If you use Gxmame for a front-end, you should really do a CVS pull and grab the latest. The version in portage is broken with xmame 0.102.
Not at all. Portage x86 versions of xmame (0.102) and gxmame (gxmame-0.35_beta2) are fine together, and they have no problems at all with my rom collection ...
Search found 44 matches
- Mon Dec 26, 2005 8:53 pm
- Forum: Gamers & Players
- Topic: MAME frontends
- Replies: 13
- Views: 6156
- Tue Dec 13, 2005 11:21 pm
- Forum: Forum italiano (Italian)
- Topic: Openoffice 2.0 senza le caption!!!
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2447
- Mon Dec 12, 2005 4:46 pm
- Forum: Unsupported Software
- Topic: k9copy (dvdrip for kde) ebuild here
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7545
- Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:51 pm
- Forum: Portage & Programming
- Topic: wx-config symlink with wxGTK 2.4 AND 2.6
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1399
wx-config symlink with wxGTK 2.4 AND 2.6
This one has been puzzling me today: I had wxGTK 2.4 already installed, and went to install 2.6 too. Once emerged, I discovered that I couldn't compile applications that required the very same wxGTK 2.6 that I had just installed (one of these was the Catapult frontend from http://openmsx.sourceforge ...
- Sun Dec 11, 2005 7:01 pm
- Forum: Unsupported Software
- Topic: k9copy (dvdrip for kde) ebuild here
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7545
- Sun Sep 18, 2005 5:48 pm
- Forum: Gentoo Chat
- Topic: portage implementation discussion
- Replies: 129
- Views: 72981
hoschi, I really don't get your point, if any, so I'll try to make mine clear. When a project starts and a platform (language/architecture/whatever) for it has to be chosen, priority should to go to the platform who helps developers get the job done well and quickly, not to the one that minimizes ...
- Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:30 pm
- Forum: Gentoo Chat
- Topic: portage implementation discussion
- Replies: 129
- Views: 72981
Probably not, but the fun is in trying.
I'm with you about this one, but it all comes down to one's definition of "fun". I don't think I would have much fun rewriting the whole Portage core in C, having to fight against infancy bugs and maybe see halfway that the real problem was in old portage's ...
I'm with you about this one, but it all comes down to one's definition of "fun". I don't think I would have much fun rewriting the whole Portage core in C, having to fight against infancy bugs and maybe see halfway that the real problem was in old portage's ...
- Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:12 am
- Forum: Gentoo Chat
- Topic: portage implementation discussion
- Replies: 129
- Views: 72981
In this topic I read a lot of personal opinions that are senselessly promoted as absolute truths.
Before *even* thinking about reimplementing Portage, what about sitting for a moment and locate the actual problem(s)? Rewriting a software from scratch just because we hope this time it will come out ...
Before *even* thinking about reimplementing Portage, what about sitting for a moment and locate the actual problem(s)? Rewriting a software from scratch just because we hope this time it will come out ...
- Sun Sep 11, 2005 9:55 pm
- Forum: Gentoo Chat
- Topic: portage implementation discussion
- Replies: 129
- Views: 72981
What's this dependency phobia you are suffering of, I don't think it's rational at all. I can't understand either why adding Python to a base system would made it "fat and slow".
Apart from these things, I think we have some dangerous effort duplication here. sportage and portage-c might be among ...
Apart from these things, I think we have some dangerous effort duplication here. sportage and portage-c might be among ...
- Sun Sep 04, 2005 8:17 pm
- Forum: Gamers & Players
- Topic: xmame updates....
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6915
- Sun Aug 28, 2005 9:27 pm
- Forum: Forum di discussione italiano
- Topic: [OT] VIA mini-itx dual nano processor
- Replies: 28
- Views: 11150
Beh, mi sembra che a inizio post cerchi di calmare gli animi ma ti rifai a fine post.
Affatto: non mi sento tenuto a "calmare" degli animi che di certo non ero intenzionato ad infiammare, e quindi non vedo su cosa avrei avuto da rifarmi a fine post. Anzi, mi pare che tu sia l'unico ad averla presa ...
Affatto: non mi sento tenuto a "calmare" degli animi che di certo non ero intenzionato ad infiammare, e quindi non vedo su cosa avrei avuto da rifarmi a fine post. Anzi, mi pare che tu sia l'unico ad averla presa ...
- Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:32 pm
- Forum: Forum di discussione italiano
- Topic: [OT] VIA mini-itx dual nano processor
- Replies: 28
- Views: 11150
- Sun Aug 28, 2005 6:36 pm
- Forum: Forum di discussione italiano
- Topic: [OT] VIA mini-itx dual nano processor
- Replies: 28
- Views: 11150
- Sat Aug 13, 2005 8:05 pm
- Forum: Forum di discussione italiano
- Topic: [OT] [TOOL] depkg
- Replies: 98
- Views: 32208
- Wed Jul 27, 2005 7:52 pm
- Forum: Forum italiano (Italian)
- Topic: [info] http://thoggen.net/
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3388
thoggen non ha nulla a che vedere con DVDShrink; quest'ultimo converte DVD9->DVD5, thoggen converte DVD->Ogg/Theora, quindi è del tutto analogo ai convertitori DVD->DivX.
Qualcosa sotto Linux che fa DVD9->DVD5 è lxdvdrip, per il quale però nessuno ha ancora scritto una GUI. La comodità dei software ...
Qualcosa sotto Linux che fa DVD9->DVD5 è lxdvdrip, per il quale però nessuno ha ancora scritto una GUI. La comodità dei software ...
- Tue Jun 28, 2005 6:43 pm
- Forum: Forum italiano (Italian)
- Topic: Gentoo mangia gli hard-disk?
- Replies: 30
- Views: 7270
Secondo me la compilazione incide poco o nulla. A parte le alzate di testa di Portage, tipo quando buttano dentro una nuova release di Gnome o KDE, al massimo compili quei 2-3 pacchetti al giorno, che di certo non stressano la meccanica del disco più di molte altre attività che svolgi ogni giorno ...
- Tue Jun 28, 2005 6:14 pm
- Forum: Forum italiano (Italian)
- Topic: La CPU che va sottostress
- Replies: 17
- Views: 3235
- Mon Apr 04, 2005 8:29 pm
- Forum: Kernel & Hardware
- Topic: no more development-sources?
- Replies: 44
- Views: 26239
- Wed Jan 05, 2005 10:02 pm
- Forum: Portage & Programming
- Topic: Docbook support in Gentoo is broken [solved]
- Replies: 35
- Views: 11089
- Wed Jan 05, 2005 9:02 pm
- Forum: Portage & Programming
- Topic: Docbook support in Gentoo is broken [solved]
- Replies: 35
- Views: 11089
please, emerge opensp 1.5.1, it uses --enable-http that 1.5-r1 (Stable) don't use, or add --enable-http to 1.5-r1 ebuild.
You're the man! That was the ticket, I had already noticed the --enable-http option but only in openjade's ebuild, and it didn't come to my mind that opensp could have such an ...
You're the man! That was the ticket, I had already noticed the --enable-http option but only in openjade's ebuild, and it didn't come to my mind that opensp could have such an ...
- Sun Jan 02, 2005 6:51 pm
- Forum: Portage & Programming
- Topic: Docbook support in Gentoo is broken [solved]
- Replies: 35
- Views: 11089
- Sun Jan 02, 2005 6:13 pm
- Forum: Portage & Programming
- Topic: Docbook support in Gentoo is broken [solved]
- Replies: 35
- Views: 11089
- Fri Dec 31, 2004 6:14 pm
- Forum: Gentoo Chat
- Topic: Wishlist for Gentoo 2005.1
- Replies: 256
- Views: 86311
I would like to add to my personal wishlist a working integration of docbook2* utils... The interested people can find an extensive description of the problem here:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=187340
Update: everything has been solved, the world is good
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=187340
Update: everything has been solved, the world is good
- Fri Dec 31, 2004 6:04 pm
- Forum: Portage & Programming
- Topic: Docbook support in Gentoo is broken [solved]
- Replies: 35
- Views: 11089
- Thu Dec 23, 2004 11:11 pm
- Forum: Portage & Programming
- Topic: Docbook support in Gentoo is broken [solved]
- Replies: 35
- Views: 11089