View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
io333 n00b
Joined: 20 Jul 2002 Posts: 49
|
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2002 6:58 pm Post subject: error: "can't locate module iso_8859" when mounti |
|
|
Situation:
I want to mount all my fat32 partitions.
To do this, I created the following fstab:
# NOTE: If your BOOT partition is ReiserFS, add the notail option to opts.
/dev/hdb8 /boot ext3 noatime 0 1
/dev/hdb10 / ext3 noatime 0 1
/dev/hdb9 none swap sw 0 0
/dev/cdroms/cdrom0 /mnt/cdrom iso9660 noauto,ro 0 0
/dev/cdroms/cdrom1 /mnt/cdrom1 iso9660 noauto,ro 0 0
proc /proc proc defaults 0 0
#/dev/hda1 /mnt/hda1 vfat defaults 0 1
#/dev/hda2 /mnt/hda2 vfat defaults 0 1
#/dev/hda3 /mnt/hda3 vfat defaults 0 1
#/dev/hda4 /mnt/hda4 vfat defaults 0 1
/dev/hda5 /mnt/hda5 vfat defaults 0 1
#/dev/hda6 /mnt/hda6 vfat defaults 0 1
#/dev/hda7 /mnt/hda7 vfat defaults 0 1
/dev/hdb1 /mnt/hdb1 vfat defaults 0 1
#/dev/hdb2 /mnt/hdb2 vfat defaults 0 1
#/dev/hdb3 /mnt/hdb3 vfat defaults 0 1
#/dev/hdb4 /mnt/hdb4 vfat defaults 0 1
/dev/hdb5 /mnt/hdb5 vfat defaults 0 1
/dev/hdb6 /mnt/hdb6 vfat defaults 0 1
/dev/hdb7 /mnt/hdb7 vfat defaults 0 1
Gosh I hope that formats out correctly.
Anyway, just by having that fstab file, and doing nothing else, all of my fat32 paritions mount just fine, and I can read and write to them without any problems, and share them over the network.
But now when I boot, I get something like 10 messages saying something
similar to the error in my subject line. This worries me. Does anyone have any idea what I'm doing wrong -- or maybe I should just ignore the error? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rommel Veteran
Joined: 19 Apr 2002 Posts: 1145 Location: Williamsburg Virginia
|
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2002 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
try copying your fstab from an editor and pasting it using the code button above
Code: | # Copyright 1999-2002 Gentoo Technologies, Inc.
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License, v2 or later
# $Header: /home/cvsroot/gentoo-src/rc-scripts/etc/fstab,v 1.7 2002/05/12 21:48:18 azarah Exp $
# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
# noatime turns of atimes for increased performance (atimes normally aren't
# needed; notail increases performance of ReiserFS (at the expense of storage
# efficiency). It's safe to drop the noatime options if you want and to
# switch between notail and tail freely.
# <fs> <mountpoint> <type> <opts> <dump/pass>
# NOTE: If your BOOT partition is ReiserFS, add the notail option to opts.
/dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy vfat noauto,user 0 0
/dev/sda1 /boot ext3 noauto,noatime 1 2
/dev/md0 / ext3 noatime 0 1
/dev/sdb1 none swap sw 0 0
/dev/sdc1 none swap sw 0 0
/dev/sdd1 /mnt/flash vfat noauto,users,ro 0 0
/dev/cdroms/cdrom0 /mnt/cdrom iso9660 noauto,users,ro 0 0
/dev/sr0 /mnt/cdrw iso9660 noauto,user,exec,async 0 0
proc /proc proc defaults 0 0
# glibc 2.2 and above expects tmpfs to be mounted at /dev/shm for
# POSIX shared memory (shm_open, shm_unlink). Adding the following
# line to /etc/fstab should take care of this:
# (tmpfs is a dynamically expandable/shrinkable ramdisk, and will use almost no
# memory if not populated with files)
#tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
|
this should work and maybe be easier for someone to see a problem of your fstab syntax thats creating the error messeges.
also dont the error messeges at boot make a referance to specific lines that are bad in fstab....might also include that information which you can get using 'dmesg | less' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
io333 n00b
Joined: 20 Jul 2002 Posts: 49
|
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2002 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, thank you, the problem is now solved. All I did is make my vfat entries look like your flash entry, i.e.: I changed "0 1" in all my lines to "0 0" and changed the word "default" to "noauto,users,ro"
I don't have any more errors showing at startup now. I was worried that eventually my filesystem would somehow get corrupted, though I have no idea if that is true. I suppose one of these days I'll figure out just what all of those options mean... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
io333 n00b
Joined: 20 Jul 2002 Posts: 49
|
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2002 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, I take it back, that's not the problem. When I went to see if my partitions were actually mounted, they were not. So then I looked into just what the heck the options meant and found out that noauto means that a partition won't mount at boot time. So when I switched it back to "defaults", I have the error again, even when I leave it set to "0 0"
The first "0" is just for using "dump," which I do not (or else I would set it to 1), and the second 0 means don't do an integrity check, while "1" means do an integrity check.
So I'm stumped. They way I have my lines, it shouldn't give me any error.
I wrote down the exact error this time:
"modprobe: modprobe: can't locate module iso-8859"
Now it seems to me that I'm probably missing something that I should have checked before I compiled the kernel.... oh hang on.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
io333 n00b
Joined: 20 Jul 2002 Posts: 49
|
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2002 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no, that wasn't it. I didn't see any option to add iso-8859 support to the kernel. I already have vfat(win95) support checked off in the kernel, as well as msdos support. I guess I'll keep digging through google... <sigh> |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjp Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 20093
|
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2002 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In kernel config, go to File Systems -> Native Language Support -> and look for NLS ISO 8859-1 (Latin 1; Western European Languages). That fixed the problem for me. I'm guessing you'd be able to select one of the non 'Western European Languages' as well. _________________ Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
io333 n00b
Joined: 20 Jul 2002 Posts: 49
|
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2002 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ok, more digging:
it seems that i'm supposed to enable nls somehow in the kernel, even though it is supposedly enabled by default. I checked off the "iso-8859-1" (western/latin) option under NLS and I'm recompiling now. Hopefully that will work... Hmmm. 4pm. Time for breakfast. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
io333 n00b
Joined: 20 Jul 2002 Posts: 49
|
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2002 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no, that didn't work either.
The 8859 error went away, now I have this:
"modprobe: modprobe: can't locate module nls_cp437"
aaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjp Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 20093
|
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2002 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Look for it in the same section. _________________ Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
io333 n00b
Joined: 20 Jul 2002 Posts: 49
|
Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2002 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
you were correct! thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjp Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 20093
|
Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2002 12:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
No problem, happened to me too. _________________ Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LugnutsForBrains Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 23 Oct 2002 Posts: 89 Location: Mesa, AZ
|
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2002 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
I get this error ISO8859 error too.
Setting up nvidia and alsa was a little painful for me and now that I have them working, I don't want to rebuild my kernel unless the lack of the module causes problems.
If there are problems that this causes, I don't see them yet...
Is this just a nuisance message or is it important enough to rebuild the kernel?
I appreciate any feedback. _________________ Is the sky really falling??? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jay l33t
Joined: 08 May 2002 Posts: 980
|
Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2002 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bumping this thread, because I have the same error. It is really neccesary to recompile the kernel or can I just stick with the messages during bootup? _________________ Do you want your posessions identified? [ynq] (n) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hhaamu Apprentice
Joined: 23 Aug 2002 Posts: 253 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2002 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jay wrote: | Bumping this thread, because I have the same error. It is really neccesary to recompile the kernel or can I just stick with the messages during bootup? |
You can compile them as modules... So you only have to compile the modules again:
Code: | make modules modules_install |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
BlackBart Apprentice
Joined: 07 Oct 2002 Posts: 252
|
Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2002 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i just ignore it, it hasn't harmed me yet, i'll probably build it in next time i recompile my kernel. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ventricle Guru
Joined: 04 Apr 2003 Posts: 305 Location: UK/Australia
|
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2003 10:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fantastic post! I'll hopefully be able to fix this problem with my boot up also.
Perhaps it might be useful to add something like this to the install documentation? _________________ [LRU] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bugs006 n00b
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2003 7:27 pm Post subject: Maybe this helps |
|
|
Using kernel gaming-sources:
I choose the following NLS (into kernel not as modules):
Codepage 437 (United States, Canada)
NLS ISO 8859-15 (Latin9; Western European Languages with Euro)
NLS ISO 8859-1 (Latin 1; Western European Languages)
and not the problems have gone; btw i also selected at the top a different nls 8859-1 --> used 8859-15.
Hope this helps (yes it doesnt do harm i think, but its damn annpying getting those error reports when booting up) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bugs006 n00b
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2003 7:27 pm Post subject: Maybe this helps |
|
|
Using kernel gaming-sources:
I choose the following NLS (into kernel not as modules):
Codepage 437 (United States, Canada)
NLS ISO 8859-15 (Latin9; Western European Languages with Euro)
NLS ISO 8859-1 (Latin 1; Western European Languages)
and now bootup problems have gone; btw i also selected at the top a different nls 8859-1 --> used 8859-15.
Hope this helps (yes it doesnt do harm i think, but its damn annoying getting those error reports when booting up) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|