View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bandreabis Advocate
Joined: 18 Feb 2005 Posts: 2490 Location: イタリアのロディで
|
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry.
Another question.
Libreoffice-3.4.2.3 in the main tree is Hard Masked or not.
eix says no! _________________ Il numero di post non fa di me un esperto! Anzi! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jasn Guru
Joined: 05 May 2005 Posts: 439 Location: Maryland, US
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bandreabis wrote: | Official ebuild, obtained this:
Code: |
Possible unintended interpolation of @HAVE_GCC_AVX in string at ./set_soenv line 1844.
Global symbol "@HAVE_GCC_AVX" requires explicit package name at ./set_soenv line 1844.
Execution of ./set_soenv aborted due to compilation errors. |
|
I received this error today trying to emerge both the portage, as well as the openoffice-geki overlay, version of libreoffice-3.4.2.3. I tried various combinations of libreoffice USE flags, as well as using then removing "-mno-avx" from my CFLAGS. Every time the emerge fails with the same message.
Thanks.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bandreabis Advocate
Joined: 18 Feb 2005 Posts: 2490 Location: イタリアのロディで
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Synced again!
This evening I'm trying to emerge libreoffice-3.4.2.3 again!
That error is not occurred, emerging is going further than any when before.
I'm quite confident this is the good one. _________________ Il numero di post non fa di me un esperto! Anzi! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jasn Guru
Joined: 05 May 2005 Posts: 439 Location: Maryland, US
|
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree. After another emerge --sync this evening, the portage libreoffice-3.4.2.3 emerged cleanly.
Thanks.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LordArthas Guru
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 500 Location: Maniago, Friûl, Italia
|
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 6:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi!
I had the same problem. After a:
emerge --sync
it was solved. _________________ Michele Beltrame
https://www.cattlegrid.info/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jfyi, bumped _pre to master (3.5 development).
have fun testing reworked eclass! _________________ hear hear |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oschtan n00b
Joined: 27 Dec 2008 Posts: 71 Location: Russia, Novosibirsk
|
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why LibreOffice rigid dependence media-gfx/sane-backends? Or "I was blinded by it from what it was?" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
app-office/libreoffice-3.4.3.1 released! _________________ hear hear |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Yamakuzure Advocate
Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 2283 Location: Adendorf, Germany
|
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2011 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just installed app-office/libreoffice-3.4.2.3 from the portage tree and it merges and runs well. Great! _________________ Important German:- "Aha" - German reaction to pretend that you are really interested while giving no f*ck.
- "Tja" - German reaction to the apocalypse, nuclear war, an alien invasion or no bread in the house.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2011 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
random note:
with libreoffice 3.5 cups is a fixed build dependency. _________________ hear hear |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
bjlockie Veteran
Joined: 18 Oct 2002 Posts: 1186 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
geki wrote: | app-office/libreoffice-3.4.3.2 released![/b] |
Writer: The bubble help when hovering the mouse over a Field is a black box with black text on my machine.
Does anyone else have that happen? _________________ AMD FX6100 CPU, 16 GiB RAM, OCZ Vertex 3 SSD
ASRock 970 Extreme3 motherboard with S/PDIF audio
Galaxy-NVidia GeForce 8800GT video card, Cyber Power CP550HG USB UPS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jfyi, imported libreoffice l10n package. remerge libreoffice before installing l10n package! _________________ hear hear |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lustmored Apprentice
Joined: 28 May 2010 Posts: 206 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anything we can do about it?
Code: | vindor ~ # cave resolve -cx world
Deciding: 821 steps, 1 metadata (1 geki-overlay)
Error:
* In program cave resolve -cx world:
* When resolving and adding dependencies recursively:
* When adding dependencies for 'app-office/libreoffice:0::(install_to_slash)' with 'app-office/libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10:0::geki-overlay':
* When handling dependency '~app-office/libreoffice-l10n-3.4.3':
* When finding slots for '~app-office/libreoffice-l10n-3.4.3':
* When determining resolvents for '~app-office/libreoffice-l10n-3.4.3':
* When finding best version of each package from packages matching ~app-office/libreoffice-l10n-3.4.3 (ignoring additional requirements) with filter all matches filtered through supports action install filtered through not masked filtered through all matches:
* When generating metadata for ID 'app-office/libreoffice-l10n-3.4.3-r1::geki-overlay':
* When loading generated metadata for 'app-office/libreoffice-l10n-3.4.3-r1::geki-overlay':
* Name '+sparc' is not a valid keyword name (paludis::KeywordNameError) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lustmored Apprentice
Joined: 28 May 2010 Posts: 206 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Indeed
New paludis also gives some QA. Donno what's important and what's not, so I'll just put it here and do whatever you want
Code: | libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * This libreoffice version is experimental.
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * Things could just break.
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> *
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * There are various extensions to libreoffice.
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * You may check ./configure for '--enable-ext-*'
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * and request them here: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-865091.html
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10>
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * QA: Package calling old check_reqs function.
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * QA: Please file a bug against the package.
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * QA: It should call check-reqs_pkg_pretend and check-reqs_pkg_setup
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * QA: and possibly use EAPI=4 or later.
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10>
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * QA: Package does not specify unit for the size check
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * QA: Assuming mebibytes.
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * QA: File bug against the package. It should specify the unit.
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * Checking for at least 512 mebibytes RAM ... [ ok ]
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * QA: Package does not specify unit for the size check
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * QA: Assuming mebibytes.
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * QA: File bug against the package. It should specify the unit.
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * Checking for at least 8000 mebibytes disk sp [ !! ]"" ...
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * Couldn't determine disk space, skipping...
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * QA: Package does not specify unit for the size check
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * QA: Assuming mebibytes.
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * QA: File bug against the package. It should specify the unit.
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> * Checking for at least 512 mebibytes disk spa [ ok ]//usr" ...
libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r10> |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
a hurray for the ones who cannot read nor calculate binary. but want to fiddle ...
there is no such eclass having these functions or variables here. where is that eclass from?! _________________ hear hear |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lustmored Apprentice
Joined: 28 May 2010 Posts: 206 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry but I don't know
Just thought paludis output can be useful for you |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
sure, it does, but only as soon as that code is in gentoo repository.
edit #1
a ha, check-reqs update came with a sync. _________________ hear hear |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lustmored Apprentice
Joined: 28 May 2010 Posts: 206 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Indeed - all QA warnings are gone |
|
Back to top |
|
|
xsilentmurmurx Apprentice
Joined: 23 Oct 2009 Posts: 233
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
soooo how stable is version 3.4.3-r2? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
xsilentmurmurx
that depends on the specific use case.
the only way to verify would be to quickpkg your stable version; do a backup of your office files; and test your office files with a newer version.
upstream would be most grateful for any failing document you submit to fix issues.
well, I can only be as specific as the question.
and then, asking on the user or developer mailing list will get you further than any packager/other user could tell regarding such questions.
is there a commonly well-known scala to determine the stability of a program of this caliber?
for me, openoffice and now libreoffice has always been stable.
neither did it ever trash my data nor did I fail to format my data. always worked some way or another. *yay* _________________ hear hear |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lustmored Apprentice
Joined: 28 May 2010 Posts: 206 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
I see config script failing to detect java-1.7 as newer than java-1.5. Are we able to do something about that? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geki Advocate
Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2387 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
well, config.log may help.
edit #1
a ha, you mean this I guess:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/configure.in#n3837
luckily I have the bytecode version hardwired to 1.5.
going to fix on 1.6 since depend was upgraded already.
edit #2
Lustmored, please tell me then, if java 1.7 is detected at runtime. _________________ hear hear |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lustmored Apprentice
Joined: 28 May 2010 Posts: 206 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
The same result with oracle-jdk-bin and oracle-jre-bin:
Code: | lustmored@vindor ~ $ lowriter
javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!
Warning: failed to read path from javaldx |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|