View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bluefoxicy n00b
Joined: 29 Aug 2004 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:58 pm Post subject: How do I turn on -hashvals,-z,dynsort |
|
|
At the risk of sounding like I don't know what I'm doing, what hoops do I need to jump through to get -hashvals and -zdynsort working? There's an overlay I need to get a new ld and glibc, right? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
freigeist Guru
Joined: 26 Jan 2004 Posts: 338 Location: Cologne, Germany
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
immudium Guru
Joined: 12 Oct 2004 Posts: 332 Location: Utah
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nesl247 Veteran
Joined: 15 Jun 2004 Posts: 1614 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When did I admit I'm not using it, I need to correct that then. Been a user since the patches were released. The newest stuff is pretty stable. You need binutils-2.17.50.0.3 from portage, nxsty's glibc with USE="hashstyle" and prelink from my overlay. Though this should all be integrated soon, if nxsty ever returns my pm. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LoSeR_5150 Guru
Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Posts: 455 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So would u recommend current users of -Wl,-Bdirect,-Wl,- hasvals,-Wl,-zdynsort to convert over? I've been nxsty's glibc overlay for some time and have been quite happy with it. So I will have to run pre-link in conjunction with the hashstyle to get significant gains? Thx _________________ Opteron 1356@2.4Ghz
6GB DDR2 800Mhz
128MB Quadro NVS 210S
640GB Western Digital HD
*Gentoo-x86_64-2.6.30-r1
Opteron175@2.2GHz
2GB DDR 400MHz
256MB Quadro 1400 Go
(2) 80GB Segate HDs: RAID0
*Gentoo-x86_64-2.6.30-r1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nesl247 Veteran
Joined: 15 Jun 2004 Posts: 1614 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No I wouldn't advise the migration unless you are very careful in it. You must follow instructions precisely or else your system will not be usable. Especially if a newer patch version comes out. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
immudium Guru
Joined: 12 Oct 2004 Posts: 332 Location: Utah
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nesl247 wrote: |
When did I admit I'm not using it, I need to correct that then. |
This line from the gentoo-wiki just above "Post Messages"
Quote: | Hope this explains it more or less, I haven't tested it myself for now obviously, but it should be correct. |
But I misunderstood. Sorry about that. I didn't understand you were just referring to upgrading from an old, patched version rather than referring to the guide as a whole. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nesl247 Veteran
Joined: 15 Jun 2004 Posts: 1614 Location: Florida
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It wasn't me that put the upgrade part in. And if it was me who made that statement, I put it in because well I haven't tested it. Otherwise it was basically from the forums whoever had posted the steps. I think Gergan. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gergan Penkov Veteran
Joined: 17 Jul 2004 Posts: 1464 Location: das kleinste Kuhdorf Deutschlands :)
|
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well you could remove this line , but this guide is only for people who update from older hashstyle.
the ones, who upgrade from -Bdirect seems to also have problems, the concept is to ensure that glibc is not using any patches through the migration, well hashvals -bdirect and so on were broken by design, that's why I have never used them, but it seems that they also break the structure of the sections - so beware and always have in mind that things could break, it seems that building glibc in chroot could help in such cases _________________ "I knew when an angel whispered into my ear,
You gotta get him away, yeah
Hey little bitch!
Be glad you finally walked away or you may have not lived another day."
Godsmack |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|