Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
[Portage] attr-2.4.39 > warning: jobserver unavailable ...
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index French
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nexus6
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 92

PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 11:54 pm    Post subject: [Portage] attr-2.4.39 > warning: jobserver unavailable .. Reply with quote

Bonsoir,

Je tente d'emerger attr-2.4.39 mais durant la compilation, j'ai plusieurs fois ce message :

Code:
gmake[1]: warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1.  Add `+' to parent make rule.


Et je finis lamentablement par ça :

Code:
/usr/bin/xgettext --language=C --keyword=_ -o attr.pot ../attr/attr.c ../getfattr/getfattr.c ../setfattr/setfattr.c ../libattr/attr_copy_fd.c ../libattr/attr_copy_file.c
/usr/bin/xgettext: error while loading shared libraries: libexpat.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
gmake[1]: *** [attr.pot] Error 127
make: *** [default] Error 2
 ?[31;01m*?[0m
 ?[31;01m*?[0m ERROR: sys-apps/attr-2.4.39 failed.
 ?[31;01m*?[0m Call stack:
 ?[31;01m*?[0m            ebuild.sh, line 1701:  Called dyn_compile
 ?[31;01m*?[0m            ebuild.sh, line 1039:  Called qa_call 'src_compile'
 ?[31;01m*?[0m            ebuild.sh, line   44:  Called src_compile
 ?[31;01m*?[0m   attr-2.4.39.ebuild, line   45:  Called die
 ?[31;01m*?[0m The specific snippet of code:
 ?[31;01m*?[0m      emake || die
 ?[31;01m*?[0m  The die message:
 ?[31;01m*?[0m   (no error message)
 ?[31;01m*?[0m
 ?[31;01m*?[0m If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant.
 ?[31;01m*?[0m A complete build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/attr-2.4.39/temp/build.log'.
 ?[31;01m*?[0m


J'ai tenté de me renseigner, et voilà ce que j'ai comme info :

Quote:
warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1. Add `+' to parent make rule.'
In order for make processes to communicate, the parent will pass information to the child. Since this could result in problems if the child process isn't actually a make, the parent will only do this if it thinks the child is a make. The parent uses the normal algorithms to determine this (see How the MAKE Variable Works). If the makefile is constructed such that the parent doesn't know the child is a make process, then the child will receive only part of the information necessary. In this case, the child will generate this warning message and proceed with its build in a sequential manner.


Mais je ne comprend pas ce qui coince.

Si quelqun a une idée...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CryoGen
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 11 Feb 2004
Posts: 1426
Location: Bamako - Mali - Afrique

PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hum, pour la compil qui ne passe pas reemerge sys-devel/gettext (cassé à cause de expat)
_________________
- CryoGen` on #gentoofr@irc.freenode.net
- ~amd64 / KDE4
- I'm the bone of my sword...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nexus6
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 92

PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Merci CryoGen. J'avais également remarqué des retours sur expat. Certains préconisaient un revdep-rebuild , d'autres de paramétrer MAKEOPTS="-j1".

Mon CPU est un Core2 Duo 64 bit, ça me semblais étrange de devoir parametrer GCC avec MAKEOPTS="-j1" Et étant donné que je ne sais pas comment faire un "revdep-rebuild", alors je vais essayer de reemerger sys-devel/gettext. Pourrais-tu cependant m'indiquer ce que c'est qu'expat? Il paraitrait que c'est une LIB qui peut poser quelques soucis?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nexus6
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 92

PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:34 am    Post subject: oops! Reply with quote

A priori j'ai toujours la même erreur, mais d'autres sont apparues :

Code:
libattr.c:304: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 5 of 'attr_list_pack' differ in signedness
libattr.c:304: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 6 of 'attr_list_pack' differ in signedness
libattr.c: In function 'attr_listf':
libattr.c:344: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 5 of 'attr_list_pack' differ in signedness
libattr.c:344: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 6 of 'attr_list_pack' differ in signedness


Bon, j'emerge gentoolkit, apparement c'est avec ça que je pourrais faire un "revdep-rebuild", en espérant que cela réparera le code cassé. Sinon, au pire, je mettrais temporairement "MAKEOPTS="-j1" en option.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nexus6
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 92

PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:42 am    Post subject: hmmm... Reply with quote

Code:
Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild

Checking reverse dependencies...

Packages containing binaries and libraries broken by a package update
will be emerged.

?[32;01mCollecting system binaries and libraries...?[0m using existing /root/.revdep-rebuild.1_files.

?[32;01mCollecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH...?[0m using existing /root/.revdep-rebuild.2_ldpath.

?[32;01mChecking dynamic linking consistency...?[0m using existing /root/.revdep-rebuild.3_rebuild.

?[32;01mAssigning files to ebuilds...?[0m using existing /root/.revdep-rebuild.4_ebuilds.

?[32;01mEvaluating package order...?[0m using existing /root/.revdep-rebuild.5_order.

?[32;01mAll prepared. Starting rebuild...?[0m
emerge --oneshot  =sys-devel/gettext-0.17 =dev-lang/python-2.4.3-r4
?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.
Calculating dependencies   
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "=dev-lang/python-2.4.3-r4".


?[31;01mrevdep-rebuild failed to emerge all packages?[0m
?[31;01myou have the following choices:?[0m

- if emerge failed during the build, fix the problems and re-run revdep-rebuild
    or
- use -X or --package-names as first argument (trys to rebuild package, not exact
  ebuild)
    or
- set ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~<your platform>" and/or /etc/portage/package.unmask
  (and remove /root/.revdep-rebuild.5_order to be evaluated again)
    or
- modify the above emerge command and run it manually
    or
- compile or unmerge unsatisfied packages manually, remove temporary files and
  try again (you can edit package/ebuild list first)

?[32;01mTo remove temporary files, please run:?[0m
rm /root/.revdep-rebuild*.?_*


Bon, je verrai ça demain... (woops ! on y est déjà :D )
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ceric35
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 27 Aug 2006
Posts: 114

PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

dev-lang/python-2.4.3-r4 ne doit plus etre disponible dans l'arbre je pense

tente un "revdep-rebuild -X"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index French All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum