View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
roofy Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 01 Sep 2003 Posts: 86 Location: miami
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2003 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | For better driver support you must tell them which driver you want included to be sure that it gets their attention. |
well that site is for 2.5, should i report it anyway? _________________ /* event horizon */
Athlon XP 2100+ (o/c'ed to 2.1ghz)
LanParty NForce2 Ultra
80GB Maxtor HD
48x CD-RW
ATI 9700 Pro |
|
Back to top |
|
|
roofy Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 01 Sep 2003 Posts: 86 Location: miami
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2003 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | For better driver support you must tell them which driver you want included to be sure that it gets their attention. |
well that site is for 2.5, should i report it anyway? _________________ /* event horizon */
Athlon XP 2100+ (o/c'ed to 2.1ghz)
LanParty NForce2 Ultra
80GB Maxtor HD
48x CD-RW
ATI 9700 Pro |
|
Back to top |
|
|
roofy Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 01 Sep 2003 Posts: 86 Location: miami
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2003 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | For better driver support you must tell them which driver you want included to be sure that it gets their attention. |
well that site is for 2.5, should i report it anyway? _________________ /* event horizon */
Athlon XP 2100+ (o/c'ed to 2.1ghz)
LanParty NForce2 Ultra
80GB Maxtor HD
48x CD-RW
ATI 9700 Pro |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mile_slo Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Apr 2003 Posts: 91 Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2003 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anybody knows, when mppe patch will be ready for 2.6 kernels? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Narada Guru
Joined: 12 Dec 2002 Posts: 300 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2003 8:16 pm Post subject: Re: nvidia geforce drivers |
|
|
hulmeman wrote: | nvidia-kernel_1.0.4496-r1 failed. |
Use the one created by a gentoo developer here. _________________ http://dhruba.name/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Narada Guru
Joined: 12 Dec 2002 Posts: 300 Location: London, UK
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
FINITE Guru
Joined: 10 May 2002 Posts: 449
|
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2003 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, I want to get in on the 2.6 kernel goodness. Have a few questions before I start the process. If I go into make menuconfig with the 2.4 series kernel and save the config to 'an alternate location' will I be able to load that config when I go to compile the 2.6 kernel? Call me lazy but I don't want to have to go though and hand select all of my options. If there is no choice then so be it. Then there is the question about making the symlink, I didn't need to do this with the 2.4 series kernel, why would I need to with the 2.6 series? Which one should I go with, the mm sources or the standard 2.6? Thats about it, sure I can figure out any problems that pop up along the way if any. Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Narada Guru
Joined: 12 Dec 2002 Posts: 300 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2003 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
FINITE: Kernel options: I would strongly recommend against migrating 2.4 kernel config to a 2.6 kernel. Generally, the rule is migrate config between the same numerical branch but not across different branches. The old options have been radically changed and there are a whole multitude of new options. Even if you do copy old config over and do 'make oldconfig' you will be asked many questions on the command line about option choices. Start fresh with configuration options and do 'make mrproper' before you begin. Symlinks: Symlinks are necessary for both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels. Create two symlinks for the 2.6 kernel that you will use: (1) /usr/src/linux and (2) /usr/src/linux-beta. These symlinks are sometimes depended upon by certain packages/ebuilds to determine which kernel to compile against such as nvidia-kernel/glx. The symlinks are basically used as a systemwide indication of which kernel sources are currently in use so are recommended. Which 2.6 kernel: Initially, I would say try the vanilla (plain) 2.6 kernel, get it working and fine tune configuration options and boot parameters if necessary. Once you have a robust .config file you can migrate it to any other variant of the 2.6 kernel including mm. The latest version as of now of vanilla dev sources is 2.6.0-test4-bk6. My decision has been to install my kernel myself rather than getting it from portage as that allows much greater freedom and also prevents kernels being outdated when portage bumps take time. HTH. _________________ http://dhruba.name/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FINITE Guru
Joined: 10 May 2002 Posts: 449
|
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2003 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the info Narada. I was going to do everything from work but I forgot to reconfigure my firewall to allow ssh. This really sucks, wanted to get everything running before I got home. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
icecube n00b
Joined: 30 Oct 2002 Posts: 34
|
Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2003 2:20 am Post subject: IMPORTANT: PROMISE Ultra 133 TX2 under 2.6.0-test5 |
|
|
I have been at this for two days trying to get 2.6.0-test5 set up correctly. I see a lot of people having some similar problems. I got a wild hair and wondered if my TX2 bios was up to date. Well I went to http://www.promise.com/support/download/download2_eng.asp?productId=87&category=bios&os=0 and downloaded and updated my bios to 2.20.0.15. Don't forget to back up the old one. Well before I updated the bios, the 3 partitions that I had on my Maxtor drive could not be mounted during boot, no matter what I did or how I compiled the kernel (as I said I've been trying for 2 days - got a day off for the hurricane). After I updated the bios, the partitions were recognized and even better yet in the 2.4.22 kernel I get "PDC20269: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later" on boot even after the new bios was installed. With the 2.6.0-test5 kernel I get "PDC20269: 100% native mode on irq 23" even before the bois was installed. Native has to be better than not 100% native. Lesson - when having problems, check bios updates. Hope this helps someone else since it took me so long to figure it out. _________________ Friday is a good day. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
icecube n00b
Joined: 30 Oct 2002 Posts: 34
|
Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2003 2:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
I also found that in order for terminals to work, you do need "Unix98 PTY Support" under "Character devices" and "/dev/pts file system for Unix98 PTYs" under "File systems -> Pseudo filesystems". Hope this helps someone else too. The last thing I have to do is get Intel e100 driver to work. Guess I will emerge the driver instead of using the one in the kernel. If anyone has any info on this, please share. Also if anyone has any trick on vmware running on 2.6, this is the last thing I need before a full switch. Thanks. _________________ Friday is a good day. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
icecube n00b
Joined: 30 Oct 2002 Posts: 34
|
Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2003 4:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Solved my own problem with e100 module. When module-init-tools is installed it changes the way modules are autoloaded. Instead of having a /etc/modules.autoload file there is the /etc/modules.autoload.d directory (which by the way was present before 2.6) which contains kernel-2.x files that hold the modules to autoload for the particular kernel that is loaded. I also found a link to fix VMware (http://thomer.com/linux/migrate-to-2.6.html), but I haven't tried it yet. Will check the Gentoo forums to and post if it works.
Once you get to understand this kernal and how it works, it rocks. Compiling is a breeze. Can't wait for stable. _________________ Friday is a good day. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
m00re n00b
Joined: 17 Jun 2002 Posts: 65 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2003 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
is there a solution on how to get lm-sensors working width a 2.6.0 kernel? i cannot compile either 2.7.0 nor 2.8.0 of lm-sensors... and when i try to fetch the stats of my sensors (i still have got a compiled version of 2.7.0 on my system) by running "sensors", i get an error about not being able to read from the /proc/busses/i2c (which doesn't exist). there's also missing the module i2c-proc (which exists in 2.4.x), and i dont find it in the config for kernel-2.6.0.
and in addition to that, i dont get a working terminal in X (starting from fluxbox menu), but i am sure to have everything enabled for it. my kernel config can be read at http://www.m00re.de/kernel.config
greets, Jens
ps: the vmware fix is working. _________________ "Fall seven times, stand up eight." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Koala Kid Guru
Joined: 09 May 2003 Posts: 382
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hmmmmm.....
Code: |
root@frontline bungle # emerge sys-kernel/development-sources
Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 2) sys-apps/module-init-tools-0.9.12-r1 to /
>>> Downloading http://gentoo.oregonstate.edu/distfiles/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2
--19:34:45-- http://gentoo.oregonstate.edu/distfiles/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2
=> `/usr/portage/distfiles/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2'
Resolving gentoo.oregonstate.edu... done.
Connecting to gentoo.oregonstate.edu[128.193.0.3]:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
19:34:46 ERROR 404: Not Found.
>>> Downloading http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo/distfiles/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2
--19:34:46-- http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo/distfiles/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2
=> `/usr/portage/distfiles/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2'
Resolving distro.ibiblio.org... done.
Connecting to distro.ibiblio.org[152.2.210.109]:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
19:34:47 ERROR 404: Not Found.
>>> Downloading http://www.uk.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2
--19:34:47-- http://www.uk.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2
=> `/usr/portage/distfiles/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2'
Resolving www.uk.kernel.org... done.
Connecting to www.uk.kernel.org[194.117.158.28]:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
19:34:48 ERROR 404: Not Found.
>>> Downloading http://www.fr.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2
--19:34:48-- http://www.fr.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2
=> `/usr/portage/distfiles/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2'
Resolving www.fr.kernel.org... done.
Connecting to www.fr.kernel.org[212.180.1.39]:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
19:34:48 ERROR 404: Not Found.
>>> Downloading http://www.de.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2
--19:34:48-- http://www.de.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2
=> `/usr/portage/distfiles/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2'
Resolving www.de.kernel.org... done.
Connecting to www.de.kernel.org[129.143.116.10]:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
19:34:49 ERROR 404: Not Found.
>>> Downloading http://www.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2
--19:34:49-- http://www.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2
=> `/usr/portage/distfiles/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2'
Resolving www.us.kernel.org... done.
Connecting to www.us.kernel.org[209.221.142.122]:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
19:34:49 ERROR 404: Not Found.
>>> Downloading http://www.at.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2
--19:34:49-- http://www.at.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2
=> `/usr/portage/distfiles/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2'
Resolving www.at.kernel.org... done.
Connecting to www.at.kernel.org[62.116.33.4]:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
19:34:50 ERROR 404: Not Found.
>>> Downloading http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2
--19:34:50-- http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2
=> `/usr/portage/distfiles/module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2'
Resolving www.kernel.org... done.
Connecting to www.kernel.org[204.152.189.116]:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
19:34:50 ERROR 404: Not Found.
!!! Couldn't download module-init-tools-0.9.12.tar.bz2. Aborting.
root@frontline bungle #
|
what's wrong here ?
thank you |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KiTaSuMbA Guru
Joined: 28 Jun 2002 Posts: 430 Location: Naples Italy
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They are removed...
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" will solve this as it gets the .15-pre1 package still there. _________________ Need to flame people LIVE on IRC? Join #gentoo-otw on freenode! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KiTaSuMbA Guru
Joined: 28 Jun 2002 Posts: 430 Location: Naples Italy
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2003 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
water wrote: | sdriesner wrote: |
Any ideas? Your help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. |
Disable "mount at boot"
On a Knoppix-system, it did the trick for me.
and if you not already have this: Code: |
rc-update add devfsd boot |
|
Similar troubles here tonight with 2.6.0-test5-mm4 and an xfs root system. But what about rc-update?
Code: | # rc-update add devfsd boot
* /sbin/rc-update: /etc/init.d/devfsd not found; aborting. |
Huh? What's that about? _________________ Need to flame people LIVE on IRC? Join #gentoo-otw on freenode! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
abombss n00b
Joined: 20 Jun 2002 Posts: 12 Location: Chicago, IL
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2003 3:39 am Post subject: 2.6 radeonfb |
|
|
Well, it has been quite some time since I compiled a kernel. I got fed up with my ati 8500 sucking so bad in 2.4 that I opted to spend time and learn solaris on a sparc. Anyway, yesterday I decided to reinstall Gentoo on x86.
Warning: Long story and rambling ahead!
I was very impressed with livecd, smp, and framebuffer support. Kudos to Gentoo, the best distro, and now with cool eye candy!! Needless to say I bootstraped from stage 1 and was on my way in no time. When it came time for the kernel I elected for gentoo 2.4.2 sources, previously I ran 2.4.0 vanilla. I was excited for the updated radeonfb patch!
When I booted I was amazed that the radeon framebuffer worked, I was in 1024x768@85 and I saw penguin!! Then things started locking up. Of course I had no boot disk, just livecd so I rebuilt a new kernel. I did this again and again and again and again and again (see a pattern). I could not figure why I was randomly locking up, I tried several configs, even bare minimal non smp configs.
Needless to say I was...
Anyway I spotted this thread and thought I should take a stab at the mm3-test5 sources. I just finished the install and I feel...
Everything is detected and seems to be working... Haven't messed with X yet
But, now my radeonfb doesn't seem to be working. Anyone else have this problem. Linux detects and loads the radeonfb fine, but it doesn't switch modes, I am stuck at 640x480. Any thoughts on modedb or fb.modes??
Bottom line... after 15 minutes of 2.6 I am in love... I might follow-up in a couple hours after I build X and Gnome and get pissed about my ati all in wonder being everything but wonderful, but hey this still beats microsuck!
Seriously, anyone have experience with running framebuffers other than vesa?
--abombss |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jaska Bodhisattva
Joined: 06 Jun 2003 Posts: 725 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2003 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry to ask but, which ebuild of the 2.6 kernel should I go for? mm-sources or development-sources? Planning to test out 2.6 this weekend. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Koala Kid Guru
Joined: 09 May 2003 Posts: 382
|
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2003 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jaska wrote: | Sorry to ask but, which ebuild of the 2.6 kernel should I go for? mm-sources or development-sources? Planning to test out 2.6 this weekend. |
sys-kernel/development-sources |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Koala Kid Guru
Joined: 09 May 2003 Posts: 382
|
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2003 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well.... new day - new troubles.
the new kernel seems to be working but X doesn't start
Code: |
(II) Setting vga for screen 0.
(II) Loading sub module "vgahw"
(II) LoadModule: "vgahw"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libvgahw.a
(II) Module vgahw: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
compiled for 4.3.0, module version = 0.1.0
ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.6
(**) NVIDIA(0): Depth 24, (--) framebuffer bpp 32
(==) NVIDIA(0): RGB weight 888
(==) NVIDIA(0): Default visual is TrueColor
(==) NVIDIA(0): Using gamma correction (1.0, 1.0, 1.0)
(--) NVIDIA(0): Linear framebuffer at 0xD0000000
(--) NVIDIA(0): MMIO registers at 0xD8000000
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the NVIDIA kernel module!
(EE) NVIDIA(0): *** Aborting ***
(II) UnloadModule: "nvidia"
(II) UnloadModule: "vgahw"
(II) Unloading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libvgahw.a
(EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.
Fatal server error:
no screens found
When reporting a problem related to a server crash, please send
the full server output, not just the last messages.
This can be found in the log file "/var/log/XFree86.0.log".
Please report problems to xfree86@xfree86.org.
|
/usr/src/linux is symlinked to the new kernel...
any solution ?
thank you
P.S.: i've installed nvidia-glx and nvidia-kernel |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Master_Of_Disaster l33t
Joined: 28 Feb 2003 Posts: 610 Location: 15.05072° East, 48.13747° North (aka Mauer), Austria
|
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2003 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Has someone managed to get lm_sensors and lirc to run with 2.6? (I use 2.6.0-test5-mm4) Apparently (damn I'm really impressed) everything else seems to work... _________________ post tenebras lux, post fenestras tux
Registered Linux User Nr. 312509
Adopt an unanswered post today! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
monicajae Guru
Joined: 03 Sep 2003 Posts: 363 Location: Dorset, VT
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2003 4:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
2.6.0-test5-bk8
here's my experience: and a question...why is it that when i ran a 2.4.22 kernel on a slackware 9.1 distribution alsa worked perfectly? when i upgraded to the 2.6.test5 kern and enabled alsa as mod's it didn't, but then i hardcoded it in the kernel and voila, sound!
then comes gentoo...2.4.22-pre2 emerge alsa no sound ... upgrade to 2.6.test5 no sound ?? what is the difference? it's still the same soundcard. the same drivers...same alsa? so, what's the problem? i want sound, dammit, and when i listen to live streaming music, via OSS, after about five minutes, it freezes, and you know what? the gentoo developers can't even help me, telling me, this isn't a gentoo bug. Fcuk yeah it is!! i, like some other people, want to take advantage of the digital qualities and strengths that alsa offers. so, what can i do? can someone tell me? do i just go back to Slackware? do i tell pat volkerding he rocks? _________________ "Conformity is the jailer of freedom and the enemy of growth." -- John F. Kennedy
"Those who dare to fail miserably can achieve greatly." -- John F. Kennedy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RedDawn Guru
Joined: 22 Sep 2003 Posts: 368 Location: Los Angeles, California
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2003 10:49 am Post subject: Wholy Crap!! |
|
|
WOW this is cool i started using Gentoo like 1 mounth ago using Kernel 2.4.20 now im using Kernel 2.6.0TEST6 and i LOVE IT!!!!! WOW.... is so fast!! my first compoile went with no prob all i had to do is emerge the Nvidia-Kernel, Nvidia-GLX drivers and i was set!!! NO PROBLEMS AT ALL!!!
except on little one!! when i exit x the computer just stops responding it wont give me any terminals and i do the 3keys of death nutting happens... it just stays there!!
can someone help me all i have is VESA compiled into the kernel...etc! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kakakoka Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 14 May 2003 Posts: 147 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2003 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
craftyc wrote: | Halanegri wrote: |
You also forgot that you have to create the /sys directory manually.
|
What's that about? I never knew you had to do that. |
I got the boot time message about /sys missing too until I emerged LVM2.
Im running LVM for 4 partitions (like in the gentoo LVM doc), and I had to emerge LVM2 before I could make LVM work with the 2.6.0 kernel. So:
Enable LVM in the kernel
emerge -c lvm-user (this will break your 2.4.x kernels I guess since you wont be able to mount your LVM partitions under your 2.4.x kernel anymore since LVM needs lvm-user in that environment)
emerge lvm2
Should get you running. _________________ Aspiring to once become a great geek
---
"Tachikoma": AMD TB 1300 Mhz, ECS-K7S5A (SIS 735), (noname) RADEON 8500, Hercules Gametheater XP, Pinnacle PCTV pro
"Pyonpyon": Athlon 2500+ Barton, MSI K7N2-delta-ISLR (Nforce2), Sapphire Radeon 9600 Pro |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Baer Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 11 Sep 2003 Posts: 96 Location: Munich, Germany
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2003 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
found this lil' text, covering most of my questions.
Regs
Baer _________________ Life is like a roll of toilet paper, when the end is near we panic! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|