls
>>> Source unpacked.
+ autoheader
+ libtoolize --ltdl --force --copy
You should add the contents of `/usr/share/aclocal/libtool.m4' to `aclocal.m4'.
+ aclocal
+ automake --foreign --add-missing
automake: configure.in: installing `./install-sh'
automake: configure.in: installing `./mkinstalldirs'
automake: configure.in: installing `./missing'
+ autoconf
+ test -z ''
+ echo 'to pass any to it, please specify them on the ./autogen.sh command line.'
to pass any to it, please specify them on the ./autogen.sh command line.
+ cd /var/tmp/portage/etox-0.0.2.20040327/work/etox
+ set +x
Now type:
 
make
make install
 
have fun.
configure: WARNING: If you wanted to set the --build type, don't use --host.
    If a cross compiler is detected then cross compile mode will be used.
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking for working aclocal-1.4... found
checking for working autoconf... found
checking for working automake-1.4... found
checking for working autoheader... found
checking for working makeinfo... found
checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables...
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
checking for strerror in -lcposix... no
checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... (cached) gcc
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... (cached) yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes
checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... (cached) none needed
checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking for egrep... grep -E
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for ld used by GCC... /usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld
checking if the linker (/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes
checking for /usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r
checking for BSD-compatible nm... nm
checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /bin/sed
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking how to recognise dependent libraries... pass_all
checking command to parse nm output... ok
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking dlfcn.h usability... yes
checking dlfcn.h presence... yes
checking for dlfcn.h... yes
checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-ranlib... no
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-strip... no
checking for strip... strip
checking for objdir... .libs
checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -fPIC
checking if gcc PIC flag -fPIC works... yes
checking if gcc static flag -static works... yes
checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... yes
checking if gcc supports -c -o file.lo... yes
checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... no
checking whether the linker (/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build static libraries... yes
checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... no
creating libtool
checking for edb-config... yes
checking for evas-config... yes
checking for estyle-config... yes
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating etox-config
config.status: creating src/Makefile
config.status: creating test/Makefile
config.status: creating config.h
config.status: executing default-1 commands
config.status: executing default commands
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/etox-0.0.2.20040327/work/etox'
Making all in src
make[2]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/etox-0.0.2.20040327/work/etox/src'
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..     -O3 -march=athlon-xp -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -c etox.c
mkdir .libs
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -O3 -march=athlon-xp -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -Wp,-MD,.deps/etox.pp -c etox.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/etox.lo
In file included from Etox.h:6,
                 from Etox_private.h:5,
                 from etox.c:2:
/usr/include/Estyle.h:4:17: Ewd.h: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** [etox.lo] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/etox-0.0.2.20040327/work/etox/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/etox-0.0.2.20040327/work/etox'
make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
 * Please do not contact the E team about bugs in Gentoo.
 * Only contact vapier@gentoo.org via e-mail or bugzilla.
 * Remember, this stuff is CVS only code so dont cry when
 * I break you :).
 
!!! ERROR: media-libs/etox-0.0.2.20040327 failed.
!!! Function enlightenment_die, Line 39, Exitcode 0
!!! emake failed
!!! SEND BUG REPORTS TO vapier@gentoo.org NOT THE E TEAM

[Freedomzen]

emerge ewd first

[wallace1819]

just emerge enlightenment-cvs (everything complied fine)... this might be a dumb question, but I do not see a binary to start it. what is the actual exacutable called?

wallace

[curtis119]

At this point in developement there is nothing to start. The CVS ebuild is only the foundation libraries. There is a few apps that are cool like entrance(X login - like kdm or gdm). Who knows when the window manager will be finished.

[cuerty]

At this point in developement there is nothing to start. The CVS ebuild is only the foundation libraries. There is a few apps that are cool like entrance(X login - like kdm or gdm). Who knows when the window manager will be finished.

Desktop shell, not window manager

[curtis119]

Oh yeah right. I hope Raster doesn't read that.

[headache]

just emerge enlightenment-cvs (everything complied fine)... this might be a dumb question, but I do not see a binary to start it. what is the actual exacutable called?

wallace

/usr/bin/enlightenment

[curtis119]

/usr/bin/enlightenment

That is the e16 binary. There is no e17 binary (yet). Only the libs and a few programs that (will?) be included as part of the "desktop shell".

[tyme]

for this wh are curious about DR17...

straight from the horses mouth:

The upcoming release of DR17 is still under development. As stated in the State of the E-nion document that was published in March 2003, the version presently in CVS was a glorified test app, and is now deprecated -- it will not compile against present versions of the Enlightenment libraries. Development is already underway for the real E17, now that most of the EFL libraries are getting to a mature stage.

[powdahound]

Looks awesome.

[nighty]

im sorry to say with all belief in open source but the enlightenment development proccess seems to be too self centered and too little developers are involved. if they want to make this the greatest working enviroment for linux they have to start looking around them.

dr16 is nice but way too spartan. making it look pretty and not offerring any real revolutionary features wont help me if i can get something like fluxbox or ion to be more configurable.

im saying this as constructive criticism and by no means of flaming.
because i believe that by the time they will finish making dr17 longhorn will be long released and the linux grasp of graphical desktop enviroment might take a complete spin which will make projects like dr17 something of the past.

[tecknojunky]

I'm currently (re)using E16 on my box. From the look of the last to pages worth of posts in this thread, it does not seem I can get to use some E17 stuffs in my setup if I want a stable system. Am I wrong?

[ZothOmmog]

I'm currently (re)using E16 on my box. From the look of the last to pages worth of posts in this thread, it does not seem I can get to use some E17 stuffs in my setup if I want a stable system. Am I wrong?

I use Entrance, Erss & Evidence, all of which require E17 libraries, on my machine without any problems...

One potential source of problems: NPTL enabled glibc makes the edje library do bad, bad things....

[mondauge]

I use Entrance, Erss & Evidence, all of which require E17 libraries, on my machine without any problems...

Then you need to try out entice. It's a very nice imageviewer built on top of the EFL

mondauge

[chipi]

I think you guys should check http://www.rasterman.com/ again... There's a lot of talking about the new WM... IMO - beautiful screenshots!

[curtis119]

I think you guys should check http://www.rasterman.com/ again... There's a lot of talking about the new WM... IMO - beautiful screenshots!

Neuromantik and I both have built this successfully against the EFL in CVS. It is very cool! The launcher bar has wicked animations. The WM part of it doesn't work yet though but by all indications Rasterman and Co. have outdone themsleves. YEAH!!!!!!!!

[chipi]

So, are you saying the launch bar is usable? I don't like Iconbar or Engage too much, and by what I can in those screenshot - this one looks sweet.

[stahlsau]

somewhat quite around this topic...so noone tested the latest releases?
Do it - you will be impressed!
All that nice animations and stuff and its very fast too. I´m thinking of dropping xfce4...well no, i wont. But e17 is really great and has got some new pathbreaking technologies included.

[daktak]

Where would I find the mount module on this page? http://www.get-e.org/Resources/Modules/index.html Also the eVolume module could be cool.

Code: Select all

ls /usr/lib/enlightenment/modules_extra/

doesn't show anything that would look like it after a recompile of e_modules.

[nixnut]

Please use this thread instead: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-2 ... ml#2842780