Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Which arch is dominant in 2009?
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Which arch do you use?
alpha
0%
 0%  [ 2 ]
amd64
70%
 70%  [ 223 ]
arm
0%
 0%  [ 2 ]
hppa
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
ia64
1%
 1%  [ 4 ]
mips
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
ppc
0%
 0%  [ 2 ]
ppc64
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
sparc
0%
 0%  [ 3 ]
x86
25%
 25%  [ 81 ]
Total Votes : 317

Author Message
hook
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 23 Oct 2002
Posts: 1398
Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia

PostPosted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 11:55 am    Post subject: Which arch is dominant in 2009? Reply with quote

I was just wondering the other day how come ARCH="x86" is still considered the main architecture even though pretty much all modern CPU are AMD64 (or Intel64).

So, I'd like to know which is the dominant arch (i.e. ACCEPT_KEYWORDS) being used by Gentoo users in 2009.


P.S. Yes, I searched for similar topics. But whatever's out there is already outdated.
P.P.S. Due to poll limitations, I had to ommit some of the arches. Missing are all the *-fbsd keywords, m68k, s390, sh. So if you use any of those, add a comment.
_________________
tea+free software+law=hook

(deep inside i'm still a tux's little helper)


Last edited by hook on Sun Jun 21, 2009 4:28 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
szczerb
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 1709
Location: Poland => Lodz

PostPosted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 12:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I did vote for amd64 because that's my main system (ma lappy), but then I realised that I have more x86 (2) machines then amd64 (1) - so I guess that I should've answered x86...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Letharion
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 13 Jun 2005
Posts: 1344
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 12:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Next time I install again I will go with 64-bit. I did once "long" (2005) ago and a lot of stuff didn't work, so I've avoided it since.
I'm still on x86 because I can't switch without a complete reinstall, and that most likely won't happen until I buy a new computer. (Unless I mess things up)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hook
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 23 Oct 2002
Posts: 1398
Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia

PostPosted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 1:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it's time for me to comment as well.

I've switched to amd64 (from x86) in 2005 when I got my (now dead) Acer laptop. At times it's been a bumpy ride, but for the past year or so, more or less all problems were solved. Sure, Psyco is not yet ported to amd64, but that's just an optional package anyway. Pretty much everything else works just fine (including Flash and video codecs, which used to be quite a bother in the past).

Actually, the only annoyance on amd64 for me lately is that many packages are keyworded and stabilised a lot slower then on x86. It seems a bit odd to me that amd64 has to have a separate arch team and considered as a second class citizen. This is also the reason why I made this poll - to find out if the "x86 is more common" assumption still stands (I think it doesn't).

Needless to say, when I get my new laptop (aaah, sweet ThinkPad), I'll again use ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64" :]
_________________
tea+free software+law=hook

(deep inside i'm still a tux's little helper)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeddySeagoon
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 05 Jul 2003
Posts: 54237
Location: 56N 3W

PostPosted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 1:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I use ~sparc ~x86 and ~amd64.
I would use ~arm too but I can't get gentoo to build for my iPaq.

Many users with 64 bit amd (alike) CPUs still do 32 bit installs. Thats a feature that will continue for some time as 64 bit installs have few advantages.
_________________
Regards,

NeddySeagoon

Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
d2_racing
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 13047
Location: Ste-Foy,Canada

PostPosted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 1:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AMD64 will be again very strong, since the CoreI7 that rip a lot of compilation time and if you run with a 64 bits installation, then it's even faster :P
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asturm
Developer
Developer


Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 8936

PostPosted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 1:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For me it's currently amd64 (2) : x86 (2), although from those two x86 systems one is a tiny C7 server, the other one my abandoned, old notebook.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hoacker
Guru
Guru


Joined: 04 Aug 2007
Posts: 505
Location: Bürstadt, Germany

PostPosted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

amd64 2 : x86 1
It would be 3:0 if I could get the wireless to work with amd64, but no way with this card: No linux driver and no 64bit XP-driver I could use with ndiswrapper.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
avx
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 2152

PostPosted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 7:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

amd64(6), x86(4), sparc(1), ppc(1)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Naib
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 21 May 2004
Posts: 6051
Location: Removed by Neddy

PostPosted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 7:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

amd64,x86,arch
_________________
Quote:
Removed by Chiitoo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hook
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 23 Oct 2002
Posts: 1398
Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The poll's been up for 4 days so far and already 66 people voted. I know this is not a very good sample statistically, but since it's been put under "Gentoo Chat" and not promoted (that I know of) on any arch-specific forums or channels, I think it's a pretty fair poll.

As it stand today AMD64 is currently the most used ACCEPT_KEYWORDS option used by Gentoo (forum) users — being used by more than 2/3 of users who voted.

If this trend continues, I think it would be worth rethinking why we're still maintaining x86 as the main arch on Gentoo. Or at least why AMD64 isn't better maintained.
_________________
tea+free software+law=hook

(deep inside i'm still a tux's little helper)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asturm
Developer
Developer


Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 8936

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hm, where is it behind x86? I don't feel much difference nowadays, but then I'm using ~amd64.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Letharion
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 13 Jun 2005
Posts: 1344
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 9:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hook wrote:
The poll's been up for 4 days so far and already 66 people voted. I know this is not a very good sample statistically, but since it's been put under "Gentoo Chat" and not promoted (that I know of) on any arch-specific forums or channels, I think it's a pretty fair poll.

As it stand today AMD64 is currently the most used ACCEPT_KEYWORDS option used by Gentoo (forum) users — being used by more than 2/3 of users who voted.

If this trend continues, I think it would be worth rethinking why we're still maintaining x86 as the main arch on Gentoo. Or at least why AMD64 isn't better maintained.


I'm not sure what "maintaining x86 as the main arch" really means, but won't transition to amd64 "as main" occur more or less naturally as developers move their own machines?
If x86 is ahead in anyway, it is atleast possible that the explanation is simple. x86 has been around far longer than amd64, and more people have more knowledge about it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asturm
Developer
Developer


Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 8936

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 9:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Agreed. More demand brings more bugzilla entries bring more interest, and things move on from there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hook
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 23 Oct 2002
Posts: 1398
Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia

PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 9:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

@genstorm: OK, I admit, ~amd64 is not too far behind ~x86, but in the stable branches there's quite a difference.

Letharion wrote:

I'm not sure what "maintaining x86 as the main arch" really means


From my experience of bugs.gentoo.org, if the bug doesn't include any specific arch team, it is handled by whatever dev team is assigned to it (e.g. desktop, core, kernel ...) and the changes from any of those teams first show on x86 arch. If something is marked for inclusion or stabilisation, it gets "x86" by default and usually even "~amd64" has to be explicitly asked for. Every arch out there has its own dedicated team, except "x86" — that arch belongs to every non-special-arch dev (team).

Quote:
but won't transition to amd64 "as main" occur more or less naturally as developers move their own machines?


Currently there are some packages that are stabilised faster for SPARC then for AMD64. I hardly doubt that there's many more SPARC users then AMD64 :P

Quote:
If x86 is ahead in anyway, it is atleast possible that the explanation is simple. x86 has been around far longer than amd64, and more people have more knowledge about it.


That would explain old bugs, but not newer ones. I'd say that already the sole fact that AMD64 has a dedicated arch team means that it's considered a second class citizen.
_________________
tea+free software+law=hook

(deep inside i'm still a tux's little helper)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NotQuiteSane
Guru
Guru


Joined: 30 Jan 2005
Posts: 488
Location: Klamath Falls, Jefferson, USA, North America, Midgarth

PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think i'm the only ~sparc user. but lets see, of machines running some form of unix that i have either direct or root privledges:

6 sparc (7 chips)
1 arm
23 x86 (37 chips)
1 opteron (4 chips)

note that i co-admin a site that has a mix of unix clients.

NQS
_________________
These opinions are mine, mine I say! Piss off and get your own.

As I see it -- An irregular blog, Improved with new location

To delete French language packs from system use 'sudo rm -fr /'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
disi
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 28 Nov 2003
Posts: 1354
Location: Out There ...

PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I voted for arm, they will bring out new notebooks this year afaik :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hook
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 23 Oct 2002
Posts: 1398
Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia

PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 8:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NotQuiteSane wrote:
6 sparc (7 chips)
1 arm
23 x86 (37 chips)
1 opteron (4 chips)


Wow! O_O


I'm posting a reply that Jeremy "darkside" Olexa posted on my page here:
Quote:

The "problem" is quite clear. If your metric for how supported an arch is, is based off of stable keywords then just look at bugs.gentoo.org. x86 has 65 open stablereq bugs, amd64 has 140. That bit of data alone tells me that x86 arch team is at least 2x more staffed (counting developer hours, not number of developers).<

_________________
tea+free software+law=hook

(deep inside i'm still a tux's little helper)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
keenblade
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Posts: 1087

PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I use ~amd64. And I am extremely happy with it.
I wanna use ~arm, too, but I don't think gentoo will work on my qtec s200. It would be great get this old pda usable with gentoo.
_________________
Anyway it's all the same at the end...
Need help to get it working: "x-fi surround 5.1"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
krinn
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 02 May 2003
Posts: 7470

PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 1:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think that poll would answer anything:
1/ people will generaly use their favorite computer to answer it (because faster, newer cpu... mouse, keyboard... nicer screen... well their best computer, seems logic they just use it more). So they should answer that kind of question with amd64

2/ if you count how many users really have x86 and amd64 that will be different, i have personnaly 5 computers : 4 are x86 and only 1 is amd64 capable, and no i don't use amd64 because i would need cross compiling for that and i don't wish that.
If i was only using that computer i suppose i would have been amd64 too (so i would have been case 1 as nearly everyone with a newer cpu)
So you could guess that 32bits gentoo are really more common, because not all computers could run a 64bits arch, but all X86-64 computers could run a 32bits distro. (i'm not sure for the others 64bits arch so i just use X86-64)

3/ I don't think amd64 is discriminated vs x86, it's just (in my opinion) that they are so close that fixing the 32bits version of a product would fix 95% of the amd64 version. So you need a staff to fix the 5% gap, that should explain a little amd64 team.
Considering that, we could say fixing 100% amd64 would fix 100% 32bits (let's just assume it's the case): yes but fixing 95% of amd64 is still faster than fixing 100% amd64, so they hit stable state faster.

I also have a feeling that thread gave me: "hey drop the x86 so few use it vs amd64, and why not droping sparc while we're at it... and mac and..." and (even more provocating :D ) "and while optimizing dev time: why not just drop linux so many computers use windows our dev could do even a little task, that will hit a far bigger audience"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dmpogo
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 02 Sep 2004
Posts: 3267
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have 4 computers - old opteron server, two desktops and a laptop, all amd64, never had anything else since 2005 (oops, my old laptop up to 2007 was Fedora)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
muhsinzubeir
l33t
l33t


Joined: 29 Sep 2007
Posts: 948
Location: /home/muhsin

PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 9:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have 1 laptop, 1 desktop and 2 servers...all running X86.
I did use amd64 on my desktop as is the only machine that can support it.Unfortunately, I removed amd64 and move to x86 due to personal issues.
Just wanted the desktop to be the same with other boxes...probably gain a little time in maintannce if all boxes are kinda the same ~arc...but probably not true :lol:
_________________
~x86
p5k-se
Intel Core 2 Duo
Nvidia GT200
http://www.zanbytes.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NathanZachary
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 2605

PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For my home computers, I have x86 (9), amd64 (2), so I guess x86 is still my top by a long shot. Even though I have several processors that support 64bit, I don't see that many advantages.
_________________
“Truth, like infinity, is to be forever approached but never reached.” --Jean Ayres (1972)
---avatar cropped from =AimanStudio---
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
d2_racing
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 13047
Location: Ste-Foy,Canada

PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kalos wrote:
For my home computers, I have x86 (9), amd64 (2), so I guess x86 is still my top by a long shot. Even though I have several processors that support 64bit, I don't see that many advantages.


You should try, for my concern I had less compilation time actually with a AMD64 installation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NathanZachary
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 2605

PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe I will try it again. I know that I installed the AMD64 version of Gentoo on the computer at my parents' house and it did seem to be a lot smoother of a process than in the past. I didn't ever notice until then that some of the kernel options are different for 64bit installations.
_________________
“Truth, like infinity, is to be forever approached but never reached.” --Jean Ayres (1972)
---avatar cropped from =AimanStudio---
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum