View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
telex4 l33t
Joined: 21 Sep 2002 Posts: 704 Location: Reading, UK
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
sindre wrote: | Half-life is based on id software's quake 2 graphic engine. Quake 2 isn't opensourced yet right? I don't think half-life can be opensourced without the graphics engine.
I wouldn't be too surprised to se ID opensource quake2 though.
signed |
Quake2 has been opensourced, hence there is quake2forge and I think an icculus version of it. Opensourcing Half-Life would therefore just involve opensourcing Valve's modifications to the engine... considering that the engine is no longer of any value to Valve (only the data packs on the CD are), opensourcing it wouldn't cost them anything, and it might promote more CD sales to get the packs to play the new ports of the engine. It'd also mean they wouldn't have to bother porting the engine, since people like icculus would do it for them. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wHAcKer Apprentice
Joined: 18 Oct 2002 Posts: 228 Location: Grimbergen, Belgium
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
GREAT IDEA
damn this'd be SO awesome.
I mean you can play HL with wine but wine is quite slow and we indeed do need NATIVE games |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Uranus Guru
Joined: 07 May 2002 Posts: 438 Location: Portugal, Braga
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ribs wrote: | Sorry, I only just saw your question. A counter is currently in the works. Currently, I don't have much time to work on it...
-Ribs. |
not that hard man! SELECT Count(*) FROM table !
there! a counter! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telex4 l33t
Joined: 21 Sep 2002 Posts: 704 Location: Reading, UK
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually (hogging the thread ), another benefit of opening the source is that we can then have a whole series of free (beer) and in some cases Free (speech) games made from the mods. If the engine is opensource, and the mod is opensource, that's a complete game that's opensource, so CS, DoD, TFC and all the other great HL mods would be available to download as games in their own right |
|
Back to top |
|
|
progster Apprentice
Joined: 16 Jul 2002 Posts: 271
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sindre wrote: | Half-life is based on id software's quake 2 graphic engine. Quake 2 isn't opensourced yet right? I don't think half-life can be opensourced without the graphics engine.
I wouldn't be too surprised to se ID opensource quake2 though.
signed |
I am quite confident the quake 2 engine is open source...
edit: oops someone already mentioned that
Anyway I signed as well! Slashdot would get you more then 7000 hits btw...
~prgoster |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Opteron n00b
Joined: 09 Mar 2003 Posts: 54 Location: Sweden, Husqvarna
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I made a post on a swedish forum! Hopefully many will sign |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dalu Guru
Joined: 20 Jan 2003 Posts: 530
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sindre wrote: | Half-life is based on id software's quake 2 graphic engine. Quake 2 isn't opensourced yet right? I don't think half-life can be opensourced without the graphics engine.
I wouldn't be too surprised to se ID opensource quake2 though.
signed |
the q2 source was released quite a while ago.
but honestly, would you really play halflife if it was on linux? why don't you just ask for a linux port of cs, cuz this is what you really want ain't it so? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telex4 l33t
Joined: 21 Sep 2002 Posts: 704 Location: Reading, UK
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dalu wrote: | but honestly, would you really play halflife if it was on linux? why don't you just ask for a linux port of cs, cuz this is what you really want ain't it so? |
But if Half-Life were open sourced, then potentially we could use all of the HL-based mods. It would only take a little work to ensure the modifications they've made to the HL engine work with the ported engine for GNU/Linux, MacOSX etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Uranus Guru
Joined: 07 May 2002 Posts: 438 Location: Portugal, Braga
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dalu wrote: | but honestly, would you really play halflife if it was on linux? why don't you just ask for a linux port of cs, cuz this is what you really want ain't it so? |
Not so!!! I don't even like CS! I play Natural Selection! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Uranus Guru
Joined: 07 May 2002 Posts: 438 Location: Portugal, Braga
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I posted a story to slashdot... now let's see if they will post it
if they do, prepare to see your website on its knees
Code: |
Here are your recent submissions to Slashdot, and their status within the system:
* 2003-06-15 15:05:48 Petition for a Half-Life linux port (games,fps)
Summary:
* pending (1)
|
UPDATE:
Code: |
Here are your recent submissions to Slashdot, and their status within the system:
* 2003-06-15 15:05:48 Petition for a Half-Life linux port (games,fps) (rejected)
Summary:
* rejected (1)
|
Last edited by Uranus on Sun Jun 15, 2003 6:05 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
refriedbean n00b
Joined: 19 Jan 2003 Posts: 70 Location: N 37° 33.327 E 126° 55.650
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ribs;
If you haven't yet, I suggest also posting this at http://www.linuxquestions.org .
There are a fair number of people scouring that forum
Refried |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telex4 l33t
Joined: 21 Sep 2002 Posts: 704 Location: Reading, UK
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Any idea of the number of signatures so far?
Tuxgames have a similar petition already by the way, just so you know:
http://www.tuxgames.com/petitions/
Oh, and I sent the news to www.linuxgames.com
update it's now an item on linuxgames
Last edited by telex4 on Sun Jun 15, 2003 9:04 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geekX Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 02 Apr 2003 Posts: 86 Location: Cape Town, South Africa
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would also love to know how many people have signed this so far.
btw: How many people do you guys think would have to 'sign' before Valve would start to take linux users seriously?
My guess is that they would first release HalfLife 1's source code to test the reaction before they consider porting HalfLife 2. Thats because HalfLife 2's engine (source) is probably not based on any ID software engine any more and therefore probably very dependent on Direct 3D. I think it would be a hell of a mission to port HalfLife 2. Look at Neverwinter Nights.... and they actually planned a linux version from the start. _________________ Sometimes I feel like Superman.
Sometimes I'm just recuperating. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pindrop Apprentice
Joined: 09 Jul 2002 Posts: 165 Location: Virginia, USA
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Signed with enthusiasm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lovechild Advocate
Joined: 17 May 2002 Posts: 2858 Location: Århus, Denmark
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dalu wrote: | sindre wrote: | Half-life is based on id software's quake 2 graphic engine. Quake 2 isn't opensourced yet right? I don't think half-life can be opensourced without the graphics engine.
I wouldn't be too surprised to se ID opensource quake2 though.
signed |
the q2 source was released quite a while ago.
but honestly, would you really play halflife if it was on linux? why don't you just ask for a linux port of cs, cuz this is what you really want ain't it so? |
Fuck no - I hate CS, I really want to play Half-Life again, because I never completed the game, I own every addon their ever released and I haven't played them in a long time, I really think that HL is one of the best games of all time simply because it has an exellent story. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AgenT Apprentice
Joined: 18 May 2003 Posts: 280
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quake & Quake2 source code has been out for years now. But to make things clear, Half-Life is based on Quake source code, not Quake2. Anyone who has played all three games can easily tell you that Half-Life uses the Quake engine (file types, names and commands are similar or exact to Quake).
There was, however, some function or whatnot from Quake2 pertaining to netcode that was allowed into Half-Life (although I may be mistaken somewhat on this point).
If I remember The Carmack mentions this in one of his .plan updates a few years ago.
/end FUD police |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Azaghal Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 02 May 2003 Posts: 103
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Valve won't release the source until no (CS-)cheater is buying the game anymore because they got banned.
seriously, Valve's listening to the community has been crap ever, the HL engine is old, buggy and slow (but most of you don't notice that anymore because of fast CPU's now), and Valve has been really crap for years at defeating cheaters. Don't get me wrong, I like the game much, but Valve support/the HL engine are just way too poor.
I read in some preview of HL2 that this is because they had been investing all their money/effort in HL2. I hope this is true.
And imagine the cheater-boom that would occur when they release HL open source right now, with it(well it's most famous MOD we all hate and love) still being the most played FPS online.
oh P.S. HL2 isn't derived from the q3 engine right? Since they started with HL2 right after it was clear HL1 was a success? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ribs Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 16 Nov 2002 Posts: 133 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The arguement of cheating is an interesting one which didn't cross my mind when making this petition. However, think about programs like Apache. It's open source, yet it's very secure because so many people contribute to it. This could theorically happen with HL; people could write cheat protection into the software which far surpasses Valves' efforts. Then again, people could also write cheats into the game.
Either way, HL is old, as you said, and Valve doesn't seem to care much for it anymore, so what have they got to loose by releaseing the source?
Just my two cents.
-Ribs. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telex4 l33t
Joined: 21 Sep 2002 Posts: 704 Location: Reading, UK
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cheating won't be *that* much easier because you can do md5 checksums of the binary and other datafiles on connecting to a server to make sure you are using a valid release that hasn't been mucked around with. It will just mean making hooks will be a little easier, but again that won't change detection so catching cheats won't be any harder... it will just be easier to make more devious cheats. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ethzero n00b
Joined: 24 May 2003 Posts: 53 Location: Colorado
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
wolf31o2 Retired Dev
Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Posts: 628 Location: Mountain View, CA
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sindre wrote: | Half-life is based on id software's quake 2 graphic engine. Quake 2 isn't opensourced yet right? I don't think half-life can be opensourced without the graphics engine.
I wouldn't be too surprised to se ID opensource quake2 though.
signed | Actually, Quake2 has been released for a while now.... and Half Life is actually based on the Quake engine (not Quake2) with a ton of modifications. Previous attempts to get Half_life ported have been met with "it contains way too much DirectX-specific code"... This does not rule out them making it open source, but I still doubt it since Half-Life is still an economically viable game for Valve. Since Wine and WineX are capable of running Half-Life, fixing up a port should not be too much trouble with the source in hand.
I think the real issue comes down to the fact that Half-Life still makes Valve money. We won't see anything from them, no matter how much we beg and plead. If you really wanted to get something going, have people mail you hand-written, legible letters asking to have the source made available to someone like Ryan Gordon (icculus or icculus.org) to do a closed-source port. This is much more likely than them open sourcing the product. Hand written letters have MUCH more clout than online petitions or email. Once you get a large number of letters, then mail them all to Valve.
They'll get the idea, then. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DuF Advocate
Joined: 09 Dec 2002 Posts: 2687 Location: Paris
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You can't say that a game will be better than an other only with videos... to know if a game is better, we need to play this game, to test it... so for the moment be quiet and wait is the better attitude imho ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jrz Apprentice
Joined: 19 Mar 2003 Posts: 272 Location: Sacramento, CA USA
|
Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2003 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i tell everyone this but after playing the leaked d3 demo the gfx kick hl2's and the sound adds a new dimension that no game (to my knowledge) has taken advantage of. the sound will make doom3. hl2 (imo) doesn't beat doom3 on gfx and if it doesn't beat it in sound (atmosFEAR) then it won't really be a competition. just half-life hangers-on who want half-life to continue will buy it :] _________________ Press F1 for Help. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ethzero n00b
Joined: 24 May 2003 Posts: 53 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
DuF wrote: | You can't say that a game will be better than an other only with videos... to know if a game is better, we need to play this game, to test it... so for the moment be quiet and wait is the better attitude imho ! |
You didn't watch the demo, did you? I meant that the Source engine will be better than the Doom 3 engine, not that Half Life 2 will be a better a game (and you can judge an engine by video). But if Half Life 1 is any indicator, Half Life 2 will probably be a better game too |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DuF Advocate
Joined: 09 Dec 2002 Posts: 2687 Location: Paris
|
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
ethzero wrote: | DuF wrote: | You can't say that a game will be better than an other only with videos... to know if a game is better, we need to play this game, to test it... so for the moment be quiet and wait is the better attitude imho ! |
You didn't watch the demo, did you? I meant that the Source engine will be better than the Doom 3 engine, not that Half Life 2 will be a better a game (and you can judge an engine by video). But if Half Life 1 is any indicator, Half Life 2 will probably be a better game too |
I watch the demo, and I'm not impress by the engine. When we see a man fall this is not really natural, not really look normal... I don't say that it will not be a great game, I have buy Half-Life, but when I see videos, for me HL2 is not impressed me. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|