View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kevinsgs n00b
Joined: 16 Oct 2007 Posts: 34
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:09 am Post subject: Fluxbox overlay question |
|
|
I am wondering if there is a fluxbox overlay that I can use with layman instead of compiling it myself. There is a bug with fluxbox and wine that shows the taskbar over some fullscreen apps that is fixed but portage is not updated yet. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikegpitt Advocate
Joined: 22 May 2004 Posts: 3224
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 4:45 am Post subject: Re: Fluxbox overlay question |
|
|
kevinsgs wrote: | I am wondering if there is a fluxbox overlay that I can use with layman instead of compiling it myself. There is a bug with fluxbox and wine that shows the taskbar over some fullscreen apps that is fixed but portage is not updated yet. | I'm not a fluxbox user, so I'm not sure which version fixes your problem, but you could check bugzilla for an updated ebuild (or modify one for the new version):
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=ALL+fluxbox |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kevinsgs n00b
Joined: 16 Oct 2007 Posts: 34
|
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's fixed in 1.0.0 but portage is still on the release candidate builds.
I should probably just wait a bit I'm sure they will update it soon.
Untill then I will just compile it myself because I have not yet taken the time to learn to create ebuilds. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikegpitt Advocate
Joined: 22 May 2004 Posts: 3224
|
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 1:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
kevinsgs wrote: | It's fixed in 1.0.0 but portage is still on the release candidate builds.
I should probably just wait a bit I'm sure they will update it soon.
Untill then I will just compile it myself because I have not yet taken the time to learn to create ebuilds. | Maybe you need to do an emerge --sync. The latest stable release looks to be 1.0.0, and portage also has revision 1 and 2 ebuilds marked unstable. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kevinsgs n00b
Joined: 16 Oct 2007 Posts: 34
|
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 11:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh woops I was misreading revision 2 as release candidate 2.
Thanks for the help, mistake on my part. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|