Page 6 of 6

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:52 am
by minervaix
LOL, i was joking, i cant believe people are taking this thread seriously. even the dev thought it was serious, ;)

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 3:02 pm
by Sadako
minervaix wrote:LOL, i was joking, i cant believe people are taking this thread seriously. even the dev thought it was serious, ;)
I think a ban is in order for making a fool of us all.

Where's bunder when you need him?

Re: gentella network

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:16 am
by nwmcsween
omp wrote:
minervaix wrote:whatda think?
That it would be easy to inject malicious code into the source prior to building something.
Bittorrent has hash checking... so no it wouldn't be. Back that with a http based crypto sum of md5 whatever and you get distributed source and low infrastructure costs. I see no reason not to implement this as some form of de facto standard like a sourceforge p2p distributing source. But using gnutella is stupid so is spelling mistakes (reference to thread starter).