| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
karl11
Guru
Joined: 25 Jun 2002
Posts: 469
Location: Raleigh, NC
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2002 3:39 am Post subject: /etc/make.profile GONE!! |
 |
|
I just did an emerge rsync (10:30 pm cst 9/7/2002) and now my /etc/make.profile is gone. I keep rsyncing to see if I can hit an rsync server with a slightly different game, in hopes to get /etc/make.profile back. So as it stands, I can't emerge anything, but I can do an emerge rsync. Would someone either please post a working /etc/make.profile or please fix the portage tree 
Karl Abbott
EDIT (rac): unstuck |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
karl11
Guru
Joined: 25 Jun 2002
Posts: 469
Location: Raleigh, NC
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2002 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry to go postal so fast! I just figured out that there was a structure change in the profiles directory. However, you can see how quickly this can cause alarm as an error. Correct me if I'm wrong, but has default-x86-2.0 been moved to 1.4 to be aligned with the gentoo releases? Wish it would have said something about this (yes, I know it says what it's deleting at first, and I saw it, but I figured it would just put something newer in its place)
Karl |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fghellar
Bodhisattva
Joined: 10 Apr 2002
Posts: 856
Location: Porto Alegre, BR
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2002 3:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, /etc/make.profile is just a symbolic link to /usr/portage/profiles/[something]. You can fix it yourself, very easily.
If you're using gcc-2.95.3: | Code: | | ln -sf /usr/portage/profiles/default-1.0 /etc/make.profile |
And for gcc-3.2: | Code: | | ln -sf /usr/portage/profiles/default-x86-1.4 /etc/make.profile |
(Edited to correct typos.)
_________________
| www.gentoo.org | www.tldp.org | www.google.com |
Last edited by fghellar on Sun Sep 08, 2002 10:07 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fghellar
Bodhisattva
Joined: 10 Apr 2002
Posts: 856
Location: Porto Alegre, BR
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rasmus
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 14 Jul 2002
Posts: 78
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2002 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fghellar wrote:
| Quote: |
And for gcc-3.0.2:
Code:
|
Excuse me, but don't you mean GCC-3.2? The 2.0 profile installed GCC-3.2, have you decided to wait before going for 3.2? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fghellar
Bodhisattva
Joined: 10 Apr 2002
Posts: 856
Location: Porto Alegre, BR
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hielvc
Advocate
Joined: 19 Apr 2002
Posts: 2805
Location: Oceanside, Ca
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2002 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just a note that if you change the link to 1.4 from 1.0 or 1.2 you will be changed over to gcc-3.2 the next time you "emerge -u world". I've no had problems except with "arts" and that wasnt caused by aggressive flags but to ccache. Its only about 6hrs emerge ( gcc) on a P200.
hielvc |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Portage & Programming
Thanks. 