| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ksuther Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 09 May 2003 Posts: 86 Location: New York
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 1:32 pm Post subject: Re: xorg 6.7.99.903 + ati drivers +DRI/Gnome |
|
|
I've also been unable to get this running with the ATI drivers. After emerging xorg-x11, running opengl-update xorg-x11 then opengl-update ati, seems to work. I've a dual head setup, and only after switching to the ATI drivers can I use both heads. i.e. xorg-x11 drivers just give me a cloned 2nd head, rather than a separate one!
However, whenever I access any OpenGl functions, it just goes! It looks liks a complete hard freeze. no mouse, no nothing. However I can ssh from elsewhere on my network. X is not running. So ther is nothing to kill. I have to "startx" or restart GDM. Even running glxinfo can do this.
Also Gnome gives the same errors. Using the xorg-x11 drivers, i can run Gnome perfectly (2.6), but with the ATI propreitary drivers, it gives the above errors!!
Oh well, I'm sure (hope) that ATI may provide new drivers soon! (not that I'm sure that it's their drivers at fault!)
Cheers
Ferg[/quote]
I'm having this too. Do you have this error in your xorg log?
No matching visual for __GLcontextMode with visual class = -1 (-1), nplanes = 0
No clue what it means, but i doesn't seem right  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
perchut2 Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 31 Mar 2003 Posts: 96 Location: Paris
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i've got exactly the same. I believed it was because loading glx in xorg.conf didn't load opengl from the ati drivers but the mesa ones.
But this is still quite complicated for me  _________________ Bonheur Amour Risette,
Labeur Labour Levrette. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
playfool l33t


Joined: 01 Jun 2004 Posts: 688 Location: Ã
rhus, Denmark
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| is it just me or does this thing redraw like a lighting when using RenderAccel on nvidia's latest drivers - I have never seen X redraw this fast.. it's just awesome. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Al_bin n00b

Joined: 10 Jun 2004 Posts: 28 Location: Large forest: Sweden
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 5:03 pm Post subject: Re: 6.7.99.903 |
|
|
| Reverent wrote: | the 6.7.99.903 xorg works much better for me, so far i havent got any hard locks, only restarts of the x-server. Using an nvidia geforce-3ti and the 1.0.6111 driver. In KDE only scaling and shading a window leaves some artefacts when using transparency and client shadows.
Here i recorded the beast in action (xcompmgr -c & transset):
xorg.avi (~6.3 megs, DivX4) |
What program did you use to make that recording ? _________________ Life is like a rpm system, dependency hell. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shredz Apprentice


Joined: 05 Feb 2004 Posts: 215 Location: Antwerp
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well that sure looks nice. Considering I've got a gf3 and a 50-page paper to read I'm merging this latest version. Anyone started making an expose-patch for kwin already btw ?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Reverent n00b

Joined: 13 Feb 2003 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 5:43 pm Post subject: Re: 6.7.99.903 |
|
|
| Al_bin wrote: | | What program did you use to make that recording ? |
xvidcap to capture and mencoder(mplayer) to do some tweaking, its in portage. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
psofa Guru


Joined: 28 Feb 2004 Posts: 485
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tried gnome with the radeon driver and xcompmgr (metacity compositor disabled) .All are ok after the pixmap problems got addressed.Waimea has some probs with the background ( if set ,it gets artifacts) and the shading event (these are easily fixable).On the other way using the crappy fglrx whore my screen is an artifact mess.However even if these issues with ati get fixed theres render accel which perfoms even worse than the radeon driver and i highly doubt it will be ever fixed so this is a good reason for me to upgrade to an nvidia when the time comes....(i wont bother mentioning the opengl performance ) _________________ psofa |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
imptech n00b

Joined: 29 Sep 2003 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 5:54 pm Post subject: Re: xorg 6.7.99.903 + ati drivers +DRI/Gnome |
|
|
| ksuther wrote: | Also Gnome gives the same errors. Using the xorg-x11 drivers, i can run Gnome perfectly (2.6), but with the ATI propreitary drivers, it gives the above errors!!
|
I was having the same problem where Gnome would crash out on load with the ATI drivers but be fine with the xorg radeon driver. I think its just the same issue as with opengl apps crashing. I was able to stop it by disabling xscreensaver. OpenGL apps still don't work, naturally. But at least I can get into Gnome. That said, the composite performance is terrible with the ATI proprietary drivers, so I may go back to the xorg driver anyway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tactless l33t


Joined: 14 Jul 2002 Posts: 642 Location: Mitzpe Adi, Israel
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
First of all, I'm lovin' it! My girlfriend was complaining about how utterly stupid existing fake-transparency was, and she'll love this when she gets home.
Here's testing that I've done with xorg-x11 6.8.0 RC3. I'm using nvidia binaries of version 6111, kernel 2.6.7.
Interesting note: /var/tmp permissions were incorrect. They need to be 1777 (rwxrwxrwt), or the kbd driver causes problems. These problems did not seem to exist in previous versions of X[org/Free]. Changing the permissions solves this.
I use Openbox3. xcompmgr closes all preexisting windows on startup and shutdown. I've tried it with KDE3.2, however, and all of the windows reappeared properly.
Using the -f option for xcompmgr causes Mozilla's menus to be invisible at times. I can live without the (extremely wicked) fading effect, but I thought I should mention it.
Finally, I've tried OpenGL apps while xcompmgr is operational. Quake 3 works. GLXgears works. UT2004demo works, but causes xcompmgr to crash - which, as I've mentioned, causes all open windows to go away. TORCS causes the X server to restart.
All in all, a very solid prerelease. Composite is turned off by default, and I doubt that they'll have it ready to be on by default by 6.8.0 final, but the progress is quick, and with cooperation from nVidia (and ATI), I don't think it will take too long. Keep up the good work, fd.o! _________________ Tactless
"If it wasn't for fog, the world would run at a really crappy framerate."
Jabber: tactless@amessage.info |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aethyr Veteran


Joined: 06 Apr 2003 Posts: 1085 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| tactless wrote: | | My girlfriend was complaining about how utterly stupid existing fake-transparency was, and she'll love this when she gets home. |
Where can you go to complain how utterly stupid real-transparency is? ;)
Anyways, I'm going to be doing a test installation on a spare partition later (don't wanna mess up my main install) so I guess I'll be able to see what all the talk is about.
Last edited by aethyr on Mon Aug 30, 2004 7:15 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
meital Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've just emerged xorg-x11-6.7.99.903 and I can't startx anymore because it cant find the screen this is my Xorg.0.log : | Code: | This is a pre-release version of the The X.Org Foundation X11.
It is not supported in any way.
Bugs may be filed in the bugzilla at http://bugs.freedesktop.org/.
Select the "xorg" product for bugs you find in this release.
Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions please check the
latest version in the The X.Org Foundation "monolithic tree" CVS
repository hosted at http://www.freedesktop.org/Software/xorg/
X Window System Version 6.7.99.903 (6.8.0 RC 3)
Release Date: 28 August 2004
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.7.99.903
Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.7-gentoo-r11 i686 [ELF]
Current Operating System: Linux DeepThought 2.6.7-gentoo-r11 #1 Tue Aug 3 19:18:44 IDT
2004 i686
Build Date: 30 August 2004
Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.X.Org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Mon Aug 30 21:40:36 2004
(==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf"
Parse error on line 429 of section Extentions in file /etc/X11/xorg.conf
"Extentions" is not a valid section name.
(EE) Problem parsing the config file
(EE) Error parsing the config file
Fatal server error:
no screens found
Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support
at http://wiki.X.Org
for help.
Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for additional information.
|
does anyone know how to fix it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
codergeek42 Bodhisattva

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 5142 Location: Anaheim, CA (USA)
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| meital wrote: | I've just emerged xorg-x11-6.7.99.903 and I can't startx anymore because it cant find the screen this is my Xorg.0.log : | Code: | This is a pre-release version of the The X.Org Foundation X11.
It is not supported in any way.
Bugs may be filed in the bugzilla at http://bugs.freedesktop.org/.
Select the "xorg" product for bugs you find in this release.
Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions please check the
latest version in the The X.Org Foundation "monolithic tree" CVS
repository hosted at http://www.freedesktop.org/Software/xorg/
X Window System Version 6.7.99.903 (6.8.0 RC 3)
Release Date: 28 August 2004
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.7.99.903
Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.7-gentoo-r11 i686 [ELF]
Current Operating System: Linux DeepThought 2.6.7-gentoo-r11 #1 Tue Aug 3 19:18:44 IDT
2004 i686
Build Date: 30 August 2004
Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.X.Org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Mon Aug 30 21:40:36 2004
(==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf"
Parse error on line 429 of section Extentions in file /etc/X11/xorg.conf
"Extentions" is not a valid section name.
(EE) Problem parsing the config file
(EE) Error parsing the config file
Fatal server error:
no screens found
Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support
at http://wiki.X.Org
for help.
Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for additional information.
|
does anyone know how to fix it? | The section name should be "Extensions"...
[edit]Btw, I love how you named your computer "DeepThought". Very excellent ! _________________ ~~ Peter: Programmer, Mathematician, STEM & Free Software Advocate, Enlightened Agent, Transhumanist, Fedora contributor
Who am I? :: EFF & FSF |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KingPunk Guru


Joined: 22 Jan 2004 Posts: 442 Location: Utica, New York, USA
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| aethyr wrote: | | tactless wrote: | | My girlfriend was complaining about how utterly stupid existing fake-transparency was, and she'll love this when she gets home. |
Where can you go to complain how utterly stupid real-transparency is?
Anyways, I'm going to be doing a test installation on a spare partition later (don't wanna mess up my main install) so I guess I'll be able to see what all the talk is about. |
..better yet, thats all a girl has to complain about? what is this world coming to?
she a geek too? i'd hope so. i hope she didn't walk up, all of a studden all
advanced-like uber geeky stylie.. and say,
"UGH, i hate how fake transparency exists, its just so, so.. um, fake. its like,
totally useless, ya?"
 _________________ When the FBI/CIA/NSA/FDA/and other three-letter government agencies come looking, you don't know me, you never saw me, never heard of me. get it? got it? good!
also: ALL YOUR POLLITICAL BASE ARE BELONG TO HILLARY IN '08!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
meital Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 93
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I guess DeepThought would'nt misspell "Extensions"
I've changed it but it still won't do, now it cant find the keyboard | Code: | (**) Option "Protocol" "IMPS/2"
(**) Mouse1: Device: "/dev/mouse"
(**) Mouse1: Protocol: "IMPS/2"
(**) Option "CorePointer"
(**) Mouse1: Core Pointer
(**) Option "Device" "/dev/mouse"
(==) Mouse1: Emulate3Buttons, Emulate3Timeout: 50
(**) Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"
(**) Mouse1: ZAxisMapping: buttons 4 and 5
(**) Mouse1: Buttons: 5
(**) Mouse1: SmartScroll: 1
(EE) No Input driver matching `Keyboard'
(II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "Mouse1" (type: MOUSE)
(II) Mouse1: ps2EnableDataReporting: succeeded
No core keyboard
Fatal server error:
failed to initialize core devices
Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support
at http://wiki.X.Org
for help.
Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for additional information.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KingPunk Guru


Joined: 22 Jan 2004 Posts: 442 Location: Utica, New York, USA
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| meital wrote: | I guess DeepThought would'nt misspell "Extensions"
I've changed it but it still won't do, now it cant find the keyboard | Code: | (**) Option "Protocol" "IMPS/2"
(**) Mouse1: Device: "/dev/mouse"
(**) Mouse1: Protocol: "IMPS/2"
(**) Option "CorePointer"
(**) Mouse1: Core Pointer
(**) Option "Device" "/dev/mouse"
(==) Mouse1: Emulate3Buttons, Emulate3Timeout: 50
(**) Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"
(**) Mouse1: ZAxisMapping: buttons 4 and 5
(**) Mouse1: Buttons: 5
(**) Mouse1: SmartScroll: 1
(EE) No Input driver matching `Keyboard'
(II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "Mouse1" (type: MOUSE)
(II) Mouse1: ps2EnableDataReporting: succeeded
No core keyboard
Fatal server error:
failed to initialize core devices
Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support
at http://wiki.X.Org
for help.
Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for additional information.
|
|
learn how to read. the keyboard driver, is no longer keyboard, but kbd
thats covered in the basic howto, guide, and anything else.
hell its been mentioned on here, like 100x.
did you pass 5th grade english?  _________________ When the FBI/CIA/NSA/FDA/and other three-letter government agencies come looking, you don't know me, you never saw me, never heard of me. get it? got it? good!
also: ALL YOUR POLLITICAL BASE ARE BELONG TO HILLARY IN '08!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DFanick Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Aug 2004 Posts: 78 Location: Norderstedt
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aethyr Veteran


Joined: 06 Apr 2003 Posts: 1085 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 7:50 pm Post subject: Re: xorg with shadows |
|
|
NWS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shredz Apprentice


Joined: 05 Feb 2004 Posts: 215 Location: Antwerp
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Got it working on nvidia 53.xx drivers in KDE. Works really well apparently, only mplayer acts all weird once it gets "thrown in the mix". Probably due to xv driver acting weird or something.
Since we're all screening anyway, here's my shot.
http://wilma.vub.ac.be/~sstommel/pwnt.jpg
Really looking forward to the millions of eye candy patches coming our way
edit: the translucency really needs integrating, turned it off already since everything translucent gives me a headache... still looks cool though hehe |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tactless l33t


Joined: 14 Jul 2002 Posts: 642 Location: Mitzpe Adi, Israel
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| KingPunk wrote: | | aethyr wrote: | | tactless wrote: | | My girlfriend was complaining about how utterly stupid existing fake-transparency was, and she'll love this when she gets home. |
Where can you go to complain how utterly stupid real-transparency is?
Anyways, I'm going to be doing a test installation on a spare partition later (don't wanna mess up my main install) so I guess I'll be able to see what all the talk is about. |
..better yet, thats all a girl has to complain about? what is this world coming to?
she a geek too? i'd hope so. i hope she didn't walk up, all of a studden all
advanced-like uber geeky stylie.. and say,
"UGH, i hate how fake transparency exists, its just so, so.. um, fake. its like,
totally useless, ya?"
 |
She's a bit of a geek, but not really when it comes to computers. I've shown her Linux and set it up on her machine as well. When I showed her transparent terminals, it really bugged her that only the background was showing.
Screenie. Yes, that is her in the wallpaper.
http://lutzky.homelinux.net/~tactless/screenshots/20040830.png _________________ Tactless
"If it wasn't for fog, the world would run at a really crappy framerate."
Jabber: tactless@amessage.info |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DFanick Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Aug 2004 Posts: 78 Location: Norderstedt
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 8:37 pm Post subject: Console |
|
|
@aethyr:
What does "NWS" mean?
It's not my girlfiend on the wallpaper anyway. But with my new transparant konsole i bet i'll get her - haha.
Nice greetings out of Hamburg to all of you boys! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
neuron Advocate


Joined: 28 May 2002 Posts: 2371
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 8:54 pm Post subject: Re: xorg 6.7.99.903 + ati drivers +DRI/Gnome |
|
|
| imptech wrote: | | That said, the composite performance is terrible with the ATI proprietary drivers, so I may go back to the xorg driver anyway. |
wait a min, the xorg-x11 radeon drivers work faster than the fglrx drivers for you? Hmm, maybe they've made some progress with that
also for those who doesn't know it, ati is planning to release a point release ati driver a few weeks after xorg release for better compatibility (and opengl). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John5788 Advocate


Joined: 06 Apr 2004 Posts: 2140 Location: 127.0.0.1
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 8:54 pm Post subject: Re: Console |
|
|
| DFanick wrote: | @aethyr:
What does "NWS" mean?
It's not my girlfiend on the wallpaper anyway. But with my new transparant konsole i bet i'll get her - haha.
Nice greetings out of Hamburg to all of you boys! |
Not Work Safe im pretty sure. but most people use NSFW = not safe for work _________________ John5788 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DFanick Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Aug 2004 Posts: 78 Location: Norderstedt
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 9:00 pm Post subject: i like it |
|
|
btw:
i can now watch "mplayer -vo x11" through other windows even if it's awfully slow when zoomed to 1280x1024.
This day is a bit like christmas... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DFanick Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Aug 2004 Posts: 78 Location: Norderstedt
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 9:14 pm Post subject: so cool |
|
|
Maybe you'll think that I'm a talkaholic, but I want to write that it is even possible to make the x11-video-output transparant. With a compiling console in the background it looks everthing like "matrix".
But ain't everything the "matrix"? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KingPunk Guru


Joined: 22 Jan 2004 Posts: 442 Location: Utica, New York, USA
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 9:42 pm Post subject: Re: so cool |
|
|
| DFanick wrote: | Maybe you'll think that I'm a talkaholic, but I want to write that it is even possible to make the x11-video-output transparant. With a compiling console in the background it looks everthing like "matrix".
But ain't everything the "matrix"? |
http://www.deviantart.com/view/9926615/ - just shows some of my
crap. its transparent video too. thats why im showing you.  _________________ When the FBI/CIA/NSA/FDA/and other three-letter government agencies come looking, you don't know me, you never saw me, never heard of me. get it? got it? good!
also: ALL YOUR POLLITICAL BASE ARE BELONG TO HILLARY IN '08!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|