Hauppage TV Card (advice/comparison) [TERMINATED]

HeXiLeD · Veteran Joined: 20 Aug 2005 Posts: 1159 Location: Online

Edit: 08.05.2023 - I have since given up on this idea

###
I am currently about to buy a tv card and would like your input about some Hauppage models and comparisons

I have read the following :

https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-562744-highlight-hauppauge.html
http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/Tuner_Card
http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

Many people have the hauppage PVR-150
http://www.hauppauge.com/site/products/data_pvr150.html

Some other use the PVR-500
http://hauppauge.com/site/products/data_pvr500mckit.html
(which is said to be the pvr 150 with 2 tuners)

and i am looking at something like the PVR-1800
http://www.hauppauge.com/site/products/data_hvr1800.html

I want not only TV but also radio and dual tuners is cool to have.
Primary usage will be cable TV and FM radio

The pvr-150 seems not to have an fm tuner.
The pvr-500 has a fm tuner
The pvr-1800 has it all (picture)

Questions:

Does anyone have this card working perfectly ?
How is the FM tuner support and what software aplications do we have for it ?
I have seen the BT* kernel driver support. Should we compile has [m] or [*] ?
How is the remote control support ?
What are your general thoughs about this specifc card ?

note to moderators: please don't merge this topic
_________________
Do you hear the sound of inevitability?
With age, comes great grumpiness and that, was 20 years ago...

CertFP: becbbd161d5a5c31de3c45171b77bf710911db29 / d985d21f89fe2977b593c4d381a1a86802e62990d9328d893db76d59f9935244

durian · Guru Joined: 16 Jul 2003 Posts: 312 Location: Margretetorp

Not one of the models you mention, but I have a PVR-350 which is supported without problems - drivers are in the kernel. It's a single tuner analogue card, with hardware mpeg2 decoder and TV-out. Has been working floawlessly for three years.

Never tried the radio though....

-peter

AaronPPC · Guru Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 522 Location: Tucson, AZ

I have an HVR-1600, which I believe to be the PCI version of the 1800. It works well.

You can't buy new 150, 350, or 500's anymore. They have been discontinued as part of the U.S. DTV transition. You'll have to find one of those on ebay.
_________________
--Aaron

HeXiLeD · Veteran Joined: 20 Aug 2005 Posts: 1159 Location: Online

I am making my decision for the PVR-1800
http://www.hauppauge.com/site/products/data_hvr1800.html

Kernel:

poly_poly-man · Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:26 pm Post subject:

I like my hvr-950. NTSC, ATSC, and full linux support. The 950Q has a different chipset but still has linux support. Adds clear QAM over the 950.
_________________
iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAA

avatar: new version of logo - see topic 838248. Potentially still a WiP.

Jaglover · Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:30 pm Post subject:

And I like mine ... http://www.pchdtv.com/

Tony0945 · Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 12:41 am Post subject:

HexiLED, how did that HVR-1800 work out for you? It doesn't seem to be in production, but some are listed on ebay.

jathlon · Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 6:31 am Post subject:

HeXiLeD · Veteran Joined: 20 Aug 2005 Posts: 1159 Location: Online

Thought about digging out this old thread because i have not bought the card yet. The old options did not satisfy me at the time.

I was reading a little bit about and seems that Linux support is a bit better and one thing i really want is hardware encoding (for obvious reasons).

Hauppauge 1229 WinTV-HVR-2255 Dual TV Tuner / Encoder which seems to be linux supported.

https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg86862.html

But how good is the support for this card ? Any feedback ?

Another card i was looking into is:

Hauppauge Colossus, PCI-Express High Definition H.264 Video Recorder for PCs

Colossus seems great but no linux as far as i can see: https://www.mythtv.org/wiki/Hauppauge_Colossus

Then:
https://www.mythtv.org/wiki/Hauppauge_HD-PVR

Tony0945 · Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2016 3:46 pm Post subject:

I have two HVR-1600's that are working fine on Gentoo. They should be supported by MythTV, but I don't use Myth. I find the navigation too non-standard. I record by setting frequency by azap and copying, like LinuxTV suggests for a test.

i.e "azap -r "WYCC"" followed by "cat /dev/dvb/dvr0 ><file name>" these can be put into a script that sleeps then kills the azap and cat processes when it wakes up. Watching TV is even easier

vaxbrat · l33t Joined: 05 Oct 2005 Posts: 731 Location: DC Burbs

I've been running an HVR-2250 with mythtv for several years.

Tony0945 · Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2016 9:15 pm Post subject: Re: HVR 2250 here

danomac · Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2016 6:17 pm Post subject:

Yes, I ordered another 2250 as well and was sent the non-working 2255. Back in 2012 a developer said support on linux was coming, but didn't say it would take 4 years or so for the 2255 to work.

So far the best tuner I've used is the HDHomeRun. It picks up weak channels that my 2250 *and* TV refuse to lock on to.

depontius · Advocate Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 3509

I have a pair of HVR-1600s that I'm no longer using. I worked a bit with the developer way back when getting the drivers into better shape.
I used them years ago with MythTV, but then Comcast dropped SDTV and went fully-encrypted with HDTV, so I bought an HD HomeRun Prime.
Drop a line if you're intersested.
_________________
.sigs waste space and bandwidth

HeXiLeD · Veteran Joined: 20 Aug 2005 Posts: 1159 Location: Online

I am thinking about the HVR-2255. From what i read, it brings enhancements when compared to the HVR-2250. If anyone knows of any HVR 2255 issues, let me know.

Alternatively HD HomeRun seems a great purchase but i am looking into internal hardware at the moment.

@vaxbrat

Could you post all your related kernel CONFIG_MEDIA_PCI_SUPPORT for the saa7164 driver ?
_________________
Do you hear the sound of inevitability?
With age, comes great grumpiness and that, was 20 years ago...

CertFP: becbbd161d5a5c31de3c45171b77bf710911db29 / d985d21f89fe2977b593c4d381a1a86802e62990d9328d893db76d59f9935244

depontius · Advocate Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 3509

Check carefully what your cable provider is doing, and what they have announced that they plan on doing.

I'm with Comcast, and at some point they announced that they were going to encrypt everything - including the basic broadcast channels that they are required to carry by the FCC. Comcast also provkdes one or two "digital converter" boxes for free to meet the FCC requirements for broadcast.

The only way for me to get real value out of MythTV was with the HD HomeRun Prime and a CableCard. (I suppose I could have tried IR controlling a box, but I understand this is difficult with Scientific Atlanta cable boxes, and I wanted more channel choices than the digital converter boxes offer.)
_________________
.sigs waste space and bandwidth

HeXiLeD · Veteran Joined: 20 Aug 2005 Posts: 1159 Location: Online

Good info. I just called to get info about the service and got the following:

Boxes used: Nextbox HD 4642 HD and the cable signal is encrypted.

So i guess this now changes everything. What are my options ?

Can I still use a card that will receive the signal from the box after decription or is there a good card that can decrypt directly from the cable ?

One other question is about vl4 support. Will I need x11-drivers/xf86-video-v4l & media-tv/v4l-utils ?
_________________
Do you hear the sound of inevitability?
With age, comes great grumpiness and that, was 20 years ago...

CertFP: becbbd161d5a5c31de3c45171b77bf710911db29 / d985d21f89fe2977b593c4d381a1a86802e62990d9328d893db76d59f9935244

depontius · Advocate Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 3509

At this point you might have two choices:

1 - HD HomeRun Prime with Cable Card

2 - The cable company's cable box, driven by an IR blaster, and some sort of frame-grabber on the output.

The choice that might be missing is #2, depending on your needs/wishes. Driving a cable box with an IR blaster is known art, though often trick, and the information you need may well be proprietary. In other words, you may not be able to get the IR codes you need to blast. That's only the first obstacle. The second obstacle is that most likely the only output from the cable box is video, and almost certainly not QAM. So right there you're out of the realm of regular video capture cards, and into something else. Years back some cable boxes would output firewire, and that's the easy path. I don't know if that still happens, it was never there for me. As for video capture, I believe there is hardware meant to do that, I never really looked for myself, only heard about others doing it. If you're content to record SDTV - 480i, no problem. If you want HDTV, of course it would mean different capture hardware, but it might be impossible. There is a thing called HDCP that can be used to encrypt the video going out through HDMI. If the HTMI output of your cable box is HDCP-encrypted, you're toast. Plus getting the IR blaster to do what you want is far from trivial, and you're mostly on your own, because there's not standardization, and pretty much every setup will be different.

Now you know why I went with #1.
_________________
.sigs waste space and bandwidth

HeXiLeD · Veteran Joined: 20 Aug 2005 Posts: 1159 Location: Online

I was just checking my tv box and it has:

depontius · Advocate Joined: 05 May 2004 Posts: 3509

It sounds like your cable box has two outputs that can carry "TV out" - HDMI and firewire. Neither of those is NTSC / QAM that the normal TV tuner card is equipped to handle. I'm not sure what the "IR out" on the cable box is for, but I believe in the present context it's not useful to you, unless it's mislabeled and it's really "IR in. I can see how they might label it that way if it's meant to be connected to the "IR out" of your capture device.

So you have the firewire output, which I understand is the preferred way to get video. Next question is whether it's enabled or not. Do you have any hardware with a firewire port? (My laptop does, but that's my only firewire.) If so, you can start learning and test this path. Problem is, they don't always enable the firewire output.

There are also HDMI capture devices, but as I said, if the cable company is using HDCP, which is fairly likely, you're outta luck on that one.

It's google time for you.

I would also suggest going to the MythTV mailing list archives, and start looking for people in similar situations to you. Even if you're not running MythTV, it's probably the most concentrated information source for what you're trying to do.

Also, https://askubuntu.com/questions/290971/how-to-capture-from-hdmi-with-ubuntu has interesting information.
_________________
.sigs waste space and bandwidth