| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
n0rbi666
l33t
Joined: 04 Mar 2005
Posts: 707
Location: \Poland\Krakow
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 10:56 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Code: | /dev/hda:
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: ST3120026A
Firmware Revision: 3.54
Standards:
Used: ATA/ATAPI-6 T13 1410D revision 2
Supported: 6 5 4 3 |
| Code: | /dev/hdb:
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: ST380011A
Firmware Revision: 3.06
Standards:
Used: ATA/ATAPI-6 T13 1410D revision 2
Supported: 6 5 4 3 |
| Code: | /dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 1748 MB in 2.00 seconds = 873.26 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 164 MB in 3.00 seconds = 54.66 MB/sec
|
| Code: | /dev/hdb:
Timing cached reads: 1740 MB in 2.00 seconds = 868.83 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 168 MB in 3.01 seconds = 55.75 MB/sec |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dlugidll
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 143
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
a moze ktos pokaze wyniki testow prawdziwego programu do testowania - bonnie++ wersja 1.0.3a, anie pseudotestera jakim jest hdparm
proponuje bonnie++ w wersji najnowszej 1.0.3, ale nie poprzez emerge tylko ze strony dopmowej - z emerga niedziala proawidlowo przynajmniej u mnie
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BeteNoire
Veteran
Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 1827
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Załóż wątek "bonnie++ contest"  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Poe
Bodhisattva
Joined: 03 Apr 2004
Posts: 2155
Location: Mysłowice/Lublin, Poland
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cóż... nie powala 
| Code: |
root@failed> hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 1264 MB in 2.00 seconds = 631.15 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 120 MB in 3.02 seconds = 39.69 MB/sec
|
dla
| Code: |
root@failed> hdparm -I /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: WDC WD400AB-00CBA1
Serial Number: WD-WMAA61344373
Firmware Revision: 04.07B04
Standards:
Supported: 5 4 3 2
Likely used: 6
|
dysk jest jakos 3-4 letni... tak jak caly komp..
_________________
Hardware:HP Pavilion DV6875SE[C2DT5550@1.83GHz_3GB-DDR2_320GB-SATA_GF8400GS]
http://popularcoffee.blogspot.com - Popkulturowa Kawa
RLU#342333 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
w.tabin
Apprentice
Joined: 02 Feb 2005
Posts: 158
Location: Bełchatów/Polska 51°21'52.868"N, 19°22'43.439"E
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mój dysk Seagate Barracuda 7200.7
| Code: | # hdparm -tT /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 1248 MB in 2.00 seconds = 623.96 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 168 MB in 3.02 seconds = 55.55 MB/sec |
Pozdrawiam 
_________________
Gentoo 2008.0; kernel-2.6.26 + fbcondecor; xorg-x11-7.3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sathian
n00b
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oto moj wynik:
Dysk Seagate Baracuda 7200
| Code: | /dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 856 MB in 2.01 seconds = 426.27 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 118 MB in 3.02 seconds = 39.12 MB/sec |
Czy tak słaby wynik może być skutkiem tego że mam na jednej taśmie dwa dyski, ten drugi Seagate 3-letni? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blazeu
Apprentice
Joined: 02 Feb 2005
Posts: 159
Location: Cracow, Poland
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Zmienilem kernelka na vanille 2.6.15, dodałem do niego patche z adaptive readahead i reisera4 i zanotowalem poprawe predkosci o 1/3 blisko... a w najlepszym przypadku o 1/2 :] moj system od dawna tak szybko nie ganial...
/me dances happily around my PC
_________________
Przeczytanie manuala: 5-10minut
Zadanie kolejnego bzdurnego pytania na forum: 0.5 minuty
Status idioty wsrod forumowiczow: bezcenny
Tako rzecze ja: kapral rezerwy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gabrys
Veteran
Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 1096
Location: Toruń [PL]
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 11:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sathian wrote: | Oto moj wynik:
Dysk Seagate Baracuda 7200
| Code: | /dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 856 MB in 2.01 seconds = 426.27 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 118 MB in 3.02 seconds = 39.12 MB/sec |
Czy tak słaby wynik może być skutkiem tego że mam na jednej taśmie dwa dyski, ten drugi Seagate 3-letni? |
Odpal kilka razy hdparm i obserwuj wzrost .
_________________
Sabayon Professional 1.1 (czyli zdradziłem oryginalne Gentoo)
@ Dell Inspiron 8600 (nVidia, Realtek, Pentium M) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
OBenY
Guru
Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 552
Location: Poland -> Wroclaw
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patchset dla masochistow:
http://www.kadu.net/~obeny/kernel/patch-2.6.15-ock1.bz2
readahead, supermount-ng, fbsplash, alsa-update, ide-delay, usb-polling-interval, reiser4
moze ktos skorzysta
zrobione na wlasne potrzeby...
EDIT: nakladac tylko na vanille-2.6.15
EDIT2: wywalilem alse, bo przeszkadzala, teraz juz jest chyba okej, smialo uzywac!
EDIT3: dla leniwcow jest ebuild http://www.kadu.net/~obeny/ebuilds/ock-sources.tar.bz2
_________________
Linux registered user: #205241
KDE registered user: #1919
http://obeny.obeny.net
Last edited by OBenY on Sat Jan 07, 2006 6:06 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BeteNoire
Veteran
Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 1827
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ide-delay to ta łatka od probowania dysków przy bootowaniu? Ile czasu jest to faktycznie szybsze? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gabrys
Veteran
Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 1096
Location: Toruń [PL]
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BeteNoire wrote: | | ide-delay to ta łatka od probowania dysków przy bootowaniu? Ile czasu jest to faktycznie szybsze? |
Z rozmowy z autorem się dowiedziałem, że ustalając ide-delay=10 jako opcję kernela skracamy czas wykrywania dysków z około sekundy na 10 ms. Czyli dużo szybsze.
_________________
Sabayon Professional 1.1 (czyli zdradziłem oryginalne Gentoo)
@ Dell Inspiron 8600 (nVidia, Realtek, Pentium M) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BeteNoire
Veteran
Joined: 25 Sep 2005
Posts: 1827
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| A jak się to ma do stabilności czy niezawodności wykrywania? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gabrys
Veteran
Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Posts: 1096
Location: Toruń [PL]
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jak coś pójdzie nie tak, to zwiększasz owy czas. Jak w ogóle się wysypuje, to wywalasz opcję i leci po staremu.
_________________
Sabayon Professional 1.1 (czyli zdradziłem oryginalne Gentoo)
@ Dell Inspiron 8600 (nVidia, Realtek, Pentium M) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
OBenY
Guru
Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Posts: 552
Location: Poland -> Wroclaw
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quake ja tej latki nie wynalazlem, ja tylko ja podkradlem i dostosowuje do nowych jajek, bo przydatna. w lilo lub grubie w sekcji cos a'la append nalezy dodac ide-delay=10 i jazda jak cos sie wali, to zwiekszyc np do 50, a jak to nie pomaga, to w ogole nie dodawac  Generalnie latka jest nieszkodliwa, wiec mozna smialo uzywac.
Btw, ten patchpack jest spieprzony :/ cos dalem popalic z alsa, sie nie raczy skompilowac, zaraz poprawka bedzie ...
_________________
Linux registered user: #205241
KDE registered user: #1919
http://obeny.obeny.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pmz
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 96
Location: Wroclaw, Poland
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | arrakis ~ # hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 3144 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1571.90 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 188 MB in 3.03 seconds = 62.08 MB/sec |
Dysk to SEAGATE Barracuda 200 GB, 8MB, IDE (ST3200822A), chodzi jako udma5 na płycie MSI K8T Neo2-F. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
olejseba
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 95
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 11:48 am Post subject: ha ha soft raid rulez |
|
|
sebasoctam ktos # hdparm -tT /dev/md1
/dev/md1:
Timing cached reads: 3040 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1519.91 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 352 MB in 3.00 seconds = 117.33 MB/sec
pozdrowionka olejseba |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dlugidll
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 143
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| olejseba mozesz podac jakie to dyski sa dokladnie? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
arsen
Bodhisattva
Joined: 10 Apr 2004
Posts: 1803
Location: Tychy, Poland
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: |
/dev/md0:
Timing cached reads: 1248 MB in 2.00 seconds = 623.96 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 310 MB in 3.01 seconds = 103.05 MB/sec
|
2 x Maxtor 6Y080M0 SATA 80Gb "spięte" w programowy raid0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cpu
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 09 Nov 2003
Posts: 122
Location: POLAND/ZG
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | /dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 1908 MB in 2.00 seconds = 953.19 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 202 MB in 3.01 seconds = 67.01 MB/sec |
| Code: |
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: SAMSUNG SP2504C
Serial Number: S09QJ10Y609512
Firmware Revision: VT100-33 |
SATA2 Samsung na SIL3112A pod nF2U400 (mobo Abit NF7-S 2.0 procek A1700+@10x200) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
olejseba
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 95
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dlugidll wrote: | | olejseba mozesz podac jakie to dyski sa dokladnie? |
2 x Dysk Samsung 80GB 7200obr 8MB cache
na ata100 soft raid0 plyta asus a8n-sli deluxe |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
slazeros
n00b
Joined: 20 Dec 2004
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hej, oto moje wyniki :
| Code: |
hdparm -tT /dev/hdc
/dev/hdc:
Timing cached reads: 1168 MB in 2.00 seconds = 583.96 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 158 MB in 3.01 seconds = 52.52 MB/sec
|
male info
| Code: |
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: ST3160023A
Serial Number: 3JS3QTC8
Firmware Revision: 8.01
Standards:
Used: ATA/ATAPI-6 T13 1410D revision 2
Supported: 6 5 4 3
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lewy23
n00b
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 2
Location: Szczecin
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hej! Przede wszystki to pozdrowionka dla Wszystkich !
Mam male pytanko , moj dysk to
| Code: | ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: WDC WD800JB-00ETA0
Serial Number: WD-WCAHL5408955
Firmware Revision: 77.07W77
ATA-100
|
przed przystapieniem do zabawy z hdparm mialem wyniki :
| Code: | /dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 2372 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1183.81 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 144 MB in 3.02 seconds = 47.58 MB/sec
|
a po paru zmianach mam :
| Code: | /dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 2324 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1161.93 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 126 MB in 3.02 seconds = 41.72 MB/sec
|
moje ustawienia to:
| Code: |
/dev/hda:
multcount = 16 (on)
IO_support = 3 (32-bit w/sync)
unmaskirq = 1 (on)
using_dma = 1 (on)
keepsettings = 0 (off)
readonly = 0 (off)
readahead = 256 (on)
geometry = 16383/255/63, sectors = 80026361856, start = 0
hda_args="-d1-u1 -c3 -m16 -M254"
|
Kombinowalem juz z roznymi ustawieniami ale niestety powrocic do pierwotnej wartosci mi sie nie udalo . Czy mozna cos z tym zrobic zeby ta dolna wartos sie zwiekszyla ? Bo w takim razie to po co wogle uzywac Hdparm , czy to cos daje , jak to mi tylko popsulo wyniki ? A moze ja cos namieszalem ?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
evilav
n00b
Joined: 09 Aug 2004
Posts: 63
Location: Wroc³aw
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 1540 MB in 2.02 seconds = 762.11 MB/sec
HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
Timing buffered disk reads: 164 MB in 3.01 seconds = 54.42 MB/sec
HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
dla WD80GB SATAII
_________________
evilav |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
karol
n00b
Joined: 21 Jun 2005
Posts: 22
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Seagate na zwyklej ATA...
| Code: | hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 1992 MB in 2.00 seconds = 996.15 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 160 MB in 3.00 seconds = 53.25 MB/sec
|
| Code: | /dev/hda:
ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: ST380011A
Serial Number: 5JVLFY9N
Firmware Revision: 8.01 |
I non stop mam problemy z :
| Code: |
hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
|
_________________
gg: 1910078 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pmz
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 96
Location: Wroclaw, Poland
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| karol wrote: | I non stop mam problemy z :
| Code: |
hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC }
|
|
Miałem coś podobnego na wadliwym/źle dopiętym kablu. Polecam sprawdzić. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Polskie forum (Polish) 
