Forums

Skip to content

Advanced search
  • Quick links
    • Unanswered topics
    • Active topics
    • Search
  • FAQ
  • Login
  • Register
  • Board index Assistance Unsupported Software
  • Search

___DEPRECATED___ 2.6.14-nitro2

This forum covers all Gentoo-related software not officially supported by Gentoo. Ebuilds/software posted here might harm the health and stability of your system(s), and are not supported by Gentoo developers. Bugs/errors caused by ebuilds from overlays.gentoo.org are covered by this forum, too.
Post Reply
Advanced search
417 posts
  • Page 6 of 17
    • Jump to page:
  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • …
  • 17
  • Next
Author
Message
b3cks
Veteran
Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 1481
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 10:01 am
Location: Bremen (GER)

  • Quote

Post by b3cks » Wed Nov 16, 2005 6:51 am

HecHacker1 wrote:i am switching to ext3 for my / partition and leaving reiser4, i'll report back to say if it solves my disk load problem. I really do like reiser4, but something happened in 1.0.5 that slowed it way down for me, at least for my laptop hard drive.
I checked the disk performance this morning and it's just normal. I copied small and big files, did a sync and ran Anjuta for test-compiling a project. All things ran well and normal. Maybe this is really because of a newer Reiser4(Progs) version. My last installation is about six months ago.
I am /root and if you see me laughing you better have a backup.
Top
HecHacker1
Apprentice
Apprentice
User avatar
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 5:39 am
Location: UCSD
Contact:
Contact HecHacker1
Website

  • Quote

Post by HecHacker1 » Wed Nov 16, 2005 8:07 am

yeah.. Well I just got back into my new ext3 partition with dir_index and journaling enabled, and guess what.. the disk load issues are gone! The problem really was caused by reiser4. Now with ext3 it takes only 1 second to open /etc/X11/xorg.conf instead of the 30+ for reiser4.

Everything is sooo much faster and the disk load is almost 0 instead of 100%. Hmmm, i think the reiser4 1.0.5 tools did something to cause massive latency or disk thrashing.
Top
fauxalliance
n00b
n00b
User avatar
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 4:00 am
Location: Newfoundland, Canada

FB me crazy.

  • Quote

Post by fauxalliance » Wed Nov 16, 2005 4:02 pm

Many thanks for another rippin' kernel.

Are there still issues wth vesa-tng? I have been unable to sync my LCD monitor when leaving X. According to nvnews, its not news. Trying vesa drivers now.

-fa
Top
Tiger683
Veteran
Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 1347
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 8:34 pm
Location: Heffner's House

  • Quote

Post by Tiger683 » Wed Nov 16, 2005 4:53 pm

vesafb-tng works well in this release....
Retired gentoo user
Top
mayday147
l33t
l33t
User avatar
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:13 am
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Re: FB me crazy.

  • Quote

Post by mayday147 » Wed Nov 16, 2005 6:22 pm

fauxalliance wrote:Many thanks for another rippin' kernel.

Are there still issues wth vesa-tng? I have been unable to sync my LCD monitor when leaving X. According to nvnews, its not news. Trying vesa drivers now.

-fa
Are you using ATI? I had the same problem on my laptop and I had to switch to 16bpp in xorg.conf.
gentoo.ro
Top
tuam
l33t
l33t
User avatar
Posts: 765
Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 9:09 am
Location: CGN, Germany

  • Quote

Post by tuam » Wed Nov 16, 2005 9:18 pm

Tiger683 wrote:It means you shouldn't build reiser4 as module.... ;)

there is a patch for this error on namesys ftp though.....
Thanks, as builtin it's OK now.

FF,

Daniel
Top
satanskin
Guru
Guru
Posts: 353
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 1:37 am

  • Quote

Post by satanskin » Wed Nov 16, 2005 11:53 pm

HecHacker1 wrote:yeah.. Well I just got back into my new ext3 partition with dir_index and journaling enabled, and guess what.. the disk load issues are gone! The problem really was caused by reiser4. Now with ext3 it takes only 1 second to open /etc/X11/xorg.conf instead of the 30+ for reiser4.

Everything is sooo much faster and the disk load is almost 0 instead of 100%. Hmmm, i think the reiser4 1.0.5 tools did something to cause massive latency or disk thrashing.
Why not just use the stable release of Reiser if you liked Reiser but R4 broke stuff? Why go back to Ext3 instead?
Top
bollucks
l33t
l33t
Posts: 606
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 11:49 pm

  • Quote

Post by bollucks » Wed Nov 16, 2005 11:59 pm

Tuned ext3 has lower latency than reiser3. Try also noatime and changing journalling to writeback with tune2fs; this helps as well.
Top
HecHacker1
Apprentice
Apprentice
User avatar
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 5:39 am
Location: UCSD
Contact:
Contact HecHacker1
Website

  • Quote

Post by HecHacker1 » Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:42 am

satanskin wrote:
HecHacker1 wrote:yeah.. Well I just got back into my new ext3 partition with dir_index and journaling enabled, and guess what.. the disk load issues are gone! The problem really was caused by reiser4. Now with ext3 it takes only 1 second to open /etc/X11/xorg.conf instead of the 30+ for reiser4.

Everything is sooo much faster and the disk load is almost 0 instead of 100%. Hmmm, i think the reiser4 1.0.5 tools did something to cause massive latency or disk thrashing.
Why not just use the stable release of Reiser if you liked Reiser but R4 broke stuff? Why go back to Ext3 instead?
because the official portage version of reiser4 is 1.0.5 and even the livecd's I use to set up the reiser4 partitions use 1.0.5. I would have to get an old version that uses 1.0.0.

I am happy with ext3 right now, it is slower on some things like emerge sync, but it does have it's benefits. Now I can use inotify with rlocate to have real time file location, and beagle to search all my data. I think beagle works with reiser4 too, but in an emulation mode that will use more cpu and be slower.

I think i'll wait for an updated version of reiser4 before I go back, it's a simple procedure anyways.
Top
Tiger683
Veteran
Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 1347
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 8:34 pm
Location: Heffner's House

  • Quote

Post by Tiger683 » Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:52 am

Using recent reiser4 code with early reiser4progs would most probably break your system badly....
Retired gentoo user
Top
Thetargos
Apprentice
Apprentice
User avatar
Posts: 155
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 7:25 pm
Location: Mexico City

What da??

  • Quote

Post by Thetargos » Thu Nov 17, 2005 10:26 am

Just saw this a few moments ago... I don't like the looks of it, anyone seen this?

Code: Select all

nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel.
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:01:00.0[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 217
NVRM: loading NVIDIA Linux x86_64 NVIDIA Kernel Module  1.0-7676  Fri Jul 29 13: 15:16 PDT 2005
agpgart: Found an AGP 3.0 compliant device at 0000:00:00.0.
agpgart: Putting AGP V3 device at 0000:00:00.0 into 8x mode
agpgart: Putting AGP V3 device at 0000:01:00.0 into 8x mode
Debug: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/rwsem.h:66
in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():0

Call Trace:<ffffffff8011fb7f>{change_page_attr_addr+43} <ffffffff8011efed>{iorem ap_change_attr+77}
       <ffffffff8011f64d>{iounmap+130} <ffffffff88533510>{:nvidia:os_unmap_kerne l_space+9}
       <ffffffff88335905>{:nvidia:_nv002010rm+101} <ffffffff8846bf0c>{:nvidia:_n v004040rm+102}
       <ffffffff8845ee75>{:nvidia:_nv004588rm+145} <ffffffff8845e8e1>{:nvidia:_n v004386rm+99}
       <ffffffff88338775>{:nvidia:_nv001419rm+251} <ffffffff8833ba23>{:nvidia:rm _shutdown_adapter+99}
       <ffffffff88530a3d>{:nvidia:nv_kern_close+205} <ffffffff801759fa>{__fput+1 83}
       <ffffffff80172f92>{filp_close+93} <ffffffff8017350f>{sys_close+155}
       <ffffffff8010e950>{tracesys+209}
agpgart: Found an AGP 3.0 compliant device at 0000:00:00.0.
agpgart: Putting AGP V3 device at 0000:00:00.0 into 8x mode
agpgart: Putting AGP V3 device at 0000:01:00.0 into 8x mode
Debug: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/rwsem.h:66
in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():0

Call Trace:<ffffffff8011fb7f>{change_page_attr_addr+43} <ffffffff8011efed>{iorem ap_change_attr+77}
       <ffffffff8011f64d>{iounmap+130} <ffffffff88533510>{:nvidia:os_unmap_kerne l_space+9}
       <ffffffff88335905>{:nvidia:_nv002010rm+101} <ffffffff8846bf0c>{:nvidia:_n v004040rm+102}
       <ffffffff8845ee75>{:nvidia:_nv004588rm+145} <ffffffff8845e8e1>{:nvidia:_n v004386rm+99}
       <ffffffff88338775>{:nvidia:_nv001419rm+251} <ffffffff8833ba23>{:nvidia:rm _shutdown_adapter+99}
       <ffffffff88530a3d>{:nvidia:nv_kern_close+205} <ffffffff801759fa>{__fput+1 83}
       <ffffffff80172f92>{filp_close+93} <ffffffff8017350f>{sys_close+155}
       <ffffffff8010e950>{tracesys+209}
This thing gets logged everytime the card is used... in oder words, games suffer a lot from IO activity and whatever this would mean. I'm not sure what is causing this, but seems like "sleep in spinlock" is the responsible for this. This is a reference kernel I built to test things out, anyone else noticed anything unsual? This is with nVidia's 7676 driver.
Top
Tiger683
Veteran
Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 1347
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 8:34 pm
Location: Heffner's House

  • Quote

Post by Tiger683 » Thu Nov 17, 2005 10:51 am

omg!!!!! my eyes!!!!!!

now seriously, if i were you i would disable kernel debugging entirely,
or at least the sleep inside spinlock checks, this bug is on nvidia side AFAIK.
Retired gentoo user
Top
Thetargos
Apprentice
Apprentice
User avatar
Posts: 155
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 7:25 pm
Location: Mexico City

  • Quote

Post by Thetargos » Thu Nov 17, 2005 11:21 am

I'm in the process of building another test case, without debugging options (I left them in thsi test case to see if it catched anythig, boy did it catch something!) Oddly enough with Gentoo sources (or reference Fedora kernel), this does not happen... I just hope this is not caused by setting low-lat desktop...
Top
ahorn
Guru
Guru
User avatar
Posts: 366
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 7:31 pm
Location: Ol' europe

  • Quote

Post by ahorn » Thu Nov 17, 2005 3:49 pm

thanks for including the voltage patch in the next releases.

anyway, this release works fine at some pcs, but one (an old p3 500mhz) got a segfault at hibernating to suspend2 (no modules are loaded). any ideas? it works fine at my laptop.

greetings, ahorn.
Too many connections. Please try again later.
Top
tagwar
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper
User avatar
Posts: 147
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 3:20 pm
Location: Karlsruhe

resuming now works

  • Quote

Post by tagwar » Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:54 pm

woohoo.. just tried hibernating and resuming once again, and this time it worked... i haven't changed anything, but it works... great!!! Now i'm realy happy... :-)
Top
1U
Guru
Guru
User avatar
Posts: 319
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 8:56 pm

  • Quote

Post by 1U » Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:40 pm

I moved to this kernel from the previous 14-rc3-nitro1 I think it was. All my crashing has stopped. I was getting insane pdflush problems and it was impossible to use the computer for more than 20 minutes. I'm glad this one works nicely. Thanks for the suggestion Tiger. Btw, did you rename this release? Or how was it that I was posting about serious problems and this was r3-nitro1 and now they are gone?
Obstacles do not exist to be surrendered to, but only to be broken.
Top
Tiger683
Veteran
Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 1347
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 8:34 pm
Location: Heffner's House

  • Quote

Post by Tiger683 » Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:45 pm

1U wrote:I moved to this kernel from the previous 14-rc3-nitro1 I think it was. All my crashing has stopped. I was getting insane pdflush problems and it was impossible to use the computer for more than 20 minutes. I'm glad this one works nicely. Thanks for the suggestion Tiger. Btw, did you rename this release? Or how was it that I was posting about serious problems and this was r3-nitro1 and now they are gone?
hmm, mysterious, i didn't rename threads, to keep things more transparent i usually do not do it...
Retired gentoo user
Top
1U
Guru
Guru
User avatar
Posts: 319
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 8:56 pm

  • Quote

Post by 1U » Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:49 pm

Then perhaps I must have downloaded the wrong ebuild or I got all of the recent nitro threads mixed up. Btw, you wouldn't happen to know if there were any major tulip changes since .12 do you? Because my tulip card fails after some usage and it worked great in the .12 nitro releases.
Obstacles do not exist to be surrendered to, but only to be broken.
Top
Tiger683
Veteran
Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 1347
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 8:34 pm
Location: Heffner's House

  • Quote

Post by Tiger683 » Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:30 pm

1U wrote:Then perhaps I must have downloaded the wrong ebuild or I got all of the recent nitro threads mixed up. Btw, you wouldn't happen to know if there were any major tulip changes since .12 do you? Because my tulip card fails after some usage and it worked great in the .12 nitro releases.
There certainly were some, and if not in driver, then in the network device framework...
If it needs firmare loaded to work, you might try to upgrade/reemerge the firmware...
Retired gentoo user
Top
satanskin
Guru
Guru
Posts: 353
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 1:37 am

  • Quote

Post by satanskin » Thu Nov 17, 2005 7:27 pm

HecHacker1 wrote:
satanskin wrote:
HecHacker1 wrote:yeah.. Well I just got back into my new ext3 partition with dir_index and journaling enabled, and guess what.. the disk load issues are gone! The problem really was caused by reiser4. Now with ext3 it takes only 1 second to open /etc/X11/xorg.conf instead of the 30+ for reiser4.

Everything is sooo much faster and the disk load is almost 0 instead of 100%. Hmmm, i think the reiser4 1.0.5 tools did something to cause massive latency or disk thrashing.
Why not just use the stable release of Reiser if you liked Reiser but R4 broke stuff? Why go back to Ext3 instead?
because the official portage version of reiser4 is 1.0.5 and even the livecd's I use to set up the reiser4 partitions use 1.0.5. I would have to get an old version that uses 1.0.0.

I am happy with ext3 right now, it is slower on some things like emerge sync, but it does have it's benefits. Now I can use inotify with rlocate to have real time file location, and beagle to search all my data. I think beagle works with reiser4 too, but in an emulation mode that will use more cpu and be slower.

I think i'll wait for an updated version of reiser4 before I go back, it's a simple procedure anyways.
I didn't mean an earlier version of Reiser4. I meant the stable Reiserfs. I believe it's 3.5 or 3.4 or something like that. The one that nearly every kernel supports without a patch.
Top
1U
Guru
Guru
User avatar
Posts: 319
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 8:56 pm

  • Quote

Post by 1U » Thu Nov 17, 2005 9:50 pm

That's ReiserFS which is 3.6 btw.
Obstacles do not exist to be surrendered to, but only to be broken.
Top
phranzee
Guru
Guru
User avatar
Posts: 397
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 5:19 pm
Location: katowice/pl

  • Quote

Post by phranzee » Fri Nov 18, 2005 2:52 pm

another problem - external usb 2.0 hdd connects as usb 1.0 no matter what i do.

i don't have this problem with other kernel
signature fault
post dumped ;]
Top
yaneurabeya
Veteran
Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 1754
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 10:47 pm
Location: Seattle

  • Quote

Post by yaneurabeya » Fri Nov 18, 2005 5:37 pm

Don't see much of a difference between vanilla sources and nitro, but the differences may be small enough to be non-noticeable... I also upgraded my video card yesterday so it's difficult to differentiate ;p.

I'm running reiserfsprogs-3.6 and I did see some lessened disk access (more burstlike behavior) I think, which is definitely a good thing.

I also didn't enable a lot of the features in nitro though.
Top
Thetargos
Apprentice
Apprentice
User avatar
Posts: 155
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 7:25 pm
Location: Mexico City

  • Quote

Post by Thetargos » Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:21 pm

Bur you are using ReiserFS 3.6, don't you? Because Reiser4 requires you to have ReiserProgrs 4
Top
Thetargos
Apprentice
Apprentice
User avatar
Posts: 155
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 7:25 pm
Location: Mexico City

RieserFS problems with Disk I/O operations

  • Quote

Post by Thetargos » Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:35 pm

Maybe the reason some people is experiencing problems with their RiserFS partitions and Nitro2 is due to a problem actually found in CK5 (reported to the CKML), regarding an issue with CFQ scheduler. Have any of you with the problem tried anticipatory I/O sched only? In the report to the ML they say:
Thomas Kuther
most impressive example was when copying a big file from one
partition to another (ext3 to reiserfs), and the copy process even
stalled. While the copy process hang there, i switched
to anticipatory, then it took a short moment, and the copy process
finished in between some seconds. uptime has been over 6 days till this
morning without any slowdowns whatsoever.
Top
Post Reply

417 posts
  • Page 6 of 17
    • Jump to page:
  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • …
  • 17
  • Next

Return to “Unsupported Software”

Jump to
  • Assistance
  • ↳   News & Announcements
  • ↳   Frequently Asked Questions
  • ↳   Installing Gentoo
  • ↳   Multimedia
  • ↳   Desktop Environments
  • ↳   Networking & Security
  • ↳   Kernel & Hardware
  • ↳   Portage & Programming
  • ↳   Gamers & Players
  • ↳   Other Things Gentoo
  • ↳   Unsupported Software
  • Discussion & Documentation
  • ↳   Documentation, Tips & Tricks
  • ↳   Gentoo Chat
  • ↳   Gentoo Forums Feedback
  • ↳   Duplicate Threads
  • International Gentoo Users
  • ↳   中文 (Chinese)
  • ↳   Dutch
  • ↳   Finnish
  • ↳   French
  • ↳   Deutsches Forum (German)
  • ↳   Diskussionsforum
  • ↳   Deutsche Dokumentation
  • ↳   Greek
  • ↳   Forum italiano (Italian)
  • ↳   Forum di discussione italiano
  • ↳   Risorse italiane (documentazione e tools)
  • ↳   Polskie forum (Polish)
  • ↳   Instalacja i sprzęt
  • ↳   Polish OTW
  • ↳   Portuguese
  • ↳   Documentação, Ferramentas e Dicas
  • ↳   Russian
  • ↳   Scandinavian
  • ↳   Spanish
  • ↳   Other Languages
  • Architectures & Platforms
  • ↳   Gentoo on ARM
  • ↳   Gentoo on PPC
  • ↳   Gentoo on Sparc
  • ↳   Gentoo on Alternative Architectures
  • ↳   Gentoo on AMD64
  • ↳   Gentoo for Mac OS X (Portage for Mac OS X)
  • Board index
  • All times are UTC
  • Delete cookies

© 2001–2026 Gentoo Foundation, Inc.

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited

Privacy Policy

 

 

magic