View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
drizzt Guru
Joined: 21 Jul 2002 Posts: 428
|
Posted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 3:36 pm Post subject: Whoever improved ufed |
|
|
a big Thank You from me !
Great Job
_________________ People don't have to earn my respect. I offer my respect to them, but be careful to lose my respect... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jaglover Watchman
Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 8291 Location: Saint Amant, Acadiana
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Yamakuzure Advocate
Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 2284 Location: Adendorf, Germany
|
Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You are welcome! But please note that it is an RC. Aaaaand there are more things to do to (someday) get to a real 1.0 version.
If you'd like to help, please take a look at the list of open bugs, as I appreciate any and every feedback! _________________ Important German:- "Aha" - German reaction to pretend that you are really interested while giving no f*ck.
- "Tja" - German reaction to the apocalypse, nuclear war, an alien invasion or no bread in the house.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
comprookie2000 Retired Dev
Joined: 25 Jul 2004 Posts: 925 Location: Sun City Center, Florida
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mv Watchman
Joined: 20 Apr 2005 Posts: 6747
|
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Unfortunately, new ufed does not show all USE-flags anymore: It seems that all flags containing "_" are filtered.
I can imagine that this was intentional since in many cases "_" correspond to USE_EXPAND variables.
However, there are also many USE-flags with "_" which are not USE_EXPAND. Examples: SECURITY_HAZARD, 16k_voice, action_modeswitch, all_sfx, embed_data_files, pax_kernel, sse4_1, sse2_4way.
None of these flags shows up with current ufed...
Should I open a bug for this? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Yamakuzure Advocate
Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 2284 Location: Adendorf, Germany
|
Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
mv wrote: | Unfortunately, new ufed does not show all USE-flags anymore: It seems that all flags containing "_" are filtered.
I can imagine that this was intentional since in many cases "_" correspond to USE_EXPAND variables.
However, there are also many USE-flags with "_" which are not USE_EXPAND. Examples: SECURITY_HAZARD, 16k_voice, action_modeswitch, all_sfx, embed_data_files, pax_kernel, sse4_1, sse2_4way.
None of these flags shows up with current ufed... | That is bad, and I'll look into it. mv wrote: | Should I open a bug for this? | Yes, of course. The person a bug is assigned to will be e-mailed the report then. Chances are high that a maintainer is never aware of such issues otherwise.
However, I just took a look into ufed-0.90_rc1 and can see:- SECURITY_HAZARD (net-misc/iputils)
- 16k_voice (app-accessibility/eflite)
- action_modeswitch (sys-fs/udev)
- all_sfx (app-arch/rar)
- embed_data_files (app-text/pandoc, dev-haskell/citeproc-hs)
- pax_kernel (multiple packages)
- sse4_1 (media-libs/libvpx, sci-chemistry/gromacs) and
- sse2_4way (net-misc/bfgmimer, net-misc/cgminer)
So if you can not see those flags but I can, we have two possibilities. A) You are doing something wrong (what on earth could *that* be?) or B) There is a bug that simply does not show up on my system.
In any case I tend to believe possibility B) to be by far more likely and it would really help if you opened a bug against that issue. _________________ Important German:- "Aha" - German reaction to pretend that you are really interested while giving no f*ck.
- "Tja" - German reaction to the apocalypse, nuclear war, an alien invasion or no bread in the house.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mv Watchman
Joined: 20 Apr 2005 Posts: 6747
|
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks. Now that I know that the behaviour is indeed unintended, I analyzed the problem and found the cause. Bug opened. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|