Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Richard Stallman's thoughts on Gentoo
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
CliveHarris
n00b
n00b


Joined: 24 Nov 2003
Posts: 66
Location: Melbourne, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 12:02 pm    Post subject: Richard Stallman's thoughts on Gentoo Reply with quote

I went to a lecture by RMS last night and, in the discussion afterwards, I asked him if he had any recommendations about Linux distributions (sorry, GNU/Linux distributions!). The gist of his answer was that the only distro he unreservedly supported was "Ubuntu", but Gentoo came out better than most because it would only install packages the user specifically asked for, so you know exactly what you're getting. His main criticism was the inclusion of "unfree" packages in the portage tree.

When I explained to him about the package masking policy, where "unsafe" packages had to be specifically asked for, he approved and thought it was a step in the right direction.

I think to get him fully onside you would have to mask or remove all the "non-GPL-compatable" packages. However, perhaps there is a case for having a keyword or USE flag which would allow a "pure GPL" user to filter out incompatible packages.

As for myself, I'm not quite so particular. I've installed the Nvidia graphics drivers and a few other "unfree" packages. I don't like it but I'm willing to compromise where necessary.

By the way, after that we grabbed Richard's laptop to see what he was running. It turned out to be a customised version of Debian.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
moocha
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 21 Oct 2003
Posts: 5722

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 12:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't see a way to do that *and* at the same time not to fall into the same trap as Debian, namely a slow development cycle... That's the good thing about distributions - there are so many of them that one can choose if one doesn't like one :)
_________________
Military Commissions Act of 2006: http://tinyurl.com/jrcto

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- attributed to Benjamin Franklin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PingEnt
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 05 Apr 2003
Posts: 89
Location: Norway

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 12:22 pm    Post subject: Re: Richard Stallman's thoughts on Gentoo Reply with quote

CliveHarris wrote:
I think to get him fully onside you would have to mask or remove all the "non-GPL-compatable" packages. However, perhaps there is a case for having a keyword or USE flag which would allow a "pure GPL" user to filter out incompatible packages.
Hmm, I think I've heard/read something about a "ACCEPT_LICENSE=" keyword thing that is being devolped for Portage, but maybe I've dreamt the whole thing :?:
_________________
Thanks for reading. This has been a PingEnt presentation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
miqorz
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 04 Apr 2004
Posts: 1170
Location: Pissing into the wind.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 1:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So the Lord thy God has spoken. SO IT SHALL BE DONE.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stormy Eyes
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 09 Apr 2003
Posts: 1064
Location: Watching God spit-shine my boots.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 1:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's not like "non-free" packages are installed by default. You have to ask for a non-GPL package just like you have to ask for everything else, so what's Stallman's beef?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
miqorz
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 04 Apr 2004
Posts: 1170
Location: Pissing into the wind.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 1:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stormy Eyes wrote:
It's not like "non-free" packages are installed by default. You have to ask for a non-GPL package just like you have to ask for everything else, so what's Stallman's beef?


He's a GPL zealot, but can you blame him?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CliveHarris
n00b
n00b


Joined: 24 Nov 2003
Posts: 66
Location: Melbourne, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 1:14 pm    Post subject: Is he ... like Bill Gates? Reply with quote

After I got back from the meeting, I told my 9-year-old daughter that I had met the man who had written most of the programs on her computer. She looked puzzled for a minute and then said "Is he very famous - you know - like Bill Gates? He must be very rich! Did you shake his hand?"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stormy Eyes
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 09 Apr 2003
Posts: 1064
Location: Watching God spit-shine my boots.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 1:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

miqorz wrote:
So the Lord thy God has spoken. SO IT SHALL BE DONE.


Get it right, man. It's supposed to be "So it shall be written. So it shall be done." (Eddie 6:66), 'cos Iron Maiden fucking rules.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
miqorz
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 04 Apr 2004
Posts: 1170
Location: Pissing into the wind.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 1:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stormy Eyes wrote:
miqorz wrote:
So the Lord thy God has spoken. SO IT SHALL BE DONE.


Get it right, man. It's supposed to be "So it shall be written. So it shall be done." (Eddie 6:66), 'cos Iron Maiden fucking rules.


I know this, But he said it - So it isn't written! ;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CliveHarris
n00b
n00b


Joined: 24 Nov 2003
Posts: 66
Location: Melbourne, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 1:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
It's not like "non-free" packages are installed by default. You have to ask for a non-GPL package just like you have to ask for everything else, so what's Stallman's beef


I think his point was that you shouldn't be able to ACCIDENTLY install non-GPL packages. i.e. you shouldn't get them unless you specifically ask for them. I don't necessarily agree with that, but I can see his point.

By the way. No, I didn't shake hands with him. I'm sure all celebrities must get heartily sick of sycophants "pressing the flesh" just to brag about it afterwards!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
miqorz
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 04 Apr 2004
Posts: 1170
Location: Pissing into the wind.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I ever met RMS, he'd kick my ass for using FreeBSD, lol. :lol:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stormy Eyes
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 09 Apr 2003
Posts: 1064
Location: Watching God spit-shine my boots.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 1:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CliveHarris wrote:
I think his point was that you shouldn't be able to ACCIDENTLY install non-GPL packages. i.e. you shouldn't get them unless you specifically ask for them. I don't necessarily agree with that, but I can see his point.


How in the dark eternal do you install something like Flash or RealPlayer by accident? How do you install anything in Gentoo by accident? I can understand installing something unwanted as a dependency, or if you're drunk, but by accident?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
miqorz
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 04 Apr 2004
Posts: 1170
Location: Pissing into the wind.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 1:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stormy Eyes wrote:
CliveHarris wrote:
I think his point was that you shouldn't be able to ACCIDENTLY install non-GPL packages. i.e. you shouldn't get them unless you specifically ask for them. I don't necessarily agree with that, but I can see his point.


How in the dark eternal do you install something like Flash or RealPlayer by accident? How do you install anything in Gentoo by accident? I can understand installing something unwanted as a dependency, or if you're drunk, but by accident?


I think he means installing something without knowing it's not GPL.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
richk449
Guru
Guru


Joined: 24 Oct 2003
Posts: 345

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 2:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

From what CliveHarris said, Stallman liked Gentoo because you don't have to worry about "accidentally installing real player" or something like it. He is making a contrast between Gentoo, where the user makes all the choices, and the RedHat/Suse/Mandrake/etc type distros where there is a default installation that often includes non-free (as in freedom) software.

Miqorz - you should just put the fact that you run BSD in your sig, so that you dont have to bring it up in every thread.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Athas
Guru
Guru


Joined: 04 Sep 2003
Posts: 394
Location: Brøndby, Denmark

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 2:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stormy Eyes wrote:
CliveHarris wrote:
I think his point was that you shouldn't be able to ACCIDENTLY install non-GPL packages. i.e. you shouldn't get them unless you specifically ask for them. I don't necessarily agree with that, but I can see his point.


How in the dark eternal do you install something like Flash or RealPlayer by accident? How do you install anything in Gentoo by accident? I can understand installing something unwanted as a dependency, or if you're drunk, but by accident?


Subtle nonfree packages kan be pulled in as dependencies. Personally, I'd a USE-flag that made Portage barf if it encountered a nonfree license in a package it was about to install. Then I would be able to deal with it on a case by case basis.

Quote:
If I ever met RMS, he'd kick my ass for using FreeBSD, lol. Laughing


I doubt it, apart from the fact that Stallman isn't very strong, his website used to run on FreeBSD.
_________________
Emacs-optimized danish console keymap - My .emacs
Climacs - next generation Emacs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
miqorz
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 04 Apr 2004
Posts: 1170
Location: Pissing into the wind.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 2:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

richk449 wrote:
From what CliveHarris said, Stallman liked Gentoo because you don't have to worry about "accidentally installing real player" or something like it. He is making a contrast between Gentoo, where the user makes all the choices, and the RedHat/Suse/Mandrake/etc type distros where there is a default installation that often includes non-free (as in freedom) software.

Miqorz - you should just put the fact that you run BSD in your sig, so that you dont have to bring it up in every thread.


lol :P
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
spb
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 02 Jan 2004
Posts: 2135
Location: Cambridge, UK

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 2:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Athas wrote:
Personally, I'd a USE-flag that made Portage barf if it encountered a nonfree license in a package it was about to install. Then I would be able to deal with it on a case by case basis.
GLEP 23.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ciaranm
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Posts: 1719
Location: In Hiding

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 3:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We had this discussion with him a while back... He started out demanding that we removed all non-Free stuff from the tree, and then backed down to "only accept fsf-approved licences by default" when GLEP 23 was mentioned.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
senectus
Guru
Guru


Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Posts: 534

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 3:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RMS is a legend :-)
But I honestly believe that by the time his hard on for "GPL ONLY" environments are a commercial possibility, he'll be well past caring.

But you always need "extremist hippies" to balance out the evil being done by the capitalist henchmen currently wrecking the world.

edit: yes I'm aware of how contradicting the above statements are :-P
RMS is a powerhouse of philosophical brilliance.. I just think that he's come too early
_________________
2800+XP A7N8X FX6600GT
www.modmeup.net |
Belief is 9/10 of YOUR reality.
Wise man say: A skilled troll is a master baiter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ciaranm
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Posts: 1719
Location: In Hiding

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 3:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

senectus wrote:
RMS is a legend :-)
But I honestly believe that by the time his hard on for "GPL ONLY" environments are a commercial possibility, he'll be well past caring.

Well, since you need some *BSD licenced stuff to be able to build the "GPL ONLY" userland, that's kinda tricky... I think he cares more about "FSF approved" licences than purely GPL.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pjp
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 20630

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 5:26 pm    Post subject: Re: Richard Stallman's thoughts on Gentoo Reply with quote

CliveHarris wrote:
I think to get him fully onside
I didn't know we were trying. RMS can keep is unreasonable ideals to himself, and the software he develops. Thanks.
_________________
Quis separabit? Quo animo?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tomk
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 7221
Location: Sat in front of my computer

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 6:00 pm    Post subject: Re: Richard Stallman's thoughts on Gentoo Reply with quote

CliveHarris wrote:
However, perhaps there is a case for having a keyword or USE flag which would allow a "pure GPL" user to filter out incompatible packages.


Me and a few others wrote a licenses2kill script which will remove any packages with licenses that you don't want.
_________________
Search | Read | Answer | Report | Strip
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wdreinhart
Guru
Guru


Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 569
Location: 4QFJ12345678

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 7:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stormy Eyes wrote:
so what's Stallman's beef?


He's tormented by the knowledge that someone, somewhere is writing non-GPL software.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Liquid
n00b
n00b


Joined: 18 Nov 2003
Posts: 59

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 8:47 pm    Post subject: Re: Richard Stallman's thoughts on Gentoo Reply with quote

pjp wrote:
I didn't know we were trying. RMS can keep is unreasonable ideals to himself, and the software he develops. Thanks.


Why so aggressive with RMS?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
moocha
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 21 Oct 2003
Posts: 5722

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 9:14 pm    Post subject: Re: Richard Stallman's thoughts on Gentoo Reply with quote

Liquid wrote:
pjp wrote:
I didn't know we were trying. RMS can keep is unreasonable ideals to himself, and the software he develops. Thanks.


Why so aggressive with RMS?


Reflecting in kind :)

Fanaticism tends to make people suspicious of one's motives.
_________________
Military Commissions Act of 2006: http://tinyurl.com/jrcto

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- attributed to Benjamin Franklin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum