| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
clouds222
Apprentice
Joined: 13 Jul 2009
Posts: 187
Location: Shanghai
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 5:59 am Post subject: How can I deal with there errors that no ebuild to satisfy? |
 |
|
| Code: | These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-python/pygobject-2.28.0:2[introspection]".
(dependency required by "gnome-extra/gnome-tweak-tool-3.0.5" [ebuild])
(dependency required by "gnome-base/gnome-extra-apps-3.0.0" [ebuild])
(dependency required by "gnome-base/gnome-3.0.0[extras]" [ebuild])
(dependency required by "@selected" [set])
(dependency required by "@world" [argument]) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DaggyStyle
Watchman
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 5909
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 6:21 am Post subject: Re: How can I deal with there errors that no ebuild to satis |
|
|
| clouds222 wrote: | | Code: | These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-python/pygobject-2.28.0:2[introspection]".
(dependency required by "gnome-extra/gnome-tweak-tool-3.0.5" [ebuild])
(dependency required by "gnome-base/gnome-extra-apps-3.0.0" [ebuild])
(dependency required by "gnome-base/gnome-3.0.0[extras]" [ebuild])
(dependency required by "@selected" [set])
(dependency required by "@world" [argument]) |
|
easy, compile the package in question with the requested flag 
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
clouds222
Apprentice
Joined: 13 Jul 2009
Posts: 187
Location: Shanghai
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 7:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
But I already added the use flag "introspection" to the make.conf.
this package is from an overlay, is there a config file instead of make.conf I should add the flag? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaggyStyle
Watchman
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 5909
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 7:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| clouds222 wrote: | But I already added the use flag "introspection" to the make.conf.
this package is from an overlay, is there a config file instead of make.conf I should add the flag? |
you've got a newer versions of dev-python/pygobject in portage, use it.
in general, you can force portage to compile that package with that flag by adding
| Code: | | dev-python/pygobject introspection |
to /etc/portage/package.use
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
clouds222
Apprentice
Joined: 13 Jul 2009
Posts: 187
Location: Shanghai
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| DaggyStyle wrote: | | clouds222 wrote: | But I already added the use flag "introspection" to the make.conf.
this package is from an overlay, is there a config file instead of make.conf I should add the flag? |
you've got a newer versions of dev-python/pygobject in portage, use it.
in general, you can force portage to compile that package with that flag by adding
| Code: | | dev-python/pygobject introspection |
to /etc/portage/package.use |
Yes, I have added in the package.use but not help.
I found there is no ebuild pygobject-2.28.0 in /usr/portage. but just pygobject-2.28.4 and pygobject-2.28.6.ebuild. will it impact? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaggyStyle
Watchman
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 5909
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 8:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| clouds222 wrote: | | DaggyStyle wrote: | | clouds222 wrote: | But I already added the use flag "introspection" to the make.conf.
this package is from an overlay, is there a config file instead of make.conf I should add the flag? |
you've got a newer versions of dev-python/pygobject in portage, use it.
in general, you can force portage to compile that package with that flag by adding
| Code: | | dev-python/pygobject introspection |
to /etc/portage/package.use |
Yes, I have added in the package.use but not help.
I found there is no ebuild pygobject-2.28.0 in /usr/portage. but just pygobject-2.28.4 and pygobject-2.28.6.ebuild. will it impact? |
note what I've said (bold in the quote).
for me, it is more logical that pygobject-2.28.6 will work better in that case as you are trying to install gnome 3.
rule of thumb, if portage's version is newer or equal to the overlay pacakge, use it.
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
clouds222
Apprentice
Joined: 13 Jul 2009
Posts: 187
Location: Shanghai
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Indeed, I've already installed =dev-python/pygobject-2.28.6 with introspection. But I still can't resolve the dependence. Even I changed the dependence to 2.28.6 in ebuild, it still reported no ebuild to satisfy >=dev-python/pygobject-2.28.6:2[introspection]. It seems strange, I think it not just related to the package version as I've created 2.28.0.ebuild and 2.28.2.ebuild and also downloaded the codes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Arkhelion
Apprentice
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Posts: 151
Location: France
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Didn't check lately but use flag introspection might still be profile-masked.
If so, you should unmask the introspection use flag :
| Code: | | # echo "-introspection" >> /etc/portage/profile/use.mask |
_________________
Arkhelion |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
clouds222
Apprentice
Joined: 13 Jul 2009
Posts: 187
Location: Shanghai
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 8:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Arkhelion wrote: | Didn't check lately but use flag introspection might still be profile-masked.
If so, you should unmask the introspection use flag :
| Code: | | # echo "-introspection" >> /etc/portage/profile/use.mask |
|
That did solve the problem.
Thank you all for your help. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Desktop Environments
