View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
luis-tux n00b

Joined: 18 Sep 2003 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 5:46 am Post subject: ATI vs NVidia (oh boy) |
|
|
I Plan on getting a new video card for my system, and was wondering what would you folks recommend.
I want a vid. card with the most simple to install drivers(i would give up on "easy" for "stability/performance", and that would have the best performance for a dual display setup, and Video out.
I have used an NVidia before, but it was an older card and remember only being able to use dual-display on X, and lots or proprietary drivers. The ATI I have recently accquired is giving me hell! Since I will not be able to do benchmarks, I was wondering if anyone would recommend either of the 2?
If I could use dual display on CLI that would be awesome! Is it possible? with which card? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peshwengi n00b

Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Posts: 66 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know about dual dispaly on the terminal... how would you tell the PC which window you were typing in? Although maybe someone's figured out a way!
I got X working great using Xinerama and an ATI Radeon 9700 pro. It took a lot of documentation-reading though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
luis-tux n00b

Joined: 18 Sep 2003 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well...I was doing a lspci on my radeon 9700Se and it shows as being 2 diffrent Vid. cards....
So...If you have the certain tty directed to whatever "video card" you want it to go...it will be displayed there...
only usefull app. i see on this is to have on one monitor something like monitors, logs, or compiling a program on one screen while doing something else on another...
Or...reading a manual on one...while typing on another...it would be cool make it work just for the sake of it though  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peshwengi n00b

Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Posts: 66 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hehe I just use x terminals!
I had dual head working here at work (I work in a University) but then the systems people put Fedora on my machine instead of Gentoo (they changed their mind about me having root and now the dual head doesn't work  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
markalexander n00b

Joined: 11 Nov 2003 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 10:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have an NVIDIA, though, if I were to buy a new card it would defintely be an ATI. ATI's cards blow away NVIDIA. ATI are releasing drivers ever 2 months for Linux. Check out ATI's Linux fourms. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jcc Apprentice


Joined: 30 May 2003 Posts: 233 Location: Fort de France, Martinique
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
okay, they are releasing drivers every freaking second... and then? Do you have any problem with current NVidia drivers? Do you have low performance? Common man... If I was to choose my gfx card by driver update frequency, firstly, I'd still be running windows... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
luis-tux n00b

Joined: 18 Sep 2003 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
jcc wrote: | okay, they are releasing drivers every freaking second... and then? Do you have any problem with current NVidia drivers? Do you have low performance? Common man... If I was to choose my gfx card by driver update frequency, firstly, I'd still be running windows... |
Well...if they are releasing new drivers it means they are activelly developing it...which IS a good thing, mainly in linux when a lot of OEMs just release a driver and let it sit....
ATI is definetly a good chice in linux...I guess i just have a lot to read for the next couple months(good thing it's winter) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
neenee Veteran


Joined: 20 Jul 2003 Posts: 1786
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
i believe both ati and nvidia are good.
ati had less linux support a while back,
but they seem to be catching up or
have caught up already. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sgaap l33t


Joined: 16 Aug 2002 Posts: 754 Location: Enschede, The Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would still go for nvidia, they still have far better drivers than ati for linux: much better performance and good dualhead and tv-out support (and more important: easy to setup)
while using windows it maybe interesting to buy an ati card, in linux ati still doesnt come near nvidia. _________________ In "old" Europe we already have a word for "pre-emptive strikes" mr Bush: its called "war" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sindre Guru

Joined: 01 Nov 2002 Posts: 315 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From what benchmarks I can remember nvidia seems to do quite a bit better than ati on opengl apps/games (this is reviews on windows). Since opengl is the 3d acceleration you probably will be using in Gentoo, I would go for nvidia. Nvidia also has a longer history with drivers for linux. What I really want is of course an opensourced driver, but I don't see that ati is more likely to provide for this than nvidia. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ewan.paton Veteran


Joined: 29 Jul 2003 Posts: 1219 Location: glasgow, scotland
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2003 7:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
personaly id wait till after xmas unless you really have an app that needs it its not as if doom3 or hl2 are going to be out this side of febuary and almost every other game ive played ran on a geforce2mx as most of the best ones till use the quake3 engine. for ease of use nvidia has my money and next year they may have a good card based on the next chipset _________________ Giay tay nam | Giay nam cao cap | Giay luoi |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|