| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
slithy
Guru
Joined: 26 Nov 2005
Posts: 321
Location: Kansas
|
 Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 12:57 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| BorgDrone2 wrote: | I have 4 machines, all with Xorg 7.2
All run at least 1 kde session
kernel 2.6.16.36
2 have nvidia cards: x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-1.0.9631
one uses the i915 driver
one is a headless VNC machine running 2 kde sessions
I'm not seeing any memory leak on any of these machines.
So, this suggests that there is some other factor that triggers the leak. |
How long have those 4 X servers been running? Sometimes I didn't see the leak happen until > 6hrs of real time (not time seen in top). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BorgDrone2
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 107
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| All > 1d so far. But before that, I they had been up for >1 week (rebooted after updating glibc and others) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BorgDrone2
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 107
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 2:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
For those experiencing the leak, what apm/acpi settings are in effect.
xorg 1.1.1 had some acpi bugs (ie, one that would cause DPMS to not kick in) that were fixed in 1.2. Things working for hours and then go south suggest something along the lines of acpi. And another post above mentioned that the leak goes away with acpi=off |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
slithy
Guru
Joined: 26 Nov 2005
Posts: 321
Location: Kansas
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BorgDrone2 wrote: | | For those experiencing the leak, what apm/acpi settings are in effect. |
| Code: | slithy@mentat ~ $ grep ACPI /usr/src/linux/.config
# ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) Support
CONFIG_ACPI=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_AC is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_BATTERY is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=y
CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_HOTKEY is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_FAN=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=y
CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_ASUS is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_IBM is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_TOSHIBA is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0
# CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y
CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y
CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_CONTAINER is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_SBS is not set
CONFIG_PNPACPI=y |
I don't have any apm stuff built into my kernel or modules. I also don't have acpid installed and I am using the DPMS offtime option in my xorg.conf. I was experencing the leak under 2.6.19. Since I downgraded to xorg-server-1.1.1-r4, I have upgrade to 2.6.20, but haven't test xorg-server-1.2.0. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VoVaN
l33t
Joined: 02 Jul 2003
Posts: 688
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BorgDrone2 wrote: | I have 4 machines, all with Xorg 7.2
one is a headless VNC machine running 2 kde sessions
I'm not seeing any memory leak on any of these machines.
So, this suggests that there is some other factor that triggers the leak. |
VNC has nothing to do with xorg-server... so your point just a bit offtopic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BorgDrone2
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 107
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | VNC has nothing to do with xorg-server... so your point just a bit offtopic |
No, read my full post. I'm completely on topic.
VNC is X server based. KDE running under that VNC session is not leaking. Therefore, the leak is not KDE
I run 7.2 + nvidia + kde - no leak, therefore the leak is not strictly nvidia +xorg-7.2
I run 7.2 + i915 + kde - no leak, therefore the leak is not strictly kde + xorg-7.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
abhay
Apprentice
Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 161
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am running xorg 7.2 with i915 and AIGLX.
After 2:13 hrs of uptime, xorg mem usage is 167M :O |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BorgDrone2
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 107
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | I am running xorg 7.2 with i915 and AIGLX.
After 2:13 hrs of uptime, xorg mem usage is 167M :O |
This is consistent with reports on the ubuntu forums with xorg/aiglx |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
abhay
Apprentice
Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 161
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| So this much memory usage is expected? BTW, I just tried to disable AIGLX and Beryl...restarted X and the memory footprint was just 26MB. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BorgDrone2
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 107
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| slithy wrote: | | BorgDrone2 wrote: | | For those experiencing the leak, what apm/acpi settings are in effect. |
| Code: | slithy@mentat ~ $ grep ACPI /usr/src/linux/.config
# ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) Support
CONFIG_ACPI=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_AC is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_BATTERY is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=y
CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_HOTKEY is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_FAN=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=y
CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_ASUS is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_IBM is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_TOSHIBA is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0
# CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y
CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y
CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_CONTAINER is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_SBS is not set
CONFIG_PNPACPI=y |
I don't have any apm stuff built into my kernel or modules. I also don't have acpid installed and I am using the DPMS offtime option in my xorg.conf. I was experencing the leak under 2.6.19. Since I downgraded to xorg-server-1.1.1-r4, I have upgrade to 2.6.20, but haven't test xorg-server-1.2.0. |
OK, maybe we are getting somewhere. I have
| Code: | CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y
CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y
CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y
|
but the rest are built as modules, and they are not loaded.
What happens if you turn off
| Code: | | CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=y |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
johoe
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Posts: 92
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry to say that, as I reported in my previous post turning off acpi helps, but does not cure the problem. It seems that memory consumption is slowed down but still increasing continously.
@BorgDrone2: how much memory are your x sessions cosuming?
regards,
johoe |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BorgDrone2
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 107
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
4943 root 15 0 109m 89m 7668 S 1 4.4 20:03.40 X
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
4868 root 15 0 239m 32m 2540 S 1.0 6.6 46:50.95 X
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
4835 root 16 0 63580 26m 5680 S 3.7 10.8 88:28.32 X
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
5213 root 15 0 26796 24m 1912 S 0.0 2.4 14:44.14 Xvnc
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
5232 root 15 0 20224 17m 1904 S 0.0 1.8 2:53.21 Xvnc
|
3 X servers + 2 VNC sessions for comparison.
All have been holding steady |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jjeje007
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 142
Location: France, La Croix Valmer
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I get also this bug / problem 
I'm an nvidia user and :
| Quote: | PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
16395 root 0 0 568m 549m 7016 S 4 27.1 7:03.71 X |
EDIT : And my acpi kernel (2.6.20) config :
| Quote: | rep ACPI /usr/src/linux/.config
# Power management options (ACPI, APM)
# ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) Support
CONFIG_ACPI=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_AC is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_BATTERY is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_HOTKEY is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_FAN is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=y
CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_ASUS is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_IBM is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_TOSHIBA is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0
# CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y
CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y
CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y
# CONFIG_ACPI_CONTAINER is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_SBS is not set
CONFIG_PNPACPI=y
|
Jjeje007 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VoVaN
l33t
Joined: 02 Jul 2003
Posts: 688
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd say that xorg-server-1.1.1-r4 eating memory as well, but slower. In my case it starts with ~100/50Mb VIRT/RES memory respectively and after 3 day uptime it's 256/172Mb.... too bad  (( |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
miho
n00b
Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Same problem here...
Uptime: ~ 8days
| Code: | PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
1010 root 16 0 1175m 1.0g 10m S 4 25.3 279:32.18 X |
xrestop
| Code: | res-base Wins GCs Fnts Pxms Misc Pxm mem Other Total PID Identifier
2200000 1046 53 1 5140 5238 20211K 149K 20360K 1203 emerald
1200000 83 48 3 415 475 17655K 17K 17672K 1103 KDE Desktop
2400000 380 25 8 1298 332 12131K 25K 12156K 25196 Gentoo Forums :: Post a reply - Opera
2000000 101 1 1 13 3505 8197K 85K 8282K ? beryl
2e00000 11 5 3 225 131 4925K 6K 4931K 8013 superkaramba
4200000 486 127 3 701 62893 1710K 1491K 3202K 9792 Amarok - Wish by Kosheen
2600000 221 17 3 400 405 2731K 18K 2749K 7322 superkaramba
2800000 11 11 3 126 111 1509K 6K 1515K 7429 superkaramba
...
|
But /proc/pid/maps is really spooky:
http://forum.pctuning.cz/zaloha/miho/maps.txt
looks like memory leak to me!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
krtek.net
n00b
Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 5
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Intel 855GM here (i810 driver). Same behaviour. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jjeje007
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 142
Location: France, La Croix Valmer
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
Ok guys, I was so angry and so i go ahead and format
I reinstall every thing and I have NO MORE this problem
The only thing that i change is my overlay, i had xeffects, xeffects-experimental and i didn't "renable" them.
So I thing, this problem could come from one of the overlay (xeffects, xeffects-experimental) and maybe the tweaked qt from xeffects overlay ??
So, guys, are you using xeffects overlay ??
Jjeje007
Note: sorry for my poor english  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
firephoto
Veteran
Joined: 29 Oct 2003
Posts: 1612
Location: +48° 5' 23.40", -119° 48' 30.00"
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I had the runaway memory useage here on a kubuntu system, I stopped superkaramba yesterday, restarted, and haven't seen the leak since.
_________________
#gentoo-kde on freenode |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VoVaN
l33t
Joined: 02 Jul 2003
Posts: 688
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jjeje007 wrote: | Hi,
Ok guys, I was so angry and so i go ahead and format
I reinstall every thing and I have NO MORE this problem
The only thing that i change is my overlay, i had xeffects, xeffects-experimental and i didn't "renable" them.
So I thing, this problem could come from one of the overlay (xeffects, xeffects-experimental) and maybe the tweaked qt from xeffects overlay ??
So, guys, are you using xeffects overlay ??
Jjeje007
Note: sorry for my poor english |
Maybe this is only YOUR problem, but as I mentioned already in this post downgrading _only_ xorg-server solves the problem, therefore it's somehow xorg-server related. I'me using xeffectsoverlay for a while and don't have any problems with xorg-server until unstalled the latest >=1.2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PaulSorensen
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 80
Location: Chicago, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| firephoto wrote: | | I had the runaway memory usage here on a kubuntu system, I stopped superkaramba yesterday, restarted, and haven't seen the leak since. |
I did have superkaramba running as well - I'll let you know if not running it fixes the problem (of course even if that is it, it sounds like it is triggering a memory leak in xorg).
Now that I've noticed that cairo-clock is in portage, I don't need superkaramba anyway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AaronPPC
Guru
Joined: 29 May 2005
Posts: 522
Location: Tucson, AZ
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| VoVaN wrote: | | Maybe this is only YOUR problem, but as I mentioned already in this post downgrading _only_ xorg-server solves the problem, therefore it's somehow xorg-server related. |
I agree.
_________________
--Aaron |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PaulSorensen
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 80
Location: Chicago, USA
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Confirmed.
I stopped superkaramba and X has been at about 7.5% of memory for 2 days.
Now - is this a bug in superkaramba or in X? Others in this thread have said that the problem goes away with earlier versions of X. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VoVaN
l33t
Joined: 02 Jul 2003
Posts: 688
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| PaulSorensen wrote: | Confirmed.
I stopped superkaramba and X has been at about 7.5% of memory for 2 days.
Now - is this a bug in superkaramba or in X? Others in this thread have said that the problem goes away with earlier versions of X. |
I don't have superkaramba and have this problem with the latest xorg-server. Below is all I have:
| Code: | vovan 1426 0.0 0.5 48976 5292 ? S 16:52 0:00 kio_http [kdeinit] http /home/vovan/.kde3.5/socket-vovan/klauncherIIr8kc.slave-socket /home/vovan/.kde3.5/socket-vovan/konquerorcUoxrc.slave-socket
vovan 1429 0.0 0.5 40780 5272 ? S 16:52 0:00 kio_http [kdeinit] http /home/vovan/.kde3.5/socket-vovan/klauncherIIr8kc.slave-socket /home/vovan/.kde3.5/socket-vovan/konquerorJw033a.slave-socket
vovan 1430 0.0 0.5 48976 5284 ? S 16:52 0:00 kio_http [kdeinit] http /home/vovan/.kde3.5/socket-vovan/klauncherIIr8kc.slave-socket /home/vovan/.kde3.5/socket-vovan/konquerorCP85Ta.slave-socket
vovan 1431 0.0 0.5 48976 5284 ? S 16:52 0:00 kio_http [kdeinit] http /home/vovan/.kde3.5/socket-vovan/klauncherIIr8kc.slave-socket /home/vovan/.kde3.5/socket-vovan/konquerorDXqvMb.slave-socket
vovan 1501 0.0 0.4 39756 5108 ? S 16:52 0:00 kio_http [kdeinit] http /home/vovan/.kde3.5/socket-vovan/klauncherIIr8kc.slave-socket /home/vovan/.kde3.5/socket-vovan/konquerorufUxVb.slave-socket
vovan 1513 0.0 0.4 7016 4756 ? S 16:52 0:00 aspell -a -S -C -d en
vovan 1552 0.0 0.0 2520 920 pts/2 R+ 16:53 0:00 ps aux
vovan 1553 0.0 0.0 1960 692 pts/2 R+ 16:53 0:00 grep --colour=auto vovan
vovan 4423 0.0 0.1 3252 1208 ? Ss 10:04 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/kde/3.5/bin/startkde
vovan 4454 0.0 0.0 2592 516 ? S 10:04 0:00 /usr/bin/dbus-launch --sh-syntax --exit-with-session
vovan 4455 0.0 0.0 2204 356 ? Ss 10:04 0:00 /usr/bin/dbus-daemon --fork --print-pid 4 --print-address 6 --session
vovan 4475 0.0 0.2 21956 2728 ? Ss 10:04 0:00 kdeinit Running...
vovan 4478 0.0 0.1 12876 1980 ? S 10:04 0:00 dcopserver --nosid
vovan 4480 0.0 0.5 23144 5616 ? S 10:04 0:00 klauncher [kdeinit] --new-startup
vovan 4482 0.0 1.4 29908 15088 ? S 10:04 0:06 kded --new-startup
vovan 4487 0.0 0.0 1640 348 ? S 10:04 0:00 kwrapper ksmserver
vovan 4489 0.0 0.5 19212 5836 ? S 10:04 0:00 ksmserver
vovan 4490 0.0 0.9 21288 9736 ? S 10:04 0:03 kwin -session 10e46f7661000116257974800000065140000_1172683066_534338
vovan 4492 0.0 1.2 27144 12780 ? S 10:04 0:00 kdesktop
vovan 4494 0.0 1.6 31276 16720 ? S 10:04 0:01 kicker
vovan 4503 0.0 0.5 19192 5912 ? S 10:04 0:00 kaccess
vovan 4505 0.0 1.0 22460 10660 ? S 10:04 0:00 kmix -session 10e46f7661000111424197600000057880037_1172683066_517280
vovan 4507 0.0 2.5 44132 26024 ? S 10:04 0:02 akregator -session 10e46f7661000111876630700000176810011_1172683066_517493
vovan 4510 0.0 0.9 24504 10080 ? S 10:04 0:00 kget -session 10e46f7661000113678808100000089060012_1172683066_517819
vovan 4511 0.0 0.8 23968 8420 ? S 10:04 0:00 knotify [kdeinit]
vovan 4513 0.0 1.1 27608 11452 ? S 10:04 0:00 kgpg -session 10e46f7661000114477311100000065940011_1172683066_519929
vovan 4515 0.0 0.8 24160 8744 ? S 10:04 0:00 kkbswitch -session 10e46f7661000116543099500000068010007_1172683066_520140
vovan 4522 0.0 0.8 16308 8592 ? S 10:04 0:04 gkrellm2 -s bsd --sm-client-id 10e46f7661000113733917400000136950008
vovan 4525 0.0 0.8 33756 8884 ? S 10:04 0:10 gkrellm2 --sm-client-id 10e46f7661000116258175300000065140020
vovan 4535 0.0 1.1 26788 12368 ? S 10:04 0:11 konsole -session 10e46f7661000116543102800000068010010_1172683066_517634
vovan 4540 0.7 2.4 79756 25588 ? Sl 10:04 2:56 kmail -session 10e46f7661000117268300900000058550014_1172683066_519185
vovan 4542 0.0 2.1 39364 22052 ? S 10:04 0:00 knotes -session 10e46f7661000117268305000000058550015_1172683066_517897
vovan 4544 0.0 0.7 22888 7504 ? S 10:04 0:00 klipper
vovan 4547 0.0 0.1 3328 1864 pts/1 Ss+ 10:04 0:00 mc -c
vovan 4553 0.0 0.1 3604 1628 pts/2 Ss 10:04 0:00 bash -rcfile .mc/bashrc
vovan 4564 0.0 0.6 42864 7004 ? S 10:04 0:00 kio_imap4 [kdeinit] imaps /home/vovan/.kde3.5/socket-vovan/klauncherIIr8kc.slave-socket /home/vovan/.kde3.5/socket-vovan/kmail0NC1sb.slave-socket
vovan 4567 0.4 1.8 55272 19428 ? S 10:04 1:44 kio_imap4 [kdeinit] imaps /home/vovan/.kde3.5/socket-vovan/klauncherIIr8kc.slave-socket /home/vovan/.kde3.5/socket-vovan/kmailjQh8ib.slave-socket
vovan 4571 0.0 0.8 24396 9092 ? S 10:04 0:00 kio_uiserver
vovan 4585 0.0 2.5 71140 26320 ? Sl 10:04 0:01 kopete -caption Kopete -icon kopete -miniicon kopete
vovan 5400 0.2 5.6 71384 58172 ? S 10:09 0:53 konqueror --silent
vovan 7693 0.0 1.0 62528 11000 ? S 10:34 0:05 /usr/kde/3.5/bin/nspluginviewer -dcopid nspluginviewer-5400
vovan 18524 0.0 0.4 23260 4552 ? S 12:58 0:00 kio_file [kdeinit] file /home/vovan/.kde3.5/socket-vovan/klauncherIIr8kc.slave-socket /home/vovan/.kde3.5/socket-vovan/kopeteyZg47a.slave-socket
|
So, probably it's a good idea to post all application running for persons who have with memory leak, then we can filter out if it's application related... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PaulSorensen
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Posts: 80
Location: Chicago, USA
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| VoVaN wrote: |
I don't have superkaramba and have this problem with the latest xorg-server.
[snip]
So, probably it's a good idea to post all application running for persons who have with memory leak, then we can filter out if it's application related... |
Agreed - it sounds like an X bug that is probably triggered by multiple applications. But SuperKaramba appears to be at least one app that causes it.
EDIT March 5th: Spoke too soon - it's just growing a lot more slowly than when superkaramba was running.
Last edited by PaulSorensen on Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:04 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
shakti
Guru
Joined: 15 May 2002
Posts: 358
Location: omnipresent
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i seem to have this mem leak even when just sitting there at the login screen, nothing but kdm running
_________________
Using Gentoo since 2002. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Desktop Environments
