Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
delete_this_thread
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next  
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
cheater1034
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558

PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 1:59 am    Post subject: delete_this_thread Reply with quote

If you're seeking this thread for the use of this thread, this link is obsolete, please see here:

https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-509252.html
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land.


Last edited by cheater1034 on Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:36 pm; edited 14 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tejecske
n00b
n00b


Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Posts: 60
Location: Pécs, Hungary

PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:57 am    Post subject: whussup? Reply with quote

mkdir /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/sunrpc/rpcsvc
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/sunrpc/rpcgen: relocation error: /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/dlfcn/libdl.so.2: symbol _libc_intl_domainname, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference
make[2]: *** [/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/sunrpc/xbootparam_prot.stmp] Error 127
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
CPP='i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -E -x c-header' /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/elf/ld-linux.so.2 --library-path
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl:/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3
/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/math:/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl
/elf:/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/dlfcn:/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3
/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/nss:/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/nis:
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/rt:/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3/work
/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/resolv:/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/crypt:
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/nptl /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3/work
/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/sunrpc/rpcgen -Y ../scripts -h rpcsvc/bootparam_prot.x -o /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/sunrpc/rpcsvc/bootparam_prot.T
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/sunrpc/rpcgen: relocation error: /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/dlfcn/libdl.so.2: symbol _libc_intl_domainname, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference
make[2]: *** [/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/sunrpc/rpcsvc/bootparam_prot.stmp] Error 127
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3/work/glibc-2.5/sunrpc'
make[1]: *** [sunrpc/others] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3/work/glibc-2.5'
make: *** [all] Error 2

!!! ERROR: sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3 failed.
Call stack:
ebuild.sh, line 1568: Called dyn_compile
ebuild.sh, line 937: Called src_compile
glibc-2.5-r3.ebuild, line 1162: Called toolchain-glibc_src_compile
glibc-2.5-r3.ebuild, line 261: Called die

!!! make for default failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant.

!!! This ebuild is from an overlay: '/usr/local/overlays/conrad'
dreamer ~ #
_________________
The w/ELDER


Last edited by tejecske on Fri Oct 20, 2006 8:27 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cheater1034
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558

PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:32 am    Post subject: Re: whussup? Reply with quote

tejecske wrote:
Code removed, it expanded the width of the page.


Ehh, that's a nxsty overlay ebuild, nothing changed from me, probally a -Bdirect error or something (the patch is automatically applied by it now), just do rm -r /usr/local/overlays/conrad/sys-libs, and emerge glibc-2.5 from portage, as it now has the hashstyle in it upstream afaik.

I'll fix it by this afternoon.
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land.


Last edited by cheater1034 on Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:05 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tejecske
n00b
n00b


Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Posts: 60
Location: Pécs, Hungary

PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

libdl.so.2: symbol _libc_intl_domainname, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference
_________________
The w/ELDER
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tejecske
n00b
n00b


Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Posts: 60
Location: Pécs, Hungary

PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i have problems with no-sources-digests too:
Quote:
dreamer ~ # LANG="C" emerge --digest =sys-kernel/no-sources-2.6.18-r2
Calculating dependencies... done!
>>> Resuming download...
>>> Downloading 'http://gentoo.inode.at/distfiles/2.6.18-no2.bz2'
--13:43:45-- http://gentoo.inode.at/distfiles/2.6.18-no2.bz2
=> `/usr/portage/distfiles/2.6.18-no2.bz2'
Resolving gentoo.inode.at... 81.223.20.162
Connecting to gentoo.inode.at|81.223.20.162|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
13:43:45 ERROR 404: Not Found.

>>> Resuming download...
>>> Downloading 'http://gentoo.osuosl.org/distfiles/2.6.18-no2.bz2'
--13:43:45-- http://gentoo.osuosl.org/distfiles/2.6.18-no2.bz2
=> `/usr/portage/distfiles/2.6.18-no2.bz2'
Resolving gentoo.osuosl.org... 140.211.166.134
Connecting to gentoo.osuosl.org|140.211.166.134|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
13:43:46 ERROR 404: Not Found.

>>> Resuming download...
>>> Downloading 'http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/gentoo/distfiles/2.6.18-no2.bz2'
--13:43:46-- http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/gentoo/distfiles/2.6.18-no2.bz2
=> `/usr/portage/distfiles/2.6.18-no2.bz2'
Resolving distro.ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.109
Connecting to distro.ibiblio.org|152.46.7.109|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
13:43:48 ERROR 404: Not Found.

>>> Resuming download...
>>> Downloading 'http://no.oldos.org/files/2.6.18-no2/2.6.18-no2.bz2'
--13:43:48-- http://no.oldos.org/files/2.6.18-no2/2.6.18-no2.bz2
=> `/usr/portage/distfiles/2.6.18-no2.bz2'
Resolving no.oldos.org... 69.56.173.228
Connecting to no.oldos.org|69.56.173.228|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable

The file is already fully retrieved; nothing to do.

!!! Couldn't download '2.6.18-no2.bz2'. Aborting.

>>> Emerging (1 of 1) sys-kernel/no-sources-2.6.18-r2 to /
* 2.6.18-mm3.bz2 RMD160 ;-) ... [ ok ]
* 2.6.18-mm3.bz2 SHA1 ;-) ... [ ok ]
* 2.6.18-mm3.bz2 SHA256 ;-) ... [ ok ]
* 2.6.18-mm3.bz2 size ;-) ... [ ok ]
>>> Resuming download...
>>> Downloading 'http://gentoo.inode.at/distfiles/2.6.18-no2.bz2'
--13:43:50-- http://gentoo.inode.at/distfiles/2.6.18-no2.bz2
=> `/usr/portage/distfiles/2.6.18-no2.bz2'
Resolving gentoo.inode.at... 81.223.20.162
Connecting to gentoo.inode.at|81.223.20.162|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
13:43:51 ERROR 404: Not Found.

>>> Resuming download...
>>> Downloading 'http://gentoo.osuosl.org/distfiles/2.6.18-no2.bz2'
--13:43:51-- http://gentoo.osuosl.org/distfiles/2.6.18-no2.bz2
=> `/usr/portage/distfiles/2.6.18-no2.bz2'
Resolving gentoo.osuosl.org... 140.211.166.134
Connecting to gentoo.osuosl.org|140.211.166.134|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
13:43:51 ERROR 404: Not Found.

>>> Resuming download...
>>> Downloading 'http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/gentoo/distfiles/2.6.18-no2.bz2'
--13:43:51-- http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distributions/gentoo/distfiles/2.6.18-no2.bz2
=> `/usr/portage/distfiles/2.6.18-no2.bz2'
Resolving distro.ibiblio.org... 152.46.7.109
Connecting to distro.ibiblio.org|152.46.7.109|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
13:43:53 ERROR 404: Not Found.

>>> Resuming download...
>>> Downloading 'http://no.oldos.org/files/2.6.18-no2/2.6.18-no2.bz2'
--13:43:53-- http://no.oldos.org/files/2.6.18-no2/2.6.18-no2.bz2
=> `/usr/portage/distfiles/2.6.18-no2.bz2'
Resolving no.oldos.org... 69.56.173.228
Connecting to no.oldos.org|69.56.173.228|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable

The file is already fully retrieved; nothing to do.

!!! Couldn't download '2.6.18-no2.bz2'. Aborting.
dreamer ~ #

_________________
The w/ELDER
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tejecske
n00b
n00b


Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Posts: 60
Location: Pécs, Hungary

PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had the same problem with portage's glibc-2.5 too, so i masked it until your's (al least nxty's) arrived with IG3.1, i hoped it's fixed.
Quote:

dreamer ~ # emerge -pv glibc

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ] sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3 [2.4-r4] USE="nls nptl nptlonly -glibc-compat20%* -build -debug% -glibc-omitfp -hardened (-multilib) -nomalloccheck% -profile (-selinux)" 0 kB [1]

Total size of downloads: 0 kB
Portage overlays:
[1] /usr/local/overlays/conrad
[2] /usr/local/portage
dreamer ~ #

Something to do with glibc-compat20 ?
_________________
The w/ELDER
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
7seven7
n00b
n00b


Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Posts: 72

PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have one question, it dont be more correct:
Code:
#LDFLAGSHASHSTYLE=" -Wl,--hash-style=both"

instead of
Code:
#LDFLAGSHASHSTYLE=" -Wl,--hash-style=gnu"

?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mb.Tab
n00b
n00b


Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 44
Location: /home/mb.Tab

PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey nice to see the update :) ... I will try the update step today or tomorrow cant say right now, but i´ll report back then :)

Have a nice day !
_________________
[center]~*It´s mb.Tab*~[/center]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EAD
Guru
Guru


Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 352

PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 2:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does it include GCC 4.2? or glibc 2.5? or XORG 7.1.1 and so on? what are the new things in it? and what kernel does it use?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cheater1034
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558

PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

7seven7 wrote:
I have one question, it dont be more correct:
Code:
#LDFLAGSHASHSTYLE=" -Wl,--hash-style=both"

instead of
Code:
#LDFLAGSHASHSTYLE=" -Wl,--hash-style=gnu"

?


We only want the GNU linking style.

EAD wrote:
Does it include GCC 4.2? or glibc 2.5? or XORG 7.1.1 and so on? what are the new things in it? and what kernel does it use?

Read the changelog!
No, yes, yes. It has always and will always use no-sources ;) (2.6.18-no2)
Changelog has the basic changes as well.

tejecske wrote:
I had the same problem with portage's glibc-2.5 too, so i masked it until your's (al least nxty's) arrived with IG3.1, i hoped it's fixed.
Quote:

dreamer ~ # emerge -pv glibc

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ] sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r3 [2.4-r4] USE="nls nptl nptlonly -glibc-compat20%* -build -debug% -glibc-omitfp -hardened (-multilib) -nomalloccheck% -profile (-selinux)" 0 kB [1]

Total size of downloads: 0 kB
Portage overlays:
[1] /usr/local/overlays/conrad
[2] /usr/local/portage
dreamer ~ #

Something to do with glibc-compat20 ?


I'll see what I can do (Trying to reproduce it)

But I have one favor to ask, in your first reply to this thread, could you please delete the code and move it to a pastebin or other source? Only because it expands the width of the page, and this being the first page it is the most important to viewers. thanks :)

I'm going to reproduce it now, if portage's doesn't build, I'll blame it on one of the genpatches, and I'll be mad :-p
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cheater1034
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558

PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm also going back to --hash-style=both, so you can use that change. I was misdirected on how both was bad, but it really is best right now :-p

*EDIT*
reverted to hash-style=both
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cheater1034
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558

PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 9:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

@tejeske
glibc 2.5-r3 from the overlay builds fine, no errors what so ever for me.

Try doing a -uD world, and make sure you update nss to the latest version.
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EAD
Guru
Guru


Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 352

PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

why is
Code:
6.2 - *** IMPORTANT *** Getting GCC piepatches
I will improve the ebuild soon so we don't need to do this, until then

still nessacery? when will you remove it please? and anthor thing, when will the new no-sources kernel with 2.6.19-rc2 be ready? there many cool things in it like ext4 and so on :twisted:
BTW, this Conrad seem very nice :!:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cheater1034
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558

PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EAD wrote:
why is
Code:
6.2 - *** IMPORTANT *** Getting GCC piepatches
I will improve the ebuild soon so we don't need to do this, until then

still nessacery? when will you remove it please? and anthor thing, when will the new no-sources kernel with 2.6.19-rc2 be ready? there many cool things in it like ext4 and so on :twisted:
BTW, this Conrad seem very nice :!:


You need to do that step still, yes ;)

2.6.19-rc2-no will be released as unstable, and not implemented into this guide soon.

btw, I don't necessarily endorse ext4, only because it isn't finished yet, wait for it to be more complete.
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seren
Guru
Guru


Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Posts: 448
Location: Wisconsin

PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:48 pm    Post subject: Re: whussup? Reply with quote

oops

Last edited by seren on Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:49 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
je_fro
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 14 Dec 2002
Posts: 236
Location: Republic of Texas

PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:17 pm    Post subject: Hahahaha Reply with quote

Dear User,
If you try this, please DON'T EVEN THINK ABOUT FILING A BUG when the end result isn't what you expected. :D
_________________
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect.
--Linus Torvalds

My site with some gentoo config files:
http://je-fro.net/page.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lu_zero
Developer
Developer


Joined: 05 Sep 2002
Posts: 49

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear user, don't even think about filling a bug even upstream...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cheater1034
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

lu_zero wrote:
Dear user, don't even think about filling a bug even upstream...


Whoa whoa, Please, it's under control.

cheater1034 wrote:
=~~-~~=
Forewarning
This is an advanced install guide for Gentoo Linux, it assumes you have previous knowledge of both Gentoo and GNU/Linux in general!
Also, DO NOT POST BUGS ON BUGS.GENTOO.ORG! I Will handle your support requests personally. The CONRAD Installation Guide is not supported in any way, shape, or form by the Gentoo Linux.
Please report your requests in #conrad (FreeNode * we have a great community there), or this thread.
=~~-~~=


I guess I'll enhance this message a little bit, but this is already there in fine print.

I sure hope that the user understand that this is an advanced installation method for gentoo linux, which is not supported or endorsed in any way by gentoo linux.
----

But as you requested, I made the message bigger and more visible.
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
skaggmuff
n00b
n00b


Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 12

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 1:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

hi.....i have a problem whit emerging no-sources

portage saves it but say couldn't download "2.6.18-no2.bz2

if i have rebuild the system whit --hash-style=gnu do i have to rebuild it again whit the new --hash-style=both....?
_________________
skaggmuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cheater1034
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 1:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

skaggmuff wrote:
hi.....i have a problem whit emerging no-sources

portage saves it but say couldn't download "2.6.18-no2.bz2

if i have rebuild the system whit --hash-style=gnu do i have to rebuild it again whit the new --hash-style=both....?


you dont need to rebuild again, both is just the new linking style (gnu) and the old one if there are any problems with GNU, afaik.

do this for no-sources:
Code:
# rm -r /usr/local/overlays/conrad/sys-kernel/no-sources/files /usr/local/overlays/conrad/sys-kernel/no-sources/Manifest
# emerge --digest no-sources

_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Conan
Guru
Guru


Joined: 02 Nov 2004
Posts: 360

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 1:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cheater1034 wrote:

..snip..
I guess I'll enhance this message a little bit, but this is already there in fine print.

I sure hope that the user understand that this is an advanced installation method for gentoo linux, which is not supported or endorsed in any way by gentoo linux.


If by advanced you mean utterly stupid and redundant.... sure.

ps i'm fairly sure that if you notice a slowdown while installing, its not xgl thats the problem, its portage shaking it's head at your silly cflags.

I'm fairly sure that a user representative promoting this is one of the scariest things I've ever seen, The majority of gentoo users are not this crazy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Janax
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 17 Aug 2004
Posts: 162
Location: Iowa

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Conan wrote:
cheater1034 wrote:

..snip..
I guess I'll enhance this message a little bit, but this is already there in fine print.

I sure hope that the user understand that this is an advanced installation method for gentoo linux, which is not supported or endorsed in any way by gentoo linux.


If by advanced you mean utterly stupid and redundant.... sure.

ps i'm fairly sure that if you notice a slowdown while installing, its not xgl thats the problem, its portage shaking it's head at your silly cflags.

I'm fairly sure that a user representative promoting this is one of the scariest things I've ever seen, The majority of gentoo users are not this crazy.

First to call TROLL on this stupid and useless post! If you don't like it, don't do it.
_________________
Americans for Fair Taxation because the current tax system is not only burdensome but corrupt as well!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Conan
Guru
Guru


Joined: 02 Nov 2004
Posts: 360

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Call me whatever you want... I don't really care

While I don't have to do it, I do feel obliged to point out to people the foolishness of doing it. Furthermore, the fact that it is a user representative pointing this out makes me worry that more people will think its safe, and therefore will cause lots more problems for gentoo users.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Conan
Guru
Guru


Joined: 02 Nov 2004
Posts: 360

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

btw, a friendly little reminder from the people on the sideline

Code:
$set BLAH="1 2 3 4 5 6 7"
$echo -${BLAH}
-1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cheater1034
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 09 Sep 2004
Posts: 1558

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 2:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Conan wrote:
If by advanced you mean utterly stupid and redundant.... sure.

hmmm

Quote:
ps i'm fairly sure that if you notice a slowdown while installing, its not xgl thats the problem, its portage shaking it's head at your silly cflags.

Ok, a few things wrong here
1) What slowdown while installing?
2) Why are you talking about XGL?
3) Did you ever read the GCC handbook about compiler parameters, obviously not, because you do not recognize the CFLAGS.

In response to #3:
Hey pal, if you've done your research, you'd see that my CFLAGS are the optimizations of -Os, with a few things from -O2, 2 things from -O3, and a few stuff from the grave.
So these crazy CFLAGS are really LESS optimizations than an -O2 or an -O3---- do your research buddy, and please don't troll like this :roll: .[/quote]

Quote:
I'm fairly sure that a user representative promoting this is one of the scariest things I've ever seen, The majority of gentoo users are not this crazy.

My audience is not the majority of gentoo users, this guide is for whoever wants to use it, and I think it's made clear that this is not supported or endorsed by the gentoo linux foundation in any way, and it's stated to never post bugs to bugs.gentoo.org.

I also am updating with a statement that says how gentoo does not support the CFLAGS used in this installation.

Users who do try it know the risks, and they also know several people have installed it successfully, it is their choice whether to use this installation document or not, all the consequences are put out there for them to consider.
_________________
IRC!: #zen-sources on irc.rizon.net
zen-kernel.org
--
Lost in android development land.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Unsupported Software All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum