View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bLUEbYTE84 Guru
Joined: 21 Jul 2006 Posts: 566 Location: universe.tar.gz, src/earth.h, struct homo_sapiens_table
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 1:03 am Post subject: 2007.0! It Arrived! |
|
|
I checked several other mirrors but they don't allow dir access yet, but my local mirror is up and has it!
At last. No official word about the release yet though.
Although Gentoo is not a release-driven distro, it is very good to see the new release! Go Gentoo
Edit: 'fixed' the link _________________ Advanced Signature Camouflage System®(ASCS) v0.1
Last edited by bLUEbYTE84 on Mon May 07, 2007 1:25 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
no_hope Guru
Joined: 23 Jun 2003 Posts: 482
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 1:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
I got my mirror banned from the official mirror list once for accidentally allowing access to a new release before the official release date. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robbat2 Developer
Joined: 19 Feb 2003 Posts: 82
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for pointing out that mirror, we'll follow up with that admin as to why his server is misconfigured.
Please don't post the URLs publically, rather file a bug or email somebody in the infrastructure team in future.
- Robbat2, your friendly infra guy, who's handling the infra-side of release work of 2007.0 since jforman's busy. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bilbravo Guru
Joined: 30 May 2003 Posts: 319 Location: Baltimore, MD
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So when is the official release date? Older builds won't boot on my new system. _________________ me |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kimczuba n00b
Joined: 02 Oct 2003 Posts: 55 Location: Denmark (Copenhagen)
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 2:28 pm Post subject: bouncer.gentoo.org |
|
|
no_hope wrote: | I got my mirror banned from the official mirror list once for accidentally allowing access to a new release before the official release date. |
Who will ban this culprit?
http://
http://
[Edit links deleted by NeddySeagoon - Please use PM for this sort of thing]
Sorry, it was just too tempting to post those url's. _________________ "Fear is the path to the Dark Side. Fear leads to anger; anger leads to hate; hate leads to suffering. I sense much fear in you."
- Yoda speaking to Anakin at the Jedi Council (SW - The Phantom Menace)
Last edited by kimczuba on Mon May 07, 2007 2:40 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
padoor Advocate
Joined: 30 Dec 2005 Posts: 4185 Location: india
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 2:37 pm Post subject: current portage shows profile 2007.0 |
|
|
localhost ~ # eselect profile list
Available profile symlink targets:
[1] default-linux/x86/2006.1 *
[2] default-linux/x86/no-nptl
[3] default-linux/x86/no-nptl/2.4
[4] default-linux/x86/2006.1/desktop
[5] default-linux/x86/2007.0
[6] default-linux/x86/2007.0/desktop
[7] hardened/x86/2.6
[8] selinux/x86/2006.1
localhost ~ #
does this mean i can make default profile to 2007.0 in my laptop now?? _________________ reach out a little bit more to catch it (DON'T BELIEVE the advocate part under my user name) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paapaa l33t
Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 955 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 3:25 pm Post subject: Re: current portage shows profile 2007.0 |
|
|
padoor wrote: | does this mean i can make default profile to 2007.0 in my laptop now?? |
The upgrade docs are not yet updated:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-upgrading.xml
But I took the risk and updated my x86_64 system with no problems. Some new default use flags but nothing interesting. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
padoor Advocate
Joined: 30 Dec 2005 Posts: 4185 Location: india
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 4:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mmmm anyway the new profile is uptodate 2006.1 with emerge -Du system
may be additional base commands added .
will wait till docs are available.
thanks for the info Paapaa _________________ reach out a little bit more to catch it (DON'T BELIEVE the advocate part under my user name) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Monkeh Veteran
Joined: 06 Aug 2005 Posts: 1656 Location: England
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bilbravo wrote: | So when is the official release date? Older builds won't boot on my new system. |
Just throw a new kernel on the old CD. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kallamej Administrator
Joined: 27 Jun 2003 Posts: 4975 Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The release is official now. _________________ Please read our FAQ Forum, it answers many of your questions.
irc: #gentoo-forums on irc.libera.chat |
|
Back to top |
|
|
96140 Retired Dev
Joined: 23 Jan 2005 Posts: 1324
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 7:22 pm Post subject: Re: current portage shows profile 2007.0 |
|
|
--
Last edited by 96140 on Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:28 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cato` Guru
Joined: 03 Jun 2002 Posts: 430 Location: Norway, Trondheim
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So the only thing you have to do to update your profile is
Code: |
eselect profile default-linux/x86/2007.0/desktop
emerge -avuD world
|
? _________________ Don't mess with the Penguin. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paapaa l33t
Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 955 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 7:35 pm Post subject: Re: current portage shows profile 2007.0 |
|
|
nightmorph wrote: |
That's because at the time, release was still 3 hours away. The docs aren't updated until the media is available on the mirrors. I had already written the handbooks and other docs, and I committed them at the same time that infra sent the command to make the 2007.0 media available. So they went "live" at the same time (an hour and 22 minutes ago). Refresh your browser to see the nifty changes I made to the upgrading guide. |
First of all: thanks for the great job to all devs!
Why don't the docs mention "--newuse" at all? I think users could get problems if they update the profile but don't update with "--newuse" as many use flags get changed at profile changes. I'd guess that at least "--depclean" could cause problems. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wah Guru
Joined: 25 Feb 2005 Posts: 453 Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not complaining, just a curiosity - was it intentional to leave the fbsplash with 2006.1 on it? _________________ - AMD64 3000+, MSI K8N-SLI, Nvidia Geforce 6600 PCIE, 2GB OCZ Dual-Channel PC3200,2x160GB SATA
- Registered Linux User #418541 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
96140 Retired Dev
Joined: 23 Jan 2005 Posts: 1324
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
--
Last edited by 96140 on Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:28 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
steveL Watchman
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 5153 Location: The Peanut Gallery
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apparently x86 has kerberos, tiff and acl new USE? kerberos might hit a few people.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
96140 Retired Dev
Joined: 23 Jan 2005 Posts: 1324
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
--
Last edited by 96140 on Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:28 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Red Moose n00b
Joined: 16 Apr 2005 Posts: 24
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 8:12 pm Post subject: Good timing |
|
|
Bloody good timing!
Today been trashing my Windows XP installation on my Vaio, couldn't get Ubuntu 7.4 to install due to ongoing ATI problems with detection. It also wouldn't pick up an IP from my DHCP router, although it did bring up eth0 without an error report.
So, after many years, I am going back to Linux. The 2006.1 LiveCD for some reason borked my partition table, and wouldn't detect my hard disk, I had already wiped Windows
So, low and behold, I reinstalled a small 15GB Windows partition (smallest that the Vaio resintallation allows), went to Gentoo homepage and hooray, 2007.0 is out.
So, downloading now, hopefully it will work well. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
szamot n00b
Joined: 17 Apr 2006 Posts: 7 Location: W-wa, Poland
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wahman143 wrote: | Not complaining, just a curiosity - was it intentional to leave the fbsplash with 2006.1 on it? |
LOL You're right ;d grep did not found it while they were changing versions _________________ (\__/)
(O.o )
(> < )
This is Bunny.
Copy Bunny into your signature
to help him on his way to world domination. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nicom Guru
Joined: 30 Jan 2003 Posts: 380
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nicee. Off to try it out. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
96140 Retired Dev
Joined: 23 Jan 2005 Posts: 1324
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
--
Last edited by 96140 on Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:28 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kuhrscher Guru
Joined: 29 Dec 2003 Posts: 498 Location: Hamburg, Germany
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
wah Guru
Joined: 25 Feb 2005 Posts: 453 Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nightmorph wrote: | szamot wrote: | wahman143 wrote: | Not complaining, just a curiosity - was it intentional to leave the fbsplash with 2006.1 on it? |
LOL You're right ;d grep did not found it while they were changing versions |
Yeah, that was accidentally left in. And it's only on the x86 minimal iso. |
Cool - just wondering. Thanks! _________________ - AMD64 3000+, MSI K8N-SLI, Nvidia Geforce 6600 PCIE, 2GB OCZ Dual-Channel PC3200,2x160GB SATA
- Registered Linux User #418541 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
boniek Guru
Joined: 26 Mar 2005 Posts: 373
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
steveL Watchman
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 5153 Location: The Peanut Gallery
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nightmorph wrote: | steveL wrote: | kerberos might hit a few people.. |
First, that's not in the base 2007.0/ profile; that's in the desktop/ subprofile.
Second, I spoke with Releng, and the response is that it's there for a few reasons, including evolution-exchange and PAM authentication through active directory (thanks to wolf31o2 and dostrow for that information). |
Sure, I've always installed with kerberos for integration with AD. Thing is it's always been a bit tricky, but it won't be an issue for new installs from now on of course. I think the smbkrb5passwd in openldap conflicts with it iirc, by pulling in heimdal, and some people might have that set. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|