Can we have our signature length expanded so we can link to all these good ideas? I'm out of room! OT: Oh and I don't remember anyone coming clean on why graphics were disabled

It is limited to 255 characters, not 5 lines. So even if your visible sig is pretty short adding hyperlinks and maybe even a [size] tag to make the text smaller push it over the 255 character mark.andrew_j_w wrote:Erm, why not put more than one thing on a line? Five lines is plenty - I don't want to have to scroll past pages of signatures to find the interesting stuff.stonent wrote:Can we have our signature length expanded so we can link to all these good ideas? I'm out of room!

255 characters is PLENTY for a signature. Have you seen signatures on some forums? They're completely ridiculous. Graphics should be disabled for exactly the same reason.stonent wrote:Can we have our signature length expanded so we can link to all these good ideas? I'm out of room! OT: Oh and I don't remember anyone coming clean on why graphics were disabled :)
Yea I think graphics should stay off, especially since we get a bit of spam these days and I don't want to be confronted by Mr Goatse one dayaethyr wrote:255 characters is PLENTY for a signature. Have you seen signatures on some forums? They're completely ridiculous. Graphics should be disabled for exactly the same reason.stonent wrote:Can we have our signature length expanded so we can link to all these good ideas? I'm out of room! OT: Oh and I don't remember anyone coming clean on why graphics were disabled

Yeah. I'm a member on a forum where some people have animated avatars and signatures, some of which hit 1/2 MB. It takes about 10 years to load a page on my cable connection if the stuff isn't cached. On a slow computer browsing the page is really jerky because of all the activity.aethyr wrote:255 characters is PLENTY for a signature. Have you seen signatures on some forums? They're completely ridiculous. Graphics should be disabled for exactly the same reason.stonent wrote:Can we have our signature length expanded so we can link to all these good ideas? I'm out of room! OT: Oh and I don't remember anyone coming clean on why graphics were disabled


HAHAHA, omg, I can't believe you even have the courage to show your sig over there in a thread here about increasing your sig size.stonent wrote:Wanna see a really large sig? http://delltalk.us.dell.com/supportforu ... ge.id=9592

this thread makes me want to get rid of sigs altogether :Pbatterj2 wrote:_________________
[img:9bc36a0121]http://jimbat.townersworld.co.uk/batterj2.jpg[/img:9bc36a0121]
The way I see it that just creates unnessecary work for the mods enforcing such a policy.batterj2 wrote: So why not have limitations like on other forums? eg no animations, 500x300 max? Any violation has there post deleted. In another forum I post at which uses phpBB has them deleted if 3 lines of smileys are used and they get a personal message from admin if their sigs are too big.
(admin must really hate me now......sorry, but i really dont see the harm)
At the risk of sounding like a tv evangelistaethyr wrote:255 characters is PLENTY for a signature. Have you seen signatures on some forums? They're completely ridiculous. Graphics should be disabled for exactly the same reason.stonent wrote:Can we have our signature length expanded so we can link to all these good ideas? I'm out of room! OT: Oh and I don't remember anyone coming clean on why graphics were disabled
Well in many cases it really helps there. One guy has a list of all the common dell part numbers and phone numbers because people are always asking how to get additional drive trays for their laptops and such, so the answer is always "Read Johnallg's sig!"pjp wrote:At that point, it ceases to be a sig, and becomes something else entirely.
At this time there is no real useful reason to increase the allowed sig size, so it will remain at 255.
You forgot the Bush '04 and Libertatem Defendimus in my sig.aethyr wrote:Stonent's sig