| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Duncan_Shriek
n00b
Joined: 17 Aug 2010
Posts: 10
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:15 am Post subject: emerge @preserved-rebuild requires xulrunner:1.9 |
 |
|
| Code: |
#emerge @preserved-rebuild
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "net-libs/xulrunner:1.9".
(dependency required by "@preserved-rebuild" [argument])
|
I don't believe that. There's nothing left on my system that's using <xulrunner-2.0
How can I debug it?
emerge --debug doesn't tell anything more than that it's required, but not why. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dol-sen
Retired Dev
Joined: 30 Jun 2002
Posts: 2805
Location: Richmond, BC, Canada
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Have you tried | Code: | | equery depends xulrunner |
and check if any are still looking for 1.9?
_________________
Brian
Porthole, the Portage GUI frontend irc@freenode: #gentoo-guis, #porthole, Blog
layman, gentoolkit, CoreBuilder, esearch... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Duncan_Shriek
n00b
Joined: 17 Aug 2010
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dol-sen wrote: | Have you tried | Code: | | equery depends xulrunner |
and check if any are still looking for 1.9? |
Yes, I know and am using equery. According to it I've nothing installed that depends on any xulrunner version. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
krinn
Watchman
Joined: 02 May 2003
Posts: 7470
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm sure (didn't look at it for real to confirm) that the preserved-rebuild list is kept and not removed after each emerge run.
So if you do action that fill the @preserved-rebuild list and don't rebuild it and wait you may endup with that list fill with packages that are so old they were remove from your system.
Could it be just that, added times ago to preserve it and you left it like that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Duncan_Shriek
n00b
Joined: 17 Aug 2010
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, there is something strange:
| Code: |
# equery l xulrunner
* Searching for xulrunner ...
[I--] [??] net-libs/xulrunner-2.0.1-r1:1.9
|
Note the 1.9 slot for the actual xulrunner! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Duncan_Shriek
n00b
Joined: 17 Aug 2010
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| krinn wrote: | I'm sure (didn't look at it for real to confirm) that the preserved-rebuild list is kept and not removed after each emerge run.
So if you do action that fill the @preserved-rebuild list and don't rebuild it and wait you may endup with that list fill with packages that are so old they were remove from your system.
Could it be just that, added times ago to preserve it and you left it like that. |
That would be | Code: | | /var/lib/portage/preserved_libs_registry |
. I can't spot something from ancient times there.
| Code: |
{
"dev-libs/icu:0": [
"dev-libs/icu-51.1",
"24125",
[
"/usr/lib64/libicudata.so.50.1.1",
"/usr/lib64/libicui18n.so.50.1.1",
"/usr/lib64/libicuio.so.50.1.1",
"/usr/lib64/libicuuc.so.50.1.1",
"/usr/lib64/libicudata.so.50",
"/usr/lib64/libicui18n.so.50",
"/usr/lib64/libicuio.so.50",
"/usr/lib64/libicuuc.so.50"
]
],
"media-libs/ilmbase:0": [
"media-libs/ilmbase-2.0.0",
"23543",
[
"/usr/lib64/libHalf.so.6.0.0",
"/usr/lib64/libHalf.so.6"
]
],
"media-libs/libpng:0": [
"media-libs/libpng-1.6.1",
"24139",
[
"/usr/lib64/libpng15.so.15.15.0",
"/usr/lib64/libpng15.so.15"
]
]
}
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Duncan_Shriek
n00b
Joined: 17 Aug 2010
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I unmerged xulrunner-2.0.1, which solved my problem.
My guess is that there's still a bug remaining in portage which led to that state, but I wouldn't know how to state that for a bug report. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Portage & Programming
