This was an rsync-only error; there are certainly other errors which can occur with git only. You can never be completely safe of any mistake somebody might make.darkbasic wrote:Afer the "contains .git" error
Main downside is a much larger disk space requirement, especially compared to e.g. squashfs.Are there any downsides?
Never tried, but I don't see why it shouldn't. Timestamps should not play a role here AFAIK.Does it support portage news? Last time I heard it didn't.




