Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
[SOLVED] Nvidia - Video Cards
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Joseph_sys
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 2716
Location: Edmonton, AB

PostPosted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 4:03 am    Post subject: [SOLVED] Nvidia - Video Cards Reply with quote

I have a question with regards to video cards.
Currently I have in one of my box Nvidia "Geforce 8600 GT" card (with only 256Mb or RAM, if I'm not mistaken) and the fonts on the display are very crisp and "thin" which I like it.

But in my new box I just got is Radeon: Ausus EAH6770 DC SL 2DI1GD5 card (with 1GB or RAM) and the fonts on the screen are very thick in comparison to Nvidia.
Ps. I have a lot of problems with this card as well, so I suggest you folks to stay away from this card.

What the thickness of the fonts depend on? Both my computers have the same configurations and the thickness of the fonts are especially visible in email client.

What Nvidia card would you fold recommend?


Last edited by Joseph_sys on Mon Dec 26, 2011 7:00 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hu
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 23449

PostPosted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 4:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do you have all the same font packages installed on both? I have found both nVidia and Radeon cards to produce very usable displays with their respective open drivers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
palmer
Guru
Guru


Joined: 17 Nov 2004
Posts: 322
Location: Berkeley, CA

PostPosted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 5:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

On my system, enabling anti-aliasing makes the fonts thicker and enabling sub-pixel rendering makes the fonts thinner (back to about as thick as they were originally, just better looking).

I've also found that the fonts that are installed/selected seem to make a big difference in this type of situation. Unfortunately, my font is just called "Sans", so that won't be of much help. For reference, here are the fonts I have installed:
Code:
# grep font /var/lib/portage/world           
media-fonts/arkpandora
media-fonts/arphicfonts
media-fonts/corefonts
media-fonts/dejavu
media-fonts/font-bh-ttf
media-fonts/font-bh-type1
media-fonts/font-isas-misc
media-fonts/freefonts
media-fonts/liberation-fonts
media-fonts/terminus-font
media-fonts/ttf-bitstream-vera
media-fonts/unifont


Here are the fonts I have setup:
Code:
# eselect fontconfig list
Available fontconfig .conf files (* is enabled):
  [1]   10-autohint.conf
  [2]   10-no-sub-pixel.conf
  [3]   10-sub-pixel-bgr.conf
  [4]   10-sub-pixel-rgb.conf
  [5]   10-sub-pixel-vbgr.conf
  [6]   10-sub-pixel-vrgb.conf
  [7]   10-unhinted.conf
  [8]   20-fix-globaladvance.conf *
  [9]   20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans-mono.conf
  [10]  20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans.conf
  [11]  20-unhint-small-dejavu-serif.conf
  [12]  20-unhint-small-vera.conf *
  [13]  25-ttf-arphic-ukai-render.conf
  [14]  25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf
  [15]  25-ttf-arphic-uming-render.conf
  [16]  25-unhint-nonlatin.conf
  [17]  30-metric-aliases.conf *
  [18]  30-urw-aliases.conf *
  [19]  35-ttf-arphic-ukai-aliases.conf
  [20]  35-ttf-arphic-uming-aliases.conf
  [21]  40-nonlatin.conf *
  [22]  41-ttf-arphic-ukai.conf
  [23]  41-ttf-arphic-uming.conf
  [24]  42-luxi-mono.conf *
  [25]  45-latin.conf *
  [26]  49-sansserif.conf *
  [27]  50-user.conf *
  [28]  51-local.conf *
  [29]  57-dejavu-sans-mono.conf
  [30]  57-dejavu-sans.conf
  [31]  57-dejavu-serif.conf
  [32]  60-latin.conf *
  [33]  60-liberation.conf
  [34]  61-stix.conf
  [35]  64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf
  [36]  65-fonts-persian.conf *
  [37]  65-khmer.conf
  [38]  65-nonlatin.conf *
  [39]  69-unifont.conf *
  [40]  70-no-bitmaps.conf
  [41]  70-yes-bitmaps.conf
  [42]  75-ttf-arphic-ukai-select.conf
  [43]  80-delicious.conf *
  [44]  90-synthetic.conf *
  [45]  90-ttf-arphic-ukai-embolden.conf
  [46]  90-ttf-arphic-uming-embolden.conf


My fonts look like this, which I think looks quite good :). I'm running a nVidia card (binary drivers), but the fonts look similar on an Intel card (sorry, no ATI card to test it on).
http://i.imgur.com/iHylH.png
http://dabbelt.com/~palmer/bbs/2011-12-26-fonts.png (backup link, for when the free image host throws out my image)

Hopefully some of that helps.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joseph_sys
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 2716
Location: Edmonton, AB

PostPosted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 6:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hu wrote:
Do you have all the same font packages installed on both? I have found both nVidia and Radeon cards to produce very usable displays with their respective open drivers.


I do think I have the same fonts installed on both system. My mail client Thunderbird looks much better "thinner fonts" on Nvidia (old card).
I don't know what make it so different.
Font is "sans-serif" size 15 on both systems.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joseph_sys
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 2716
Location: Edmonton, AB

PostPosted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 6:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank for the hint, yes you are correct. I had to enable Hinting = Full and increase the size to 11
Now it looks good. I have nothing like this enable on the older system and they look good, very thin.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum